Topic: bounty hunter paid USDT? - page 10. (Read 60753 times)
If it realy ,i agree.but i dnt never know till now any campaign that paid usdt for their campaign.just paid at their token.eth and bitcoin just gambling site that paid at their campain.for ico always paid with their token.where it will do
Bounty is usdt could be considered good for bounty hunters because they will know the dollar value of their reward and also it will help to prevent sell off of the new token when it hits exchanges. But not so good for those who want to get in at the early stages of a new project.
I support the motion that bounty hunters should be paid in USdt henceforth, considering the fact that many developers are insisting that their tokens price tanks below expectation upon listing on exchanges because of bounty hunters.
So paying hunters in USdt would save everyone the stress of apportioning blames .
Yes, I strongly agree if Bounty hunters are paid only with USDT, because it will be more profitable for bounty hunters, while for project owners will feel safe, because there will be no price reduction due to Bounty hunters if using USDT. So paying hunters in USdt would save everyone the stress of apportioning blames .
I support the motion that bounty hunters should be paid in USdt henceforth, considering the fact that many developers are insisting that their tokens price tanks below expectation upon listing on exchanges because of bounty hunters.
So paying hunters in USdt would save everyone the stress of apportioning blames .
So paying hunters in USdt would save everyone the stress of apportioning blames .
I feel that paying with USDT will be beneficial but it will also be harmful. The benefit is that the price of the token will not be dumped and their bounty will have many participants, but its disastrous side is that the project will have no community and no one will trade their token and gradually their token will also die
I agree, if the choice is between USDT and shit coin. 
But better I would prefer Bitcoin or Ethereum. This is in my opinion a more solid cryptocurrency for payment.
But better I would prefer Bitcoin or Ethereum. This is in my opinion a more solid cryptocurrency for payment. 
I really agree with you, I think it will be very good for the stability of the price of their coins, but it is unfortunate that it will be very difficult for the team or dev, they certainly will not agree with the decision, because it will be very detrimental to them.
I think it would be quite fair if the work of the bounty-hunters were paid in half by tokens and stablecoins, in particular Tether (USDT). Recently, ICO project tokens enter exchanges too slow. You have to wait half a year or more to get earned tokens. Payment of USDT would allow bounty hunters to remain stable in the financial issue. However, it is not profitable for the projects themselves to pay rewards with USDT tokens.
Once I've meet such approach, but I missed the train. To my mind only a few projects can pay out in usdt and ethereum, those who has high hype level and they believe too much in own tokens
::)Yes, fraudsters do not want to pay usdt. I think it would be an interesting solution. And payments every week. I think all the fraudsters would immediately leave the market. Well, except for large ones.
I think every hunter will appreciate this. It will lead more effectiveness and efficiency with bounty hunting. Better pay leads to more commitment on the part of the hunters which in turn leads to better leads conversion thus, bringing in more investors to their respective projects.
I am neutral in this option, but I will always prefer to receive some bounty campaign in the project offered, because maybe there is a chance of making bigger gains in relation to this type of fixed gain! Incidentally, lately many people are liking the stablecoin idea, this is a bit scary.
I think this is a good solution, as too many complain that bounty hunters are dumping the value of their tokens. To solve this problem, you can pay bounty hunters in another major cryptocurrency.
It is good to be paid in USDT which is a stable coin. This will give a little bit of security to the bounty hunter, in addition to the token be paid in the projects cryptocurrency
do you agree if the bounty hunter is paid USDT?
the good or bad impact on investors and the development of the ICO project, give your reasons
I think that such a cold-blooded relationship between ICO and bounty participants is unlikely to work.By participating in the bounty,those who work on the promotion of the project usually become its participants.Ie essentially bounty participants are the target audience of any project.I don’t think that the project leaders who are conducting the ISO will simply give up so many of the initial participants of the platform. the good or bad impact on investors and the development of the ICO project, give your reasons
This is stupid, it is necessary to spend the money of investors on the bountists, instead of spending them on the development of the project.
I agree, but this practice is now unpopular, companies pay with their tokens for work, it is much more convenient for them and they are unlikely to agree to pay awards in another equivalent.
Well, what is not profitable is Yes , but I think if the project is open and does not want the price of the token immediately fell to the bottom that it is profitable to pay in usdt do you agree if the bounty hunter is paid USDT?
the good or bad impact on investors and the development of the ICO project, give your reasons
It will be a wonderful thing if bounty hunters are paid in USDT. With that hunters get the exact amount for their commitment. And the fear of possible dump will be removed. However, it is important to know that beyond doing daily or weekly tasks, hunters also provide liquidity for projects. And without statistics, I can say that most hunters hardly dump their campaign rewards which gives heavy price support for tokens. Being paid in USDT is cool, but beyond that lies other consequences for the projects. the good or bad impact on investors and the development of the ICO project, give your reasons
I like it when when there are such bounty that make payments in Bitcoin or ethereum, it is in these now is the earnings!
I agree with your proposal but this will be not probable because most of ICO have no found at the beginning to they couldn't pay in FIAT or coins that are different from their own token.
they can soon collect funds because investors invest on them . its possible if they use usdt or even mainstream cryptos as payment , in that way . bounty hunters can trust them more because they are sure that their efforts wont be wasted .
as I know, USDT is only in exchange. right? that means it will be troublesome for the bounty hunter. sending currencies directly to exchanges, sometimes having obstacles. it could be that the USDT sent does not arrive at our balance. if that happens, there will be many complaints.
There are many wallets for usdt , not just in exchange but theres no problem at all even if we use the wallets exchange and i guess that is more better because we can automatically trade them with other coins that we like without worrying for the deposit fees .
Jump to: