Pages:
Author

Topic: bounty hunter paid USDT? - page 12. (Read 60789 times)

full member
Activity: 1120
Merit: 101
January 28, 2019, 09:57:33 AM

Can you name one campaign that is now doing that, that rewarding bounty hunters with USDT I doubt if any will and can do it because of the bearish market, they will have to spend with their money and there's no guaranty now that they are going to reach their softcap.
achieving a softcap or not is a problem for the team's ability to attract investors. for campaigns that pay participants with USDT I don't see it, but for payments with ETH and BTC I think there are still many campaigns like that. we don't need to worry whether it's payment with eth, btc or with ico tokens I think it's your own choice.
hero member
Activity: 2184
Merit: 513
Moonbet.io | Web3 Casino
January 28, 2019, 09:55:22 AM
It seems to me that paying bounty hunters in USDT looks very interesting, and most importantly, the question about the fact that they will dump tokens immediately after entering the stock exchange will immediately disappear!
usually if allocation using token , most of bounty hunters want immediately sell their token reward in market.no matter although its price cheap enough.but if using usdt we dev team could avoid this action.
That should be the main consideration for every ico creator. At least they must consider about how important to find a solution to protect the price of token. This matter a lot to the market.
The dev team must try to consider about this option.
jr. member
Activity: 308
Merit: 8
January 28, 2019, 09:54:52 AM
I will like this payment option for all bounty hunters. This will reduce dumping which kills coins in the market and keeps the coin afloat. The payment through USDT will make sense.
sr. member
Activity: 2254
Merit: 258
January 28, 2019, 09:52:26 AM
do you agree if the bounty hunter is paid USDT?
the good or bad impact on investors and the development of the ICO project, give your reasons

Can you name one campaign that is now doing that, that rewarding bounty hunters with USDT I doubt if any will and can do it because of the bearish market, they will have to spend with their money and there's no guaranty now that they are going to reach their softcap.
full member
Activity: 644
Merit: 100
January 28, 2019, 09:13:09 AM
Different projects offered or paid bounty token not only for marketing. Trading volume is the main reason, huge people investor, Hunter and new people would be high volume.
This increase popularity of a project if it paid in tokens. Most ICO don't understand that bounty hunters is also part of their community. And more people will have their tokens, more info and activity will be around the project.
copper member
Activity: 142
Merit: 6
January 28, 2019, 08:39:50 AM
do you agree if the bounty hunter is paid USDT?
the good or bad impact on investors and the development of the ICO project, give your reasons

Every bounty hunters dreaming for that kind of payment. But it seem impossible to do in an ICO which is in stage of development. Basically the earning of bounty hunters depend on ICO profit during sales and percentage allocation only given toba bounty hunter and they do the payment through token created which part of there promotion so it impossible for USDT payment.
sr. member
Activity: 728
Merit: 252
January 28, 2019, 08:25:20 AM
This topic has a very large coverage and unfortunately today is not the best time to talk about what is better in the end. It may be better to receive funds in tokens. I think that people need to be given a choice.
full member
Activity: 644
Merit: 100
January 28, 2019, 08:22:06 AM
Hope we will see such projects in the future and this will crush myth, that price on listing falling because of bounty hunters, and not because of ICO strange behavior and late with their timelines)
copper member
Activity: 168
Merit: 0
January 28, 2019, 06:26:59 AM
I hope one day project developers used to understand the clever idea of payment bounty in stable coins or other high utilized coins like ETH, waves, XLM. Its easy that this will prevent their coins dumping because of bounty payments. Bounty hunting is a part time job that most of hunter needs to sell their coins asap.
full member
Activity: 899
Merit: 101
January 28, 2019, 06:14:03 AM
It seems to me that paying bounty hunters in USDT looks very interesting, and most importantly, the question about the fact that they will dump tokens immediately after entering the stock exchange will immediately disappear!
usually if allocation using token , most of bounty hunters want immediately sell their token reward in market.no matter although its price cheap enough.but if using usdt we dev team could avoid this action.
jr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 1
January 28, 2019, 06:07:39 AM
It seems to me that paying bounty hunters in USDT looks very interesting, and most importantly, the question about the fact that they will dump tokens immediately after entering the stock exchange will immediately disappear!
member
Activity: 490
Merit: 10
January 28, 2019, 06:02:22 AM
I think it would be very nice if the project paid for the participation in generosity with a stable coin such as a digital dollar.
full member
Activity: 518
Merit: 100
January 28, 2019, 05:40:55 AM
I think I agree of paying bounty hunters with USDT because it won't affect the value of the currency they promote once they cash it out. And I think it would make sense to the investors that they will not gonna blame those bounty hunters to the value of the currency when it falls down it's value in the market and I think campaign must have a good strategy in choosing the participants.
copper member
Activity: 157
Merit: 0
Best solution for smart cities
January 28, 2019, 05:18:16 AM
It is not really that hunters should be paid in USDT, even if we should be paid in tokens, it would be best to allocate the tokens in dollar value, I have seen a few projects doing this and it's a great initiative.
legendary
Activity: 3108
Merit: 1290
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
January 28, 2019, 04:20:37 AM
It makes sense, but unfortunately, it doesn't make sense for the project owners to make it happen. In fact, they create a kind of mobility by distributing their own token. They do work for them. There's no money left in your pockets.

This is the right answer. Nobody wants to risk their own money if he can give away something that costs him almost nothing. Also, it is very important that people agree to work for tokens - if there were no supporters it would have to change for (for example) USDT.
That's very selfish of them.

If the project will become a success they will be benefited more as they are running it and they control the terms, on the other hand, if it fails it will cost them nothing, that's a pretty way to run a project but I don't appreciate that kind of strategy and therefore would not trust them .

Running an ICO always require some budget, as a team, you should also have a funds from the very beginning and paying USDT if it will make the project better then I guess it should be done. This concern was only raise because of the market condition, so it's a case to case basis.
full member
Activity: 588
Merit: 100
January 28, 2019, 04:15:01 AM
It makes sense, but unfortunately, it doesn't make sense for the project owners to make it happen. In fact, they create a kind of mobility by distributing their own token. They do work for them. There's no money left in your pockets.

This is the right answer. Nobody wants to risk their own money if he can give away something that costs him almost nothing. Also, it is very important that people agree to work for tokens - if there were no supporters it would have to change for (for example) USDT.
People are looking for stable coins in time of crysis. But imagine what would be the answer in bear market, everyone wanted free ICO tokens because 90% of all ICO tokens went up by hundreds of percent!  Cool
legendary
Activity: 2492
Merit: 1001
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
January 28, 2019, 04:09:30 AM
in this case, of course there will be very many parties who support, because besides that it is certain, it will also not make the price of a token a dump because of a bounty hunter. I think that would be a very good idea when the bounty hunter is paid using USDT, or even bitcoin, or eth.
sr. member
Activity: 1232
Merit: 266
> CAMPAIGN MANAGER < https://t.me/TheAndy500
January 28, 2019, 04:03:56 AM
It makes sense, but unfortunately, it doesn't make sense for the project owners to make it happen. In fact, they create a kind of mobility by distributing their own token. They do work for them. There's no money left in your pockets.

This is the right answer. Nobody wants to risk their own money if he can give away something that costs him almost nothing. Also, it is very important that people agree to work for tokens - if there were no supporters it would have to change for (for example) USDT.
jr. member
Activity: 196
Merit: 1
Ternion | Hybrid Crypto Exchange with fiat gateway
January 27, 2019, 08:21:11 AM
do you agree if the bounty hunter is paid USDT?
the good or bad impact on investors and the development of the ICO project, give your reasons

How can they better promote their ICO if they will not going to use it as a payment for their bounty hunters? I guess it adds some pride when they use their own token rather than paying in USDT.
member
Activity: 310
Merit: 10
January 27, 2019, 08:15:42 AM
ICOs are already thinking about it, but they are too greedy to share their profit. It is much easier to share their tokens that are worth nothing at the moment rather than to share a percent of their collected funds.
Pages:
Jump to: