Claymore's CryptoNote AMD GPU Miner v11.3 - page 134.

Cubirez

full member

Activity: 185

Merit: 100

Quote from: bitkachu on February 07, 2017, 04:19:48 AM

My current hashrate is approximately 2.6kh total using claymore
Based on calculator, i should be getting 0.293 XMR per day
But in my minergate account theres only 0.198

Factor in the consideration of Dev fee 2.5% + pool fee 1%
there is a deviation of approximate 40%...
Can anyone shed a light on this?

Do you have unconfirmed/pending payments form minergate?
What is your rate of rejected shares?
Was minergate up all the time?

Maybe it's some very bad luck (I don't use minergate but most of the pools have some tool for monitoring the pool luck). But 40% seems like a lot for such a big pool.

bitkachu

newbie

Activity: 10

Merit: 0

My current hashrate is approximately 2.6kh total using claymore
Based on calculator, i should be getting 0.293 XMR per day
But in my minergate account theres only 0.198

Factor in the consideration of Dev fee 2.5% + pool fee 1%
there is a deviation of approximate 40%...
Can anyone shed a light on this?

Cubirez

full member

Activity: 185

Merit: 100

Quote from: almirfiorio on February 06, 2017, 01:10:45 PM

Dear bitkachu

How did you get 1136 h / s with just one video card?

I have a rx-470 and I only do 690. how im Can do it?

Quote from: bitkachu on February 05, 2017, 03:42:09 PM

for single card (my other rig) its up to 1.2k hash rate...
it almost doubled. too good to be true?

Read carefuly, he said a few post above that most of the shares were stales, making his 1100H/s not effective at all.

You can increase your hashrate a bit by overclocking the memory and modifying your bios.
Simple copy of your 1500 mem strap on the 1625/1750/2000 mem straps should increase your hashrate a bit.
If you want a bigger increase of your hashrate (up to 900 as xneoenx pointed out), you need custom mem strap which are much more complicated to figure out. As far as i know, these aren't being shared for free atm.

almirfiorio

sr. member

Activity: 312

Merit: 250

Dear bitkachu

How did you get 1136 h / s with just one video card?

I have a rx-470 and I only do 690. how im Can do it?

Quote from: bitkachu on February 05, 2017, 03:42:09 PM

for single card (my other rig) its up to 1.2k hash rate...
it almost doubled. too good to be true?

almirfiorio

sr. member

Activity: 312

Merit: 250

Im have same error
how im can fix this ?

Quote from: exortis on February 04, 2017, 03:33:57 PM

xneoenx

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

Quote from: equipoise on February 05, 2017, 06:35:20 PM

Dare to share your options?

Custom timings should get you to 900 h/s per card depending on RAM, Hynix is best. Stable / low powered / and Share accepted rates.

bitkachu

newbie

Activity: 10

Merit: 0

Apparently the number is a lie. This morning when I wake up I have tons of negative shares and I have huge amount negative unconfirmed balance

equipoise

hero member

Activity: 794

Merit: 1000

Monero (XMR) - secure, private, untraceable

Quote from: bitkachu on February 05, 2017, 03:42:09 PM

for single card (my other rig) its up to 1.2k hash rate...
it almost doubled. too good to be true?

Dare to share your options?

deadsix

hero member

Activity: 751

Merit: 517

Fail to plan, and you plan to fail.

Low Power settings for Sapphire RX 470 4G Hynix - 700+ per card : 1100/1750 @ 890/890 and ~95W from the wall ( can go lower on mv's, experiment )
Custom Bios/Mem Straps, talk to Wolf0 for more details

bitkachu

newbie

Activity: 10

Merit: 0

for single card (my other rig) its up to 1.2k hash rate...
it almost doubled. too good to be true?

http://i.hizliresim.com/41BRpA.png

bitkachu

newbie

Activity: 10

Merit: 0

Interesting...

By modifying some settings my hash rate increased from 690 to 999!
300 h/s increase EACH CARD!
Will monitor one day to see whether its stable or not
So far minergate reflecting actual hashrate too!

PS: I'm using SAPPHIRE RX470 8GB OC

Radjs

newbie

Activity: 1

Merit: 0

Hi all,

"FAQ
Monero payout thresholds:
after authorization you also can change the threshold for wallets (both for personal and exchange ones): 10, 5, 2, 1, 0.5, 0.2 and 0.1 XMR

you also can request an immediate withdrawal every time. It is independent of autopayout, but the amount should be more than 0.1 XMR "

How to do it? Huh

exortis

sr. member

Activity: 322

Merit: 250

ccccccc7

full member

Activity: 223

Merit: 100

Quote from: Ursul0 on February 04, 2017, 11:21:57 AM

Quote from: bitkachu on February 04, 2017, 10:56:54 AM

Hi all,

I have 2 rigs for testing.
First with just single SAPPHIRE RX470 8GB, second with two SAPPHIRE RX470 8GB
Heres the weird part... I used 60 minutes as a scale to test

First Rig:
Speed: 690 h/s, Total Shares: 394, Rejected 0, Mining time: 01:00

Second Rig:
Speed: 1378 h/s, Total Shares: 397, Rejected 0, Mining time: 01:00

Is this behavior normal? Both number of total shares are almost the same

proper vardiff maybe.
what's your pool/port?

Indeed vardiff. Shares a made up of hashes and not all shares are equal!

Rig 1

Target 6156 - (6156 * 394) = 2425464

Rig 2

Target 12121 - (12121 * 394) = 4775674

Ursul0

sr. member

Activity: 857

Merit: 262

Quote from: bitkachu on February 04, 2017, 10:56:54 AM

Hi all,

I have 2 rigs for testing.
First with just single SAPPHIRE RX470 8GB, second with two SAPPHIRE RX470 8GB
Heres the weird part... I used 60 minutes as a scale to test

First Rig:
Speed: 690 h/s, Total Shares: 394, Rejected 0, Mining time: 01:00

Second Rig:
Speed: 1378 h/s, Total Shares: 397, Rejected 0, Mining time: 01:00

Is this behavior normal? Both number of total shares are almost the same

proper vardiff maybe.
what's your pool/port?

ccccccc7

full member

Activity: 223

Merit: 100

Quote from: ?? on ??

Can anyone care to explain the terms SHARE FOUND (target 6156) vs SHARE FOUND (target 12121)?
Target 6156 is from single GPU rig whereas Target 12121 is from dual GPU rig

My guess would be target=difficulties?
If my guess is correct.. then it would explain why the total shares found for both single GPU and dual GPU rig is almost the same

As I understand it, share size or target size defines the target amount of hashes in a share and the lowest number of hashes the pool will accept.

The larger share target on your dual GPU system is because most pools as using variable difficulty (vardiff) by default which increases the share/target size when higher hashrates are detected.

This is done to reduce network load - the pool receives the same total number of hashes but in a more efficient way.

I do not like vardiff and I recommend to set static difficulty where possible

bitkachu

newbie

Activity: 10

Merit: 0

Hi all,

I have 2 rigs for testing.
First with just single SAPPHIRE RX470 8GB, second with two SAPPHIRE RX470 8GB
Heres the weird part... I used 60 minutes as a scale to test

First Rig:
Speed: 690 h/s, Total Shares: 394, Rejected 0, Mining time: 01:00

Second Rig:
Speed: 1378 h/s, Total Shares: 397, Rejected 0, Mining time: 01:00

Is this behavior normal? Both number of total shares are almost the same

wacko

legendary

Activity: 1106

Merit: 1014

Quote from: jesup on February 04, 2017, 07:54:57 AM

So, the question is why gtx 1070 sux that much compared to the 6 years old HD6970?

I think the reason is that no one really worked hard on a cryptonight miner that is efficient with nvidia Pascal cards. It's not that nvidia sucks at XMR in general, GTX 750 Ti for example were pretty good at it (and might actually be a better purchase than HD6970 if power consumption matters).
P.S. I've just sent you a PM about CPU mining (since it's offtopic here).

jesup

newbie

Activity: 2

Merit: 0

Hello. I'm using 3 miners for XMR:

Claymore's CryptoNote GPU miner 9.7 on ref. radeon 6970 2gb.
Claymore's CPU miner (set 6 threads) on 6C-12T Xeon X5650 @ 4GHz, tripple channel DDR3-1809 10-12-12-28-1T, 3.5Ghz Northbridge
and the last one is tsiv cuda miner on Palit JetStream GTX 1070

The first gives about 400 H/s, the second 260 H/s and the last one shows about a 430 H/s. So, the question is why gtx 1070 sux that much compared to the 6 years old HD6970? At the same time CPU works too well compared to GPU-s. This way used 6970 looks like a nice choice in case of free energy.

Termie

sr. member

Activity: 642

Merit: 292

Quote from: ginmac on February 04, 2017, 04:40:34 AM

Hi, what settings for Dwarfpool - vardiff? I still only fixed 10000 (port: 8050).

There are no diff setting for Dwarfpool. All ports working with fixed 10000 there, for whatever reason.

Topic: Claymore's CryptoNote AMD GPU Miner v11.3 - page 134. (Read 2145056 times)