Topic: BitcoinSV creating vexatious and invalid flags - page 2. (Read 639 times)

Duh, SockFace, it was signed with the spend key for Genesis Block coinbase, as recently returned to Dr. Wright by the Tulip Trust—together with the keys for another 21 billion bitcoins, and the solid gold hamster wheel that Bitcoin’s grandmother used for exercise.  YOU DIDN’T DISPROVE IT!!  I, personally, am Original Bitcoin.

---

I had intended to merit your post bringing this to my attention; but I was too busy just beginning to click oppose, oppose, oppose...  Please pass it on to someone else who makes a great post tearing up Faketoshi.

Mate, if I had some merit, I'd give you some for that post. Brilliant.

However, I am having some issues checking the digital signature on that picture. You said it was signed by Satoshi, but Craig Wright's PGP key isn't working!

This is revealing.  I am trying to figure out why each user was targeted.  Those marked as “defamators [sic]” must be the users with the most effective recent posts showing BSV’s scam for what it is.  (Well, the highly effective Bitcoin defenders not already flagged by BSV; check flagging history.)

The message is clear:  If you show the public a new angle on BSV’s scamminess, if you start a discussion that will lead to an organized community response to BSV, then you will be honoured by the public spectacle of BSV throwing a hissy fit at you.

I suggest to the Bitcoin community that if you care about Bitcoin, and if BSV has not yet abusively flagged you, then you should do something to deserve that prize.  I see that BSV has created many absurd retaliatory flags before; and I’m ashamed that it took me more than a whole week back on the forum to get one myself.  C’mon, folks, show us what you’ve got!

If BSV has flagged you, please tell me which of your posts you think probably hurt its poor little scammer feelings sufficiently to be the trigger.  I have some sMerit that I am currently saving for what I think are the best pro-Bitcoin posts (both in a positive sense of explaining why Bitcoin is great, and by protecting Bitcoin from lies).  I will trust BSV’s “endorsement” via a ridiculous flag as a mark of potential meritoriousness.

As for BSV’s accusation that I am a “defamator”, well, I only tell THE TRUTH as I have learned it from Dr. Wright!!!  And the truth is that Craig Wright’s mother is a hamster.  You did not disprove it.  Here is the PROOF, digitally signed by Satoshi Nakamoto himself in the presence of Gavin Andresen:


Now, go away, or I will taunt BSV into flagging me again.


Whether or not it is, I hope that BSV is not banned for this.  It’s a great way for BSV to make a laughingstock of itself (for the 2ⁿth time, with large n).  I choked on my coffee when I saw this post—seriously, it almost killed me with amusement.

---

P.S., BSV’s trust-flag antics are funny; but BSV’s fraudulent attack on Bitcoin is not.  Thus I want to let you know, for those who may be wondering, I will indeed be replying further on the Project Anastasia discussion about Craig Wright being an identity thief.  My response there is only a bit slow, because I have been preparing something else I want to post and link there... and because I’m meanwhile trying to catch up on other projects I had thrown aside for the past few days to begin developing a larger strategic campaign to promote and protect Bitcoin and all it stands for.  This is only the beginning.  Watch for it!

I don't think so he would be banned for that, just don't support the flags you don't feel right and it will work out itself.

Because my posts keep getting deleted from BitcoinSV's thread for being "off-top"

---

Speaking of "rulebreakers":
Need to see actual evidence for Type-2 and Type-3 flag to support it. The reference link used is NOT in a topic started by you as required by flag creation rules. It is a thread created by "the-one-above-all". Unless you are alt of "the-one-above-all", then it is an invalid reference and cannot be used to support the flags regarding nutildah.

@BitcoinSV, can you provide any evidence to prove that nutildah broke a contract with you that resulted in damages?

If not, then you lied while creating the flag and you have no honor, sir!

---

BitcoinSV has also created Type-2 and Type-3 flags against:
nullius: Type-2 and Type-3
DooMAD: Type-2 and Type-3
MagicByt3: Type-2 and Type-3
blurryeyed: Type-2 and Type-3
dragonvslinux: Type-2 and Type-3
shinohai: Type-2 and Type-3

all of which reference this single thread (archived here, which does not accurately nor completely describe ANY of the supposed contracts that were violated.

---

In fact, all the Type-2 and Type-3 flags raised by BitcoinSV have invalid references that do not provide any details of any contracts or instances of contract violation that relate to BitcoinSV. They are all vexatious and invalid.

Is this sort of flagrant disregard for the rules of flag creation and obvious flag abuse grounds for a ban?