Pages:
Author

Topic: Chips.gg |🎰 1000+ Slots |🎤 Live Casino |🎲 1% House Edge Dice |🏦 The Vault - page 12. (Read 26639 times)

legendary
Activity: 3500
Merit: 1354

When I read the 220x to beat "the chance is great to beat it" but when I opened the current leaderboard "damn it is already that big to beat" LOL.
The current leader has more than 2000x and someone need to hit at least 888x to be on the 3rd position for the last reward.
I tried this long time ago several times but I had no luck while I was trying to beat the boss (and other bosses)  Grin
sr. member
Activity: 1022
Merit: 393
Underestimate- nothing
I think that stance is quite common, the government likes to throw that statement as far as I'm aware. Can't really blame casinos if they want to implement KYC because of that. I feel like I have had the same discussion in the past about this, feels like deja vu.

Anyway, has anyone answered the Weekly Stream question above? Maybe Chips can answer that?

This is part of the requirements that will be given to permission to run does casino and I won't blame them to if they accept or even agree with the government is not somthing that they can even reject, it is either they agree and continue with business I don't see anything wrong, their are people that don't want to do Kyc but they don't even have a choice.

And the implementation is not new so people are suppose to be use to crypto by now and it is not somthing thay is a big deal, and I don't even know why some people are still complaining about Kyc they should just accept and move on is not as if any casino will leak their data, the Kyc is just for extra measures in case so if it is already part of their police's then accepting will not be an option.
hero member
Activity: 868
Merit: 530
We host multiple events weekly on Discord, with our main attractions being “Beat the Boss” and blackjack streams. Both events feature giveaways and prizes for viewers. In “Beat the Boss,” the host plays games suggested by viewers, aiming for the highest multiplier. The game that ends with the highest multiplier becomes the target event on our site, where participants must try to beat that multiplier.

Our latest being Stack'em with 220x: https://chips.gg/promotions/promotion:I87T8W5PHP5UFK98R0KQ3W

Interesting. Thanks for the information.
This must be a good thing for the community who regularly watch the streams and actively participate in discord server. I am not a discord guy and don't spend time on discord servers. But I will check the events from now on. I have joined the signature campaign for a couple of weeks now. But I haven't logged in to my chips account yet. It seems I forgot which email I have used. I will have to talk to support if they can assist me with the account recovery or if it is okay to create a new account.
copper member
Activity: 136
Merit: 56
The Future Of Cryptocurrency Gambling
I always receive a reminder email from CHIPS, regarding "Weekly Stream".

Anyone in here ever watch them ? did the stream are sharing some code too or not. Like we usually watch in (Stake.com), perhaps someone who having experience watching Weekly Stream from CHIPS GG can making some description for what they did.

I only reading the part, they are sharing the prize to the viewer from Email description. But want to know from steam experience, especially by the user who are watching them during the stream.


Anyway, has anyone answered the Weekly Stream question above? Maybe Chips can answer that?


We host multiple events weekly on Discord, with our main attractions being “Beat the Boss” and blackjack streams. Both events feature giveaways and prizes for viewers. In “Beat the Boss,” the host plays games suggested by viewers, aiming for the highest multiplier. The game that ends with the highest multiplier becomes the target event on our site, where participants must try to beat that multiplier.

Our latest being Stack'em with 220x: https://chips.gg/promotions/promotion:I87T8W5PHP5UFK98R0KQ3W



legendary
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1789
does anyone really think that it is a problem for a gangster to find some documents and pass KYC?
I think that stance is quite common, the government likes to throw that statement as far as I'm aware. Can't really blame casinos if they want to implement KYC because of that. I feel like I have had the same discussion in the past about this, feels like deja vu.

Anyway, has anyone answered the Weekly Stream question above? Maybe Chips can answer that?
hero member
Activity: 2730
Merit: 632
Too many services don't do this kind of gesture nowadays.
Yes, that's the problem.

People hate KYC cause they can delay the withdraw as well, we are allowed for deposit & play without KYC and suddenly getting these after we withdraw bigs. Even, all casino will response (Casino will never block or ask KYC for big withdraw). But, we all know these just can be used for some KYC for delay the transition > hopefully the player using the balance and lose them all.

Kyc it's fine, but they should ask in front.

Due to that situations happen where there are some casinos using this to trap winning gamblers I also think about doing KYC in advance is fine. Since we need to deal with it anyways and better to execute this early so there's no reason for them to use this reason to delay everything especially the withdrawal requested by people.

If the casino want fairness then they should implement this since for sure this matter is actually not a big deal for those people who used to do KYC on reputable online platforms also for sure they would comply on this especially if the casino allow this to happen. I guess there's less people skeptical on this requirements but for sure majority want to do it due to those reason mentioned by people here.
It is really that becoming a norm now on which those old and known casinos into this market had already making up some transitioned that on the moment that you do make out some registration then they would really be asking out some KYC. Just like on Stake or Roobet but Stake is much more strict since you would really be needing up to give out more information and verification.

Most of us would really be still that trying out to prefer on having those platforms on which doesnt ask out some KYC but if they were really that trying out to ask out on the moment that you do win up some significant amount then its better that you have done it earlier but who knows? right for us to win up something big?. This is why some people would really be that skeptical when it comes to verification procedures
because they cant be sure whether they win up something big or not. We do much prefer on staying up anonymous as possibly as we could.
hero member
Activity: 868
Merit: 530
Although cryptocurrencies were founded on sovereignty and decentralization, casinos are required to comply with license requirements. All casinos displaying a seal from any of the regulators are required to follow KYC and AML procedures and reporting requirements. The content providers we all enjoy will not allow activation of games or worse they may remove content from the casino altogether if the company fails to comply. These policies exist to combat fraud, crime, underage gambling, responsible gaming, and/or gameplay from restricted regions. KYC is a necessary part of doing business in regulated markets and brings strong legitimacy to online casinos overall. As an example, if a player is allowed to play from a restricted region or the platform has been used to facilitate crime, the casino may be held responsible for this and be required to endure expensive legal litigation to find resolution.

Your explanation makes sense. Actually, I have nothing against KYC. But I guess you know that not everyone likes KYC. So, respecting privacy, some casinos do not require KYC upon registration. Players are only required to do KYC if they reach certain limits. For example, I have seen casinos that require their customers to do KYC only when their winnings reach a thousand dollars.

The casino industry is getting bigger every day, and there are more regulations as well. Anyway, I know that casinos that provide games from third-party game providers have to have a license, follow the guides, and collect KYC from the players.
legendary
Activity: 2758
Merit: 1228
Too many services don't do this kind of gesture nowadays.
Yes, that's the problem.

People hate KYC cause they can delay the withdraw as well, we are allowed for deposit & play without KYC and suddenly getting these after we withdraw bigs. Even, all casino will response (Casino will never block or ask KYC for big withdraw). But, we all know these just can be used for some KYC for delay the transition > hopefully the player using the balance and lose them all.

Kyc it's fine, but they should ask in front.

Due to that situations happen where there are some casinos using this to trap winning gamblers I also think about doing KYC in advance is fine. Since we need to deal with it anyways and better to execute this early so there's no reason for them to use this reason to delay everything especially the withdrawal requested by people.

If the casino want fairness then they should implement this since for sure this matter is actually not a big deal for those people who used to do KYC on reputable online platforms also for sure they would comply on this especially if the casino allow this to happen. I guess there's less people skeptical on this requirements but for sure majority want to do it due to those reason mentioned by people here.
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1191
kYC was a big problem at one time; I believe that there were more gamblers before against it than now. More gamblers now understand why KYC is important.

I still don't think KYC is important, I don't like the idea of ​​sharing my private information with just about every casino licensed on some island. But crypto casinos are growing and expanding markets, so they have to comply with various laws and introduce mandatory KYC if they want to operate globally. That's why I don't think more and more people understand the importance of KYC, we're just getting used to the new situation where more and more casinos are introducing that rule...

Any casino not requiring any form of KYC will be a tool for criminals to launder money...

This is political propaganda... does anyone really think that it is a problem for a gangster to find some documents and pass KYC? You go through some poor neighborhood and for 20-30 dollars you will find a bunch of them who will do it for you. And with wagering requirements for any deposit, why would anyone bother and risk laundering some money?
legendary
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1262
Too many services don't do this kind of gesture nowadays.
Yes, that's the problem.

People hate KYC cause they can delay the withdraw as well, we are allowed for deposit & play without KYC and suddenly getting these after we withdraw bigs. Even, all casino will response (Casino will never block or ask KYC for big withdraw). But, we all know these just can be used for some KYC for delay the transition > hopefully the player using the balance and lose them all.

Kyc it's fine, but they should ask in front.
legendary
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1789
So, a pops up for KYC after register before player deposit & play will be always solution. Even we all know these scheme will making a new member stay away from there, but mad respect for casino are doing these in the front.
Agreed. I believe Chips does the same although some users complained that the pop-up didn't show up a few pages ago if I remember correctly. Hopefully, there will be more notice so that even if the user disables JavaScript or other necessary stuff to show the pop-up they'll still get notified anyway. Too many services don't do this kind of gesture nowadays.
copper member
Activity: 136
Merit: 56
The Future Of Cryptocurrency Gambling
KYC is a mandatory thing for businesses related to finance. But when it comes to crypto business, people have some arguments. Crypto users are supposed to stay anonymous. Crypto is your own bank and helps you stay anonymous with your money; nobody knows how much money you have. But you are no longer anonymous when you do your KYC on several platforms where you keep your Bitcoin or altcoin.

Kyc is not really a bad thing when it comes to gambling even if is not everyone that actually likes it, only when it comes to cryptocurrency that I know it most hated their people that prefer using decentralized exchanges than the once that are centralized just because of the Kyc. Every crypto user will want to protect their currency by all means. The fact that no bother should know anything about your crypto account and many more is what makes it very interesting. If it's gambling I don't think I have issues with Kyc since it's a game and what everyone will actually enjoy and expect something in return.

Quote
This is the reason crypto users prefer KYC-free casinos. But then people are taking more risks playing on unregulated casinos where they have a chance to get scammed. The argument could be, that the license provider never helps the players to get their funds back. I agree with that.

Everyone as a reason for what they like and what they don't like and Kyc is a policy that most of this companies take seriously it's like an act that they won't have a choice but to follow in case. And if they decide that they want to play in an unregulated casinos they should go ahead and they will have to dance to the music of their own action.

Although cryptocurrencies were founded on sovereignty and decentralization, casinos are required to comply with license requirements. All casinos displaying a seal from any of the regulators are required to follow KYC and AML procedures and reporting requirements. The content providers we all enjoy will not allow activation of games or worse they may remove content from the casino altogether if the company fails to comply. These policies exist to combat fraud, crime, underage gambling, responsible gaming, and/or gameplay from restricted regions. KYC is a necessary part of doing business in regulated markets and brings strong legitimacy to online casinos overall. As an example, if a player is allowed to play from a restricted region or the platform has been used to facilitate crime, the casino may be held responsible for this and be required to endure expensive legal litigation to find resolution.
sr. member
Activity: 1022
Merit: 393
Underestimate- nothing
KYC is a mandatory thing for businesses related to finance. But when it comes to crypto business, people have some arguments. Crypto users are supposed to stay anonymous. Crypto is your own bank and helps you stay anonymous with your money; nobody knows how much money you have. But you are no longer anonymous when you do your KYC on several platforms where you keep your Bitcoin or altcoin.

Kyc is not really a bad thing when it comes to gambling even if is not everyone that actually likes it, only when it comes to cryptocurrency that I know it most hated their people that prefer using decentralized exchanges than the once that are centralized just because of the Kyc. Every crypto user will want to protect their currency by all means. The fact that no bother should know anything about your crypto account and many more is what makes it very interesting. If it's gambling I don't think I have issues with Kyc since it's a game and what everyone will actually enjoy and expect something in return.

Quote
This is the reason crypto users prefer KYC-free casinos. But then people are taking more risks playing on unregulated casinos where they have a chance to get scammed. The argument could be, that the license provider never helps the players to get their funds back. I agree with that.

Everyone as a reason for what they like and what they don't like and Kyc is a policy that most of this companies take seriously it's like an act that they won't have a choice but to follow in case. And if they decide that they want to play in an unregulated casinos they should go ahead and they will have to dance to the music of their own action.
legendary
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1262
I'd love to see a detailed research on this. I know the value of such research is probably small but it will be interesting to read. We can run a poll on this forum if we have the time, although the result is probably biased anyway.
You can right now ~XD

TBH, I think everyone are mostly not having a problem for KYC with condition (Casino ask these in the front). So, they taken serious for KYC and asking in the front to avoided people who doesn't like (KYC) are playing or deposit. I more respect, If casino do these since mostly people are not gonna to read the term & condition cause TLTR (to long to read).

So, a pops up for KYC after register before player deposit & play will be always solution. Even we all know these scheme will making a new member stay away from there, but mad respect for casino are doing these in the front.
copper member
Activity: 136
Merit: 56
The Future Of Cryptocurrency Gambling
Why KYC is extremely dangerous – and useless but many times people want to use a service, they have to do KYC. Business platforms will not ask KYC on customers if they don't have to do it by pressure from governments
KYC is a mandatory thing for businesses related to finance. But when it comes to crypto business, people have some arguments. Crypto users are supposed to stay anonymous. Crypto is your own bank and helps you stay anonymous with your money; nobody knows how much money you have. But you are no longer anonymous when you do your KYC on several platforms where you keep your Bitcoin or altcoin.

This is the reason crypto users prefer KYC-free casinos. But then people are taking more risks playing on unregulated casinos where they have a chance to get scammed. The argument could be, that the license provider never helps the players to get their funds back. I agree with that.


At Chips.gg, we understand the concerns regarding KYC and anonymity in the crypto space. While KYC is necessary to comply with regulatory requirements and maintain a secure environment, we also recognize the preference of many crypto users for anonymity. Our goal is to strike a balance between meeting legal obligations and protecting user privacy.
hero member
Activity: 868
Merit: 530
Why KYC is extremely dangerous – and useless but many times people want to use a service, they have to do KYC. Business platforms will not ask KYC on customers if they don't have to do it by pressure from governments
KYC is a mandatory thing for businesses related to finance. But when it comes to crypto business, people have some arguments. Crypto users are supposed to stay anonymous. Crypto is your own bank and helps you stay anonymous with your money; nobody knows how much money you have. But you are no longer anonymous when you do your KYC on several platforms where you keep your Bitcoin or altcoin.

This is the reason crypto users prefer KYC-free casinos. But then people are taking more risks playing on unregulated casinos where they have a chance to get scammed. The argument could be, that the license provider never helps the players to get their funds back. I agree with that.
legendary
Activity: 2044
Merit: 1018
I believe there is nothing without risk in this world. It's always a trade-off between what you can accept to lose and what you want to gain. Free lunch is nonexistent.
There is no free lunch and there is nothing with zero risk in the world including cryptocurrency market for investment or trading.

Bitcoin has smallest risk compares to all altcoins but it has risk too, it's wrong to say there is zero risk with Bitcoin. With anything, when black swan event occurs, things will collapse quickly and very terribly. So either investment or trading with Bitcoin, make sure to have plan B and have your stop loss order set up for your trading position and have plan B for your investment, exit as well.

Bitcoin investment theses.
Bitcoin & Intrinsic value.

Why KYC is extremely dangerous – and useless but many times people want to use a service, they have to do KYC. Business platforms will not ask KYC on customers if they don't have to do it by pressure from governments.
legendary
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1789
These types of casinos are the final destination for people who care about their privacy. But still, there are some risks. If they ever hit a big multiplier and then want to withdraw their big wins, they will have to complete the KYC or leave their winnings.
I believe there is nothing without risk in this world. It's always a trade-off between what you can accept to lose and what you want to gain. Free lunch is nonexistent.

We all know, everyone who are playing casino in online with cryptocurrency want the privacy without any (KYC). We doing the KYC just because is being asked or mostly people who are chasing rewards (example, like stake did forcing user KYC and giving user 50 or 250$ depends on the rank).
I'd love to see a detailed research on this. I know the value of such research is probably small but it will be interesting to read. We can run a poll on this forum if we have the time, although the result is probably biased anyway.

When you mention identity theft, I don't know how that come into play in this case or you are suggesting that people could perform KYC with the documents of others?
I believe he mainly refers to fraud when talking about why KYC is important. I can see this if we view this from the POV of the casino. But yeah, there are a lot of cases where documents get faked and a business approves a fake identity verification.
legendary
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1262
kYC was a big problem at one time; I believe that there were more gamblers before against it than now. More gamblers now understand why KYC is important.
Is there a survey or research about this? I'm not sure about the exact numbers, but even if the majority of people don't mind KYC I believe it's a good choice to attract a niche demographic especially when the cost to do so isn't that big.
I don't think he have the survey or number.

It's just always based of his opinion, with the signature. We all know, everyone who are playing casino in online with cryptocurrency want the privacy without any (KYC). We doing the KYC just because is being asked or mostly people who are chasing rewards (example, like stake did forcing user KYC and giving user 50 or 250$ depends on the rank).


Even he making a pools in here, comparison playing casino on KYC or without KYC. The pools without KYC are gonna to mostly win, we doing KYC just because we don't have a choice.
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 603
Strengthening our verification process is key to preventing fraud while respecting the privacy concerns of our community. We remain committed to enhancing the user experience and ensuring trust.​
Due to the increased cases of fraud and identity theft, many gamblers understand why there is a KYC requirement in most casinos and why some casinos, serious about their business, are strengthening their KYC verification process. TBH, I will even be reluctant to gamble and refer any other gambler to gamble in a casino that I find not demanding any form of KYC verification. It is like a red flag.

With the commitment that Chips.gg have towards strengthening their KYC process, it will be hard for it to be considered for fraud by criminals. and that is good for gamblers.
I have created account in the platform and I did not see anything different from the basic KYC that other casinos require. Could it be that I'm missing something? When you mention identity theft, I don't know how that come into play in this case or you are suggesting that people could perform KYC with the documents of others? Most people that don't like performing KYC are even because of the safety of their document such as it being stolen or sold by the platform where they submitted them.
Pages:
Jump to: