A little off topic - With Nheqminer, is there a command to force the GPU to work at 100% ??
No, it's just crap.
Topic: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v15.0 (Windows/Linux) - page 1062. (Read 6590565 times)
November 04, 2016, 08:27:03 AM
No, it's just crap.
November 04, 2016, 08:26:35 AM
CPU usage will show us whether Claymore is using Silent Army kernel or not ))
November 04, 2016, 08:25:51 AM
A little off topic - With Nheqminer, is there a command to force the GPU to work at 100% ??
No, it's just crap.
November 04, 2016, 08:21:53 AM
Good news: I'm going to release my ZEC miner in a few hours so all ZEC-related discussion will move to new thread finally 
Bad news: I was not reach 100h/s on 390 in this version. I'm going to improve speed, but people want to have miner asap so I will release it as is, about 50h/s on stock 390X. I don't like to hurry so further improvements will be added later.
Bad news: I was not reach 100h/s on 390 in this version. I'm going to improve speed, but people want to have miner asap so I will release it as is, about 50h/s on stock 390X. I don't like to hurry so further improvements will be added later.
Nice!
November 04, 2016, 08:18:45 AM
Woot! I increased my earnings big time now.
OS: Windows 7 64 bit
Miners: nheqminer_v0.3a, genoil-0.4.1, Claymore 8.0.7
nheqminer (CPU, R9 280x: = 37 Sol/s
genoil-0.4.1 (RX 480, R9 380x): = 21.78 Sol/s
Claymore (mining Eth): = 45.6 MH/s
Pools: Coinotron and Suprnova
CPU: AMD FX-8370 Eight-Core Processor
Before I used this combo I was only getting. 16 MH/s Ethereum and 45 Sol/s.
Claymore by itself 60 MH/s
nheqminer by itself 50 Sol/s
OS: Windows 7 64 bit
Miners: nheqminer_v0.3a, genoil-0.4.1, Claymore 8.0.7
nheqminer (CPU, R9 280x: = 37 Sol/s
genoil-0.4.1 (RX 480, R9 380x): = 21.78 Sol/s
Claymore (mining Eth): = 45.6 MH/s
Pools: Coinotron and Suprnova
CPU: AMD FX-8370 Eight-Core Processor
Before I used this combo I was only getting. 16 MH/s Ethereum and 45 Sol/s.
Claymore by itself 60 MH/s
nheqminer by itself 50 Sol/s
Where did you find Claymore 8.0.7 to try? I am dying to try it.
TIA
November 04, 2016, 08:17:40 AM
Silent Army v3, Ubuntu 16.04:
6 x RX 480 8GB OC:
Total 280.2 sol/s [dev0 48.1, dev1 44.9, dev2 49.3, dev3 48.7, dev4 50.7, dev5 49.1] 579 shares
Total 281.1 sol/s [dev0 47.4, dev1 46.1, dev2 49.1, dev3 47.7, dev4 49.6, dev5 51.2] 581 shares
Total 281.9 sol/s [dev0 47.8, dev1 45.6, dev2 48.8, dev3 49.9, dev4 49.1, dev5 48.2] 583 shares
Total 281.1 sol/s [dev0 47.8, dev1 46.2, dev2 46.3, dev3 49.0, dev4 48.6, dev5 49.8] 583 shares
Total 281.3 sol/s [dev0 48.5, dev1 47.0, dev2 45.3, dev3 48.9, dev4 48.3, dev5 50.3] 585 shares
Total 281.1 sol/s [dev0 48.1, dev1 47.2, dev2 44.9, dev3 47.4, dev4 49.6, dev5 49.7] 586 shares
Total 280.9 sol/s [dev0 48.8, dev1 45.7, dev2 46.0, dev3 49.0, dev4 48.3, dev5 49.1] 587 shares
Total 280.9 sol/s [dev0 48.1, dev1 46.5, dev2 43.5, dev3 49.2, dev4 49.1, dev5 51.0] 590 shares
wow, my 6x RX470 is just 235-250, what's your main board & cpu, bro?6 x RX 480 8GB OC:
Total 280.2 sol/s [dev0 48.1, dev1 44.9, dev2 49.3, dev3 48.7, dev4 50.7, dev5 49.1] 579 shares
Total 281.1 sol/s [dev0 47.4, dev1 46.1, dev2 49.1, dev3 47.7, dev4 49.6, dev5 51.2] 581 shares
Total 281.9 sol/s [dev0 47.8, dev1 45.6, dev2 48.8, dev3 49.9, dev4 49.1, dev5 48.2] 583 shares
Total 281.1 sol/s [dev0 47.8, dev1 46.2, dev2 46.3, dev3 49.0, dev4 48.6, dev5 49.8] 583 shares
Total 281.3 sol/s [dev0 48.5, dev1 47.0, dev2 45.3, dev3 48.9, dev4 48.3, dev5 50.3] 585 shares
Total 281.1 sol/s [dev0 48.1, dev1 47.2, dev2 44.9, dev3 47.4, dev4 49.6, dev5 49.7] 586 shares
Total 280.9 sol/s [dev0 48.8, dev1 45.7, dev2 46.0, dev3 49.0, dev4 48.3, dev5 49.1] 587 shares
Total 280.9 sol/s [dev0 48.1, dev1 46.5, dev2 43.5, dev3 49.2, dev4 49.1, dev5 51.0] 590 shares
Motherboard: Biostar Hi Fi H81 S2 Socket 1150
CPU: 1 x Intel G1840 (Celeron) CPU
RAM: 1 x 4GB DDR3 Ram
November 04, 2016, 08:13:19 AM
By the time its launched, zec will be less profitable then eth... I got all my machines switched over to zcash finally running stable and the price has dropped by 50% while difficulty increases 200% every couple days. another week i might switch back to eth for stability.
Yeah I'm watching ETH and XMR to try to decide when to resume mining them. It's really hard to predict when that point will be - when everyone else switches back over is too late
November 04, 2016, 08:08:17 AM
By the time its launched, zec will be less profitable then eth... I got all my machines switched over to zcash finally running stable and the price has dropped by 50% while difficulty increases 200% every couple days. another week i might switch back to eth for stability.
November 04, 2016, 07:59:12 AM
Perhaps complaining is too strong a word .. my apologies. It's been a long week 
November 04, 2016, 07:58:01 AM
It takes time and skill to write a good stable and efficient miner. I have absolutely no problem with paying someone for their time to do this and release it publicly.
Would you prefer people with these skills to create private miners so only they capitalise? Or perhaps have some steep upfront fee?
If a miner works well, is stable and gives me a consistent hash rate it will automatically be a few % faster than a buggy one that needs to be restarted constantly. If there are tweaks and enhancements to give me a greater hash rate - so much the better. If I share a percentage of these additional gains with the developer as a way of paying for his/her time - I'm more than happy with that.
If the dev fee erodes the improvement and means that it becomes less efficient for me to use than other miners, then clearly I won't use it - that's my choice and something the miner developer should take in to account. All of you have the same choice so I don't understand what all this complaining is about
Would you prefer people with these skills to create private miners so only they capitalise? Or perhaps have some steep upfront fee?
If a miner works well, is stable and gives me a consistent hash rate it will automatically be a few % faster than a buggy one that needs to be restarted constantly. If there are tweaks and enhancements to give me a greater hash rate - so much the better. If I share a percentage of these additional gains with the developer as a way of paying for his/her time - I'm more than happy with that.
If the dev fee erodes the improvement and means that it becomes less efficient for me to use than other miners, then clearly I won't use it - that's my choice and something the miner developer should take in to account. All of you have the same choice so I don't understand what all this complaining is about
Not complaining, if the miner is significantly faster, ok, fee would be at it's place. If it's not, i honestly don't see the point in using something that is open source and without a fee elsewhere..
November 04, 2016, 07:56:54 AM
It takes time and skill to write a good stable and efficient miner. I have absolutely no problem with paying someone for their time to do this and release it publicly.
Would you prefer people with these skills to create private miners so only they capitalise? Or perhaps have some steep upfront fee?
If a miner works well, is stable and gives me a consistent hash rate it will automatically be a few % faster than a buggy one that needs to be restarted constantly. If there are tweaks and enhancements to give me a greater hash rate - so much the better. If I share a percentage of these additional gains with the developer as a way of paying for his/her time - I'm more than happy with that.
If the dev fee erodes the improvement and means that it becomes less efficient for me to use than other miners, then clearly I won't use it - that's my choice and something the miner developer should take in to account. All of you have the same choice so I don't understand what all this complaining is about
Would you prefer people with these skills to create private miners so only they capitalise? Or perhaps have some steep upfront fee?
If a miner works well, is stable and gives me a consistent hash rate it will automatically be a few % faster than a buggy one that needs to be restarted constantly. If there are tweaks and enhancements to give me a greater hash rate - so much the better. If I share a percentage of these additional gains with the developer as a way of paying for his/her time - I'm more than happy with that.
If the dev fee erodes the improvement and means that it becomes less efficient for me to use than other miners, then clearly I won't use it - that's my choice and something the miner developer should take in to account. All of you have the same choice so I don't understand what all this complaining is about
I wasn't complaining. I'll gladly pay the fee as I have been doing for ETH.
November 04, 2016, 07:56:06 AM
Silent Army v3, Ubuntu 16.04:
6 x RX 480 8GB OC:
Total 280.2 sol/s [dev0 48.1, dev1 44.9, dev2 49.3, dev3 48.7, dev4 50.7, dev5 49.1] 579 shares
Total 281.1 sol/s [dev0 47.4, dev1 46.1, dev2 49.1, dev3 47.7, dev4 49.6, dev5 51.2] 581 shares
Total 281.9 sol/s [dev0 47.8, dev1 45.6, dev2 48.8, dev3 49.9, dev4 49.1, dev5 48.2] 583 shares
Total 281.1 sol/s [dev0 47.8, dev1 46.2, dev2 46.3, dev3 49.0, dev4 48.6, dev5 49.8] 583 shares
Total 281.3 sol/s [dev0 48.5, dev1 47.0, dev2 45.3, dev3 48.9, dev4 48.3, dev5 50.3] 585 shares
Total 281.1 sol/s [dev0 48.1, dev1 47.2, dev2 44.9, dev3 47.4, dev4 49.6, dev5 49.7] 586 shares
Total 280.9 sol/s [dev0 48.8, dev1 45.7, dev2 46.0, dev3 49.0, dev4 48.3, dev5 49.1] 587 shares
Total 280.9 sol/s [dev0 48.1, dev1 46.5, dev2 43.5, dev3 49.2, dev4 49.1, dev5 51.0] 590 shares
wow, my 6x RX470 is just 235-250, what's your main board & cpu, bro? 6 x RX 480 8GB OC:
Total 280.2 sol/s [dev0 48.1, dev1 44.9, dev2 49.3, dev3 48.7, dev4 50.7, dev5 49.1] 579 shares
Total 281.1 sol/s [dev0 47.4, dev1 46.1, dev2 49.1, dev3 47.7, dev4 49.6, dev5 51.2] 581 shares
Total 281.9 sol/s [dev0 47.8, dev1 45.6, dev2 48.8, dev3 49.9, dev4 49.1, dev5 48.2] 583 shares
Total 281.1 sol/s [dev0 47.8, dev1 46.2, dev2 46.3, dev3 49.0, dev4 48.6, dev5 49.8] 583 shares
Total 281.3 sol/s [dev0 48.5, dev1 47.0, dev2 45.3, dev3 48.9, dev4 48.3, dev5 50.3] 585 shares
Total 281.1 sol/s [dev0 48.1, dev1 47.2, dev2 44.9, dev3 47.4, dev4 49.6, dev5 49.7] 586 shares
Total 280.9 sol/s [dev0 48.8, dev1 45.7, dev2 46.0, dev3 49.0, dev4 48.3, dev5 49.1] 587 shares
Total 280.9 sol/s [dev0 48.1, dev1 46.5, dev2 43.5, dev3 49.2, dev4 49.1, dev5 51.0] 590 shares
November 04, 2016, 07:53:49 AM
It takes time and skill to write a good stable and efficient miner. I have absolutely no problem with paying someone for their time to do this and release it publicly.
Would you prefer people with these skills to create private miners so only they capitalise? Or perhaps have some steep upfront fee?
If a miner works well, is stable and gives me a consistent hash rate it will automatically be a few % faster than a buggy one that needs to be restarted constantly. If there are tweaks and enhancements to give me a greater hash rate - so much the better. If I share a percentage of these additional gains with the developer as a way of paying for his/her time - I'm more than happy with that.
If the dev fee erodes the improvement and means that it becomes less efficient for me to use than other miners, then clearly I won't use it - that's my choice and something the miner developer should take in to account. All of you have the same choice so I don't understand what all this complaining is about
Would you prefer people with these skills to create private miners so only they capitalise? Or perhaps have some steep upfront fee?
If a miner works well, is stable and gives me a consistent hash rate it will automatically be a few % faster than a buggy one that needs to be restarted constantly. If there are tweaks and enhancements to give me a greater hash rate - so much the better. If I share a percentage of these additional gains with the developer as a way of paying for his/her time - I'm more than happy with that.
If the dev fee erodes the improvement and means that it becomes less efficient for me to use than other miners, then clearly I won't use it - that's my choice and something the miner developer should take in to account. All of you have the same choice so I don't understand what all this complaining is about
November 04, 2016, 07:53:00 AM
Who wants to guess the dev fee?
5%
5%
The dev fee will stay the same. Claymore is not greedy, he knows 1% of a good miner is more than enough to make some money while keeping a faithful comunity
More than 1% will probably take away a significant part of the current legion of miners using his stuff
Of course, simply because there are other miners out there with similar or even better results..
November 04, 2016, 07:51:39 AM
Who wants to guess the dev fee?
5%
5%
The dev fee will stay the same. Claymore is not greedy, he knows 1% of a good miner is more than enough to make some money while keeping a faithful comunity
More than 1% will probably take away a significant part of the current legion of miners using his stuff
November 04, 2016, 07:48:04 AM
Who wants to guess the dev fee?
5%
5%
1% @ 50h/s (first miner)
5% @ 100H/s
November 04, 2016, 07:46:20 AM
Who wants to guess the dev fee?
5%
5%
November 04, 2016, 07:43:04 AM
Quote
That's bullshit. I just tried with 6 GPUs. 60% loss in hashrate + full crash of the system.
I just tried once but the result was absolutely terrible.
EDIT : Also crashed from a friend.
I just tried once but the result was absolutely terrible.
EDIT : Also crashed from a friend.
Try my setup.
Woot! I increased my earnings big time now.
OS: Windows 7 64 bit
Miners: nheqminer_v0.3a, genoil-0.4.1, Claymore 8.0.7
nheqminer (CPU, R9 280x: = 37 Sol/s
genoil-0.4.1 (RX 480, R9 380x): = 21.78 Sol/s
Claymore (mining Eth): = 45.6 MH/s
Pools: Coinotron and Suprnova
CPU: AMD FX-8370 Eight-Core Processor
Claymore by itself 60 MH/s
nheqminer by itself 50 Sol/s
Total Mining now. Ethereum: 45.6 MH/s ZCash: 58.78 Sol/s.
I actually increased over my solo mining of ZCash.
If you do not have older cards like R9 280x you may get by with just genoil-0.4.1 for GPU and nheqminer for CPU mining.
Ok now many will probably want to know what my start scripts are setup as so here you go.
My 3 start scripts for the mining
Quote
Code:
@echo off
set GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
set GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool coinotron.com:3344 -ewal -esm 2 -epsw -allpools 1 -ethi 1,1,1
@echo on
set GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
set GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool coinotron.com:3344 -ewal
@echo on
Code:
genoil.exe -c zec.suprnova.cc:2142 -u -p -g 1 2
Code:
nheqminer_suprnova.exe -u -p -t 4 -od 0
Where did you find that version? I believe the latest is 7.3
If dual mining like this was possible, I don't think we would have seen the global hash rate drop so much.
November 04, 2016, 07:41:09 AM
Latest Silent army release, which is free, without a fee, does 50 as well.. isn't that something?
Where can I get a copy to test it?
https://github.com/mbevand/silentarmy
there
Seems Claymore is taking mrb's silentarmy version 3 work and monetizing it as part of his miner to mine ZEC.
November 04, 2016, 07:39:36 AM
Very excited about the release of the new ZEC miner.. Thanks in advance Claymore.
Ive got a question about the current miner version 7.3 and was wondering if anyone can tell me if there was any increase in hashrate from version 6.4beta , which I am currently using, as I do not want to go upset the apple cart if its not necessary. All cards are RX470 OC Hynix and was getting about 25mh before changing to ZEC with Extermal miner and currently getting 35 sols per card. Excited to bump it up to 50 sols ASAP :-)
Ive got a question about the current miner version 7.3 and was wondering if anyone can tell me if there was any increase in hashrate from version 6.4beta , which I am currently using, as I do not want to go upset the apple cart if its not necessary. All cards are RX470 OC Hynix and was getting about 25mh before changing to ZEC with Extermal miner and currently getting 35 sols per card. Excited to bump it up to 50 sols ASAP :-)
Jump to: