Pages:
Author

Topic: [BitFunder] IceDrill.ASIC IPO (235 Thash Mining Operation powered by HashFast) - page 98. (Read 378660 times)

sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250

You should find another exchange that doesn't require the user to use some experimental buggy exchange service.

I went to sign up to bitfunder to purchase a few shares who required me to sign up to some weexcahnge site. When i went to sign up there I recieved this warning.

Quote
!!!!! ATTENTION !!!!!

THIS SITE IS IN BETA DEVELOPMENT AND MAY BE PRONE TO ERRORS.

Due to unforeseen circumstances database rollbacks may happen.
All information is kept private. We do not share it with anyone.

PROTECT YOUR ACCOUNT LOGIN INFORMATION.
We are not responsible if someone can access the account.
We highly suggest you use advanced authentication methods such as GPG.

The owners of the site obviously don't trust the software, so why should the users?



You even trust in ICEDDRILL, you should way more trust in bitfunder and weexchage.


bad English = bad logic?
member
Activity: 210
Merit: 10

You should find another exchange that doesn't require the user to use some experimental buggy exchange service.

I went to sign up to bitfunder to purchase a few shares who required me to sign up to some weexcahnge site. When i went to sign up there I recieved this warning.

Quote
!!!!! ATTENTION !!!!!

THIS SITE IS IN BETA DEVELOPMENT AND MAY BE PRONE TO ERRORS.

Due to unforeseen circumstances database rollbacks may happen.
All information is kept private. We do not share it with anyone.

PROTECT YOUR ACCOUNT LOGIN INFORMATION.
We are not responsible if someone can access the account.
We highly suggest you use advanced authentication methods such as GPG.

The owners of the site obviously don't trust the software, so why should the users?



You even trust in ICEDDRILL, you should way more trust in bitfunder and weexchage.
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1015
So is this a good Stock to get into right now?

Depends, a load of weak hands are selling cheap. If you are going to hold the stock until December it will be worth it. But if you want to sell this month then don't buy it.
legendary
Activity: 1311
Merit: 1000
So is this a good Stock to get into right now?

If you like train wrecks.
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
So is this a good Stock to get into right now?
Vbs
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 500
The chips are the most expensive part by far (Not actual CHIP Cost, but Markup Cost)

One would assume that they will probably allow DeaDTerra to source parts from them as well but more than likely won't be free.

You are correct it depends on the high markup cost, just don't expect a 400W cooling solution to come cheap either (try to find CPU or GPU coolers that are able to deliver 400W of heat dissipation and check their prices).
Vbs
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 500
I believe IceDrill has Miner Protection.

If they don't make 100% ROI within 3 months. November - December - January, then they will give them up to double or four times as many chips as originally purchased in order to make their ROI. It will only be chips though.

That combined with shareholders getting paid 0.0016/share before private investors should make this a fairly safe bet (If you trust DeaDTerra and HashFast)

It's going to be a long wait though!

Only the chips? That's like 1/3 to 1/4 of the total system cost. What about the rest?

Are they releasing the PCB specs? PCBs are +/- cheap to manufacture, but the cooling solution can be even pricier than the chip itself (waterblock? vapour chamber/heatpipe air cooler?) plus adequate power-supplies.
Vbs
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 500
(...)
Does HF's "Miner protection plan" apply to IceDrill?   If so, that may help, since 10Mh/s could end up about 50Mh/s if the ROI is bad.

Good question. Even if it did, what's the time-frame on receiving those extra chips? Weeks? Months?
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
I'm still wrapping my head at why someone would want to pay 0.0016 for 10MH/s starting at best in November. It is a HUGE gamble for that price point, investors are taking a big risk.

At 0.0016 for 10MH/s, 1GH/s/W:

Even when buying at 0.0014, the risk is very big:

This is assuming optimal conditions where: (1) The chips are able to get no worse than 1GH/s/W (imho this is still the biggest gamble of HF chips) and (2) the only operational expenses needed to be paid are the energy consumption, it's neck to neck. Factoring all the extra costs (cooling, maintenance, personnel, ...) and the "growth" cut, just makes it overboard as it hardly will be enough to compensate for the network growth rate expected during Q3 2013 and Q1 2014. Undecided

If HF's power efficiency is worse then 0.875Gh/j then they're boned, because the chips are already at 350W, and increasing that past 1Gh/j would mean pushing more then 400W through a single IC.

Does HF's "Miner protection plan" apply to IceDrill?   If so, that may help, since 10Mh/s could end up about 50Mh/s if the ROI is bad.
Vbs
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 500
I'm still wrapping my head at why someone would want to pay 0.0016 for 10MH/s starting at best in November. It is a HUGE gamble for that price point, investors are taking a big risk.

At 0.0016 for 10MH/s, 1GH/s/W:

Even when buying at 0.0014, the risk is very big:

This is assuming optimal conditions where: (1) The chips are able to get no worse than 1GH/s/W (imho this is still the biggest gamble of HF chips) and (2) the only operational expenses needed to be paid are the energy consumption, it's neck to neck. Factoring all the extra costs (cooling, maintenance, personnel, ...) and the "growth" cut, just makes it overboard as it hardly will be enough to compensate for the network growth rate expected during Q3 2013 and Q1 2014. Undecided
donator
Activity: 2772
Merit: 1019
I am working on the changes of the first pages Smiley
Sorry for taking a while, I wanted to finalize the changes before fixing anything.
Any chances made has been marked red in the document below
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_uecYI2qlr_I3vj0VVG0E5F9_x_V0mBebeYpAvNZnl0/edit

I tried to keep it short and simple, if you think a extensive explanation is needed just ask and I will try to explain it in more detail in the document.
//DeaDTerra


thank you!
legendary
Activity: 1123
Merit: 1000
SaluS - (SLS)
member
Activity: 203
Merit: 10
The World’s First Blockchain Core
legendary
Activity: 1123
Merit: 1000
SaluS - (SLS)
Nice, you found a block!  Wink
donator
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000
I am working on the changes of the first pages Smiley
Sorry for taking a while, I wanted to finalize the changes before fixing anything.
Any chances made has been marked red in the document below
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_uecYI2qlr_I3vj0VVG0E5F9_x_V0mBebeYpAvNZnl0/edit

I tried to keep it short and simple, if you think a extensive explanation is needed just ask and I will try to explain it in more detail in the document.
//DeaDTerra
legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1072
Crypto is the separation of Power and State.
How about setting up passthroughs at MPEX and Havelock?

The weenies at BTCT are afraid ice.drill will be too competitive with their beloved "$2/GH" Chinese scam IPOs, so lets give the other exchanges a chance.   Cool
legendary
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1023
Democracy is the original 51% attack
Are you going to change the first post of the thread to summarize the various changes you have made?

Yeah DT you should do this...
donator
Activity: 2772
Merit: 1019
To make sure we keep the 10/Mhash, we are scaling up the percentage of ownership and in accordance with the deal change with Hashfast, we no longer need to sell all of batch 3. If batch 3 does not fully sell we will rebalance the private to public shares and decrease the private shares even more so that we can keep the 10/Mhash per share starting point.

This is good news, so if batch 3 does not sell our shares become slightly more valuable (Bigger amount of the profits?)

Is this correct?


Quote from: DT
The third batch is of 12,000,000 (12 million) shares and will be sold at the price of 0.0016 BTC per share. These shares have to be sold by the 4th of November (00:00:00 UTC, 4 November 2013)  for the IPO to be deemed a success. At the opening of the mine, this equates to a price of 0.16 BTC per Gh.s.

Don't know what happens then the IPO is not a success. Also don't know why it's so hard to fix the info in the first 2 posts and on bitfunder.
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1015
To make sure we keep the 10/Mhash, we are scaling up the percentage of ownership and in accordance with the deal change with Hashfast, we no longer need to sell all of batch 3. If batch 3 does not fully sell we will rebalance the private to public shares and decrease the private shares even more so that we can keep the 10/Mhash per share starting point.

This is good news, so if batch 3 does not sell our shares become slightly more valuable (Bigger amount of the profits?)

Is this correct?
legendary
Activity: 2478
Merit: 1020
Be A Digital Miner
Are you going to change the first post of the thread to summarize the various changes you have made?
Pages:
Jump to: