I hate what people allowed running a business to become. We've allowed them to turn us into slaves drowning in paperwork and red tape.
You should be allowed to run a business whenever and however you want. If the business is inefficient, losing you money, scamming customers, it's all on you. If they come at you with pitchforks, there's nothing anybody can do to defend you.
Clients should demand full transparency from a business and if there's not enough of it, they should go somewhere else. That's how free market should work. Instead the business owner has to treat every customer like a potential criminal and act like the police on behalf of the government. This has to change.
What kind of business transparency can we talk about if the majority of online casino owners are located in Curacao (an offshore zone)?
Bring liability or simply sue an individual/legal entity located 4 thousand kilometers from you and operating in its jurisdiction it's practically impossible.
Because of this KYC verification, many gamblers have to think a lot while selecting a gambling website. There are many gamblers who try to do various illegal activities using gambling websites, due to which other gamblers also have to do KYC verification due to this problem. It is a brutal fact that when a gambler wins huge on a gambling website, that gambling website will try their best to find any excuse to block the withdrawal of that gambler. So a gambler then has nothing to do but wait for the decision of that gambling website, because KYC verification is then forced on those gamblers.
Yes before you choose a casino to play on, you need to have a settlement of mind before you consider them, for instance in making the choice either to do KYC or not and this should be the determinants point of choosing the site.
Casinos have no right to not ask for customer kyc documents since they have to comply with the government rules on anti-money laundering and the rest of the laws attached to the licensing, those that do not want to comply with kyc demands have to look else where fhat doesn't demand kyc such as decentralized casinos.
This is what I'm talking about. As long as the casino is tied to a real place - the place of registration of its operator, unfortunately, there can be no talk of any abolition of KYC/AML. Therefore, questions related to “illegal enrichment/tax concealment” will arise for the owner of such a casino. There is practically no difficulty in implementing all the popular slot machines and poker/roulette on the simplest contracts in any blockchain. This is the level of the first contracts for Solidity in the ETH network and the first “doublers”, and this is 2016.