Pages:
Author

Topic: Bitcoin Shrinking - The Long View - page 10. (Read 19400 times)

legendary
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1001
July 15, 2011, 02:55:08 PM
IMHO it's way too early to gauge the direction of the BTC based on temporary spike in the charts.

Agreed.  Reading tea leaves here.

As I said once before... a monkey with a ouija board has a better chance of predicting where this is going than anyone here... but it's fun to correct the mistakes made by the little trolls.
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
July 15, 2011, 02:55:01 PM
IMHO it's way too early to gauge the direction of the BTC based on temporary spike in the charts.

Agreed.  Reading tea leaves here.

Not really.  There's plenty of quantitative evidence to the facts presented. You need only see them for what they are, or at least pose real and effectual evidence to the contrary.
hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 500
You're fat, because you dont have any pics on FB
July 15, 2011, 02:53:56 PM
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
July 15, 2011, 02:53:29 PM
Bitcoin Forums: The alternative spell checker.
full member
Activity: 146
Merit: 103
July 15, 2011, 02:52:36 PM
IMHO it's way too early to gauge the direction of the BTC based on temporary spike in the charts.

Agreed.  Reading tea leaves here.
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
July 15, 2011, 02:52:12 PM
Bitcoin Forums: The show.

    Description:  Watch as amateur investors and young anarcho-liberarians ignore negative assessments of their hobby and attack the personas of the iconoclasts.

and that would be personae... really, you shouldn't try to use complicated words

Are you that English major again?

And where's my fucking coffee?

Get you're manager out here now.
I didn't think "your" was a complicated word...

Well then your really making an ass out of yourself by admissioning that, are not you?
hero member
Activity: 896
Merit: 1000
Seal Cub Clubbing Club
July 15, 2011, 02:51:36 PM
IMHO it's way too early to gauge the direction of the BTC based on temporary spike in the charts.
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
July 15, 2011, 02:51:14 PM
Bitcoin Forums: The show.

    Description:  Watch as amateur investors and young anarcho-liberarians ignore negative assessments of their hobby and attack the personas of the iconoclasts.

and that would be personae... really, you shouldn't try to use complicated words

Are you that English major again?

And where's my fucking coffee?

Get you're manager out here now.
I didn't think "your" was a complicated word...
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
July 15, 2011, 02:50:16 PM
The profanity and constant attacks on people who oppose your views isn't strengthening your position.  You would have been better off taking the high road and sticking to your points than allowing this thread to degrade into.... well this.

I actually agree with your basic premise, the amount of fanaticism by some Bitcoin posters is almost cultish.  But to paint the entire community with such a broad stroke would be wrong on my part because there are some very intelligent and rational people here as well.  However, the way you're conveying your point is not going to get those types to engage in a reasonable debate, you're only going to encourage hostility.

Meh. So it goes.
hero member
Activity: 672
Merit: 500
July 15, 2011, 02:49:39 PM
The profanity and constant attacks on people who oppose your views isn't strengthening your position.  You would have been better off taking the high road and sticking to your points than allowing this thread to degrade into.... well this.

I actually agree with your basic premise, the amount of fanaticism by some Bitcoin posters is almost cultish.  But to paint the entire community with such a broad stroke would be wrong on my part because there are some very intelligent and rational people here as well.  However, the way you're conveying your point is not going to get those types to engage in a reasonable debate, you're only going to encourage hostility.
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
July 15, 2011, 02:47:31 PM
Bitcoin Forums: The show.

    Description:  Watch as amateur investors and young anarcho-liberarians ignore negative assessments of their hobby and attack the personas of the iconoclasts.

and that would be personae... really, you shouldn't try to use complicated words

Are you that English major again?

And where's my fucking coffee?

Get you're manager out here now.
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
July 15, 2011, 02:46:27 PM

It's simply another fact of bitcoin: To the other 300 million Americans and the rest of the financially advanced world that exist outside of this backwater forum, It does not make sense to use.  At all.  At all.  At all.



It's a good thing, or otherwise we'd have had 300 million Facebooks, Googles, Microsofts...

Great spirits have always found violent opposition from mediocre minds.  The later cannot understand it when a man does not thoughtlessly submit to hereditary prejudices but honestly and courageously uses his intelligence and fulfills the duty to express the results of his thoughts in clear form.  -A.E.

Not to say that every hare-brained idea is genius, but you really are blind if you don't see the advantages of a secure, easily transferred, convenient digital currency exchange medium.   We're done here, your argument boils down to "I don't believe in bitcoin and neither do other slack-jawed types."  That can't be addressed.


No my argument actually doesn't boil down to that, you're just too stupid to read the top post and reply with any type of substantial rebuttal.
legendary
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1001
July 15, 2011, 02:45:56 PM
Bitcoin Forums: The show.

    Description:  Watch as amateur investors and young anarcho-liberarians ignore negative assessments of their hobby and attack the personas of the iconoclasts.

and that would be personae... really, you shouldn't try to use complicated words
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
July 15, 2011, 02:44:58 PM

It's simply another fact of bitcoin: To the other 300 million Americans and the rest of the financially advanced world that exist outside of this backwater forum, It does not make sense to use.  At all.  At all.  At all.



It's a good thing, or otherwise we'd have had 300 million Facebooks, Googles, Microsofts...

Great spirits have always found violent opposition from mediocre minds.  The later cannot understand it when a man does not thoughtlessly submit to hereditary prejudices but honestly and courageously uses his intelligence and fulfills the duty to express the results of his thoughts in clear form.  -A.E.

Not to say that every hare-brained idea is genius, but you really are blind if you don't see the advantages of a secure, easily transferred, convenient digital currency exchange medium.   We're done here, your argument boils down to "I don't believe in bitcoin and neither do other slack-jawed types."  That can't be addressed.
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
July 15, 2011, 02:40:01 PM
Bitcoin Forums: The show.

    Description:  Watch as amateur investors and young anarcho-liberarians ignore negative assessments of their hobby and attack the personas of the iconoclasts.
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
July 15, 2011, 02:38:11 PM


So let's see, in your idiotic scenario where cash is such a motherfucking hassle and for whatever reason you were too stupid to originally consider a personal check since that's apparently a better option for this hypothetical seller, then what would the seller rather do?  Create a Dwolla account, get verified, and basically have the money deposited directly into his back account, or go through a bunch of goddamn asinine intermediary steps with bitcoin markets to get his USD out of bitcoin?

You my friend, have just been made a fool of.

You are talking about today.  And hell no, I those people wouldn't sign up and trust Dwolla just because I told them so.  It's good for Dwolla that people you know are instantly trusting, the people I deal with not so much.  And by the way, TradeHill *used* to have electronic funds transfer in and out functionality.  What's to say they or MtGox won't have it again?  Besides, dollars need not be involved at all if bitcoin is mainstream, which is when my scenario is practical.  I consider bitcoins far far FAR more secure than numbers at a single web site "associated" with banks.  Yes, even today I'd rather have enough funds in bitcoin to buy a house than several hundred grand at Dwolla.

Your "thesis" is long term.  Long term bitcoin will become mainstream barring technical flaws with implementation or regulatory hurdles.   As a mainstream currency it is vastly superior to current offerings.  But you go ahead and spew obscenities and nonsense.


It's not superior.  This has been fleshed out numerous times, but unfortunately threads here are just as meaningless as the "currency" it's about, but let me just remind you that John Q. Public will never give a shit about bitcoins. NEVER.

It's simply another fact of bitcoin: To the other 300 million Americans and the rest of the financially advanced world that exist outside of this backwater forum, It does not make sense to use.  At all.  At all.  At all.



HUUR DUUR, REPITION MAKES YOU RIGHT, HUH SYNAPTIC...HURR.

*insert all other ad hominem here*
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
July 15, 2011, 02:36:08 PM


So let's see, in your idiotic scenario where cash is such a motherfucking hassle and for whatever reason you were too stupid to originally consider a personal check since that's apparently a better option for this hypothetical seller, then what would the seller rather do?  Create a Dwolla account, get verified, and basically have the money deposited directly into his back account, or go through a bunch of goddamn asinine intermediary steps with bitcoin markets to get his USD out of bitcoin?

You my friend, have just been made a fool of.

You are talking about today.  And hell no, I those people wouldn't sign up and trust Dwolla just because I told them so.  It's good for Dwolla that people you know are instantly trusting, the people I deal with not so much.  And by the way, TradeHill *used* to have electronic funds transfer in and out functionality.  What's to say they or MtGox won't have it again?  Besides, dollars need not be involved at all if bitcoin is mainstream, which is when my scenario is practical.  I consider bitcoins far far FAR more secure than numbers at a single web site "associated" with banks.  Yes, even today I'd rather have enough funds in bitcoin to buy a house than several hundred grand at Dwolla.

Your "thesis" is long term.  Long term bitcoin will become mainstream barring technical flaws with implementation or regulatory hurdles.   As a mainstream currency it is vastly superior to current offerings.  But you go ahead and spew obscenities and nonsense.


It's not superior.  This has been fleshed out numerous times, but unfortunately threads here are just as meaningless as the "currency" it's about, but let me just remind you that John Q. Public will never give a shit about bitcoins. NEVER.

It's simply another fact of bitcoin: To the other 300 million Americans and the rest of the financially advanced world that exist outside of this backwater forum, It does not make sense to use.  At all.  At all.  At all.

legendary
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1006
July 15, 2011, 02:33:22 PM
a rambling man.........rambles

sr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
July 15, 2011, 02:31:41 PM
these are the facts.

This is usually a sure sign that the person is trying to force an agenda.
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
July 15, 2011, 02:31:16 PM


So let's see, in your idiotic scenario where cash is such a motherfucking hassle and for whatever reason you were too stupid to originally consider a personal check since that's apparently a better option for this hypothetical seller, then what would the seller rather do?  Create a Dwolla account, get verified, and basically have the money deposited directly into his back account, or go through a bunch of goddamn asinine intermediary steps with bitcoin markets to get his USD out of bitcoin?

You my friend, have just been made a fool of.

You are talking about today.  And hell no, I those people wouldn't sign up and trust Dwolla just because I told them so.  It's good for Dwolla that people you know are instantly trusting, the people I deal with not so much.  And by the way, TradeHill *used* to have electronic funds transfer in and out functionality.  What's to say they or MtGox won't have it again?  Besides, dollars need not be involved at all if bitcoin is mainstream, which is when my scenario is practical.  I consider bitcoins far far FAR more secure than numbers at a single web site "associated" with banks.  Yes, even today I'd rather have enough funds in bitcoin to buy a house than several hundred grand at Dwolla.

Your "thesis" is long term.  Long term bitcoin will become mainstream barring technical flaws with implementation or regulatory hurdles.   As a mainstream currency it is vastly superior to current offerings.  But you go ahead and spew obscenities and nonsense.
Pages:
Jump to: