I agree to pay the USDT to bounty hunter.But the team pays their tokens to the hunter.I didn't see the payment of USDT.Because the team still needs money to develop.
actually if developers team pay bounty hunter used usdt ot btc, they have more benefits,their token price become more stable.and if someday they need money they couls sell token that reserved for company. 
Topic: bounty hunter paid USDT? - page 9. (Read 60789 times)
I agree to pay the USDT to bounty hunter.But the team pays their tokens to the hunter.I didn't see the payment of USDT.Because the team still needs money to develop.
You are right, the funds collected from the token offer provided from the project will usually not be used to pay the bounty campaign participants, they CEOs prefer to pay the participants to use tokens from the project because it will make the funds collected at the ICO will not reduced. 
I agree to pay the USDT to bounty hunter.But the team pays their tokens to the hunter.I didn't see the payment of USDT.Because the team still needs money to develop.
This can only be possible if there is a renewed interest in ICO. Now not a single project wants to spend a cent on marketing, which is why they use the services of bounty hunters.
I completely agree if paid in such a cryptocurrency, but most likely it will affect the pool that will be allocated!
if the hunter bounty paid USDT for now is the best and the best, but if the altcoin condition is good then we will lose because what we get is fixed and will not feel the pump
bounty is not only mean to pay the amount basically bounty means to spread the coins to number of users and increase the community of the coin. It means to grow the userbase if any one pay in USD no one cares for coins itself so this is not a good idea in my view
I personally strongly agree, especially if you pay with Ethereum. But it all depends on management policy because it keeps the coin price stable. And there are only a few projects that pay bounty hunters using Ethereum.
if that can happen, then it will be very positive, because bounty hunters no longer need to wait for the token distribution process to market exchange.
very much in agreement, the benefits actually exist on two sides, namely the ico team and the bounty hunter. Bounty hunters will benefit greatly from not having to wait for more tokens on the listing to the exchanger. and the ico team does not need to worry about a dump when the token has just been listed, because their tokens are safe from dumps that the bounty hunter will do after getting it.
This is good idea because will give more benefits for bounty hunter and also for investor in ICO. By payment in USDT all bounty hunter will get better reward and they can calculate the income in to fiat. This way also will protect investor in ICO from price dump by bounty hunter. By this way all people will get benefits so hopely the team developer will do it.
do you agree if the bounty hunter is paid USDT?
the good or bad impact on investors and the development of the ICO project, give your reasons
the good or bad impact on investors and the development of the ICO project, give your reasons
USDT is so much fixed, there's no volatility ahead unlike if they chose eth or BTC as payment, there is much much more excitement and we can also hodl it for the sake of its amount increase.
good advice, but think about what if the project doesn't reach hardcap and certainly the bounty allocation is definitely not maximal.
As a result, bounty hunters get small rewards. if you only want to solve the problem of a bounty hunter dump why not distribute the reward in several stages. this is better than paying another coin. dev definitely doesn't want to use the money earned from ICO just to pay for a bounty hunter.
As a result, bounty hunters get small rewards. if you only want to solve the problem of a bounty hunter dump why not distribute the reward in several stages. this is better than paying another coin. dev definitely doesn't want to use the money earned from ICO just to pay for a bounty hunter.
do you agree if the bounty hunter is paid USDT?
the good or bad impact on investors and the development of the ICO project, give your reasons
This of course would be good , but I think it is not feasible, or rather few of the projects will agree to pay in Fiat , I think only without Scam projects would pay the good or bad impact on investors and the development of the ICO project, give your reasons
Bounty is usdt could be considered good for bounty hunters because they will know the dollar value of their reward and also it will help to prevent sell off of the new token when it hits exchanges. But not so good for those who want to get in at the early stages of a new project.
It depends on the project, if you promote a project that is going to be next top 100 coin, then you want to earn tokens but if you promote some project that is useless, you want dollars because you know that the token will have no value.
Ohh, if it will become true, it will be one the most important thing in bounty campaigns, because bounty hunters can't dump the price of the project they have promoted and will be able to convert it in real money.
If it realy ,i agree.but i dnt never know till now any campaign that paid usdt for their campaign.just paid at their token.eth and bitcoin just gambling site that paid at their campain.for ico always paid with their token.where it will do
Paying in USDT would be very convenient for bounty hunters, since it would solve the problem of checking KYC and make it obvious that we should not pass such a check. Earlier we were told that we were paid with tokens, and therefore, as well as investors, we will need to undergo a KYC check. In this case, we will actually pay for advertising services with ordinary money and therefore we definitely cannot be considered clients of the ICO project. 
I totally agreed that paid bounty hunters USDT because the ICO will not dump instantly and the bounty hunter will be faithful in the project they a usdt.Like example of Probit Exchange that paid usdt and their token was not dumping and there's more profit in their project.
Many projects don't have USDT available, they just want to distribute with their tokens. Because it is much easier due to the token, they can control it because they create
This will not happen. Because projects need money to operate. If they pay usdt for bounty hunters, they may not have enough money to pay employees, partners and advisors.
The bounty campaign has a total reward of 200 ETH. But they only increased 400 ETH. They will not have enough USDT to pay bounty hunters
The bounty campaign has a total reward of 200 ETH. But they only increased 400 ETH. They will not have enough USDT to pay bounty hunters
paying hunters in USDT will be a welcome development , there was one bounty which they paid hunters reward using USDT and it was really good .
i think the developers who complained that hunters are the ones who usually dumped their token price should rather pay them in USDT in order to control their token price. but the fact is a lot of projects wont dare do that .
i think the developers who complained that hunters are the ones who usually dumped their token price should rather pay them in USDT in order to control their token price. but the fact is a lot of projects wont dare do that .
Jump to: