I did the same. Dumped all that BitcoinTrash as soon as I claimed it. Turns out that was a much better decision than holding on to this trash and just watching its value slow drop over time. BCH is down to 0.074BTC, and I fully expect it to continue dumping as most people are only in it to claim their forked coins.
Looks like Poloniex and HitBTC have now opened their markets for BCHSV and BCHABC. Am I the only one who things those names are truly ridiculous? Just as ridiculous/stupid as them constantly bleating about being "the real bitcoin".
Yes. Bitcoin Cash claiming itself as the real Bitcoin is true nonsense to me. After all, Satoshi wanted Bitcoin to scale in the most decentralized way possible. What Bitcoin Cash is doing is wrong, IMO, since its method of scaling involves a high risk of centralization. Not to mention, Roger Ver and Craig Wright dominate the future direction of the BCH blockchain, which makes it another centralized banking system in the hands of a few individuals. Because of that and many other reasons, I've quickly sold all my BCH to Bitcoin.
The real Bitcoin (BTC) is much more decentralized than Bitcoin Cash, and extremely active in development and innovation. No one controls its future direction, as the whole community works together in helping achieve this. As for Bitcoin Cash, it could either die in the long term, or remain in the crypto market for some time. For what I've seen lately, it looks that BCH may not last that long. The Bitcoin SV fork could destroy the reputation of the Bitcoin Cash blockchain or even make both chains become non-functional as we speak.
Nonetheless, what really matters is that Bitcoin is still the real Bitcoin and has performed as intended for a couple of years now. It's the most secure blockchain in existence, and probably the most decentralized compared with other cryptocurrencies on the market. The Lightning Network may be truly the safest way to scale Bitcoin, without compromising the blockchain. Increasing the block size to enormous amounts, would only make it worse as node storage costs will increase, as well as, bandwidth. Imagine if BCH's blocks becoming filled to its maximum capacity of 32MB. Or even 128MB with the Bitcoin SV fork. If that happens, then I believe that there will be lesser nodes over time as not everyone could afford the costs.
Therefore, Bitcoin will win the battle in the end, while other forks or useless coins would fade into oblivion. Just my opinion