Regarding the point about gap-fill.
Someone highlighted the continuous trading nature of Bitcoin. This is exactly what feeds into my thoughts about a bitcoin run-up being the closest thing you get to a "gap-up" in traditional open/close markets.
In a typical market, the manic run-ups will often lead to speculative mania manifesting in a gap out of hours, and I think it is precisely because the market is closed (and so a large number of participants, cannot contribute to prices action) that these run-ups end up being somewhat curtailed. Whereas, in a continuous market it gets to *really* run up as the market gets stuck in a feedback loop and *everybody* gets to pile in (or out).
So I consider the big verticals in Bitcoin price action bit gappish.
In the same way that a gap up (or down) has to be filled so that all he market participants can re-assert there positions under slightly more rational conditions, I believe that any monumental run-up that happens also needs to be fully backtested. So the mania can. be shaken loose and the price can consolidate at its new baseline high.
Anyone calling me a parma-bull is just revealing that they know nothing of my ~10 year history here. I made this call because I feel like like it is an accurate forecast of what will happen following the run up to 20k. A run up of that magnitude, I think, necessitates a multi year bear market in order to consolidate, I dint forecast it because I want it to happen, or because I would like it to happen. It is because it is what I *believe* will happen. All the kneejerk emotional reaction that I read, I just chuckle. Being emotionally invested doesn't seem wise, but what would I know. Anyone remember MatTheCat, air he would let emotions get in the way of some otherwise decent trading ability. It wasn't pretty.
The reason why I think it will play out this comes from what I have observed over the years with how the market sentiment appears to play out.
It starts with what happen on the run up to 32. I experienced the price action and the corresponding forum mood. I saw how the market played out after that. A much smaller market, with fewer participants (and less "HODL" mentality to sustain momentum), things moved a lot more quickly so it wasn't all that long until the bottom was in and we saw the next speculative run up.
There was a little bump - I think it went mid 200s - then a pull back to around 60 people were skittish, but that wasn't the big run. (It seemed more analogous to the $2-$9 move that preceded the $32 run up).
The big run came after that, we went over $1200 at gox. That was pretty insane.
What came next is most crucial piece of the puzzle for me.
I watched the market go down and "find the bottom" it took a little bit longer than last time around but I figured we must be there it was like 300 or something, and I started to buy back in (I actually started around $600... ouch) because I was sure it was over - but it wasn't, it started to rise a bit, then it sunk even lower. It took almost 2-3 times longer than I expected before we really did bottom out and it took for a forum sentiment to be *very* much different to what is in place right now. I learned a lesson about patience that time around.
So my reckoning is that when we ran up to 20k, the subsequent correction and finding bottom was going to be *way* longer than people thought, even with this in mind I think I have still called it too short term (unsurprising, its a common mistake that I make! lol) and we could be looking at more like 2023 before it find a base.
This is further backed up by the fact that the general mood is still "oh just HODL and it will be fine". Can any of you deny that the general mood is still buoyant?... No you can't can you because you know I'm right, you all think its all fine and any time now we'll be at 20k again! Thats not how it works. Thats *never* been how it works in the history of bitcoin.
People are nowhere near feeling that capitulation that coincides with the bottom that I have observed take place before every run up starts.
Of course HOLDing is fine (I've held through 90% losses, its fun!)... you can just ride it out if you got the stomach
I'm not suggesting you sell at all - it's not trading advice, remember! it makes no difference to me if you buy or sell BTC. I don't hold BTC, I can categorically state that I do not want - and will *never* buy back into BTC cheaper! I don't care if you buy or sell BSV, I don't believe that the actions of anyone here can have any kind of significant effect on its value long term compared to the other factors that are at play. What I am telling you is what I think it would theoretically take for BTC to have another bite at the cherry.
If it did, then I think you would get 6 figures easy, prolly $250-500k. That is a mighty big IF though. You all know why I think it won't, I don't see any point in repeating myself
What might be of interest to any of you smart cookies is that there is a whole bunch of new information recently made available. I just finished reading about 3000+ (yes literally) pages of depositions from a certain court case in florida. I daresay you've seen some cherry picked pieces on twitter saying one thing or another depending on who is doing the cherry picking - and that is both sides of the coin so to speak.
My advise is to read it all yourself. It's a bit more time consuming the clicking like on trite 140-char witticisms support your pre-conceived notion of what is going on. However, if you have any kind of significant investment in Bitcoin then its the economically rational thing to do. Whether you believe me or not you cannot deny that is *good* advice.
Stay wise my fellow Bitcoiners, and keep learning! We are all in this together, however much we may disagree on what constitutes "Bitcoin"