Topic: Bitcoin Cash vs Bitcoin SV - page 17. (Read 24308 times)
Haha this made my day. So basically, a garbage coin will fork a new garbage coin so it's more likely a recycled coin. Its developer is a greedy ass and can't think anything profitable so now even it isn't suitable, they fork bch. Surely they'll do this every time and make a habit of creating shitcoins.
Just when everyone was abandoning all these forks in the market due to their lack of features or the low potential, such news coming up on the market will definitely cause disastrous result for not only BCH but also all the other forks out there. BCH had been able to hold up to the 500$ level but if it gets splits into to fractions, it will become just another shitcoin.
It will be better to not to give attention to what the guy who claims himself to be the real Satoshi says. Plus forked coins are not something to stick to in the long run. So, it will be better if we just concentrate and invest in the real BTC instead of the other one.
It's funny that they fought tooth and nail to make the people believe that they were the real BTC, but in the end even they were in a stump with their identity. We should just avoid them and focus more on BTC instead since this has the potential to grow more in the future.
First of all this is very funny that this forked coin is suffering from an identity crisis. Craig Wright is not the real Satoshi Nakamoto and we should stop giving him the unnecessary attention that he seeks.
Actually this is really funny things for us based on this fork coin is suffering for identity crisis based on this Craig Wright is not the Satoshi because Satoshi is a great man and developer so we should avoid such types of things.
Its the Bitcoin SV that doesn't have a replay protection and BCH holders should be extra aware to follow the devs guidelines to be secure.
Though I'm not a BCH holder, I don't think BCH would be dying this easy, BCH is one of the highest utility currency as it's one of the top 5 accepted crypto on retails.
Though I'm not a BCH holder, I don't think BCH would be dying this easy, BCH is one of the highest utility currency as it's one of the top 5 accepted crypto on retails.
Hilarious really. After spending months trying to trick newbies in to buying BCH by calling themselves "the real Bitcoin", turns out they weren't sure all along, and so will now have to fork their fork to create "the real Bitcoin". And while their silly civil war goes on, BTC continues to grow, develop and dominate the market.
I know which one I'll be sticking to.
I know which one I'll be sticking to.
Agree. Bitcoin will still be the original Bitcoin (not Bitcoin Cash or any other fork), despite what its competitors claim it to be. Given that the Bitcoin Cash community is not as unified as Bitcoin's community, they will fail over time. Developers are the ones who quickly upgrade the cryptocurrency's nodes without proper consensus of the community. Now that Craig Wright has announced that it will be forking Bitcoin Cash to create Bitcoin SV, it'll be a wild ride after November.
I'm sure that this would turn out to become a disaster for BCH, as both cryptocurrencies (Bitcoin SV and Bitcoin Cash) will fail. On the other hand, Bitcoin will continue to grow in usage and mainstream adoption, as developers successfully launch the much-awaited scalability solution called the Lightning Network. This will safely scale Bitcoin without compromising its decentralization over the long term (unlike Bitcoin Cash's on-chain scaling).
Nevertheless, grab your popcorn as this event (splintering of Bitcoin Cash) unveils by November. It'll be fun to watch as we see BCH dip in price until it becomes worthless due to the irreparable damage caused by Bitcoin SV.
Hilarious really. After spending months trying to trick newbies in to buying BCH by calling themselves "the real Bitcoin", turns out they weren't sure all along, and so will now have to fork their fork to create "the real Bitcoin". And while their silly civil war goes on, BTC continues to grow, develop and dominate the market.
I know which one I'll be sticking to.
I know which one I'll be sticking to.
Recently, nChain announced that it will be forking to a new Bitcoin Cash node implementation known as Bitcoin SV (SV stands for Satoshi's Vision). This has been supported by Craig Wright (which claims to be the real Nakamoto) as he believes that it's the safest path to scaling yet. However, Bitcoin Cash devs (Bitcoin ABC) are against this new implementation of BCH, hence a split might occur in November leading to both coins with the same history of transactions (Bitcoin Cash and Bitcoin SV).
Bitcoin SV aims to scale indefinitely by allowing miners to choose their own block size, among several other improvements. Now it's believed that this will be the "real Bitcoin" just like what has been said about Bitcoin Cash before.
What do you think about this controversy? Will Bitcoin Cash splinter into two distinct factions? Or will it remain the same? It looks like there would occur a split of the main BCH chain, causing Bitcoin SV to emerge. However, only one shall survive in the market (if not both or none of them). Looking forward for your thoughts
Bitcoin SV aims to scale indefinitely by allowing miners to choose their own block size, among several other improvements. Now it's believed that this will be the "real Bitcoin" just like what has been said about Bitcoin Cash before.
What do you think about this controversy? Will Bitcoin Cash splinter into two distinct factions? Or will it remain the same? It looks like there would occur a split of the main BCH chain, causing Bitcoin SV to emerge. However, only one shall survive in the market (if not both or none of them). Looking forward for your thoughts
Jump to: