It's not that I mind, it's more that I don't think my home network can take much more. My gpu rig is mining diamonds at 20 Mh, my ant miner is chugging along at 2 Th, and my two ASCI rigs are at 45Mh (combined) on top of that, I have a mail server, an ftp server and am hosting about 10 websites all on my home DSL network. keep in mind that the pool server has about six wallets running and my desktop computer has 4 or five wallets running.
Netflix is starting to stutter.
Let's get past this little forking issue, pull the BTB community together a bit, and see about getting a wallet developer on board. Once that is handled, or we can show there is progress in the works, more pools will pick up bitbar.
It's a good, sound crypto with a lot going for it already - think how well it will do when we have dev team behind it!
I like the idea of squishing 10 bitcoins together to make a bar, but I don't think the original developers set it up correctly to be that valuable, at lest right now....
the block reward is too high and the pos reward is too high to make the coin/bar that valuable - look at the 42coin, well, i don't think it is pos - but the block reward is so much less - like .000042 per block. at 24 hours of hashing at 40Mh earns about .0031 of a 42coin per day (about .0047 BTC)- at it's current difficulty. 1 full 42coin is worth roughly about 1.83 BTC
With the same hashrate (and this is just a guess) you should pick up about 3 Bitbars a day.
I have no intentions to change the way bitbar works. (side note: it would be nice if the block time could be reduced to like 90 seconds...)
Maybe down the line we, as a community, can have a discussion on the future of bitbar and decide
IF we want to make changes and what they are.
Right now I just want to help strengthen the community support, and get bitbar in the public eye. (and buy a lot of bitbars before the price goes up - shh. don't spread it around
)
Please, if anybody has some input, good or bad, please speak up!