Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v15.0 (Windows/Linux) - page 318.

Viaggiatore

newbie

Activity: 56

Merit: 0

Quote from: atecubanoS on March 15, 2018, 09:43:21 AM

Why people stills report problem without specify their setup?

A LOT of posts here ppl complains but don't post their OS, their drivers even their GPUs!!! WTF?!

Looks like the fluctuation problem is related to ethermine... Just a guess...

Something is very wrong with ethermine in these latest 2 days!! Going with nanopool for a while to see if there is a difference

RuMiner

member

Activity: 168

Merit: 15

Quote from: rolys on March 15, 2018, 07:36:47 AM

I've noticed with the newer versions from 11.2 although claymore shows higher hashrate the calculated hashrate at the pool is significantly lower. I've reduced the clocks on a couple of cards so no memory errors but still a lot lower. Anyone experience this? Any suggestions?

I posted this screen recently: https://yadi.sk/i/VqsiqXBk3TPi24
Arrow shows changing 11.4 to 11.5 with old kernels (i.e. like 11.1 miner). It definitely works better. rigs uptime 21 hours.

Quote from: Andrey123 on March 15, 2018, 07:45:23 AM

When you first run version 11.5
Windows wrote the error that the program EthDcrMiner64.exe is stopped!

I got such window on 11.2 - 11.4 miners. If you find this crash in eventlog, it shows amdocl64.dll is responsible for it. "-oldkernels 1" fixed this for me.

atecubanoS

newbie

Activity: 32

Merit: 0

Why people stills report problem without specify their setup?

A LOT of posts here ppl complains but don't post their OS, their drivers even their GPUs!!! WTF?!

Looks like the fluctuation problem is related to ethermine... Just a guess...

whoismoses

member

Activity: 247

Merit: 59

Quote from: DeDeRa on March 15, 2018, 09:36:26 AM

Hi guys.
On Claymore 10.6 i had 550 hours on a row on nanopool, last time i upgrade to 11.4 2 days ago, no issues and hashrate was +0.5 better sometimes and sometimes just -0.5 less than the reported, most of the time...i had more average than reported, which is crazy. I upgrade tot 11.4 and my average hashrate drop to around 5 to 6 mhs less... I check and note down my average 24 hours hashrate 3 times per day and in 550 hours i had the average almost as the reported. With 11.4 although i have it only for 2 days, i never went beyond 187.0 mhs although i have 192.9 reported...over 5 mhs average lost in the dark. So 11.4 is broken, something is working really bad right there. I will let it run one more day, but im sure the 11.4 is garbage, thats all and i will stay with 10.6.
Good luck!

I had similar results, however over the last 12 or so hours I have had several cards lose their over clock and some rigs go offline. I've updated to 11.5 for the rigs having trouble with the oldkernels flag. Let's see if that is better.

I'd say I had a rock solid setup prior to 11.4, since 11.4 33% of my rigs have crashed.

mine_phun

newbie

Activity: 208

Merit: 0

IMPORTANT UPDATE 15-3-2018:
As from today we enabled mining with your Litecoin wallet for the Blake2S / Keccak and YescryptR16 coins. Just put in your Litecoin wallet address and use password x and select your algo to mine.
The pool will pay you straight into your Litecoin (Coinbase/GDAX) wallet so you can convert straight to Eur/USD! ... this will save you a lot of time / effort and conversioncost!!

Example: -o stratum+tcp://mine.nlpool.nl:5766 -dwal -dpsw c=xvg -dcoin blake2s | To mine XVG only and get payed in LTC

NLPool is a Dutch miningpool running in Amsterdam the Netherlands. The pool has been setup to provide a good and stable pool for people who are located in the Netherlands or Benelux. Our pool is dedicated to have less latency meaning lower risks for stale shares. This means you will get higher profits.

Our philosophy:
- Performance
- Profit by lowering latency and stale shares
- Security
- Minimum fees

Our mining fee will be of 0% for all Blake2S algo coins until April 1st. After the launch period, it will be fixed between 0.5% and 1%

How to contact us ?
E-mail: [email protected]
Telegram: : t.me/nlpool

Key features:
- Amsterdam dedicated server with DDos Protection
- Small mining fee : 0% during the 2 months launch period. After, between 0,5% and 1%
- Anonymous and no registration !
- Hourly payments
- yiimp multi-algo with several coins
- Everything is tested on a second non-productive server before launching to minimize your risks on the actual mining pool. (new stratum, webpages changes, payments and other code updates)

DeDeRa

newbie

Activity: 8

Merit: 0

Hi guys.
On Claymore 10.6 i had 550 hours on a row on nanopool, last time i upgrade to 11.4 2 days ago, no issues and hashrate was +0.5 better sometimes and sometimes just -0.5 less than the reported, most of the time...i had more average than reported, which is crazy. I upgrade tot 11.4 and my average hashrate drop to around 5 to 6 mhs less... I check and note down my average 24 hours hashrate 3 times per day and in 550 hours i had the average almost as the reported. With 11.4 although i have it only for 2 days, i never went beyond 187.0 mhs although i have 192.9 reported...over 5 mhs average lost in the dark. So 11.4 is broken, something is working really bad right there. I will let it run one more day, but im sure the 11.4 is garbage, thats all and i will stay with 10.6.
Good luck!

j2james

newbie

Activity: 80

Merit: 0

Quote from: infectedmushi on March 15, 2018, 07:40:00 AM

@Claymore

seem there's issues with 11.5 and nvidia cards. i am getting a terrible fluctuation on reported hashrate

https://preview.ibb.co/ij0KNx/reported.png

Code:

ETH - Total Speed: 188.675 Mh/s, Total Shares: 2285, Rejected: 0, Time: 13:25 
ETH: GPU0 31.579 Mh/s, GPU1 31.503 Mh/s, GPU2 30.955 Mh/s, GPU3 31.549 Mh/s, GPU4 31.540 Mh/s, GPU5 31.550 Mh/s 
ETH: 03/15/18-11:35:04 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2) 
ETH: Share accepted (47 ms)! 
ETH: 03/15/18-11:35:09 - New job from eu1.ethermine.org:5555 
ETH - Total Speed: [b]156.278 Mh/s[/b], Total Shares: 2286, Rejected: 0, Time: 13:25 
ETH: GPU0 25.105 Mh/s, GPU1 25.118 Mh/s, GPU2 26.570 Mh/s, GPU3 26.366 Mh/s, GPU4 26.521 Mh/s, GPU5 26.598 Mh/s 
ETH: 03/15/18-11:35:22 - New job from eu1.ethermine.org:5555 
ETH - Total Speed: 186.744 Mh/s, Total Shares: 2286, Rejected: 0, Time: 13:25 
ETH: GPU0 31.149 Mh/s, GPU1 31.464 Mh/s, GPU2 31.531 Mh/s, GPU3 29.711 Mh/s, GPU4 31.457 Mh/s, GPU5 31.433 Mh/s

Code:

ETH: 03/15/18-11:36:08 - New job from eu1.ethermine.org:5555 
ETH - Total Speed: [b]175.530 Mh/s[/b], Total Shares: 2287, Rejected: 0, Time: 13:26 
ETH: GPU0 28.538 Mh/s, GPU1 26.970 Mh/s, GPU2 31.539 Mh/s, GPU3 28.457 Mh/s, GPU4 31.550 Mh/s, GPU5 28.477 Mh/s 
ETH: 03/15/18-11:36:09 - New job from eu1.ethermine.org:5555 
ETH - Total Speed: 187.653 Mh/s, Total Shares: 2287, Rejected: 0, Time: 13:26 
ETH: GPU0 31.562 Mh/s, GPU1 31.523 Mh/s, GPU2 30.570 Mh/s, GPU3 31.454 Mh/s, GPU4 31.554 Mh/s, GPU5 30.989 Mh/s 
ETH: 03/15/18-11:36:11 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1) 
ETH: Share accepted (47 ms)! 
ETH: 03/15/18-11:36:17 - New job from eu1.ethermine.org:5555 
ETH - Total Speed: 189.257 Mh/s, Total Shares: 2288, Rejected: 0, Time: 13:26 
ETH: GPU0 31.550 Mh/s, GPU1 31.503 Mh/s, GPU2 31.549 Mh/s, GPU3 31.549 Mh/s, GPU4 31.537 Mh/s, GPU5 31.569 Mh/s 
ETH: 03/15/18-11:36:19 - New job from eu1.ethermine.org:5555

as you can see, it goes as low as 156MH/s | 175MH/s, etc ... the rig does 188MH/s with 6 nvidia 1070, on previous versions.

anyone experiencing the same?

I have the same beginning from 11.0. So I'm still using 10.6.

rolys

newbie

Activity: 9

Merit: 0

Quote from: Tr1n1tY on March 15, 2018, 08:06:19 AM

Quote from: rolys on March 15, 2018, 07:36:47 AM

Hi

I've noticed with the newer versions from 11.2 although claymore shows higher hashrate the calculated hashrate at the pool is significantly lower. I've reduced the clocks on a couple of cards so no memory errors but still a lot lower. Anyone experience this? Any suggestions?

Hi

I found lowering mclocks by 20, and increasing the cclock by 15 helped with that issue with my rig, as in my previous post

I'll give it a try thanks

atecubanoS

newbie

Activity: 32

Merit: 0

Quote from: infectedmushi on March 15, 2018, 07:40:00 AM

@Claymore

seem there's issues with 11.5 and nvidia cards. i am getting a terrible fluctuation on reported hashrate

https://preview.ibb.co/ij0KNx/reported.png

as you can see, it goes as low as 156MH/s | 175MH/s, etc ... the rig does 188MH/s with 6 nvidia 1070, on previous versions.

anyone experiencing the same?

No problem here...

Code:

ETH: 03/15/18-09:44:43 - New job from eth.suprnova.cc:5000
ETH - Total Speed: 141.293 Mh/s, Total Shares: 2123, Rejected: 0, Time: 18:09
ETH: GPU0 26.806 Mh/s, GPU1 20.281 Mh/s, GPU2 26.661 Mh/s, GPU3 20.363 Mh/s, GPU4 20.389 Mh/s, GPU5 26.794 Mh/s

GPU #0: GeForce GTX 1070 Ti, 8113 MB available, 19 compute units, capability: 6.1 (pci bus 1:0:0)
GPU #1: GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, 6072 MB available, 10 compute units, capability: 6.1 (pci bus 2:0:0)
GPU #2: GeForce GTX 1070, 8114 MB available, 15 compute units, capability: 6.1 (pci bus 3:0:0)
GPU #3: GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, 6072 MB available, 10 compute units, capability: 6.1 (pci bus 5:0:0)
GPU #4: GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, 6072 MB available, 10 compute units, capability: 6.1 (pci bus 6:0:0)
GPU #5: GeForce GTX 1070 Ti, 8114 MB available, 19 compute units, capability: 6.1 (pci bus 7:0:0)
ETH - Total Speed: 141.374 Mh/s, Total Shares: 2123(400+304+385+316+334+384), Rejected: 0(0+0+0+0+0+0), Time: 18:09
ETH: GPU0 26.824 Mh/s, GPU1 20.355 Mh/s, GPU2 26.648 Mh/s, GPU3 20.352 Mh/s, GPU4 20.373 Mh/s, GPU5 26.823 Mh/s
Incorrect ETH shares: none
 1 minute average ETH total speed: 140.837 Mh/s

Code:

ETH: 03/15/18-09:46:29 - New job from eth.suprnova.cc:5000
ETH - Total Speed: 141.418 Mh/s, Total Shares: 2127, Rejected: 0, Time: 18:11
ETH: GPU0 26.829 Mh/s, GPU1 20.381 Mh/s, GPU2 26.677 Mh/s, GPU3 20.347 Mh/s, GPU4 20.365 Mh/s, GPU5 26.819 Mh/s

GPU #0: GeForce GTX 1070 Ti, 8113 MB available, 19 compute units, capability: 6.1 (pci bus 1:0:0)
GPU #1: GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, 6072 MB available, 10 compute units, capability: 6.1 (pci bus 2:0:0)
GPU #2: GeForce GTX 1070, 8114 MB available, 15 compute units, capability: 6.1 (pci bus 3:0:0)
GPU #3: GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, 6072 MB available, 10 compute units, capability: 6.1 (pci bus 5:0:0)
GPU #4: GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, 6072 MB available, 10 compute units, capability: 6.1 (pci bus 6:0:0)
GPU #5: GeForce GTX 1070 Ti, 8114 MB available, 19 compute units, capability: 6.1 (pci bus 7:0:0)
ETH - Total Speed: 141.339 Mh/s, Total Shares: 2127(400+305+385+317+334+386), Rejected: 0(0+0+0+0+0+0), Time: 18:11
ETH: GPU0 26.782 Mh/s, GPU1 20.359 Mh/s, GPU2 26.648 Mh/s, GPU3 20.356 Mh/s, GPU4 20.387 Mh/s, GPU5 26.808 Mh/s
Incorrect ETH shares: none
 1 minute average ETH total speed: 140.881 Mh/s

Code:

ETH: 03/15/18-09:47:09 - New job from eth.suprnova.cc:5000
ETH - Total Speed: 139.801 Mh/s, Total Shares: 2128, Rejected: 0, Time: 18:11
ETH: GPU0 26.816 Mh/s, GPU1 19.637 Mh/s, GPU2 26.383 Mh/s, GPU3 19.762 Mh/s, GPU4 20.388 Mh/s, GPU5 26.816 Mh/s

GPU #0: GeForce GTX 1070 Ti, 8113 MB available, 19 compute units, capability: 6.1 (pci bus 1:0:0)
GPU #1: GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, 6072 MB available, 10 compute units, capability: 6.1 (pci bus 2:0:0)
GPU #2: GeForce GTX 1070, 8114 MB available, 15 compute units, capability: 6.1 (pci bus 3:0:0)
GPU #3: GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, 6072 MB available, 10 compute units, capability: 6.1 (pci bus 5:0:0)
GPU #4: GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, 6072 MB available, 10 compute units, capability: 6.1 (pci bus 6:0:0)
GPU #5: GeForce GTX 1070 Ti, 8114 MB available, 19 compute units, capability: 6.1 (pci bus 7:0:0)
ETH - Total Speed: 141.264 Mh/s, Total Shares: 2128(400+305+385+317+334+387), Rejected: 0(0+0+0+0+0+0), Time: 18:11
ETH: GPU0 26.794 Mh/s, GPU1 20.367 Mh/s, GPU2 26.674 Mh/s, GPU3 20.230 Mh/s, GPU4 20.383 Mh/s, GPU5 26.815 Mh/s
Incorrect ETH shares: none
 1 minute average ETH total speed: 140.940 Mh/s

My configuration:

Code:

MyUser@UbuntuRig:~$ nvidia-smi
Thu Mar 15 09:51:20 2018
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| NVIDIA-SMI 387.26                 Driver Version: 387.26                    |
|-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
| GPU  Name        Persistence-M| Bus-Id        Disp.A | Volatile Uncorr. ECC |
| Fan  Temp  Perf  Pwr:Usage/Cap|         Memory-Usage | GPU-Util  Compute M. |
|===============================+======================+======================|
|   0  GeForce GTX 107...  On   | 00000000:01:00.0 Off |                  N/A |
|  4%   54C    P2   108W / 110W |   2614MiB /  8113MiB |    100%      Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
|   1  GeForce GTX 106...  On   | 00000000:02:00.0 Off |                  N/A |
|  0%   52C    P2    81W /  80W |   2570MiB /  6072MiB |    100%      Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
|   2  GeForce GTX 1070    On   | 00000000:03:00.0 Off |                  N/A |
|  1%   53C    P2   104W / 110W |   2592MiB /  8114MiB |    100%      Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
|   3  GeForce GTX 106...  On   | 00000000:05:00.0 Off |                  N/A |
| 22%   54C    P2    81W /  80W |   2570MiB /  6072MiB |    100%      Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
|   4  GeForce GTX 106...  On   | 00000000:06:00.0 Off |                  N/A |
| 22%   54C    P2    81W /  80W |   2570MiB /  6072MiB |    100%      Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
|   5  GeForce GTX 107...  On   | 00000000:07:00.0 Off |                  N/A |
|  0%   53C    P2   113W / 110W |   2614MiB /  8114MiB |     97%      Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Processes:                                                       GPU Memory |
|  GPU       PID   Type   Process name                             Usage      |
|=============================================================================|
|    0     22119      C   ...MyUser/Claymore/v11.5/ethdcrminer64      2595MiB |
|    1     22119      C   ...MyUser/Claymore/v11.5/ethdcrminer64      2551MiB |
|    2     22119      C   ...MyUser/Claymore/v11.5/ethdcrminer64      2573MiB |
|    3     22119      C   ...MyUser/Claymore/v11.5/ethdcrminer64      2551MiB |
|    4     22119      C   ...MyUser/Claymore/v11.5/ethdcrminer64      2551MiB |
|    5     22119      C   ...MyUser/Claymore/v11.5/ethdcrminer64      2595MiB |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

Tr1n1tY

newbie

Activity: 7

Merit: 0

Quote from: rolys on March 15, 2018, 07:36:47 AM

Hi

I've noticed with the newer versions from 11.2 although claymore shows higher hashrate the calculated hashrate at the pool is significantly lower. I've reduced the clocks on a couple of cards so no memory errors but still a lot lower. Anyone experience this? Any suggestions?

Hi

I found lowering mclocks by 20, and increasing the cclock by 15 helped with that issue with my rig, as in my previous post

Andrey123

sr. member

Activity: 1778

Merit: 305

When you first run version 11.5
Windows wrote the error that the program EthDcrMiner64.exe is stopped!

When restarted, the miner started.
But now I'm worried that nothing will close.

infectedmushi

newbie

Activity: 46

Merit: 0

@Claymore

seem there's issues with 11.5 and nvidia cards. i am getting a terrible fluctuation on reported hashrate

https://preview.ibb.co/ij0KNx/reported.png

Code:

ETH - Total Speed: 188.675 Mh/s, Total Shares: 2285, Rejected: 0, Time: 13:25 
ETH: GPU0 31.579 Mh/s, GPU1 31.503 Mh/s, GPU2 30.955 Mh/s, GPU3 31.549 Mh/s, GPU4 31.540 Mh/s, GPU5 31.550 Mh/s 
ETH: 03/15/18-11:35:04 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2) 
ETH: Share accepted (47 ms)! 
ETH: 03/15/18-11:35:09 - New job from eu1.ethermine.org:5555 
ETH - Total Speed: [b]156.278 Mh/s[/b], Total Shares: 2286, Rejected: 0, Time: 13:25 
ETH: GPU0 25.105 Mh/s, GPU1 25.118 Mh/s, GPU2 26.570 Mh/s, GPU3 26.366 Mh/s, GPU4 26.521 Mh/s, GPU5 26.598 Mh/s 
ETH: 03/15/18-11:35:22 - New job from eu1.ethermine.org:5555 
ETH - Total Speed: 186.744 Mh/s, Total Shares: 2286, Rejected: 0, Time: 13:25 
ETH: GPU0 31.149 Mh/s, GPU1 31.464 Mh/s, GPU2 31.531 Mh/s, GPU3 29.711 Mh/s, GPU4 31.457 Mh/s, GPU5 31.433 Mh/s

Code:

ETH: 03/15/18-11:36:08 - New job from eu1.ethermine.org:5555 
ETH - Total Speed: [b]175.530 Mh/s[/b], Total Shares: 2287, Rejected: 0, Time: 13:26 
ETH: GPU0 28.538 Mh/s, GPU1 26.970 Mh/s, GPU2 31.539 Mh/s, GPU3 28.457 Mh/s, GPU4 31.550 Mh/s, GPU5 28.477 Mh/s 
ETH: 03/15/18-11:36:09 - New job from eu1.ethermine.org:5555 
ETH - Total Speed: 187.653 Mh/s, Total Shares: 2287, Rejected: 0, Time: 13:26 
ETH: GPU0 31.562 Mh/s, GPU1 31.523 Mh/s, GPU2 30.570 Mh/s, GPU3 31.454 Mh/s, GPU4 31.554 Mh/s, GPU5 30.989 Mh/s 
ETH: 03/15/18-11:36:11 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1) 
ETH: Share accepted (47 ms)! 
ETH: 03/15/18-11:36:17 - New job from eu1.ethermine.org:5555 
ETH - Total Speed: 189.257 Mh/s, Total Shares: 2288, Rejected: 0, Time: 13:26 
ETH: GPU0 31.550 Mh/s, GPU1 31.503 Mh/s, GPU2 31.549 Mh/s, GPU3 31.549 Mh/s, GPU4 31.537 Mh/s, GPU5 31.569 Mh/s 
ETH: 03/15/18-11:36:19 - New job from eu1.ethermine.org:5555

as you can see, it goes as low as 156MH/s | 175MH/s, etc ... the rig does 188MH/s with 6 nvidia 1070, on previous versions.

anyone experiencing the same?

rolys

newbie

Activity: 9

Merit: 0

Hi

I've noticed with the newer versions from 11.2 although claymore shows higher hashrate the calculated hashrate at the pool is significantly lower. I've reduced the clocks on a couple of cards so no memory errors but still a lot lower. Anyone experience this? Any suggestions?

Tr1n1tY

newbie

Activity: 7

Merit: 0

My 12 GPU rig (7 x RX580's, 4 x RX480's and 1 RX570) is running stable since v11.2.
Rig was doing 359 Mh/s before v11.2, stale shares 5-10%.

on v11.4, same oc, 366 Mh/s, proved stable, but the effective average hashrate on ethermine was 5-8% below reported, stale shares 5-10%.

Upgraded to v11.4 and started testing different oc's. Increased cclock to 1200 from 1175, and decreased mclock to 2180 from 2200. Same ratio of oc for RX570 as well (cclock to 1100, mclock to 1930)
Rig is running 362.6 Mh/s stable, average effective hashrate is 3% below reported, taking in mind that fees are 2%, and 0-3% stale shares.

Rig is running on SMOS.
Only mining ETH.
Auto detection of DCRI
All cards are bios-modded
140w on avg for each card from the wall (undervolting doesn't play well with Linux)

Miner Console
ETH: GPU0 30.206 Mh/s, GPU1 30.524 Mh/s, GPU2 30.506 Mh/s, GPU3 30.524 Mh/s, GPU4 30.525 Mh/s, GPU5 30.447 Mh/s, GPU6 30.228 Mh/s, GPU7 30.496 Mh/s, GPU8 30.526 Mh/s,
GPU9 30.219 Mh/s, GPU10 30.227 Mh/s, GPU11 28.236 Mh/s
ETH: 03/15/18-10:42:44 - New job from eu1.ethermine.org:4444
ETH - Total Speed: 362.665 Mh/s, Total Shares: 418, Rejected: 0, Time: 01:21

Hope it helps

RuMiner

member

Activity: 168

Merit: 15

Updated 11.5 with -oldkernels 1 to my rigs. Lower reported hashrate, more dizzy, but effective hashrate and found shares grew up, also not a single GPU fail after almost 16 hours of uptime. Old kernels are my favorite )
https://yadi.sk/i/VqsiqXBk3TPi24

leomcr

newbie

Activity: 5

Merit: 0

Quote from: Claymore on March 14, 2018, 04:39:08 PM

Quote from: Pirator on March 14, 2018, 04:22:00 PM

Quote from: leomcr on March 14, 2018, 03:14:39 PM

I'm still on the 10.6 version, which gives me over 196mhs on my 13 rx560 cards (using linux/hiveos).
From the 11.x version, I lost about 0.800 per card, which means that I lost a big 10mhs for my rig.
Using the 11.4 version, things got a little bit better, but still under 10.6 version. With this version I got 194mhs.
Not tested yet the 11.5 version, but probably the -oldkernels switch will bring me back the best performance I had with claymore.

that is right. But the stale share is less. So you might end more valid shares.

I have similar hashrate for v10.6 and v11.5, but you can try "-oldkernels 1" if you see bad speed. Also you can try "-asm 2" and "z" key to find best -dcri for ETH-only mode.

thanks. I will test and post my feedback.

angelesmix

newbie

Activity: 10

Merit: 0

I will help with setting up your rig
through TeamViewer
for a small fee
Any difficulties

ascaloon

newbie

Activity: 36

Merit: 0

Quote from: alex_85 on March 15, 2018, 03:22:56 AM

What happened guys, i was mining very good with v.11.4 with the fixed stale shares and everything was great 1-2 % stale shares. But now (12 hours already) i got 8-12 % stale shares and nothing was changed. Is there any problem with ethermine ?
Anyone else noticed doubled stale shares last 12 hours ?

Same here

djmuler

jr. member

Activity: 41

Merit: 2

Quote from: mini miner on March 15, 2018, 04:13:34 AM

Quote from: ildotoress on March 15, 2018, 04:05:05 AM

Quote from: alex_85 on March 15, 2018, 03:22:56 AM

What happened guys, i was mining very good with v.11.4 with the fixed stale shares and everything was great 1-2 % stale shares. But now (12 hours already) i got 8-12 % stale shares and nothing was changed. Is there any problem with ethermine ?
Anyone else noticed doubled stale shares last 12 hours ?

Same here, restarted everything and still registering double stales.
Conclusion would be that Ethermine is having some issues or very high fluctuation in hash-rate.

But one thing is certain, the time of uploading a share has increased from 40ms to 60ms now (without any hardware, software or bandwidth changes).

some of ethermine miners only facing high stale shares problem.now i have changed my pool its fine now (from ethermine to nanopool), iam getting 0-1% stales now

I noticed the same problem, huge increase of stale shares about 12 hours ago in ehttermine with v 11.4, i will try 11.5 before change pool.

How can you see stales in nanopool?

big al

member

Activity: 140

Merit: 10

Quote from: ?? on ??

Cheers. Question (off topic) whats the performance like with dual mining ETH + Keccak using your 580s? Been thinking about ETH + BLAKE2S... but not sure which combo would suit best with these cards.

Hot and cranky! Msi rx580 bios flashed 8gb micron

Card 1: 32.2 ETH/193 KEC/dcri 6/137 watts/1200 core/2209 memory
Card 2: 30.8 ETH/215 KEC/dcri 7/132 watts/1215 core/2216 memory

If you are dual mining with keccak start with dcri at 6 and try some of the slower cards at 7. Your fast cards will be unstable at 7 and all will be at 8. I use the nicehash keccak server at keccak.usa.nicehash.com:3338. Just give it your bitcoin address and go to town. If you want smartcoin they have their own pools but you need to set up with them.

Topic: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v15.0 (Windows/Linux) - page 318. (Read 6590565 times)