Can you name one campaign that is now doing that, that rewarding bounty hunters with USDT I doubt if any will and can do it because of the bearish market, they will have to spend with their money and there's no guaranty now that they are going to reach their softcap.
Topic: bounty hunter paid USDT? - page 12. (Read 60774 times)
Can you name one campaign that is now doing that, that rewarding bounty hunters with USDT I doubt if any will and can do it because of the bearish market, they will have to spend with their money and there's no guaranty now that they are going to reach their softcap.
It seems to me that paying bounty hunters in USDT looks very interesting, and most importantly, the question about the fact that they will dump tokens immediately after entering the stock exchange will immediately disappear!
usually if allocation using token , most of bounty hunters want immediately sell their token reward in market.no matter although its price cheap enough.but if using usdt we dev team could avoid this action.The dev team must try to consider about this option.
I will like this payment option for all bounty hunters. This will reduce dumping which kills coins in the market and keeps the coin afloat. The payment through USDT will make sense.
do you agree if the bounty hunter is paid USDT?
the good or bad impact on investors and the development of the ICO project, give your reasons
the good or bad impact on investors and the development of the ICO project, give your reasons
Can you name one campaign that is now doing that, that rewarding bounty hunters with USDT I doubt if any will and can do it because of the bearish market, they will have to spend with their money and there's no guaranty now that they are going to reach their softcap.
Different projects offered or paid bounty token not only for marketing. Trading volume is the main reason, huge people investor, Hunter and new people would be high volume.
This increase popularity of a project if it paid in tokens. Most ICO don't understand that bounty hunters is also part of their community. And more people will have their tokens, more info and activity will be around the project. do you agree if the bounty hunter is paid USDT?
the good or bad impact on investors and the development of the ICO project, give your reasons
the good or bad impact on investors and the development of the ICO project, give your reasons
Every bounty hunters dreaming for that kind of payment. But it seem impossible to do in an ICO which is in stage of development. Basically the earning of bounty hunters depend on ICO profit during sales and percentage allocation only given toba bounty hunter and they do the payment through token created which part of there promotion so it impossible for USDT payment.
This topic has a very large coverage and unfortunately today is not the best time to talk about what is better in the end. It may be better to receive funds in tokens. I think that people need to be given a choice.
Hope we will see such projects in the future and this will crush myth, that price on listing falling because of bounty hunters, and not because of ICO strange behavior and late with their timelines)
I hope one day project developers used to understand the clever idea of payment bounty in stable coins or other high utilized coins like ETH, waves, XLM. Its easy that this will prevent their coins dumping because of bounty payments. Bounty hunting is a part time job that most of hunter needs to sell their coins asap.
It seems to me that paying bounty hunters in USDT looks very interesting, and most importantly, the question about the fact that they will dump tokens immediately after entering the stock exchange will immediately disappear!
usually if allocation using token , most of bounty hunters want immediately sell their token reward in market.no matter although its price cheap enough.but if using usdt we dev team could avoid this action.
It seems to me that paying bounty hunters in USDT looks very interesting, and most importantly, the question about the fact that they will dump tokens immediately after entering the stock exchange will immediately disappear!
I think it would be very nice if the project paid for the participation in generosity with a stable coin such as a digital dollar.
I think I agree of paying bounty hunters with USDT because it won't affect the value of the currency they promote once they cash it out. And I think it would make sense to the investors that they will not gonna blame those bounty hunters to the value of the currency when it falls down it's value in the market and I think campaign must have a good strategy in choosing the participants.
It is not really that hunters should be paid in USDT, even if we should be paid in tokens, it would be best to allocate the tokens in dollar value, I have seen a few projects doing this and it's a great initiative.
It makes sense, but unfortunately, it doesn't make sense for the project owners to make it happen. In fact, they create a kind of mobility by distributing their own token. They do work for them. There's no money left in your pockets.
This is the right answer. Nobody wants to risk their own money if he can give away something that costs him almost nothing. Also, it is very important that people agree to work for tokens - if there were no supporters it would have to change for (for example) USDT.
If the project will become a success they will be benefited more as they are running it and they control the terms, on the other hand, if it fails it will cost them nothing, that's a pretty way to run a project but I don't appreciate that kind of strategy and therefore would not trust them .
Running an ICO always require some budget, as a team, you should also have a funds from the very beginning and paying USDT if it will make the project better then I guess it should be done. This concern was only raise because of the market condition, so it's a case to case basis.
It makes sense, but unfortunately, it doesn't make sense for the project owners to make it happen. In fact, they create a kind of mobility by distributing their own token. They do work for them. There's no money left in your pockets.
This is the right answer. Nobody wants to risk their own money if he can give away something that costs him almost nothing. Also, it is very important that people agree to work for tokens - if there were no supporters it would have to change for (for example) USDT.
in this case, of course there will be very many parties who support, because besides that it is certain, it will also not make the price of a token a dump because of a bounty hunter. I think that would be a very good idea when the bounty hunter is paid using USDT, or even bitcoin, or eth.
It makes sense, but unfortunately, it doesn't make sense for the project owners to make it happen. In fact, they create a kind of mobility by distributing their own token. They do work for them. There's no money left in your pockets.
This is the right answer. Nobody wants to risk their own money if he can give away something that costs him almost nothing. Also, it is very important that people agree to work for tokens - if there were no supporters it would have to change for (for example) USDT.
do you agree if the bounty hunter is paid USDT?
the good or bad impact on investors and the development of the ICO project, give your reasons
the good or bad impact on investors and the development of the ICO project, give your reasons
How can they better promote their ICO if they will not going to use it as a payment for their bounty hunters? I guess it adds some pride when they use their own token rather than paying in USDT.
ICOs are already thinking about it, but they are too greedy to share their profit. It is much easier to share their tokens that are worth nothing at the moment rather than to share a percent of their collected funds.
Jump to: