Topic: Bounty hunters should be paid in ETH - page 40. (Read 4570 times)
The main reason that bounty program happen is that their dev want to promote their tokens, so they want to pay in tokens. Paying in Eth which mean they need to use their own money to pay.
Paid with the ETH is a very good idea, most bounty hunters will love it of course.
But, we also know the reasons why the team of ICO projects pays us with their tokens to make good circulation and community after the exchange.
However, the lower price on the exchange after selling out from most bounty hunters also true make some investors feel bad about it. Hopefully, it can be one of the considerations for some ICO to give the bounty hunters in ETH for the shake of their long-lasting token value on the market.
But, we also know the reasons why the team of ICO projects pays us with their tokens to make good circulation and community after the exchange.
However, the lower price on the exchange after selling out from most bounty hunters also true make some investors feel bad about it. Hopefully, it can be one of the considerations for some ICO to give the bounty hunters in ETH for the shake of their long-lasting token value on the market.
certainly, that is what many people expect because of the obvious ethereum has a value that is high enough and many people want to accept. However, ICO project also wants a token they could circulate in the market and used for the Exchange as well. There are indeed some who pay with ethereum but only a handful of ICO only.
Many of ICOs allocate some of the tokens to participants in bounty campaigns. Don't you think it is better to give bounty participnats reward in ETH?
1-2% of the money raised is not so much and bounty participants deserve that. Also, it can cause more investors to attract. Because they are no longer worry about the price fall after bounties are paid.
I do not think that would be a good idea. Because you work for them, you have to get tokens of that project. Getting the money that matches the ETH is not good.1-2% of the money raised is not so much and bounty participants deserve that. Also, it can cause more investors to attract. Because they are no longer worry about the price fall after bounties are paid.
If it's a potential project like Credtis, I'm sure you do not want to pay by ETH. Because if the project is listed on the exchange, your paycheck may double. This is an interesting game and you should enjoy it.
Ya it is more sure in the part of the bounty hunter if they get paid in ethereum since not all ICO coins are lised in exchanges and most of them theough they are listed most of the time they dont rise in value so the bounty participants though their tasks are sure done their profit is not sure.
Paying bounty hunters with ETH is a good idea because you are surely can get income whether their token listed on exchange and that can be less scam projects if required. We can have fixed value of ETH which we have to increase of its value rather than to hold token or ETH after trading. But this idea is impossible because every projects provide its own token to be reward to its participants and can be use for their develop project. 
Yes this way is much better fot bounty hunter and need escrow for eth for assurance even the project not been su cessful our effort must be paid. But i guess this thing will not happen, no project ot team will pay via eth because giving a token is nothing for them and eth is big deal in their side. Both team and hunter have token so if it successful both will ear. And if not both will not gain profit
Many of ICOs allocate some of the tokens to participants in bounty campaigns. Don't you think it is better to give bounty participnats reward in ETH?
1-2% of the money raised is not so much and bounty participants deserve that. Also, it can cause more investors to attract. Because they are no longer worry about the price fall after bounties are paid.
ICO project developers will not be fooled into choosing ETH as a payment method for bounty hunters, because they know they can use tokens and not affect the funds they hold. Your idea is terrible because no developer wants to spend money to pay. 1-2% of the money raised is not so much and bounty participants deserve that. Also, it can cause more investors to attract. Because they are no longer worry about the price fall after bounties are paid.
I somewhat agree but, there is no guaranyee that your project will go anywhere, and you could take 50 to 100$ a week or potentially make several thousand in one week if you hold long enough
They also want bounty hunters to circulate the altcoin which is not a good thing for me since the purpose of bounty hunting is to promote or advertise a specific altcoin that will getting implemented after an ICO will be success. Holding the token for bounty hunters has a risk since the altcoin have a possibility to collapse. I've experienced this before that is why I'm getting upset on the distribution of payment in bounty using the altcoin as payment for the labor that we spend during the time of the campaign and the amount of altcoin we've received can be lowered. Ethereum as a payment should be the thing that is given to us. We are not investors that help funding the ICO, we are just promoters.
Many of ICOs allocate some of the tokens to participants in bounty campaigns. Don't you think it is better to give bounty participnats reward in ETH?
1-2% of the money raised is not so much and bounty participants deserve that. Also, it can cause more investors to attract. Because they are no longer worry about the price fall after bounties are paid.
The main purpose of bounties is to have a following in the coin and if the project is good and if it is successful then it will give you a better profit, but most of the time it wont end up like that as most of the projects coming up are just fantasy ones and everyone is starting new projects to make money and there is no way they are going to pay with ETH unless they have the budget to allocate that kind of funds from the start. 1-2% of the money raised is not so much and bounty participants deserve that. Also, it can cause more investors to attract. Because they are no longer worry about the price fall after bounties are paid.
I would be very happy if the hunter is paid by using, we do not have to wait to sell it, if it is there then I will join
Many of ICOs allocate some of the tokens to participants in bounty campaigns. Don't you think it is better to give bounty participnats reward in ETH?
1-2% of the money raised is not so much and bounty participants deserve that. Also, it can cause more investors to attract. Because they are no longer worry about the price fall after bounties are paid.
It would be a lot better I guess if bounty hunter will be paid by ethereum. As eth has its value already unlike those tokens from project that sometimwa it takes 2 or 3 months to have value and sometimes the value is so small. Whereas in eth the value is stable.
1-2% of the money raised is not so much and bounty participants deserve that. Also, it can cause more investors to attract. Because they are no longer worry about the price fall after bounties are paid.
It would be a lot better I guess if bounty hunter will be paid by ethereum. As eth has its value already unlike those tokens from project that sometimwa it takes 2 or 3 months to have value and sometimes the value is so small. Whereas in eth the value is stable.
Many of ICOs allocate some of the tokens to participants in bounty campaigns. Don't you think it is better to give bounty participnats reward in ETH?
1-2% of the money raised is not so much and bounty participants deserve that. Also, it can cause more investors to attract. Because they are no longer worry about the price fall after bounties are paid.
As a hunter I agree and prefer my pay in ETH, but as ICO team I see where they are coming from and understand their view! It's like some of the companies in the world, give wage bonuses, to their workers in shares that the company listed on the stock market, to stimulate workers to work harder for the company to succeed, as the share price will depend on the work done from employees! 1-2% of the money raised is not so much and bounty participants deserve that. Also, it can cause more investors to attract. Because they are no longer worry about the price fall after bounties are paid.
I do not agree with it, there is a separate destination for developers to share their tokens through airdrop or bounty, one of which is to keep circulating the number of token in circulation supply
Many of ICOs allocate some of the tokens to participants in bounty campaigns. Don't you think it is better to give bounty participnats reward in ETH?
1-2% of the money raised is not so much and bounty participants deserve that. Also, it can cause more investors to attract. Because they are no longer worry about the price fall after bounties are paid.
1-2% of the money raised is not so much and bounty participants deserve that. Also, it can cause more investors to attract. Because they are no longer worry about the price fall after bounties are paid.
I agree partially but I think it would be great if it's going to be paid in half in ethereum or bitcoin and half of the token. Paying bounties with their tokens lessens the investors confidence to purchase in their ICO. This results to lesser ICO collected turnout at some point. I already getting paid less than what I have done. There's this one social and article bounty I have paticipated. I spent a day writing a good article for them. My article got approved and been paid with $10 at token valuation after their ICO. While I make $30 a day if I do other freelance skill job other than writing. There's a huge underpaid issue there. Plus the token been traded lower than it's ICO price. that's unfortunate.
I myself am a bountyhanter and I can say that it can be viewed from two sides: 1. you get a token of a prospective project and then it makes an X! 2. you get ETH and buy tokens of promising projects (this is not beneficial to the project that pays because advertising leaves him) !!!
Many of ICOs allocate some of the tokens to participants in bounty campaigns. Don't you think it is better to give bounty participnats reward in ETH?
1-2% of the money raised is not so much and bounty participants deserve that. Also, it can cause more investors to attract. Because they are no longer worry about the price fall after bounties are paid.
1-2% of the money raised is not so much and bounty participants deserve that. Also, it can cause more investors to attract. Because they are no longer worry about the price fall after bounties are paid.
I think that paying in ETH will be a lot easier for the bounty hinters, but will never happen. The projects wants to have more investors and this way they keep the bounty hunters as investors and keep them involved with the project.
If no one will use the Crypto-currency, its value will be zero, and its popularity will be very low. The main purpose of the bounty is to advertise the project. It is very important to pay bounty members their tokens, for work. Participants of the bounty will trade, mining, exchange these tokens. This is very important from the point of view of the development of the project and the popularization of the project. The more tokens fall into different hands, the more difficult it is to manipulate the market.
Many of ICOs allocate some of the tokens to participants in bounty campaigns. Don't you think it is better to give bounty participnats reward in ETH?
1-2% of the money raised is not so much and bounty participants deserve that. Also, it can cause more investors to attract. Because they are no longer worry about the price fall after bounties are paid.
1-2% of the money raised is not so much and bounty participants deserve that. Also, it can cause more investors to attract. Because they are no longer worry about the price fall after bounties are paid.
I definitely do not agree. Then they would be getting paid very little. You can still find some campaigns that pay you in eth, but you end up earning very little funds...
Hmmm! This is deep enough to think about though. I’ve being participating in the bounty campaign for some months and already had little experience too which I would say it’s less risky for Dev team to pay the campaigners with some percentage from their tokens than paying with ETH. #justmyopinion
Yes I agree with you, for companies that hold ico they pay bounty participation with their coins to reduce the risk of loss to them, and that also puts their coin circulation in the market they will launch later. So I think if the payment of bounty participants with ETH will only increase the risk of loss for companies that hold ICO.
Jump to: