Pages:
Author

Topic: Claymore XPM GPU Miner discussion - page 22. (Read 142114 times)

legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
May 08, 2014, 05:55:21 AM
Quote
You are looking for conspiracy where likely there is none. The guy gets % from mining revenue - he has no incentive to slow things down. It's not like he is charging for updates.
And what's wrong with anouncing next release he is testing probably now?

Nah .. if everything is so straight-forward and clear in this world, there wouldn't be conspiracies, scams, etc right?

Just imagine .. having the cake and eating it at the same time: charges ppl for weak miner while mine for himself using the fastest miner. not to mention regular updates keep ppl interested and generate more ppl for his revenue. At some point in time, the dev fee is going to exceed those he gained from his own mining. but overall, win-win.
actually this was a month ago, when the first gpu miner got released.
that's clearly the only reason to wait for 10.5 diff to release them. It just means it wasn't profitable for them to mine on their own.
(or at least to primegpu... but since primegpu was kind of greedy. he showed to others they could also make a lot releasing their own miners)

All this is really bad for the coin itself (but who cares actually) as it will certainly be the reason why it will never get the success bitcoin has.
(full acceptance of a 10% fee coins will hopefully never happened... for that matter any fiat currency "driven by corrupt bankers" (lol) is still better)
sr. member
Activity: 249
Merit: 250
May 08, 2014, 05:43:26 AM
Quote
You are looking for conspiracy where likely there is none. The guy gets % from mining revenue - he has no incentive to slow things down. It's not like he is charging for updates.
And what's wrong with anouncing next release he is testing probably now?

Nah .. if everything is so straight-forward and clear in this world, there wouldn't be conspiracies, scams, etc right?

Just imagine .. having the cake and eating it at the same time: charges ppl for weak miner while mine for himself using the fastest miner. not to mention regular updates keep ppl interested and generate more ppl for his revenue. At some point in time, the dev fee is going to exceed those he gained from his own mining. but overall, win-win.

Now .. I am not saying this is true, I have no proof. I do not dismiss this possibility since there is nothing to lose for him.

As for your last point .. There is nothing wrong.

newbie
Activity: 53
Merit: 0
May 08, 2014, 03:43:29 AM
I have 10 x grid Core 2 duo + 5 cards 795 or 5 cards 270x.
With CPU core 2 duo speed for 5 cards is very slow.
But with Celeron G Generation 2, 3 is good speed for 6 cards.
Claymore, please review and optimize this case for next version.
Thanks very much.

What about "-ss 2" option? Is it not enough?

I'm using -ss 2, if <3 card it's ok but 5 cards slower, can I use other option?
I think core2duo too slow. I use -ss 2 -t 8 for 2*280x on core2duo
but Athlone 2 270x handle 6*280x

I know core 2 duo too slow, so I ask Claymore for optimize it because I have 10 x grid [core2duo, 4G RAM, 5 X 270) Sad
legendary
Activity: 1001
Merit: 1005
May 08, 2014, 03:39:24 AM
I have 10 x grid Core 2 duo + 5 cards 795 or 5 cards 270x.
With CPU core 2 duo speed for 5 cards is very slow.
But with Celeron G Generation 2, 3 is good speed for 6 cards.
Claymore, please review and optimize this case for next version.
Thanks very much.

What about "-ss 2" option? Is it not enough?

I'm using -ss 2, if <3 card it's ok but 5 cards slower, can I use other option?
I think core2duo too slow. I use -ss 2 -t 8 for 2*280x on core2duo
but Athlone 2 270x handle 6*280x
newbie
Activity: 53
Merit: 0
May 08, 2014, 03:15:13 AM
I have 10 x grid Core 2 duo + 5 cards 795 or 5 cards 270x.
With CPU core 2 duo speed for 5 cards is very slow.
But with Celeron G Generation 2, 3 is good speed for 6 cards.
Claymore, please review and optimize this case for next version.
Thanks very much.

What about "-ss 2" option? Is it not enough?

I'm using -ss 2, if <3 card it's ok but 5 cards slower, can I use other option?
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
May 08, 2014, 02:55:54 AM
i have found a 11 ch and get this

═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
05/08/14-10:25:33 - BLOCK FOUND! - (Th#: 3) - DIFF:11.755423 - TYPE:1
Coin client rejected block Sad
res type: 2

but my block doesnt count
 why is that?

Do you use v7.0?
yes and its solo
full member
Activity: 348
Merit: 102
May 08, 2014, 02:54:55 AM
i have found a 11 ch and get this

═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
05/08/14-10:25:33 - BLOCK FOUND! - (Th#: 3) - DIFF:11.755423 - TYPE:1
Coin client rejected block Sad
res type: 2

but my block doesnt count
 why is that?

It's okay =)
donator
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
May 08, 2014, 02:52:36 AM
i have found a 11 ch and get this

═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
05/08/14-10:25:33 - BLOCK FOUND! - (Th#: 3) - DIFF:11.755423 - TYPE:1
Coin client rejected block Sad
res type: 2

but my block doesnt count
 why is that?

Do you use v7.0?
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
May 08, 2014, 02:47:19 AM
i have found a 11 ch and get this

═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
05/08/14-10:25:33 - BLOCK FOUND! - (Th#: 3) - DIFF:11.755423 - TYPE:1
Coin client rejected block Sad
res type: 2

but my block doesnt count
 why is that?
donator
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
May 08, 2014, 01:08:17 AM
I have 10 x grid Core 2 duo + 5 cards 795 or 5 cards 270x.
With CPU core 2 duo speed for 5 cards is very slow.
But with Celeron G Generation 2, 3 is good speed for 6 cards.
Claymore, please review and optimize this case for next version.
Thanks very much.

What about "-ss 2" option? Is it not enough?
newbie
Activity: 53
Merit: 0
May 07, 2014, 11:40:35 PM
I have 10 x grid Core 2 duo + 5 cards 795 or 5 cards 270x.
With CPU core 2 duo speed for 5 cards is very slow.
But with Celeron G Generation 2, 3 is good speed for 6 cards.
Claymore, please review and optimize this case for next version.
Thanks very much.
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
May 07, 2014, 04:17:01 PM
great!)
donator
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
May 07, 2014, 04:10:44 PM
Announcement: within 1-3 days I will release new version with about x1.5 speedup for all cards. Be ready Smiley


what about power consumstion?its still the same?or become as script?

It will be the same.
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
May 07, 2014, 04:08:50 PM
Announcement: within 1-3 days I will release new version with about x1.5 speedup for all cards. Be ready Smiley


what about power consumstion?its still the same?or become as script?
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
May 07, 2014, 04:02:56 PM
Announcement: within 1-3 days I will release new version with about x1.5 speedup for all cards. Be ready Smiley

this is some very good news!
full member
Activity: 348
Merit: 102
May 07, 2014, 03:40:41 PM

i am getting 98% GPU usage when solo mining is this normal? should it be 99%?
How mining solo? Pls write me sittings

is this normal?

There are written, that the client has been found.
Correct your settings:

primecoin.conf
________________
rpcuser=111
rpcpassword=222
rpcallowip=*.*.*.*
rpcport=7332
server=1

.bat
NsXpmMiner.exe -o 127.0.0.1:7332 -u 111 -p 222 -xpm APeYiUi***********C2nMc89 -di 0 -ss 2 -t 8

donator
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
May 07, 2014, 03:15:09 PM
Announcement: within 1-3 days I will release new version with about x1.5 speedup for all cards. Be ready Smiley
newbie
Activity: 54
Merit: 0
May 07, 2014, 03:06:25 PM

i am getting 98% GPU usage when solo mining is this normal? should it be 99%?
How mining solo? Pls write me sittings

is this normal?
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
May 07, 2014, 02:46:14 PM

i am getting 98% GPU usage when solo mining is this normal? should it be 99%?
member
Activity: 92
Merit: 10
May 07, 2014, 02:35:20 PM

Next version will be a major update with much better mining speed.

I don't use it but why not just update to the fastest already.

Getting harder to believe the algo/method can be tweaked multiple times with improvements.. Starting to be like intentionally weakened releases.



You are looking for conspiracy where likely there is none. The guy gets % from mining revenue - he has no incentive to slow things down. It's not like he is charging for updates.
And what's wrong with anouncing next release he is testing probably now?
Pages:
Jump to: