Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v15.0 (Windows/Linux) - page 61.

zsoca72

newbie

Activity: 14

Merit: 0

Quote from: VasilyS on January 09, 2020, 06:40:54 PM

It is strange, but your miner makes wrong shares while mining UBIQ. Is there compatibility issue after hardfork in 2018 and switching to Ubqhash (modernised Ethash)? PhoenixMiner is working pretty well with UBIQ now.

Didnt see any answer. Can we mine Ubiq with Claymore? If yes, how?

waywoos

jr. member

Activity: 124

Merit: 2

ethermine pays out after a week if the payment is .01 or greater i believe.

Saeglopur

newbie

Activity: 6

Merit: 0

Quote from: adaseb on January 11, 2020, 12:50:34 AM

Quote from: Saeglopur on January 10, 2020, 12:57:02 PM

Hi!
Ethermine just paid me too early and under minimum level, why?
Over two years of perfectly even payouts at 0,1 ETH just got distracted :/ But why? They paid me even less than minimum level of 0,05 ETH. I've switched after years from Nanopool and this just happened.

I don't see what the issue is here exactly, they paid you, why is that a problem?

For years payments were at every 0.1 ETH, minimum level for payout is 0.05 ETH. It always worked perfectly, I've moved to Ethermine, it's all set the same, rules are also the same (0.05 minimum) ...but they paid me 0.034.. so it's even below that 0.05 limit and now balance is going up again. I don't see any reasons for that, just curious and bit angry that that switch to Ethermine and glitch ruined my perfectly even 0.1 payout system Grin

Which pool are you using? Switching from Nanopool to Ethermine was a good decision? It seems like it's mining way faster, I'm still waiting for more days/weeks to compare results to Nanopool.

0xcosmos

full member

Activity: 585

Merit: 110

Quote from: platinum4 on January 09, 2020, 09:14:57 PM

I can't use Phoenix 4.8c/Claymore 15 with 441.87 at all, it will crash before hashing on Phoenix sometimes, and in Claymore after about two/three rounds; removed all overclocks and the same.

Pissed me off cuz I'm stable for days on Equihash192,7 and Neoscrypt (much hotter algos)

i am sure downgrading the drivers will fix the issue
but i want to say that when i was mining and had amd rigs
i always installed blockchain drivers and nothing else
never updated from it
and disabled nearly all kind of windows updates
sometimes when we update to a new software version
something or the other always breaks

siskon

newbie

Activity: 1

Merit: 1

Quote from: freak1 on January 09, 2020, 10:44:13 AM

Just started getting this error on my miners, using ethermine.org as pool.

ETH: Received error: {"id":16,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":27,"message":"Illegalparams"}}

Anyone know what that is?

solved:
just change from eu1.ethermine.org to us1.ethermine.org

adaseb

legendary

Activity: 3808

Merit: 1723

Quote from: Saeglopur on January 10, 2020, 12:57:02 PM

Hi!
Ethermine just paid me too early and under minimum level, why?
Over two years of perfectly even payouts at 0,1 ETH just got distracted :/ But why? They paid me even less than minimum level of 0,05 ETH. I've switched after years from Nanopool and this just happened.

I don't see what the issue is here exactly, they paid you, why is that a problem?

From what I recall, Ethermine I think has a min payout of 0.01 ETH and they automatically pay out any balances that reach >0.01 ETH if no payouts were made in the past 7 days.

Over the years the payouts change from time to time depending on the price of ETH. I think the payout back in 2016 for ETH was like 0.10 ETH because ETH back then was like $5. And maybe during the peak at Q1 2018 the payout was even less than 0.01 ETH however I am not sure.

Saeglopur

newbie

Activity: 6

Merit: 0

Hi!
Ethermine just paid me too early and under minimum level, why?
Over two years of perfectly even payouts at 0,1 ETH just got distracted :/ But why? They paid me even less than minimum level of 0,05 ETH. I've switched after years from Nanopool and this just happened.

platinum4

sr. member

Activity: 547

Merit: 250

Quote from: ans34 on January 03, 2020, 05:15:30 PM

Does anyone have such problem - on Win 7, v15, drvs 436.30 and 441.66 and GTX1070 cards hashrate is about 22Mhash.... Tried to clean drivers with DDU and reinstall them, tried with/withous straps, w/wo OC etc.... On other algorythms speed is same as before, no change. And some months ago with older claymore all was fine, but now, with v15 such problem

upd: same issue on Phoenix miner, but all fine on nanominer and gminer.... can't even guess what it can be...

I can't use Phoenix 4.8c/Claymore 15 with 441.87 at all, it will crash before hashing on Phoenix sometimes, and in Claymore after about two/three rounds; removed all overclocks and the same.

Pissed me off cuz I'm stable for days on Equihash192,7 and Neoscrypt (much hotter algos)

VasilyS

member

Activity: 620

Merit: 21

It is strange, but your miner makes wrong shares while mining UBIQ. Is there compatibility issue after hardfork in 2018 and switching to Ubqhash (modernised Ethash)? PhoenixMiner is working pretty well with UBIQ now.

freak1

newbie

Activity: 47

Merit: 0

Just started getting this error on my miners, using ethermine.org as pool.

ETH: Received error: {"id":16,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":27,"message":"Illegalparams"}}

Anyone know what that is?

tg88

legendary

Activity: 2492

Merit: 1429

Payment Gateway Allows Recurring Payments

Quote from: Unclegogi on January 08, 2020, 04:10:36 PM

On one rig I meet the problem:
after start it prints an error to the log mulltiple times: "cannot get current settings, error -1", after that rig can freeze (i suggest that AMD driver resets).
What does this message mean?
Did anyone meet the same problem?

This rig has 4 x Radeon VII installed, downvolted, at stock memory clock, and it was rock stable before (>1k hours uptime).
Virtual memory is set to 65-70GB that should be enought.

I suggest testing your risers, if your rig worked perfectly and started crashing normally is a problem in a riser.

Unclegogi

newbie

Activity: 44

Merit: 0

On one rig I meet the problem:
after start it prints an error to the log mulltiple times: "cannot get current settings, error -1", after that rig can freeze (i suggest that AMD driver resets).
What does this message mean?
Did anyone meet the same problem?

This rig has 4 x Radeon VII installed, downvolted, at stock memory clock, and it was rock stable before (>1k hours uptime).
Virtual memory is set to 65-70GB that should be enought.

Lunga Chung

member

Activity: 277

Merit: 23

Quote from: adaseb on January 07, 2020, 11:45:05 PM

It could display 80W in GPU-z but I am wondering what his VDDC is. If he somehow got some high 99% ASIC quality GPU where he can run it at 1236Mhz core while undervolted to the min like 0.80V and has some good quality memory which doesn't give memory errors at 2180Mhz.

I had issues running some GPUs at a small undervolt if they were over 1150Mhz, and 1236Mhz would be very difficult to get very stable to the point where you don't need to restart it daily.

He could of just used uber straps or that tool called Pimp my straps to get those speeds.

I seriously doubt that 1236 can run on less then 0.85-0.87V

I'm not saying that 33Mhs isn't possible, just not at 80W, people need to understand that goal is to run miners with the best possible hashrate/consumption ratio, I'm pretty sure if neglect the consumption we could easily reach 34-35 Mhs

adaseb

legendary

Activity: 3808

Merit: 1723

Quote from: Lunga Chung on January 07, 2020, 07:12:55 AM

Quote from: SergeySS on January 06, 2020, 06:43:34 AM

Quote from: big_daddy on January 06, 2020, 05:45:05 AM

Quote from: SergeySS on January 05, 2020, 08:18:01 AM

RX 480 8GB speed 33 MH/S Power 80 watts

what mem / timings are you using here?

1236/2180

this wouldn't display 80W even in GPU-Z

It could display 80W in GPU-z but I am wondering what his VDDC is. If he somehow got some high 99% ASIC quality GPU where he can run it at 1236Mhz core while undervolted to the min like 0.80V and has some good quality memory which doesn't give memory errors at 2180Mhz.

I had issues running some GPUs at a small undervolt if they were over 1150Mhz, and 1236Mhz would be very difficult to get very stable to the point where you don't need to restart it daily.

He could of just used uber straps or that tool called Pimp my straps to get those speeds.

big_daddy

hero member

Activity: 1680

Merit: 583

xUSD - The PRIVATE stable coin - Haven Protocol

Quote from: Lunga Chung on January 07, 2020, 07:12:55 AM

Quote from: SergeySS on January 06, 2020, 06:43:34 AM

Quote from: big_daddy on January 06, 2020, 05:45:05 AM

Quote from: SergeySS on January 05, 2020, 08:18:01 AM

RX 480 8GB speed 33 MH/S Power 80 watts

what mem / timings are you using here?

1236/2180

this wouldn't display 80W even in GPU-Z

Right
Or give us the whole modded bios, straps, timings and I’ll test it
Or this is simply a lie

andreykx

newbie

Activity: 15

Merit: 0

AMD OpenCL has a single allocation limit of 4Gb on 8Gb cards.

Do you plan on supporting 4Gb+ DAG size? Is this even possible with the AMD OpenCL CL_DEVICE_MAX_MEM_ALLOC_SIZE limit?

Lunga Chung

member

Activity: 277

Merit: 23

Quote from: SergeySS on January 06, 2020, 06:43:34 AM

Quote from: big_daddy on January 06, 2020, 05:45:05 AM

Quote from: SergeySS on January 05, 2020, 08:18:01 AM

RX 480 8GB speed 33 MH/S Power 80 watts

what mem / timings are you using here?

1236/2180

this wouldn't display 80W even in GPU-Z

sxemini

member

Activity: 1558

Merit: 69

Quote from: adaseb on January 06, 2020, 11:19:11 PM

Quote from: batsonxl on January 06, 2020, 12:10:16 AM

Quote from: adaseb on January 05, 2020, 11:36:19 PM

Quote from: Lunga Chung on January 05, 2020, 02:10:04 PM

Quote from: SergeySS on January 05, 2020, 08:18:01 AM

RX 480 8GB speed 33 MH/S Power 80 watts

yeah right

No it was never 80 watts, most likely he is talking about the wattage that you see in GPU-z which is only the GPU chip wattage and doesn't account for the rest of the board like the memory controller, fans, and other components.

Honestly I don't think 33MH/s is easy with a 480 8GB, maybe some with a certain ASIC quality were possible but with my RX 470 4GB the most I could get was like 29.5mh/s and it wasn't really efficient. The best efficiency was at like 28.5MH/s and it still used 120 Watts per GPU from the wall not including the motherboard+drive+ram.

80 watts is just not possible with any RX 470/570.

rx 470 4gb you have elpida memory i guess yes they give you stable 29.5mhz but i have also rx 470 with samsung memory which gives stable 30.5-30.8mhz which is good for these cards.32-33mhz is easy to get with rx 480-580 with samsung memory an micron also doing not bad.

The RX 470/570 4GB came with either Samsung, Hynix or Elpida memory. I think the first batch was mostly Hynix and then some manufacteurs started to include Elpida and some higher end manufacteurs included Samsung memory.

90% of all my RX 470 4GB are Hynix and 10% were Samsung. The Samsung were the best because they gained usually 1-2Mh/s more than Hynix. The Elipida I heard were the worse.

The Samsungs were also good on other algos like XMR (the old XMR algo not current).

The issue is that before you actually buy and install the card, you have no idea what type of memory is included. With some models you can look and read the chip but others its covered and you need to use GPU-z.

My opinion:
Samsung worst (30,5mh only)
Elpida good (up to 33mh)
Hynix best (up to 33,4 - 34 mh)

adaseb

legendary

Activity: 3808

Merit: 1723

Quote from: batsonxl on January 06, 2020, 12:10:16 AM

Quote from: adaseb on January 05, 2020, 11:36:19 PM

Quote from: Lunga Chung on January 05, 2020, 02:10:04 PM

Quote from: SergeySS on January 05, 2020, 08:18:01 AM

RX 480 8GB speed 33 MH/S Power 80 watts

yeah right

No it was never 80 watts, most likely he is talking about the wattage that you see in GPU-z which is only the GPU chip wattage and doesn't account for the rest of the board like the memory controller, fans, and other components.

Honestly I don't think 33MH/s is easy with a 480 8GB, maybe some with a certain ASIC quality were possible but with my RX 470 4GB the most I could get was like 29.5mh/s and it wasn't really efficient. The best efficiency was at like 28.5MH/s and it still used 120 Watts per GPU from the wall not including the motherboard+drive+ram.

80 watts is just not possible with any RX 470/570.

rx 470 4gb you have elpida memory i guess yes they give you stable 29.5mhz but i have also rx 470 with samsung memory which gives stable 30.5-30.8mhz which is good for these cards.32-33mhz is easy to get with rx 480-580 with samsung memory an micron also doing not bad.

The RX 470/570 4GB came with either Samsung, Hynix or Elpida memory. I think the first batch was mostly Hynix and then some manufacteurs started to include Elpida and some higher end manufacteurs included Samsung memory.

90% of all my RX 470 4GB are Hynix and 10% were Samsung. The Samsung were the best because they gained usually 1-2Mh/s more than Hynix. The Elipida I heard were the worse.

The Samsungs were also good on other algos like XMR (the old XMR algo not current).

The issue is that before you actually buy and install the card, you have no idea what type of memory is included. With some models you can look and read the chip but others its covered and you need to use GPU-z.

tg88

legendary

Activity: 2492

Merit: 1429

Payment Gateway Allows Recurring Payments

Quote from: sbcandrew on January 03, 2020, 03:59:53 PM

Quote from: tg88 on January 03, 2020, 03:58:25 PM

Quote from: sbcandrew on January 03, 2020, 03:48:59 PM

on windows 7 APPCRASH EthDcrMiner64.exe amdocl64.dll
drivers blockchain crimson 23 august

your miner work with windows 7?

I don't have windows 7 rigs at the moment, but I think it works.

Try to cleanly uninstall drivers with DDU uninstaller and reinstall.

already done many times, and windows also reinstalled

Try to add these parameters to your command line:

Try to add these environment variables to your command line:

GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool ssl://eu1.ethermine.org:5555 -ewal 0xD69af2A796A737A103F12d2f0BCC563a13900E6F -epsw x

If it does not work test with:
GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 1

Topic: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v15.0 (Windows/Linux) - page 61. (Read 6590757 times)