Author

Topic: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v15.0 (Windows/Linux) - page 214. (Read 6590565 times)

member
Activity: 159
Merit: 10
@mehrdadb3

Use srbpolaris 3.4 and the pimp straps and you get more hashrate. It´s the easiest way.
All of my elpidas reach 30,5 - 32 mh.

can u put your straps use for your card if u have msi rx570 gaming x 4gb and my memory is elpida/hynix
sr. member
Activity: 472
Merit: 250
lux8.net
a lot of AMD miners ask for new equihash 144_5 miner, there are demand and it's growing, already 4 coins forked to new algo - BTCZ, LTZ, SAFE, XSG and only Nvidia can mine ATM.
newbie
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
who can help? I get Calixto and there Dag file 17. the kleymor cuts a kommisiya and begins to load 196 дaгфaйл. while the kommisiya loads it is switched off. pototy to be loaded 17 yes гфaйл again. time is lost on all this 40-50 sec. how to make that the kleymor maynit a touch a coin as I?
newbie
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
Are there any good news for 1060 6GB 9gbps? Currently , hashrate still lower than 23...  Grin Grin
newbie
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
мoжeт ктo п пoмoч?  дoбывaю кaлиcтo и тaм дaг фaйл 17. клeймop вpyбaeт кoммиcию и нaчинaeт гpyзить 196 дaгфaйл   . пoкa гpyзит кoммиcия выключaeтьcя. пoтoтoм oпять гpyзитьcя 17 дa гфaйл.  вpeмя тepяeтьcя нa этo вce 40-50 ceк.  кaк cдeлaть чтoб клeймop мaйнил тyжe мoнeтy чтo и я?
member
Activity: 1558
Merit: 69
@mehrdadb3

Use srbpolaris 3.4 and the pimp straps and you get more hashrate. It´s the easiest way.
All of my elpidas reach 30,5 - 32 mh.
member
Activity: 159
Merit: 10
Don't expect much more from it.

I have several 570's ranging from 26,5 to 28,5Mhs.

I haven't seen more then 28.5 in any 570 to date, so yours is totaly normal performance wise.
really? even my old 470 refs are doing better then the numbers you state.

rx570 can go up to 31. Normally however it hashes around 29.5-30.5
I've got a rig of rx570 4gb MSI gaming with Elpida doing mere 29.4. And the only slower 570 I've got is ASUS Expedition hashing at 28.8

Of course it's possible if you are willing to deal with memory errors in HWinfo.
GPUs can have hundreds of errors and seem to work fine but you have a steady higher stale shares percentage and the ocasional rejected share so i cannot accept 30mh as a 570s normal number.



also fyi mem errors in HwInfo are both those that were corrected and those that were not.


can u say your asic quality of your card please ?
and can u share your mod bios rom
member
Activity: 159
Merit: 10
Stale shares are shares for a block submitted after the next block is already being mined. Its result from network latency and fast block times and has nothing to do with memory errors or overclocking. Too much overclocking can definetlly cause memory errors and invalid/rejected shares though. Some of my Powercolor 4GB Red Dragon RX 570's run stable at 29.5-30.5 MH/s with a 1150 MHz core and 2075 MHz memory clock. I do have some that will only run at 1950-1975 MHz memory overclock at ~28.5 MH/s.

for me too
i have msi rx 570 gaming x 4gb elpida and i cant increase memory higher than 1950 system goes to crash and i get 28.5 mh/s
and my friend have same card az me and same windows and driver but he can go memory to 2100 and get 30 mh/s
just 1 diffrent with my card and my friend is asic quality for me 76% and for he is 67%

And now, with the warming of the air, I had to decrease memory to 1900 because my system crash after 4 or 6 hours to work.when i go to 1900 its work fine but my hashrate go to 28 mh/s
newbie
Activity: 55
Merit: 0
Don't expect much more from it.

I have several 570's ranging from 26,5 to 28,5Mhs.

I haven't seen more then 28.5 in any 570 to date, so yours is totaly normal performance wise.
really? even my old 470 refs are doing better then the numbers you state.

rx570 can go up to 31. Normally however it hashes around 29.5-30.5
I've got a rig of rx570 4gb MSI gaming with Elpida doing mere 29.4. And the only slower 570 I've got is ASUS Expedition hashing at 28.8

Of course it's possible if you are willing to deal with memory errors in HWinfo.
GPUs can have hundreds of errors and seem to work fine but you have a steady higher stale shares percentage and the ocasional rejected share so i cannot accept 30mh as a 570s normal number.

https://s33.postimg.cc/hgv9pnzxb/dh31.jpg

also fyi mem errors in HwInfo are both those that were corrected and those that were not.


...sigh....I have been leading a futile existence lately. I had been using some more recent drivers (18.5.1), and from your post (and running exactly the same card) I realised I wasn't hitting the right speeds. Installed 18.2.2 and am getting the right speeds now (as a note, I had been using the compute switcher tool, but wasn't seeing any difference, the drivers I had didn't give me a compute option and I just thought Radeon Settings was being difficult, but it just wasn't there. 18.2.2 works good, 18.5.1 and some earlier versions don't. I have a 50% increase in performance now.
sr. member
Activity: 857
Merit: 262
Don't expect much more from it.

I have several 570's ranging from 26,5 to 28,5Mhs.

I haven't seen more then 28.5 in any 570 to date, so yours is totaly normal performance wise.
really? even my old 470 refs are doing better then the numbers you state.

rx570 can go up to 31. Normally however it hashes around 29.5-30.5
I've got a rig of rx570 4gb MSI gaming with Elpida doing mere 29.4. And the only slower 570 I've got is ASUS Expedition hashing at 28.8

Of course it's possible if you are willing to deal with memory errors in HWinfo.
GPUs can have hundreds of errors and seem to work fine but you have a steady higher stale shares percentage and the ocasional rejected share so i cannot accept 30mh as a 570s normal number.



also fyi mem errors in HwInfo are both those that were corrected and those that were not.
jr. member
Activity: 56
Merit: 1
Seems like all new version of Claymore never can reach the reported effective hashrate. so if you guys want more proficent.. use v9.8.

This is a valid point... my effective hashrate bops around alot, but i've rarely had the sustained avg hashrate to be the same or more than the reported hashrate for more than an hr.
sr. member
Activity: 602
Merit: 250
Seems like all new version of Claymore never can reach the reported effective hashrate. so if you guys want more proficent.. use v9.8.
copper member
Activity: 2184
Merit: 4241
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
Do you mean your swap file usage is 0% while running v11.7 or v11.8?  I'm not sure exactly, but I think the DAG files are VM intensive when the miner is first starting up, so that may not be unusual.

A reliable source recommends 2.6gb per card, plus another 10 or 12.

@bigdaddymccarron, could it be your swap file is not big enough for the DAG files?  I'm no expert on Ubuntu, but sometimes we overlook the simplest things.

I will check that, I saw something the other day that indicated it should be 22 gb.

When I check swap usage, 0% is being used.

I had to revert back to v11.7 on my Linux mining rig because v11.8 keeps crashing even after reducing the overclock speeds.  On v11.7 I can run my normal overclock speeds and the miner is much more stable.  Has anyone else had any stability issues on Linux?  My 4 Windows 10 miners seem to be working fine.
hero member
Activity: 1036
Merit: 606
Stale shares are shares for a block submitted after the next block is already being mined. Its result from network latency and fast block times and has nothing to do with memory errors or overclocking. Too much overclocking can definetlly cause memory errors and invalid/rejected shares though. Some of my Powercolor 4GB Red Dragon RX 570's run stable at 29.5-30.5 MH/s with a 1150 MHz core and 2075 MHz memory clock. I do have some that will only run at 1950-1975 MHz memory overclock at ~28.5 MH/s.
newbie
Activity: 36
Merit: 0
Don't expect much more from it.

I have several 570's ranging from 26,5 to 28,5Mhs.

I haven't seen more then 28.5 in any 570 to date, so yours is totaly normal performance wise.
really? even my old 470 refs are doing better then the numbers you state.

rx570 can go up to 31. Normally however it hashes around 29.5-30.5
I've got a rig of rx570 4gb MSI gaming with Elpida doing mere 29.4. And the only slower 570 I've got is ASUS Expedition hashing at 28.8

Of course it's possible if you are willing to deal with memory errors in HWinfo.
GPUs can have hundreds of errors and seem to work fine but you have a steady higher stale shares percentage and the ocasional rejected share so i cannot accept 30mh as a 570s normal number.
newbie
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
GPUz shows 37% fan speed, same speed its shown in MSI Afterburner or even on the competitor Phoenix Miner. But Claymore says its 51% fan speed. So yeah, Claymores readings are broken. But that isnt really a problem, the hell. Leave it as it is.
jr. member
Activity: 150
Merit: 3
i have problem with fan speed percentage,
claymore always shows 10% more than afterburner fan persantage,
whats the problem?
is there a bug in claymore?

I have set -tt -70 for 70% fan speed in Claymore miner, and fans are actually spinning at 80%.
It's probably something with Claymore miner, but it works like that for months.
sr. member
Activity: 857
Merit: 262
Don't expect much more from it.

I have several 570's ranging from 26,5 to 28,5Mhs.

I haven't seen more then 28.5 in any 570 to date, so yours is totaly normal performance wise.
really? even my old 470 refs are doing better then the numbers you state.

rx570 can go up to 31. Normally however it hashes around 29.5-30.5
I've got a rig of rx570 4gb MSI gaming with Elpida doing mere 29.4. And the only slower 570 I've got is ASUS Expedition hashing at 28.8
newbie
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
i have problem with fan speed percentage,
claymore always shows 10% more than afterburner fan persantage,
whats the problem?
is there a bug in claymore?
member
Activity: 71
Merit: 20
A reliable source recommends 2.6gb per card, plus another 10 or 12.

@bigdaddymccarron, could it be your swap file is not big enough for the DAG files?  I'm no expert on Ubuntu, but sometimes we overlook the simplest things.

I will check that, I saw something the other day that indicated it should be 22 gb.

When I check swap usage, 0% is being used.
Jump to: