Agreed. People who thought we'd top at $15k and sold off everything are hurting. Do you buy back in or wait.
That seems to be exactly the point that Wind_FURY was making... There is no recommendation in this thread to sell... . buy the dip and HODL does not mean sell.. so you seem to be asking the wrong person in the wrong thread, wheelz1200, when you are asking about the very thing that is being recommended as NOT doing.
No one seems to give too many shits if you are top buying either.. especially if you HODL for a long enough term, 4 years or more than historically your BTC would have always ended up being profitable.
You say this, but really I think you mean none of us care that much about buying tops. Mainly because we're not throwing all our money into a potential peak, but merely averaging more in right? Those who are currently buying parabolic prices aren't really doing so for the long-term, instead hoping price will continue upwards. If not, they will sell. They always do. This is exactly why we have 25-35% corrections in bull markets, because people buy the tops only to sell the bottoms - to enthusiasts like us.
Most investors stop caring about "what it could be worth in 4 years" once they are already down 25% on their investment.
I think that these days the investment thesis into bitcoin is even stronger than it was in late 2013 - and therefore, it is much more reasonable to come into bitcoin with presumptions of a longer investment timeline of 4 years or more and even 10 years or more would be even better in terms of some people just not being able to lump sum into bitcoin or any other investment. Many young people tend to take 20, 30, 40 or more years to build their investment portfolio in which they are able to plan to live off in their retirement.. and surely, some of those investment theses do not play out too well. I feel real lucky with my own plans, but I had already around 25 years of building my investment portfolio before getting into bitcoin, so in that regard, I had already built up a lump sum that I could have put into bitcoin, and largely ended up putting into bitcoin in a dollar cost averaging way over the first year of my investment into BTC (which was mostly put in during the whole year of 2014).
This is very fair point, the longer Bitcoin exists for and continues to trend upwards, the longer investors should be willing to invest for. Sometimes I forget that in late 2013 and early 2014, investors would be betting on asset that's only existed for 4/5 years with only two notable cycles of bull market and subsequent correction. Now in 2020, Bitcoin is 10 years old, therefore it's a lot more realistic to think investors will be investing for 5 years minimum, maybe even 10 years, though based on cycles I'd assume 4/5 more so.
Also in the time when you got into Bitcoin, two bull market cycles isn't exactly a pattern, but more a statistical co-incidence. Now we are more clearly entering a third cycle, this is confirmation of a distinct pattern of Bitcoin's price history. At least from the statistical standpoint of two being co-incidence, three being minimum requirements for a pattern. With this in mind, maybe we won't see such panic selling if price breaks below $16-18K, as was largely the case with the -35% correction in January 2017 from ATH levels.
Either way, the economic factors at the moment could still play a major role: vaccine or no vaccine, US political uncertainty, an over-extended stock market...