It doesnt hurt nor cost you an arm and leg when it comes to making up some research and trying out to verify on everything before you would be making out such deposit.
I don't think it will help you if you make proper research before making any deposit or starting gambling. Because many gambling sites don't mention the KYC they may ask to verify KYC while they suspect anything. 
Topic: Casinos not asking for KYC to register and play, but do require it to withdraw - page 26. (Read 12733 times)
March 10, 2024, 11:38:35 AM
March 10, 2024, 09:31:39 AM
I want just an opportunity to KYC in the casino when i want. I don`t have problems with KYC. I`m sure that lots of newbies don`t have any problems. The problem is when you want your money fast.
PS. I read here some thread, when casino asked a huge quantity of docs from gambler. He even tried to visit their office to KYC in real life, but they rejected. This is the problem, not the KYC.
There casinos that aldo ask for partial KYC where you don't have to drop all your acredentials before betting large or withdrawing.PS. I read here some thread, when casino asked a huge quantity of docs from gambler. He even tried to visit their office to KYC in real life, but they rejected. This is the problem, not the KYC.
Everyone has what they are interested in and we need to be wise and go for casino that would reach out expectations without complaining later. There are so many casino on this platform and even outside this community. We need to be ready to keep doing research on the casino that would suit our interest without basing our research on fake reviews.
March 09, 2024, 11:14:21 AM
Do you still read what i`m talking about? I several times told that i have no problem with KYC. Why i have to hate it? And i told several times that in ToS there are the the one text with small differs. And it YOU read the ToS in different casino, you can find that the text everywhere will be something about "casino can KYC you any moment they decide".
Thats what casino would really be having that kind of edge with that mentioned line that they do have the rights on asking some KYC if its needed. If it just fine to comply some KYC then its good which there would be no issues but there are people who are really that skeptical on doing such thing and this is why whenever they do encounter issues then they do really got dismayed on how the casinos been asking for such verification.Well, there's nothing we can do about it on the time that they would really be asking out such requirement before you could really be able to withdraw.
This is why its always important into those newbie gamblers that reading up sites terms and conditions is a must so that they wont really get shocked on the time that they would
really be facing up some potential issues or problems which might cause for some withdrawal hold up or lock or pending. You wont really be having no choice
actually.
PS. I read here some thread, when casino asked a huge quantity of docs from gambler. He even tried to visit their office to KYC in real life, but they rejected. This is the problem, not the KYC.
Everyone has what they are interested in and we need to be wise and go for casino that would reach out expectations without complaining later. There are so many casino on this platform and even outside this community. We need to be ready to keep doing research on the casino that would suit our interest without basing our research on fake reviews.
legendary
Activity: 2422
Merit: 1083
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
March 09, 2024, 10:09:21 AM
I see this as a moral obligation rather than an obligation under the law. It has become self-evident to expect that any services website has the absolute and sole authority to make updates to the terms of use, whether by amendment or modification, even if this is not stipulated in the TOS.
It is under their legal obligation, ToS is their legal rights and they should do it ethical/proper way. Most big companies do this and do always make it in advance, notifying its users few days before it take effect because it's the right of their users to agreed the new terms and so its users can continue or stop using their service. Although this is the right way, many services like casinos failed to do it for obvious reasons, deceive their users through their terms of service.
We know some casinos operate under a license but like we have previously discussed on this forum not once or twice but several times, licenses seem like decorations on casinos, as it seems like the agencies that grant such operational licenses to the casinos don't usually give a damn about the casinos after they have obtained the license, and because of this, casinos can do whatever they want with their terms of service and or what so ever.
But this does not apply to every casino though, there are still some casinos that are highly professional in their mode and way of operation, like Stake for example, when they updated their terms of service, also known as terms and conditions; the last time, they made the notice available to every user before hand, and the day the new terms and conditions was to take effect, they made every user to read and accept the new terms before such user will gain back access to his or her stake account.
If every casinos will do this same thing when ever they update their terms and conditions, there wouldn't be so much problems in this regard.
March 09, 2024, 09:08:58 AM
I see this as a moral obligation rather than an obligation under the law. It has become self-evident to expect that any services website has the absolute and sole authority to make updates to the terms of use, whether by amendment or modification, even if this is not stipulated in the TOS.
Thanks for the clarification on this point. As a user, I do not care much about whether the casino will lose the community’s trust in it after it changes the terms of use in any suspicious way, as much as I care about having the authority to pursue legal action. I am sure that in most cases of fraud, users are unable to impose measures by the authority of the law because they are from countries that do not support their activities and do not have a legal status that allows them to take any procedural steps.
I emphasize once again that these points are what make the user very hesitant to use any new casino comfortably, and due to the absence of sufficient guarantees, the best option is to use platforms with a good reputation. This especially applies to crypto-based casinos.
March 09, 2024, 03:04:46 AM
Do you still read what i`m talking about? I several times told that i have no problem with KYC. Why i have to hate it? And i told several times that in ToS there are the the one text with small differs. And it YOU read the ToS in different casino, you can find that the text everywhere will be something about "casino can KYC you any moment they decide".
Thats what casino would really be having that kind of edge with that mentioned line that they do have the rights on asking some KYC if its needed. If it just fine to comply some KYC then its good which there would be no issues but there are people who are really that skeptical on doing such thing and this is why whenever they do encounter issues then they do really got dismayed on how the casinos been asking for such verification.Well, there's nothing we can do about it on the time that they would really be asking out such requirement before you could really be able to withdraw.
This is why its always important into those newbie gamblers that reading up sites terms and conditions is a must so that they wont really get shocked on the time that they would
really be facing up some potential issues or problems which might cause for some withdrawal hold up or lock or pending. You wont really be having no choice
actually.
PS. I read here some thread, when casino asked a huge quantity of docs from gambler. He even tried to visit their office to KYC in real life, but they rejected. This is the problem, not the KYC.
March 08, 2024, 05:59:17 PM
I see this as a moral obligation rather than an obligation under the law. It has become self-evident to expect that any services website has the absolute and sole authority to make updates to the terms of use, whether by amendment or modification, even if this is not stipulated in the TOS.
It is under their legal obligation, ToS is their legal rights and they should do it ethical/proper way. Most big companies do this and do always make it in advance, notifying its users few days before it take effect because it's the right of their users to agreed the new terms and so its users can continue or stop using their service. Although this is the right way, many services like casinos failed to do it for obvious reasons, deceive their users through their terms of service. 
March 08, 2024, 03:06:47 PM
For me there is no difference is there some KYC or no, it i KYC myself. I`ve got several times problems that casino asked KYC when i won big enough sum and decided to withdraw it. They paid it, but KYC took from several hours up to 3 days in different cases. Once i was on the vacation and got an opportunity to get docs only next day. It isn`t awful problem usually, but i don`t like such situations.
If you do hate up KYC then one of the important things that you should really be needing to consider on the time that you would really be playing on a site on which you should really be reading up their TOS.Well, its not something new that there would be casinos or platforms that would alter out their TOS whenever there are some issues been raised but it would really be that completely depending on what
site that you are really dealing off with on which we do know that there are platforms which are honest and there are ones who arent. This is why it would really be always important that you should
really be that dealing up with a legit site and not making yourself that too impulsive on trying out to make deposits in a hurry.
It doesnt hurt nor cost you an arm and leg when it comes to making up some research and trying out to verify on everything before you would be making out such deposit.
Well, there's nothing we can do about it on the time that they would really be asking out such requirement before you could really be able to withdraw.
This is why its always important into those newbie gamblers that reading up sites terms and conditions is a must so that they wont really get shocked on the time that they would
really be facing up some potential issues or problems which might cause for some withdrawal hold up or lock or pending. You wont really be having no choice
actually.
March 08, 2024, 02:18:02 PM
Are you sure it's not mentioned on their ToS, or you didn't/forgot to read the updated ToS when they required KYC after some time? Because casinos should be transparent with their ToS since it's their defense legally especially when they ban their users. If it's not on their ToS then asked KYC, then again, they deserve negative reputation on any platform as well as negative tag in this forum.
If it's not on their ToS, they can update the TOS since the same TOS allows them to make appropriate modifications and updates whenever necessary. Do you know users who review the terms of use, especially if they use the service without problems?
It has become an open trick: platforms offer users tempting and attractive terms of use during launch. Users use the platform for a relatively long time without problems until they are satisfied with the quality of service. Then suddenly problems begin under the pretext of suspicion of possibly tampering with the system or attempting to deceive. All of them are legitimate arguments, and on the basis of them, the argument can be given for updating the TOS. I am here offering my opinion in general, and I do not have specific information about Bitser’s situation in particular.
I do not think that TOS saying that TOS can be changed at any time, without prior notification or without the opportunity for the customer to withdraw or somehowelse opt-out of the services is a valid legal tool. It will fall into the category of abusive clauses in most jurisdictions, so if that is what a site is doing, they are opening themselves to legal action.
I see this as a moral obligation rather than an obligation under the law. It has become self-evident to expect that any services website has the absolute and sole authority to make updates to the terms of use, whether by amendment or modification, even if this is not stipulated in the TOS. But we all know that this can be easily deceived because the site can make updates without an explicit announcement, that is, for example, the advertisement can be published on an unknown site or on one of the site’s inactive channels. Or the updates are made and put into effect in a short period of time, so that users do not have the opportunity to decide whether the updates meet their capabilities or not.
March 08, 2024, 09:23:18 AM
For me there is no difference is there some KYC or no, it i KYC myself. I`ve got several times problems that casino asked KYC when i won big enough sum and decided to withdraw it. They paid it, but KYC took from several hours up to 3 days in different cases. Once i was on the vacation and got an opportunity to get docs only next day. It isn`t awful problem usually, but i don`t like such situations.
If you do hate up KYC then one of the important things that you should really be needing to consider on the time that you would really be playing on a site on which you should really be reading up their TOS.Well, its not something new that there would be casinos or platforms that would alter out their TOS whenever there are some issues been raised but it would really be that completely depending on what
site that you are really dealing off with on which we do know that there are platforms which are honest and there are ones who arent. This is why it would really be always important that you should
really be that dealing up with a legit site and not making yourself that too impulsive on trying out to make deposits in a hurry.
It doesnt hurt nor cost you an arm and leg when it comes to making up some research and trying out to verify on everything before you would be making out such deposit.
March 08, 2024, 09:19:02 AM
There is not much you can do if a casino changes their ToS after you've registered your account and made a deposit. Online crypto casino are still unregulated, therefore it'll be hard to make a complain about them and get your money back.Usually, if the casino is trusted they won't make any major changes to their ToS that affect you and even if they do, they'll notice you and make you agree to the new terms.
The casinos would have even stated clearly that their ToS is subject to review and change, which means at any point in time, they can make decision on changing anything that they see needed attention to and implement something different or new, the reason for this is not to disappoint the gamblers, but comes in place when they are building up upon their security networks in other not to render then to vulnerability for attack as well as protecting the interest of the users as also against hackers from taking hold of their account.
March 08, 2024, 07:30:22 AM
Are you sure it's not mentioned on their ToS, or you didn't/forgot to read the updated ToS when they required KYC after some time? Because casinos should be transparent with their ToS since it's their defense legally especially when they ban their users. If it's not on their ToS then asked KYC, then again, they deserve negative reputation on any platform as well as negative tag in this forum.
If it's not on their ToS, they can update the TOS since the same TOS allows them to make appropriate modifications and updates whenever necessary. Do you know users who review the terms of use, especially if they use the service without problems?
It has become an open trick: platforms offer users tempting and attractive terms of use during launch. Users use the platform for a relatively long time without problems until they are satisfied with the quality of service. Then suddenly problems begin under the pretext of suspicion of possibly tampering with the system or attempting to deceive. All of them are legitimate arguments, and on the basis of them, the argument can be given for updating the TOS. I am here offering my opinion in general, and I do not have specific information about Bitser’s situation in particular.
I do not think that TOS saying that TOS can be changed at any time, without prior notification or without the opportunity for the customer to withdraw or somehowelse opt-out of the services is a valid legal tool. It will fall into the category of abusive clauses in most jurisdictions, so if that is what a site is doing, they are opening themselves to legal action.
March 07, 2024, 11:37:52 PM
If a casino tries to keep their customers in the dark without clear information about ToS and plays an excuse game, the reputation of that casino is already in doubt. How transparent a casino is should be understood in advance. Gamblers are also responsible to read the ToS properly at the time of registration in any casino so that they do not face any problem with KYC in future.
Sometimes the problem doesn't start with reading the casino TOS at the time of registration; most times it all starts when the user registers a KYC for those that enable it and is having a good time with the casino, just after they have been able to lure a large number of people with their friendly TOS.Then they will go ahead and make some amendments without properly informing the customers, unless those who visit TOS on a regular basis will be able to notice the change; if not, you will just realise that you have violated a policy that was never even there in the first place until they find a good reason to consolidate your funds in their casino. That's when they will do that, and when you ask a question, they will refer you to a new policy you know nothing about.
But the casinos we are talking about, these casinos always keep their customers on the dark side so that they can withhold the funds of the profitable customers using various excuses from time to time. Therefore, it is the responsibility of the gamblers to read the T&C carefully while registering, and research the reputation of the casino to avoid such problems. .
This is the truth, I have always recommended that the old casinos, or those that have the best reputation, are the most reliable, it is very delicate that Some casinos execute actions of To changes , without informing the users if they accept it or not, I think I am very delicate about that part, now a judge who makes any Claim must read his texts very well to base his defense on it against any eventuality that is not agreed upon and that can make the difference, the problem is that yes The rules change a lot, yours, how can you defend yourself? In the same way, here in the forum there are many opinions to see what casino we are going to think About, because just by reviewing your thread Ann we will quickly realize, why there are questions , congratulations or any other type of event that happens.
Sometimes your player chooses another casino that does not have such a good reputation because he believes that he will get more money there, and what he achieves is that he loses or his money is stolen, so when it comes to money you should be veryJealous and put the money in trustworthy sites, it is better to lose in a game system that is authentic and that the casino is honest and not win in a dark casino and it is a problem to withdraw, because you will probably never be able to withdraw, that has happened, especially in casinos that They are not registered in the forum nor do they have Ann threads but rather they are Found through simple searches on Google. When I was a newbie, unfortunately I fell into fraudulent Casinos twice, it's not like I lost much, but it's annoying to lose money Because it's stolen from you.
March 07, 2024, 05:02:11 PM
Are you sure it's not mentioned on their ToS, or you didn't/forgot to read the updated ToS when they required KYC after some time? Because casinos should be transparent with their ToS since it's their defense legally especially when they ban their users. If it's not on their ToS then asked KYC, then again, they deserve negative reputation on any platform as well as negative tag in this forum.
If it's not on their ToS, they can update the TOS since the same TOS allows them to make appropriate modifications and updates whenever necessary. Do you know users who review the terms of use, especially if they use the service without problems?
It has become an open trick: platforms offer users tempting and attractive terms of use during launch. Users use the platform for a relatively long time without problems until they are satisfied with the quality of service. Then suddenly problems begin under the pretext of suspicion of possibly tampering with the system or attempting to deceive. All of them are legitimate arguments, and on the basis of them, the argument can be given for updating the TOS. I am here offering my opinion in general, and I do not have specific information about Bitser’s situation in particular.
We should not picture this as a problem erupted from the gambling platforms, for them to be able to provide the gamblers with a free service without requesting for kyc from the start is only an indication for them on being loyal and considerate and this shouldn't be taken for granted by gamblers anytime they make up with their decision on requesting for kyc, we already know that they are such they demands on kyc and we should also be in preparedness towards providing them with every necessary requirred information.
On this basis, it would be logical to choose well-known casinos whose terms of use are clear. You should not trust everything that is promoted. Almost all reliable gambling platforms have a license and rules to follow. It is not easy to build a good reputation easily in this field.
Are you sure it's not mentioned on their ToS, or you didn't/forgot to read the updated ToS when they required KYC after some time? Because casinos should be transparent with their ToS since it's their defense legally especially when they ban their users. If it's not on their ToS then asked KYC, then again, they deserve negative reputation on any platform as well as negative tag in this forum.
If it's not on their ToS, they can update the TOS since the same TOS allows them to make appropriate modifications and updates whenever necessary. Do you know users who review the terms of use, especially if they use the service without problems?
It has become an open trick: platforms offer users tempting and attractive terms of use during launch. Users use the platform for a relatively long time without problems until they are satisfied with the quality of service. Then suddenly problems begin under the pretext of suspicion of possibly tampering with the system or attempting to deceive. All of them are legitimate arguments, and on the basis of them, the argument can be given for updating the TOS. I am here offering my opinion in general, and I do not have specific information about Bitser’s situation in particular.
i do get the logic behind casinos’ ability to change their TOS whenever necessary a new situation may erupt and they are required to create a whole new subsection of their TOS because the situation was not precedented
however i do think some casinos use this too much for their advantages i have seen some players who could withdraw just fine but as soon as they started getting bigger money, the casinos’ tos change and i dont think a casino will change their tos for one person but rather that one person is probably going to be the standard of change as for sure more people are going to be next
For this reason, you do not find that there are many projects claiming to be casinos without Kyc, because it is not possible to claim that these measures are not taken in the permanent term. There is almost no way to deal with any suspicion other than imposing procedures. It is self-evident not to believe any platform that claims this, but at the same time it is important that this be clearly stated in the TOS and any update to it must be notified to users some time in advance.
March 07, 2024, 03:59:09 PM
If a casino tries to keep their customers in the dark without clear information about ToS and plays an excuse game, the reputation of that casino is already in doubt. How transparent a casino is should be understood in advance. Gamblers are also responsible to read the ToS properly at the time of registration in any casino so that they do not face any problem with KYC in future.
Sometimes the problem doesn't start with reading the casino TOS at the time of registration; most times it all starts when the user registers a KYC for those that enable it and is having a good time with the casino, just after they have been able to lure a large number of people with their friendly TOS.Then they will go ahead and make some amendments without properly informing the customers, unless those who visit TOS on a regular basis will be able to notice the change; if not, you will just realise that you have violated a policy that was never even there in the first place until they find a good reason to consolidate your funds in their casino. That's when they will do that, and when you ask a question, they will refer you to a new policy you know nothing about.
But the casinos we are talking about, these casinos always keep their customers on the dark side so that they can withhold the funds of the profitable customers using various excuses from time to time. Therefore, it is the responsibility of the gamblers to read the T&C carefully while registering, and research the reputation of the casino to avoid such problems. .
March 07, 2024, 02:56:39 PM
If you read my previous posts you can see that i don`t afraid KYC. I want to have an opportunity to KYC when the gambler want. If i need money right now and i haven`t KYC yet - it take some money, mostly at least one day. If i can ask KYC myself - i don`t have such problems.
And don`t tell me about ToS. There are always the same thing - "The casino can KYC your any moment" with some small difference in text. I don`t see "The gambler can ask KYC himself" their.
Me too neither but it would be always best that there should be no KYC because this is where we do prefer on since we are dealing with crypto space then everything should really be that anonymous.And don`t tell me about ToS. There are always the same thing - "The casino can KYC your any moment" with some small difference in text. I don`t see "The gambler can ask KYC himself" their.
There should be no asking about those documents and verification.If you have win up a particular big amount and as long it was hit up on a fair way then they should release it right away
wtihout questions asked. Just like on what been mentioned above that since there would really be those expecting changes like regulation then these businesses having
no choice but to comply with those things which it is true that they dont have no choice.
For us users if you dont like KYC then you could be able to skip out and look for another place which we know that we do have tons of sites
on which you can be able to choose upon.
Well, its not something new that there would be casinos or platforms that would alter out their TOS whenever there are some issues been raised but it would really be that completely depending on what
site that you are really dealing off with on which we do know that there are platforms which are honest and there are ones who arent. This is why it would really be always important that you should
really be that dealing up with a legit site and not making yourself that too impulsive on trying out to make deposits in a hurry.
It doesnt hurt nor cost you an arm and leg when it comes to making up some research and trying out to verify on everything before you would be making out such deposit.
March 07, 2024, 04:15:18 AM
If you read my previous posts you can see that i don`t afraid KYC. I want to have an opportunity to KYC when the gambler want. If i need money right now and i haven`t KYC yet - it take some money, mostly at least one day. If i can ask KYC myself - i don`t have such problems.
And don`t tell me about ToS. There are always the same thing - "The casino can KYC your any moment" with some small difference in text. I don`t see "The gambler can ask KYC himself" their.
Me too neither but it would be always best that there should be no KYC because this is where we do prefer on since we are dealing with crypto space then everything should really be that anonymous.And don`t tell me about ToS. There are always the same thing - "The casino can KYC your any moment" with some small difference in text. I don`t see "The gambler can ask KYC himself" their.
There should be no asking about those documents and verification.If you have win up a particular big amount and as long it was hit up on a fair way then they should release it right away
wtihout questions asked. Just like on what been mentioned above that since there would really be those expecting changes like regulation then these businesses having
no choice but to comply with those things which it is true that they dont have no choice.
For us users if you dont like KYC then you could be able to skip out and look for another place which we know that we do have tons of sites
on which you can be able to choose upon.
March 07, 2024, 04:12:01 AM
Are you sure it's not mentioned on their ToS, or you didn't/forgot to read the updated ToS when they required KYC after some time? Because casinos should be transparent with their ToS since it's their defense legally especially when they ban their users. If it's not on their ToS then asked KYC, then again, they deserve negative reputation on any platform as well as negative tag in this forum.
If it's not on their ToS, they can update the TOS since the same TOS allows them to make appropriate modifications and updates whenever necessary. Do you know users who review the terms of use, especially if they use the service without problems?
It has become an open trick: platforms offer users tempting and attractive terms of use during launch. Users use the platform for a relatively long time without problems until they are satisfied with the quality of service. Then suddenly problems begin under the pretext of suspicion of possibly tampering with the system or attempting to deceive. All of them are legitimate arguments, and on the basis of them, the argument can be given for updating the TOS. I am here offering my opinion in general, and I do not have specific information about Bitser’s situation in particular.
I have seen enough, some would give you the clue of the update through summary, some will give you the clue of the part and also give you the opportunity to go straight to the updated part via a link without any stress, but others will just tell you they've updated their terms and condition which will make it so difficult for you to even locate it easily unless you read all parts. The latter style is the worst and any company doing that are not for any good and I try my best to excuse myself from them immediately. If not, it will surprise you that they will point you to a certain term and condition that is alien to you. This is why you would open an account with no-KYC casinos but suddenly because you are good, they would now ask you for the KYC and even point you to the terms and conditions supporting it. Is that not annoying?
legendary
Activity: 2422
Merit: 1083
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
March 07, 2024, 03:39:58 AM
Are you sure it's not mentioned on their ToS, or you didn't/forgot to read the updated ToS when they required KYC after some time? Because casinos should be transparent with their ToS since it's their defense legally especially when they ban their users. If it's not on their ToS then asked KYC, then again, they deserve negative reputation on any platform as well as negative tag in this forum.
If it's not on their ToS, they can update the TOS since the same TOS allows them to make appropriate modifications and updates whenever necessary. Do you know users who review the terms of use, especially if they use the service without problems?
It has become an open trick: platforms offer users tempting and attractive terms of use during launch. Users use the platform for a relatively long time without problems until they are satisfied with the quality of service. Then suddenly problems begin under the pretext of suspicion of possibly tampering with the system or attempting to deceive. All of them are legitimate arguments, and on the basis of them, the argument can be given for updating the TOS. I am here offering my opinion in general, and I do not have specific information about Bitser’s situation in particular.
i do get the logic behind casinos’ ability to change their TOS whenever necessary a new situation may erupt and they are required to create a whole new subsection of their TOS because the situation was not precedented
however i do think some casinos use this too much for their advantages i have seen some players who could withdraw just fine but as soon as they started getting bigger money, the casinos’ tos change and i dont think a casino will change their tos for one person but rather that one person is probably going to be the standard of change as for sure more people are going to be next
What I know casinos do or will do is, incase an issue arises with a player, and the issue is a very serious one and something they possibly failed or forgot to make mention of in their terms of service or condition, they will find a way to resolve such issue amicably with the player, and after the issue has been resolved, they can then proceed to including that in their terms of service so as to avoid future occurrence of same situation.
If a player on more are winning way more than the casino expected or wanted, they can always limit such players rather than editing their terms of service just to hurt this set of players.
But then, like I've said before, I scam casino can still engage in constant update of their terms of service at any time they are trying to scam a player, like we have seen here in the past where a casino while trying to scam a customer, will quietly edit their terms of service to favor them in such situation as they were with the player, so that in the end, other people will blame the player for not first reading the terms of service before engaging the casino in gambling - I can't remember the name of this casino but then, they were later caught and exposed.
March 07, 2024, 03:26:14 AM
Are you sure it's not mentioned on their ToS, or you didn't/forgot to read the updated ToS when they required KYC after some time? Because casinos should be transparent with their ToS since it's their defense legally especially when they ban their users. If it's not on their ToS then asked KYC, then again, they deserve negative reputation on any platform as well as negative tag in this forum.
If it's not on their ToS, they can update the TOS since the same TOS allows them to make appropriate modifications and updates whenever necessary. Do you know users who review the terms of use, especially if they use the service without problems?
It has become an open trick: platforms offer users tempting and attractive terms of use during launch. Users use the platform for a relatively long time without problems until they are satisfied with the quality of service. Then suddenly problems begin under the pretext of suspicion of possibly tampering with the system or attempting to deceive. All of them are legitimate arguments, and on the basis of them, the argument can be given for updating the TOS. I am here offering my opinion in general, and I do not have specific information about Bitser’s situation in particular.
i do get the logic behind casinos’ ability to change their TOS whenever necessary a new situation may erupt and they are required to create a whole new subsection of their TOS because the situation was not precedented
however i do think some casinos use this too much for their advantages i have seen some players who could withdraw just fine but as soon as they started getting bigger money, the casinos’ tos change and i dont think a casino will change their tos for one person but rather that one person is probably going to be the standard of change as for sure more people are going to be next
Jump to: