Topic: Bounty Hunters Dump Always? - page 14. (Read 33087 times)
There are only few bounty hunters those are selling their tokens, I dont think that problem is here. The problem is that there are not enough buyers, nobody wants to buy tokens after ICO phase.
A lot of investors blame bounty hunters for the dump of a particular token but in actually sense, its not the fault of bounty hunters but the project itself. Some projects lacks potential and they dump heavily on exchange but instead of blaming the project, investors will then blame bounty hunters for it.
Me iam a bounty hunter but i hold sometimes. But as of now after I received the token and put it on exchange i dump it cause sometimes after and hour or days the coin was going down
I try to keep my coins for as long as possible until the moment when their price rises so that they can be sold with greater profit
Not all bounty hunters dump their tokens right away.
Some of them like me are holding the tokens for a better price.
I usually wait until the project launch or go to big exchanges.
Well, no matter what the participants do to their token.
its their choice! they worked for it.
Some of them like me are holding the tokens for a better price.
I usually wait until the project launch or go to big exchanges.
Well, no matter what the participants do to their token.
its their choice! they worked for it.
I think those who sell tokens at the opening of the market are investors because they buy below the market price and also they get a discount when buying at pre ico and ico so they sell it and buy another token
Do all bounty hunters dump Cryptos after they get paid?
I believe this is not a fair assessment as a lot has to do with the crypto project itself.
Its a matter of perspective really, not all bounty hunters have the same experience or motive, some people just need an opportunity to get crypto for projects that are very difficult to get in the token sales, Example is Ncash tokens of Nucleus.Vision the project has a 1 million USD budget and it is still above ICO price even in the bear market.
Additionally some projects treat bought hunters badly which will not encourage them to stick around for much longer after they get their tokens.
I believe tokens or coins getting dumped by bounty hunters depends a lot on the project itself.
Don't worry about this. If the developer is consistent in developing the project, surely this can be anticipated. Bounty hunters do not intend to destroy or dumping that prices. They only want to reap the fruits of their work, and this is a natural thing. I believe this is not a fair assessment as a lot has to do with the crypto project itself.
Its a matter of perspective really, not all bounty hunters have the same experience or motive, some people just need an opportunity to get crypto for projects that are very difficult to get in the token sales, Example is Ncash tokens of Nucleus.Vision the project has a 1 million USD budget and it is still above ICO price even in the bear market.
Additionally some projects treat bought hunters badly which will not encourage them to stick around for much longer after they get their tokens.
I believe tokens or coins getting dumped by bounty hunters depends a lot on the project itself.
I think that now there will be few mosheynikov because the crypt has revived and is rapidly growing upwards. There are very good coins for which I am personally pleased. Also companies for the generosity of Kotor spend ICO three weeks prolong it but longer. I'm glad for them.
Only the bad project will face the coin dump after entering the exchange. Also it is normal to sell some of the rewards - people needs to pay bill and to buy some food at least.
I believe not all bounty hunter dump their coins after receiving the payments and besides the bounty pool is normally 2-3% of the total supply, is that going to change anything? And the majority of senior members promoting bounty HODL their coins for long-term to get maximum value.
This is not about this, but about the fact that bounty hunters often start selling rewards at any price. And it is true. I have repeatedly seen this, but if the project is promising, then its tokens will necessarily increase in price.
To a large extent, sale or keeping tokens of reward depends on the quality and prospects of development of the project. Surely some of the bounty hunters will sell immediately after entering the exchange. This may have a negative effect on the price reduction. However, with a good project, it's worth to wait to increase profits.
In my opinion its about the project as well, marketing strategy is much needed on this things, I think the most efficient way to avoid dumpers is to plan the listing earlier and get it on the market not too long since they distribute the token to the bounty hunters, the price can be their basis to keep their investment for long - Bounty Hunters really focus on earning and if they believe on the potential of the project, they will surely stay and wait till they can get more of its benefits.
Nobody on the cryptoworld wanted to be a bag holder for long and get its value after 2months, for sure they will sell it sooner because the project is really running slowly.
Nobody on the cryptoworld wanted to be a bag holder for long and get its value after 2months, for sure they will sell it sooner because the project is really running slowly.
Last weeks I see that not the Bounty Hunters cause the problem with price dumping but the master node holder! They are selling to fast their all rewards and they have sometimes not enough trading knowledge, they sell wrong, too cheap. This way the mn holders are not only dumping the price but loosing their own profit too.
I think that the dumps carried out by the bounty hounter are not as big as those of investors, we can see the number of allocation tokens for bounties is only in the range of 2-4% of the total allocation of ico. so it's just a small thing and the price can pump at any time easily.
yes, I also agree with your opinion that actually the bounty participant does not have a big influence on dumping a coin because we all know how many coins the bounty participant has. but why until now has the bounty participant been blamed? whereas if they force to hold their coins whether it guarantees that the coins will not be the dump.
I think that the dumps carried out by the bounty hounter are not as big as those of investors, we can see the number of allocation tokens for bounties is only in the range of 2-4% of the total allocation of ico. so it's just a small thing and the price can pump at any time easily.
i think they are getting free coins and selling coins for earning money. this is also the reason the price is decresing.
i can tell about my experience. If I see potential in coin and in product behind it, then I keep this coin.
As for dumpers, sometimes I dump as well, because I don't want to hold worthless shitcoin
Not everyone has the ability to analyze a good or bad coin, so some bounty hunters sell coins at low rates and thus have a negative psychological impact on coin holders with coin thinking. and they desperate to sell at very low prices As for dumpers, sometimes I dump as well, because I don't want to hold worthless shitcoin
I don't sell my tokens right away. I am the type to wait until it reach a certain price that I like. Unless I'm really broke and needs cash. It also boggles my mind how the dumping happens and who usually start it? I have observe many bounty hunters and know that a lot of them have been dumping their tokens as soon as it gets listed. but not all hunters do that.
In my opinion, depending on the project, the bounty hunters will decide to keep the tokens or sell them as soon as they are received. Normally, before participating in the bonus program, bounty hunters have made a thorough choice. Therefore, it is common to keep and wait for the tokens to increase.
There are many reasons why the bounty hunters dump their tokens as soon as they receive them. First of all, most of the payments are delayed by two months or more. And secondly, the tokens go down once they listed in the exchanges (in the vast majority of the cases).
Jump to: