Claymore's CryptoNote AMD GPU Miner v11.3 - page 60.

iwazamurai

newbie

Activity: 9

Merit: 0

Quote from: ser_ator on December 19, 2017, 07:06:26 AM

Quote from: iwazamurai on December 18, 2017, 08:37:30 PM

RX470

v10.2 - 530 H/s
v11 - 330 H/s

wait for the next version.

1.
lads who have lower hash with v11 :

play with -h , -h is to high.you need to find again sweetspot ... downgrade -h +/- 512 with 4 gb card -dmem 1

2. with 7950 280 card still very high incorect gpu sharre (over 15-20%)

the rest have very low percent & all in gpu 0

thanks for your advice about RX470.
But it never goes beyond v10.2. I tried with "-h" from 510 to 515 and around 900. I didn't set "- dmem 1" since default is 1.
The bios is without mod, and I have no intent to apply mod to the bios, so I stick to v10.2

ser_ator

newbie

Activity: 19

Merit: 0

Quote from: infojunkiePHD on December 18, 2017, 03:46:12 PM

Quote from: garytheasshole on December 18, 2017, 03:27:17 PM

It's not that bad, it's doing about 400ish with xmr-stak and its rather cheap and easy to find.

Really? What cards are doing 400? my 560s are doing 450, so with the reduced cost and wattage I'd be very very interested.

450? nice ..

mine only 340h/s Sad

with 992/8

ser_ator

newbie

Activity: 19

Merit: 0

Quote from: iwazamurai on December 18, 2017, 08:37:30 PM

RX470

v10.2 - 530 H/s
v11 - 330 H/s

wait for the next version.

1.
lads who have lower hash with v11 :

play with -h , -h is to high.you need to find again sweetspot ... downgrade -h +/- 512 with 4 gb card -dmem 1

2. with 7950 280 card still very high incorect gpu sharre (over 15-20%)

the rest have very low percent & all in gpu 0

onionpealer

jr. member

Activity: 238

Merit: 1

Quote from: Infpwnz on December 19, 2017, 12:22:55 AM

Can someone who's mining Electroneum on MiningPoolHub paste their start.bat here please?

Here is my Claymore Cryptonote miner configuration for MPH. I found that adding '-mport 0' oddly helped give less rejected shares.
I'm using Claymore's Cryptonote miner for mining Electronium just now as I'm having a bit of a stability problem with SGminer-GM on this machine.

Code:

setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 1
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100

NsGpuCNMiner -xpool ssl://europe.cryptonight-hub.miningpoolhub.com:20596 -xwal USER.WORKER -xpsw x -nofee 1 -allpools 1 -ftime 10 -mport 0

restless

legendary

Activity: 1151

Merit: 1001

Quote from: infojunkiePHD on December 18, 2017, 02:51:09 PM

My experience is the same as restless. On my two gigabyte 270OC, 9.7 is still the best.

11.0
-h 448 -dmem 1 (11.0 default) - OpenCL hang.
-h 512 -dmem 0 - 840h/s
-h 256 -dmem 1 - 810h/s

9.7
-h 512 (default) - 855-860h/s

You get 800h/s from 270 oc-ed ?! What clocks ?! Frankly I don't believe it
I get 480-500 from 270x running 1100/1500...

I also get hangs sometimes with 270x and 11.0 - when the card is main one running the display under Win10. Same card under Win7 runs fine 0-o

restless

legendary

Activity: 1151

Merit: 1001

Quote from: entryboy on December 18, 2017, 07:39:19 PM

WOW,

the 11.st version have only the half performance as 10.2 .

My setting(W7 pro latest driver 17.12.1):

4x fiji (2x Radeon pro duo)

-xpool ssl://xmr-eu1.nanopool.org:14433
-xwal my_long_number
-xpsw my_password
-tt 60,60,60,60
-powlim -21,-21,-21,-21
-h 960,960,960,960
-allpools 1

sorry 11.0 -> 10.2 is better (4x 860 h/s @ 730W)

Remove your -h setting. New version uses different memory access and optimal -h is different

SnOOpeRa

newbie

Activity: 20

Merit: 0

Ver 11 is a nice improvement over 10.2 , rx 470 4gb 1170/2000/875 was 845h/s in 10.2 ver. , in ver. 11 is 920h/s same settings, as much as sgminer and gatelessgate 896/8/2 , so a very good update.

Infpwnz

newbie

Activity: 20

Merit: 0

Can someone who's mining Electroneum on MiningPoolHub paste their start.bat here please?

ajw7779

member

Activity: 103

Merit: 10

290 flash mod to 290x

10.2 --> 790h/s
11.0 --> 810h/s

so unlike most other users 11 is better for me it seems

iwazamurai

newbie

Activity: 9

Merit: 0

RX470

v10.2 - 530 H/s
v11 - 330 H/s

wait for the next version.

entryboy

newbie

Activity: 44

Merit: 0

WOW,

the 11.st version have only the half performance as 10.2 .

My setting(W7 pro latest driver 17.12.1):

4x fiji (2x Radeon pro duo)

-xpool ssl://xmr-eu1.nanopool.org:14433
-xwal my_long_number
-xpsw my_password
-tt 60,60,60,60
-powlim -21,-21,-21,-21
-h 960,960,960,960
-allpools 1

sorry 11.0 -> 10.2 is better (4x 860 h/s @ 730W)

Xlii

newbie

Activity: 10

Merit: 0

Hi, i am getting
Error: GPUMiner k1a failed -4
i m using RX vega 64

Ver11.0

what can i do?

Pinocchio

newbie

Activity: 36

Merit: 0

Quote from: infojunkiePHD

My experience is the same as restless. On my two gigabyte 270OC, 9.7 is still the best.

11.0
-h 448 -dmem 1 (11.0 default) - OpenCL hang.
-h 512 -dmem 0 - 840h/s
-h 256 -dmem 1 - 810h/s

9.7
-h 512 (default) - 855-860h/s

Similar with me. I have an R9 Nano 4GB, Win 7 x64 OS, 17.12.1 Adrenaline drivers...

V10.2 = 865H/s
V10.2 -h 920 = 875H/s
V11 = 465H/s (dmem autoselection reports 1)
V11 -dmem 0 = 815H/s (uses less than 2GB of VRAM)
V11 -dmem 0 -h 990 = 865H/s (uses around 2.1GB of VRAM, any other -h value reports a lower hash rate)

Weird. Back to v10.2 for the time being, I guess...

Skol600ml

full member

Activity: 158

Merit: 100

Way better.

6 RX 580

+2,4 % more hash, no invalids so far (i got some with 10.2) and less to no fluctuation.

-h on new default (1152 if not mistaken) instead 1800

I got no crash with 10.2, so i can't say about that.

rascabily

sr. member

Activity: 379

Merit: 250

I have not taken almost anything extra power but what if I have been a very good stabilized. with 10.2 or mine all was error was only with 9.7 now perfect.
Thank you.

GrayCatt

newbie

Activity: 27

Merit: 0

Quote from: infojunkiePHD on December 18, 2017, 04:37:22 PM

Quote from: GrayCatt on December 18, 2017, 04:01:10 PM

My RX550 with 2GB gives 420...430 h/s on "Gateless Gate" and on "STAK XMR". The key is "threads=2". With its price under $100 and ~75 Watt power, I think it's a good choice now.

Claymore, please, bring back support of "Polaris 12", at least to the degree as of v9.7 !

What's your raw/intensity?

Code:

{
  "algorithm": "cryptonight",
  "rawintensity": "320",
  "worksize": "16",
  "gpu-threads": "2",

...and, certainly, patched BIOS plus some overclock in WattMan.

infojunkiePHD

newbie

Activity: 49

Merit: 0

Quote from: GrayCatt on December 18, 2017, 04:01:10 PM

Quote from: infojunkiePHD on December 18, 2017, 03:46:12 PM

Really? What cards are doing 400? my 560s are doing 450, so with the reduced cost and wattage I'd be very very interested.

My RX550 with 2GB gives 420...430 h/s on "Gateless Gate" and on "STAK XMR". The key is "threads=2". With its price under $100 and ~75 Watt power, I think it's a good choice now.

Claymore, please, bring back support of "Polaris 12", at least to the degree as of v9.7 !

What's your raw/intensity?

Eisenkopf89

full member

Activity: 262

Merit: 101

Quote from: GrayCatt on December 18, 2017, 04:01:10 PM

Quote from: infojunkiePHD on December 18, 2017, 03:46:12 PM

Really? What cards are doing 400? my 560s are doing 450, so with the reduced cost and wattage I'd be very very interested.

My RX550 with 2GB gives 420...430 h/s on "Gateless Gate" and on "STAK XMR". The key is "threads=2". With its price under $100 and ~75 Watt power, I think it's a good choice now.

Claymore, please, bring back support of "Polaris 12", at least to the degree as of v9.7 !

My RX550 Rig needs 320W (hole system) with a hashrate about 1875h/s with standard drivers and without undervolting.

GrayCatt

newbie

Activity: 27

Merit: 0

Quote from: infojunkiePHD on December 18, 2017, 03:46:12 PM

Really? What cards are doing 400? my 560s are doing 450, so with the reduced cost and wattage I'd be very very interested.

My RX550 with 2GB gives 420...430 h/s on "Gateless Gate" and on "STAK XMR". The key is "threads=2". With its price under $100 and ~75 Watt power, I think it's a good choice now.

Claymore, please, bring back support of "Polaris 12", at least to the degree as of v9.7 !

lankyman

sr. member

Activity: 382

Merit: 250

I really hope this version doesnt have issues.
10.2 for me didnt give me full performance and my 3rd GPU of the 3 identical RX4 cards was half speed.
Tested many drivers and 2 computers - windows 7.
9.7 was giving me full speed like SGminer.

Topic: Claymore's CryptoNote AMD GPU Miner v11.3 - page 60. (Read 2145056 times)