Even if we forward project out, we still could end up making mistakes and have to change our trajectory and our assumptions in order to account for changes in the facts that might allow for changes that go in either direction and perhaps sometimes in both directions.
Both ways, is it a very fatal mistake. It is very regrettable if investors who have gone through the first year's accumulation successfully and the second year becomes more messy because they want to increase the adjustment of the increase in accumulation in the second year in their investment planning. My assumption is that if an investor fails to save expenses and is not supported by increasing income, then their investment becomes more chaotic if they choose to increase the cash flow of purchases to be greater. That could make them make mistakes if the emergency fund is unable to cover the costs of expenses in the second year. Maybe it's true sir, if it is not supported by increasing income, of course the accumulation of bitcoin does not have to be adjusted to the new plan. or he uses the initial pattern in the first year by following up in the second year, of course that's better. The reason might be to avoid mistakes if that's what has to be done. I also think if one day we lose our permanent job, maybe it's 6 months, is the plan at that time what should be done, while the adjustment of expenses increases because many costs must be considered when we lose our jobs.
On the one hand, is take short-range profits for a while the best step, while we still maintain our btc ownership.
