Do you think this is legit or this is another scam like other hash cloud mining service..
I saw that many posted here are postive feedback..
A bit of a hybrid in my opinion; what you earn on hashes is faked, at least for the SHA-256, which can be proven.
Though also, I recently saw someone selling one of their (re-branded) SHA-256 miners on Ebay; which surprised me, because thus far their hardware was more or like redeemed as vaporware.
Prove the faked earnings on hashes!
Sure, see page #33 within this topic.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.15233440you misunderstood something.
its totally clear, that hashflare take some fees for their services. You have the advantage, that u dont buy big equipments to mine bitcoins; its absolutely not more profitable for the little man by the way; so, of course hashflare wouldnt offer you the same hashrate like the pools itself!
You made a comparison between apples and pears!
Greetz
Steve
Well, actually no, I am not (regarding the comparison between apples and pears
). I'm under the impression that you misinterpreted what I was referring to, so I'll try to rephrase it and elaborate otherwise:
Firstly, I wasn't making a
comparison between the two companies (fees, prices, size, etc), but the
inconsistency between them, and then specifically the SHA-256 hashes; which, on Hashflare, are faked (at least, to some degree).
What you would have to look at, are the
graphs, as these will prove that the SHA-256 hashes on Hashflare are faked; prices, fees, the amount of hashrate and the total amount of hashrate present in either companies, do not matter nor are important:
Now, take the SHA-256 graph in your Hasflare dashboard. The other graph you would need is the one from Hashnest, which is
https://www.antpool.com/poolStats.htm If you scroll down to the bottom of Hashnest's, you'll see a graph representing the 'pool luck' of Hashnest. I assume you know what this means and represents; if not, well, it basically means and represents the daily earnings generated on Hashnest.
Next, if you were to set and point your SHA-256 hashes on Hashflare for a few days 100% towards Hashnest, you would see that the graphs (i.e. generated income) do
not match with each other!
Example:
(fees and total hashrate(s) and such are not important; it's the pool
luck that counts, and which proves Hasflares's SHA-256 are faked)
- day 1: Hashnest's pool luck is 150%, and thus would generate 50% more income that day from mining on Hashnest. On Hashflare, it does not.
- day 2: Hashnest's pool luck was again 150%, and thus would generate again 50% more income that day from mining on Hashnest. On Hashflare, it does not.
- day 3: Hashnest's pool luck was now even 180%, and thus would generate a whopping 80% more income from mining that day on Hashnest. On hashflare, it does not.
- day 4: Now, Hashnest's pool luck was low, only 60%, and thus would generate 40% less income from mining that day on Hashnest. On Hashflare, it again does not.
- day 5: ...
etc. etc.
A little more than a month ago I had sold all my hashes on Hashnest, so I cannot supply screenshots along with it. Yet should you point all your SHA-256 hashes on Hashflare 100% towards Hashnest, and just compare the graphs of boths companies for while, you
would see they simply would not match. So which one of them two companies has the right statistics and numbers, and which one does not?
Off course, since there are two parties (Hashflare and Hashnest), it could just as be that (the graph of) Hashnest might be the faulty one. Or, even both the companies could have their graphs/numbers incorrect. Though (!), the hashes, and thus the (daily) pool/income/etc, of Hashnest are trackable and verifiable; whilst, those of Hashflare, are not...