try zpool:
tcp://decred.mine.zpool.ca:5744
Topic: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v15.0 (Windows/Linux) - page 726. (Read 6590565 times)
July 23, 2017, 09:43:15 PM
July 23, 2017, 09:24:21 PM
Help ! I've been fighting my Claymore start.bat configuration for hours and hours.
I have ETH mining just fine for weeks. Now trying to dual mine using Decred. I've created workers at decredpool.org and suprnova.cc for my decred but I always get error in Claymore v9.7/Windows saying:
Socket was closed remotely (by pool)
DCR: Job timeout, disconnect, retry in 20 sec...
Again my ETH mining to ubiqpool (or nanopool -- I switch back and forth occasionally but both ETH mining pools working fine). Only the Decred pools (both suprnova and decredpool give me this same error). I've tried every combination of my login name and worker name that I configured in each pools web site. For example, my username in both pools is bobsmith (not my real username) and my workname is 3 (as in number 3)--this is the only worker I have configured on their respective web sites. Password is x for my worker.
Here is my start.bat:
SETX GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
SETX GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
SETX GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
SETX GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
SETX GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool us.ubiqpool.io:8008 -ewal 0x91AaaABDa75b55AFB3CE62f262A648886A445b92 -epsw x -eworker minr3 -dcoin dcr -dpool dcr.suprnova.cc:3252 -dwal bobsmith.3 -dpsw x -allpools 1
I have tried different port numbers such as 9111, 2255, 3256 without success; however, the suprnova web site says to use 3252 for for claymore so I've tried everything I can using this port. I DO GET A "CONNECTED" message I Claymore using this port so I assume this is correct.
DCR: Stratum - connecting to 'dcr.suprnova.cc' <217.182.138.167> port 3252
DCR: Stratum - Connected (dcr.suprnova.cc:3252)
HELP PLEASE !!!! I'm dying over here.
I have ETH mining just fine for weeks. Now trying to dual mine using Decred. I've created workers at decredpool.org and suprnova.cc for my decred but I always get error in Claymore v9.7/Windows saying:
Socket was closed remotely (by pool)
DCR: Job timeout, disconnect, retry in 20 sec...
Again my ETH mining to ubiqpool (or nanopool -- I switch back and forth occasionally but both ETH mining pools working fine). Only the Decred pools (both suprnova and decredpool give me this same error). I've tried every combination of my login name and worker name that I configured in each pools web site. For example, my username in both pools is bobsmith (not my real username) and my workname is 3 (as in number 3)--this is the only worker I have configured on their respective web sites. Password is x for my worker.
Here is my start.bat:
SETX GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
SETX GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
SETX GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
SETX GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
SETX GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool us.ubiqpool.io:8008 -ewal 0x91AaaABDa75b55AFB3CE62f262A648886A445b92 -epsw x -eworker minr3 -dcoin dcr -dpool dcr.suprnova.cc:3252 -dwal bobsmith.3 -dpsw x -allpools 1
I have tried different port numbers such as 9111, 2255, 3256 without success; however, the suprnova web site says to use 3252 for for claymore so I've tried everything I can using this port. I DO GET A "CONNECTED" message I Claymore using this port so I assume this is correct.
DCR: Stratum - connecting to 'dcr.suprnova.cc' <217.182.138.167> port 3252
DCR: Stratum - Connected (dcr.suprnova.cc:3252)
HELP PLEASE !!!! I'm dying over here.
July 23, 2017, 08:48:09 PM
Hi all,
Help! My rig randomly (5-20h) freeze?
I have to manually turn the power off, then on.
Then start the Claymore's bat-file to mine again
It's so annoying.
The hasrate of GPU2 (see log) suddenly drops to 0.000 Mh/s then the whole rig freeze..
Is GPU2 (see logfile) broken?
Or do I have to disable watchdog (-wd) or restart-mode (-r)?
Or use -gser? Or do I have to undervolt/underclock GPU2?
My rig hardware is as follow:
Using the software:
Claymore logfile:
Thanks in advance!
Help! My rig randomly (5-20h) freeze?
I have to manually turn the power off, then on.
Then start the Claymore's bat-file to mine again
It's so annoying.
The hasrate of GPU2 (see log) suddenly drops to 0.000 Mh/s then the whole rig freeze..
Is GPU2 (see logfile) broken?
Or do I have to disable watchdog (-wd) or restart-mode (-r)?
Or use -gser? Or do I have to undervolt/underclock GPU2?
My rig hardware is as follow:
- 3x GPU: Asus 4GB D5 RX 580 DUAL OC (the GPU's are flashed to stock settings.)
- 3x Molex PCIe risers ver006 upgrade
- 1x PSU: Antec HCP-1000 Platinum 1000W
- 1x MOB: MSI ATX Z170A Gaming M5 (BIOS settings: Gen1, disable audio, etc.)
Using the software:
- Windows 10 Pro build 1703 (Windows Update disabled, virtual mem set to 16gb and Never turn off display/sleepmode)
- Latest driver: Radeon Crimson Relive 17.7.1
- Claymore Dual v9.7
Claymore logfile:
Code:
00:57:30:369 149c got 243 bytes
00:57:30:369 149c buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0xdfe5529def03b680612ff375825092cee0592550c68fc45308f38471b1f625d5","0xcb5d57db3888696bcf7c9b09b0c77c3ba41955b53950b8197064dc9df81cda49","0x00000000dbe6fecebdedd5beb573440e5a884d1b2fbf06fcce912adcb8d8422e"]}
00:57:30:369 149c parse packet: 242
00:57:30:369 149c ETH: job is the same
00:57:30:369 149c new buf size: 0
00:57:37:542 578 GPU0 t=69C fan=77%, GPU1 t=73C fan=89%, GPU2 t=69C fan=58%
00:57:37:542 578 em hbt: 0, fm hbt: 94,
00:57:37:542 578 watchdog - thread 0 (gpu0), hb time 62
00:57:37:542 578 watchdog - thread 1 (gpu0), hb time 281
00:57:37:542 578 watchdog - thread 2 (gpu1), hb time 62
00:57:37:542 578 watchdog - thread 3 (gpu1), hb time 281
00:57:37:558 578 watchdog - thread 4 (gpu2), hb time 203
00:57:37:558 578 watchdog - thread 5 (gpu2), hb time 422
00:57:40:339 149c ETH: checking pool connection...
00:57:40:339 149c send: {"worker": "", "jsonrpc": "2.0", "params": [], "id": 3, "method": "eth_getWork"}
00:57:40:386 149c got 243 bytes
00:57:40:386 149c buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0xdfe5529def03b680612ff375825092cee0592550c68fc45308f38471b1f625d5","0xcb5d57db3888696bcf7c9b09b0c77c3ba41955b53950b8197064dc9df81cda49","0x00000000dbe6fecebdedd5beb573440e5a884d1b2fbf06fcce912adcb8d8422e"]}
00:57:40:386 149c parse packet: 242
00:57:40:386 149c ETH: job is the same
00:57:40:386 149c new buf size: 0
00:57:46:168 149c send: {"id":6,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_submitHashrate","params":["0x3ea33cd", "0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000035a0df71"]}
00:57:50:356 149c ETH: checking pool connection...
00:57:50:356 149c send: {"worker": "", "jsonrpc": "2.0", "params": [], "id": 3, "method": "eth_getWork"}
00:57:50:403 149c got 243 bytes
00:57:50:403 149c buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0xdfe5529def03b680612ff375825092cee0592550c68fc45308f38471b1f625d5","0xcb5d57db3888696bcf7c9b09b0c77c3ba41955b53950b8197064dc9df81cda49","0x00000000dbe6fecebdedd5beb573440e5a884d1b2fbf06fcce912adcb8d8422e"]}
00:57:50:403 149c parse packet: 242
00:57:50:403 149c ETH: job is the same
00:57:50:403 149c new buf size: 0
00:58:00:373 149c ETH: checking pool connection...
00:58:00:373 149c send: {"worker": "", "jsonrpc": "2.0", "params": [], "id": 3, "method": "eth_getWork"}
00:58:00:419 149c got 243 bytes
00:58:00:419 149c buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0xdfe5529def03b680612ff375825092cee0592550c68fc45308f38471b1f625d5","0xcb5d57db3888696bcf7c9b09b0c77c3ba41955b53950b8197064dc9df81cda49","0x00000000dbe6fecebdedd5beb573440e5a884d1b2fbf06fcce912adcb8d8422e"]}
00:58:00:419 149c parse packet: 242
00:58:00:419 149c ETH: job is the same
00:58:00:419 149c new buf size: 0
00:58:03:513 149c got 243 bytes
00:58:03:513 149c buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0xf80fcacaff45bdca8ba3a4736a474029c2dd3108fd0de6ac1e5c8c8806d9c621","0xcb5d57db3888696bcf7c9b09b0c77c3ba41955b53950b8197064dc9df81cda49","0x00000000dbe6fecebdedd5beb573440e5a884d1b2fbf06fcce912adcb8d8422e"]}
00:58:03:513 149c parse packet: 242
00:58:03:513 149c ETH: job changed
00:58:03:513 149c new buf size: 0
00:58:03:513 149c ETH: 07/24/17-00:58:03 - New job from eth-eu2.nanopool.org:9999
00:58:03:529 149c target: 0x00000000dbe6fece (diff: 5000MH), epoch 135(2.05GB)
00:58:03:529 149c ETH - Total Speed: 65.728 Mh/s, Total Shares: 397, Rejected: 0, Time: 08:31
00:58:03:529 149c ETH: GPU0 21.903 Mh/s, GPU1 22.015 Mh/s, GPU2 21.810 Mh/s
00:58:06:186 149c send: {"id":6,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_submitHashrate","params":["0x3ec3e30", "0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000035a0df71"]}
00:58:10:389 149c ETH: checking pool connection...
00:58:10:389 149c send: {"worker": "", "jsonrpc": "2.0", "params": [], "id": 3, "method": "eth_getWork"}
00:58:10:436 149c got 243 bytes
00:58:10:436 149c buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0xf80fcacaff45bdca8ba3a4736a474029c2dd3108fd0de6ac1e5c8c8806d9c621","0xcb5d57db3888696bcf7c9b09b0c77c3ba41955b53950b8197064dc9df81cda49","0x00000000dbe6fecebdedd5beb573440e5a884d1b2fbf06fcce912adcb8d8422e"]}
00:58:10:436 149c parse packet: 242
00:58:10:436 149c ETH: job is the same
00:58:10:436 149c new buf size: 0
00:58:10:530 578 GPU0 t=70C fan=78%, GPU1 t=73C fan=89%, GPU2 t=69C fan=59%
00:58:10:545 578 em hbt: 16, fm hbt: 62,
00:58:10:545 578 watchdog - thread 0 (gpu0), hb time 219
00:58:10:545 578 watchdog - thread 1 (gpu0), hb time 437
00:58:10:545 578 watchdog - thread 2 (gpu1), hb time 391
00:58:10:545 578 watchdog - thread 3 (gpu1), hb time 172
00:58:10:545 578 watchdog - thread 4 (gpu2), hb time 31
00:58:10:561 578 watchdog - thread 5 (gpu2), hb time 266
00:58:20:406 149c ETH: checking pool connection...
00:58:20:406 149c send: {"worker": "", "jsonrpc": "2.0", "params": [], "id": 3, "method": "eth_getWork"}
00:58:20:484 149c got 243 bytes
00:58:20:484 149c buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0xf80fcacaff45bdca8ba3a4736a474029c2dd3108fd0de6ac1e5c8c8806d9c621","0xcb5d57db3888696bcf7c9b09b0c77c3ba41955b53950b8197064dc9df81cda49","0x00000000dbe6fecebdedd5beb573440e5a884d1b2fbf06fcce912adcb8d8422e"]}
00:58:20:484 149c parse packet: 242
00:58:20:484 149c ETH: job is the same
00:58:20:484 149c new buf size: 0
00:58:26:203 149c send: {"id":6,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_submitHashrate","params":["0x3ecb0d9", "0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000035a0df71"]}
00:58:30:423 149c ETH: checking pool connection...
00:58:30:423 149c send: {"worker": "", "jsonrpc": "2.0", "params": [], "id": 3, "method": "eth_getWork"}
00:58:30:470 149c got 243 bytes
00:58:30:470 149c buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0xf80fcacaff45bdca8ba3a4736a474029c2dd3108fd0de6ac1e5c8c8806d9c621","0xcb5d57db3888696bcf7c9b09b0c77c3ba41955b53950b8197064dc9df81cda49","0x00000000dbe6fecebdedd5beb573440e5a884d1b2fbf06fcce912adcb8d8422e"]}
00:58:30:470 149c parse packet: 242
00:58:30:470 149c ETH: job is the same
00:58:30:470 149c new buf size: 0
00:58:40:439 149c ETH: checking pool connection...
00:58:40:439 149c send: {"worker": "", "jsonrpc": "2.0", "params": [], "id": 3, "method": "eth_getWork"}
00:58:40:486 149c got 243 bytes
00:58:40:486 149c buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0xf80fcacaff45bdca8ba3a4736a474029c2dd3108fd0de6ac1e5c8c8806d9c621","0xcb5d57db3888696bcf7c9b09b0c77c3ba41955b53950b8197064dc9df81cda49","0x00000000dbe6fecebdedd5beb573440e5a884d1b2fbf06fcce912adcb8d8422e"]}
00:58:40:486 149c parse packet: 242
00:58:40:486 149c ETH: job is the same
00:58:40:486 149c new buf size: 0
00:58:43:533 578 GPU0 t=69C fan=78%, GPU1 t=73C fan=89%, GPU2 t=69C fan=58%
00:58:43:533 578 em hbt: 0, fm hbt: 15,
00:58:43:549 578 watchdog - thread 0 (gpu0), hb time 359
00:58:43:549 578 watchdog - thread 1 (gpu0), hb time 141
00:58:43:549 578 watchdog - thread 2 (gpu1), hb time 281
00:58:43:549 578 watchdog - thread 3 (gpu1), hb time 62
00:58:43:549 578 watchdog - thread 4 (gpu2), hb time 281
00:58:43:549 578 watchdog - thread 5 (gpu2), hb time 62
00:58:46:221 149c send: {"id":6,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_submitHashrate","params":["0x3ead9b3", "0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000035a0df71"]}
00:58:50:456 149c ETH: checking pool connection...
00:58:50:456 149c send: {"worker": "", "jsonrpc": "2.0", "params": [], "id": 3, "method": "eth_getWork"}
00:58:50:503 149c got 243 bytes
00:58:50:503 149c buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0xf80fcacaff45bdca8ba3a4736a474029c2dd3108fd0de6ac1e5c8c8806d9c621","0xcb5d57db3888696bcf7c9b09b0c77c3ba41955b53950b8197064dc9df81cda49","0x00000000dbe6fecebdedd5beb573440e5a884d1b2fbf06fcce912adcb8d8422e"]}
00:58:50:503 149c parse packet: 242
00:58:50:503 149c ETH: job is the same
00:58:50:503 149c new buf size: 0
00:58:58:597 149c got 243 bytes
00:58:58:597 149c buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0xf80fcacaff45bdca8ba3a4736a474029c2dd3108fd0de6ac1e5c8c8806d9c621","0xcb5d57db3888696bcf7c9b09b0c77c3ba41955b53950b8197064dc9df81cda49","0x00000000dbe6fecebdedd5beb573440e5a884d1b2fbf06fcce912adcb8d8422e"]}
00:58:58:597 149c parse packet: 242
00:58:58:597 149c ETH: job is the same
00:58:58:597 149c new buf size: 0
00:59:00:473 149c ETH: checking pool connection...
00:59:00:473 149c send: {"worker": "", "jsonrpc": "2.0", "params": [], "id": 3, "method": "eth_getWork"}
00:59:00:520 149c got 243 bytes
00:59:00:520 149c buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0xf80fcacaff45bdca8ba3a4736a474029c2dd3108fd0de6ac1e5c8c8806d9c621","0xcb5d57db3888696bcf7c9b09b0c77c3ba41955b53950b8197064dc9df81cda49","0x00000000dbe6fecebdedd5beb573440e5a884d1b2fbf06fcce912adcb8d8422e"]}
00:59:00:520 149c parse packet: 242
00:59:00:520 149c ETH: job is the same
00:59:00:520 149c new buf size: 0
00:59:00:738 149c got 243 bytes
00:59:00:738 149c buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0xb19ce10cf94e1b96390e64288bddd10fe37f9dc0ff5f5800bd18b9c0a9caf775","0xcb5d57db3888696bcf7c9b09b0c77c3ba41955b53950b8197064dc9df81cda49","0x00000000dbe6fecebdedd5beb573440e5a884d1b2fbf06fcce912adcb8d8422e"]}
00:59:00:738 149c parse packet: 242
00:59:00:738 149c ETH: job changed
00:59:00:738 149c new buf size: 0
00:59:00:738 149c ETH: 07/24/17-00:59:00 - New job from eth-eu2.nanopool.org:9999
00:59:00:754 149c target: 0x00000000dbe6fece (diff: 5000MH), epoch 135(2.05GB)
00:59:00:754 149c ETH - Total Speed: 65.779 Mh/s, Total Shares: 397, Rejected: 0, Time: 08:32
00:59:00:754 149c ETH: GPU0 21.875 Mh/s, GPU1 21.999 Mh/s, GPU2 21.904 Mh/s
00:59:06:067 149c got 243 bytes
00:59:06:067 149c buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0x78747a739d9ca835de598bc3012460dc7f2bf88f7b9f348ec95a0974d38c7f63","0xcb5d57db3888696bcf7c9b09b0c77c3ba41955b53950b8197064dc9df81cda49","0x00000000dbe6fecebdedd5beb573440e5a884d1b2fbf06fcce912adcb8d8422e"]}
00:59:06:067 149c parse packet: 242
00:59:06:067 149c ETH: job changed
00:59:06:067 149c new buf size: 0
00:59:06:067 149c ETH: 07/24/17-00:59:06 - New job from eth-eu2.nanopool.org:9999
00:59:06:083 149c target: 0x00000000dbe6fece (diff: 5000MH), epoch 135(2.05GB)
00:59:06:083 149c ETH - Total Speed: 65.583 Mh/s, Total Shares: 397, Rejected: 0, Time: 08:32
00:59:06:083 149c ETH: GPU0 21.863 Mh/s, GPU1 21.993 Mh/s, GPU2 21.728 Mh/s
00:59:06:239 149c send: {"id":6,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_submitHashrate","params":["0x3e6a90c", "0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000035a0df71"]}
00:59:07:239 149c got 243 bytes
00:59:07:239 149c buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0x4f7990720003e54066d9471dc5a96cf3b7a21f02cbbc2f3b5b41f5f1901e6a25","0xcb5d57db3888696bcf7c9b09b0c77c3ba41955b53950b8197064dc9df81cda49","0x00000000dbe6fecebdedd5beb573440e5a884d1b2fbf06fcce912adcb8d8422e"]}
00:59:07:239 149c parse packet: 242
00:59:07:239 149c ETH: job changed
00:59:07:239 149c new buf size: 0
00:59:07:239 149c ETH: 07/24/17-00:59:07 - New job from eth-eu2.nanopool.org:9999
00:59:07:255 149c target: 0x00000000dbe6fece (diff: 5000MH), epoch 135(2.05GB)
00:59:07:255 149c ETH - Total Speed: 65.762 Mh/s, Total Shares: 397, Rejected: 0, Time: 08:32
00:59:07:255 149c ETH: GPU0 21.872 Mh/s, GPU1 22.000 Mh/s, GPU2 21.891 Mh/s
00:59:10:489 149c ETH: checking pool connection...
00:59:10:489 149c send: {"worker": "", "jsonrpc": "2.0", "params": [], "id": 3, "method": "eth_getWork"}
00:59:10:536 149c got 243 bytes
00:59:10:536 149c buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0x4f7990720003e54066d9471dc5a96cf3b7a21f02cbbc2f3b5b41f5f1901e6a25","0xcb5d57db3888696bcf7c9b09b0c77c3ba41955b53950b8197064dc9df81cda49","0x00000000dbe6fecebdedd5beb573440e5a884d1b2fbf06fcce912adcb8d8422e"]}
00:59:10:536 149c parse packet: 242
00:59:10:536 149c ETH: job is the same
00:59:10:536 149c new buf size: 0
00:59:11:927 149c got 243 bytes
00:59:11:927 149c buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0x1bce730b7da39f11f98b7d3632dfb9ef34e58eca66e4ef54d2ef03ba5d8bd758","0xcb5d57db3888696bcf7c9b09b0c77c3ba41955b53950b8197064dc9df81cda49","0x00000000dbe6fecebdedd5beb573440e5a884d1b2fbf06fcce912adcb8d8422e"]}
00:59:11:927 149c parse packet: 242
00:59:11:927 149c ETH: job changed
00:59:11:927 149c new buf size: 0
00:59:11:927 149c ETH: 07/24/17-00:59:11 - New job from eth-eu2.nanopool.org:9999
00:59:11:943 149c target: 0x00000000dbe6fece (diff: 5000MH), epoch 135(2.05GB)
00:59:11:943 149c ETH - Total Speed: 65.857 Mh/s, Total Shares: 397, Rejected: 0, Time: 08:32
00:59:11:943 149c ETH: GPU0 21.881 Mh/s, GPU1 21.991 Mh/s, GPU2 21.985 Mh/s
00:59:16:537 578 GPU0 t=69C fan=77%, GPU1 t=73C fan=89%, GPU2 t=69C fan=57%
00:59:16:537 578 em hbt: 0, fm hbt: 93,
00:59:16:552 578 watchdog - thread 0 (gpu0), hb time 78
00:59:16:552 578 watchdog - thread 1 (gpu0), hb time 297
00:59:16:552 578 watchdog - thread 2 (gpu1), hb time 187
00:59:16:552 578 watchdog - thread 3 (gpu1), hb time 406
00:59:16:552 578 watchdog - thread 4 (gpu2), hb time 78
00:59:16:568 578 watchdog - thread 5 (gpu2), hb time 328
00:59:20:506 149c ETH: checking pool connection...
00:59:20:506 149c send: {"worker": "", "jsonrpc": "2.0", "params": [], "id": 3, "method": "eth_getWork"}
00:59:20:553 149c got 243 bytes
00:59:20:553 149c buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0x1bce730b7da39f11f98b7d3632dfb9ef34e58eca66e4ef54d2ef03ba5d8bd758","0xcb5d57db3888696bcf7c9b09b0c77c3ba41955b53950b8197064dc9df81cda49","0x00000000dbe6fecebdedd5beb573440e5a884d1b2fbf06fcce912adcb8d8422e"]}
00:59:20:553 149c parse packet: 242
00:59:20:553 149c ETH: job is the same
00:59:20:553 149c new buf size: 0
00:59:26:257 149c send: {"id":6,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_submitHashrate","params":["0x3ecbb0f", "0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000035a0df71"]}
00:59:30:523 149c ETH: checking pool connection...
00:59:30:523 149c send: {"worker": "", "jsonrpc": "2.0", "params": [], "id": 3, "method": "eth_getWork"}
00:59:30:570 149c got 243 bytes
00:59:30:570 149c buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0x1bce730b7da39f11f98b7d3632dfb9ef34e58eca66e4ef54d2ef03ba5d8bd758","0xcb5d57db3888696bcf7c9b09b0c77c3ba41955b53950b8197064dc9df81cda49","0x00000000dbe6fecebdedd5beb573440e5a884d1b2fbf06fcce912adcb8d8422e"]}
00:59:30:570 149c parse packet: 242
00:59:30:570 149c ETH: job is the same
00:59:30:570 149c new buf size: 0
00:59:40:539 149c ETH: checking pool connection...
00:59:40:539 149c send: {"worker": "", "jsonrpc": "2.0", "params": [], "id": 3, "method": "eth_getWork"}
00:59:40:586 149c got 243 bytes
00:59:40:586 149c buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0x1bce730b7da39f11f98b7d3632dfb9ef34e58eca66e4ef54d2ef03ba5d8bd758","0xcb5d57db3888696bcf7c9b09b0c77c3ba41955b53950b8197064dc9df81cda49","0x00000000dbe6fecebdedd5beb573440e5a884d1b2fbf06fcce912adcb8d8422e"]}
00:59:40:586 149c parse packet: 242
00:59:40:586 149c ETH: job is the same
00:59:40:586 149c new buf size: 0
00:59:46:259 149c send: {"id":6,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_submitHashrate","params":["0x3ecbb97", "0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000035a0df71"]}
00:59:49:540 578 GPU0 t=69C fan=77%, GPU1 t=73C fan=89%, GPU2 t=69C fan=57%
00:59:49:540 578 em hbt: 0, fm hbt: 62,
00:59:49:556 578 watchdog - thread 0 (gpu0), hb time 219
00:59:49:556 578 watchdog - thread 1 (gpu0), hb time 438
00:59:49:556 578 watchdog - thread 2 (gpu1), hb time 78
00:59:49:556 578 watchdog - thread 3 (gpu1), hb time 297
00:59:49:556 578 watchdog - thread 4 (gpu2), hb time 344
00:59:49:556 578 watchdog - thread 5 (gpu2), hb time 125
00:59:50:540 149c ETH: checking pool connection...
00:59:50:540 149c send: {"worker": "", "jsonrpc": "2.0", "params": [], "id": 3, "method": "eth_getWork"}
00:59:50:587 149c got 243 bytes
00:59:50:587 149c buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0x1bce730b7da39f11f98b7d3632dfb9ef34e58eca66e4ef54d2ef03ba5d8bd758","0xcb5d57db3888696bcf7c9b09b0c77c3ba41955b53950b8197064dc9df81cda49","0x00000000dbe6fecebdedd5beb573440e5a884d1b2fbf06fcce912adcb8d8422e"]}
00:59:50:587 149c parse packet: 242
00:59:50:587 149c ETH: job is the same
00:59:50:587 149c new buf size: 0
01:00:00:557 149c ETH: checking pool connection...
01:00:00:557 149c send: {"worker": "", "jsonrpc": "2.0", "params": [], "id": 3, "method": "eth_getWork"}
01:00:00:604 149c got 243 bytes
01:00:00:604 149c buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0x1bce730b7da39f11f98b7d3632dfb9ef34e58eca66e4ef54d2ef03ba5d8bd758","0xcb5d57db3888696bcf7c9b09b0c77c3ba41955b53950b8197064dc9df81cda49","0x00000000dbe6fecebdedd5beb573440e5a884d1b2fbf06fcce912adcb8d8422e"]}
01:00:00:604 149c parse packet: 242
01:00:00:604 149c ETH: job is the same
01:00:00:604 149c new buf size: 0
01:00:06:277 149c send: {"id":6,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_submitHashrate","params":["0x3cafa4f", "0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000035a0df71"]}
01:00:06:980 149c got 243 bytes
01:00:06:980 149c buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0x1bce730b7da39f11f98b7d3632dfb9ef34e58eca66e4ef54d2ef03ba5d8bd758","0xcb5d57db3888696bcf7c9b09b0c77c3ba41955b53950b8197064dc9df81cda49","0x00000000dbe6fecebdedd5beb573440e5a884d1b2fbf06fcce912adcb8d8422e"]}
01:00:06:980 149c parse packet: 242
01:00:06:980 149c ETH: job is the same
01:00:06:980 149c new buf size: 0
01:00:10:574 149c ETH: checking pool connection...
01:00:10:574 149c send: {"worker": "", "jsonrpc": "2.0", "params": [], "id": 3, "method": "eth_getWork"}
01:00:10:621 149c got 243 bytes
01:00:10:621 149c buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0x1bce730b7da39f11f98b7d3632dfb9ef34e58eca66e4ef54d2ef03ba5d8bd758","0xcb5d57db3888696bcf7c9b09b0c77c3ba41955b53950b8197064dc9df81cda49","0x00000000dbe6fecebdedd5beb573440e5a884d1b2fbf06fcce912adcb8d8422e"]}
01:00:10:621 149c parse packet: 242
01:00:10:621 149c ETH: job is the same
01:00:10:621 149c new buf size: 0
01:00:13:902 149c got 243 bytes
01:00:13:902 149c buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0xcb2f2942ac7c1175464543ff4a0f2ffba9588e1c06921f3adcae85bf241b3952","0xcb5d57db3888696bcf7c9b09b0c77c3ba41955b53950b8197064dc9df81cda49","0x00000000dbe6fecebdedd5beb573440e5a884d1b2fbf06fcce912adcb8d8422e"]}
01:00:13:902 149c parse packet: 242
01:00:13:902 149c ETH: job changed
01:00:13:902 149c new buf size: 0
01:00:13:902 149c ETH: 07/24/17-01:00:13 - New job from eth-eu2.nanopool.org:9999
01:00:13:918 149c target: 0x00000000dbe6fece (diff: 5000MH), epoch 135(2.05GB)
01:00:13:918 149c ETH - Total Speed: 65.838 Mh/s, Total Shares: 397, Rejected: 0, Time: 08:33
01:00:13:918 149c ETH: GPU0 21.861 Mh/s, GPU1 21.995 Mh/s, GPU2 21.982 Mh/s
01:00:19:169 149c got 243 bytes
01:00:19:169 149c buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0x3104ba8ee013a2a0f764d29495ed41ed08b775e0e465adbe40a994a47e98cbe2","0xcb5d57db3888696bcf7c9b09b0c77c3ba41955b53950b8197064dc9df81cda49","0x00000000dbe6fecebdedd5beb573440e5a884d1b2fbf06fcce912adcb8d8422e"]}
01:00:19:169 149c parse packet: 242
01:00:19:169 149c ETH: job changed
01:00:19:169 149c new buf size: 0
01:00:19:169 149c ETH: 07/24/17-01:00:19 - New job from eth-eu2.nanopool.org:9999
01:00:19:184 149c target: 0x00000000dbe6fece (diff: 5000MH), epoch 135(2.05GB)
01:00:19:184 149c ETH - Total Speed: 43.868 Mh/s, Total Shares: 397, Rejected: 0, Time: 08:33
01:00:19:184 149c ETH: GPU0 21.874 Mh/s, GPU1 21.994 Mh/s, GPU2 0.000 Mh/s
01:00:20:591 149c ETH: checking pool connection...
01:00:20:591 149c send: {"worker": "", "jsonrpc": "2.0", "params": [], "id": 3, "method": "eth_getWork"}
01:00:20:637 149c got 243 bytes
01:00:20:637 149c buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0x3104ba8ee013a2a0f764d29495ed41ed08b775e0e465adbe40a994a47e98cbe2","0xcb5d57db3888696bcf7c9b09b0c77c3ba41955b53950b8197064dc9df81cda49","0x00000000dbe6fecebdedd5beb573440e5a884d1b2fbf06fcce912adcb8d8422e"]}
01:00:20:637 149c parse packet: 242
01:00:20:637 149c ETH: job is the same
01:00:20:637 149c new buf size: 0
01:00:22:544 578 GPU0 t=69C fan=76%, GPU1 t=73C fan=89%, GPU2 t=61C fan=54%
01:00:22:544 578 em hbt: 0, fm hbt: 31,
01:00:22:559 578 watchdog - thread 0 (gpu0), hb time 360
01:00:22:559 578 watchdog - thread 1 (gpu0), hb time 141
01:00:22:559 578 watchdog - thread 2 (gpu1), hb time 391
01:00:22:559 578 watchdog - thread 3 (gpu1), hb time 188
01:00:22:559 578 watchdog - thread 4 (gpu2), hb time 11532
01:00:22:559 578 watchdog - thread 5 (gpu2), hb time 11313
01:00:26:294 149c send: {"id":6,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_submitHashrate","params":["0x29d5acc", "0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000035a0df71"]}
01:00:30:607 149c ETH: checking pool connection...
01:00:30:607 149c send: {"worker": "", "jsonrpc": "2.0", "params": [], "id": 3, "method": "eth_getWork"}
01:00:30:654 149c got 243 bytes
01:00:30:654 149c buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0x3104ba8ee013a2a0f764d29495ed41ed08b775e0e465adbe40a994a47e98cbe2","0xcb5d57db3888696bcf7c9b09b0c77c3ba41955b53950b8197064dc9df81cda49","0x00000000dbe6fecebdedd5beb573440e5a884d1b2fbf06fcce912adcb8d8422e"]}
01:00:30:654 149c parse packet: 242
01:00:30:654 149c ETH: job is the same
01:00:30:654 149c new buf size: 0
01:00:40:624 149c ETH: checking pool connection...
01:00:40:624 149c send: {"worker": "", "jsonrpc": "2.0", "params": [], "id": 3, "method": "eth_getWork"}
01:00:40:671 149c got 243 bytes
01:00:40:671 149c buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0x3104ba8ee013a2a0f764d29495ed41ed08b775e0e465adbe40a994a47e98cbe2","0xcb5d57db3888696bcf7c9b09b0c77c3ba41955b53950b8197064dc9df81cda49","0x00000000dbe6fecebdedd5beb573440e5a884d1b2fbf06fcce912adcb8d8422e"]}
01:00:40:671 149c parse packet: 242
01:00:40:671 149c ETH: job is the same
01:00:40:671 149c new buf size: 0
01:00:41:937 149c got 243 bytes
01:00:41:937 149c buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0xaa60973fc4e2f2879f9f003cfd591c3a1c00fb0ae6d4e1b4266d05a03520f129","0xcb5d57db3888696bcf7c9b09b0c77c3ba41955b53950b8197064dc9df81cda49","0x00000000dbe6fecebdedd5beb573440e5a884d1b2fbf06fcce912adcb8d8422e"]}
01:00:41:937 149c parse packet: 242
01:00:41:937 149c ETH: job changed
01:00:41:937 149c new buf size: 0
01:00:41:937 149c ETH: 07/24/17-01:00:41 - New job from eth-eu2.nanopool.org:9999
01:00:41:952 149c target: 0x00000000dbe6fece (diff: 5000MH), epoch 135(2.05GB)
01:00:41:952 149c ETH - Total Speed: 43.872 Mh/s, Total Shares: 397, Rejected: 0, Time: 08:34
01:00:41:952 149c ETH: GPU0 21.877 Mh/s, GPU1 21.995 Mh/s, GPU2 0.000 Mh/s
01:00:46:312 149c send: {"id":6,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_submitHashrate","params":["0x29d427b", "0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000035a0df71"]}
01:00:50:641 149c ETH: checking pool connection...
01:00:50:641 149c send: {"worker": "", "jsonrpc": "2.0", "params": [], "id": 3, "method": "eth_getWork"}
01:00:50:688 149c got 243 bytes
01:00:50:688 149c buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0xaa60973fc4e2f2879f9f003cfd591c3a1c00fb0ae6d4e1b4266d05a03520f129","0xcb5d57db3888696bcf7c9b09b0c77c3ba41955b53950b8197064dc9df81cda49","0x00000000dbe6fecebdedd5beb573440e5a884d1b2fbf06fcce912adcb8d8422e"]}
01:00:50:688 149c parse packet: 242
01:00:50:688 149c ETH: job is the same
01:00:50:688 149c new buf size: 0
01:00:55:547 578 GPU0 t=69C fan=76%, GPU1 t=73C fan=89%, GPU2 t=55C fan=50%
01:00:55:547 578 em hbt: 0, fm hbt: 0,
01:00:55:563 578 watchdog - thread 0 (gpu0), hb time 63
01:00:55:563 578 watchdog - thread 1 (gpu0), hb time 282
01:00:55:563 578 watchdog - thread 2 (gpu1), hb time 282
01:00:55:563 578 watchdog - thread 3 (gpu1), hb time 63
01:00:55:563 578 watchdog - thread 4 (gpu2), hb time 44532
01:00:55:579 578 watchdog - thread 5 (gpu2), hb time 44328
01:01:00:657 149c ETH: checking pool connection...
01:01:00:657 149c send: {"worker": "", "jsonrpc": "2.0", "params": [], "id": 3, "method": "eth_getWork"}
01:01:00:704 149c got 243 bytes
01:01:00:704 149c buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0xaa60973fc4e2f2879f9f003cfd591c3a1c00fb0ae6d4e1b4266d05a03520f129","0xcb5d57db3888696bcf7c9b09b0c77c3ba41955b53950b8197064dc9df81cda49","0x00000000dbe6fecebdedd5beb573440e5a884d1b2fbf06fcce912adcb8d8422e"]}
01:01:00:704 149c parse packet: 242
01:01:00:704 149c ETH: job is the same
01:01:00:704 149c new buf size: 0
01:01:03:736 149c got 243 bytes
01:01:03:736 149c buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0x401a139852931706bb8455794e011c07159900e7d1a96452ca57ec761a4e3c59","0xcb5d57db3888696bcf7c9b09b0c77c3ba41955b53950b8197064dc9df81cda49","0x00000000dbe6fecebdedd5beb573440e5a884d1b2fbf06fcce912adcb8d8422e"]}
01:01:03:736 149c parse packet: 242
01:01:03:736 149c ETH: job changed
01:01:03:736 149c new buf size: 0
01:01:03:736 149c ETH: 07/24/17-01:01:03 - New job from eth-eu2.nanopool.org:9999
01:01:03:751 149c target: 0x00000000dbe6fece (diff: 5000MH), epoch 135(2.05GB)
01:01:03:751 149c ETH - Total Speed: 43.898 Mh/s, Total Shares: 397, Rejected: 0, Time: 08:34
01:01:03:751 149c ETH: GPU0 21.884 Mh/s, GPU1 22.014 Mh/s, GPU2 0.000 Mh/s
01:01:06:080 149c got 243 bytes
01:01:06:080 149c buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0x7dd9cb310bb7af68242c6d0ed706ef1fcc51daba1ce14f9438006d4330f84491","0xcb5d57db3888696bcf7c9b09b0c77c3ba41955b53950b8197064dc9df81cda49","0x00000000dbe6fecebdedd5beb573440e5a884d1b2fbf06fcce912adcb8d8422e"]}
01:01:06:080 149c parse packet: 242
01:01:06:080 149c ETH: job changed
01:01:06:080 149c new buf size: 0
01:01:06:080 149c ETH: 07/24/17-01:01:06 - New job from eth-eu2.nanopool.org:9999
01:01:06:095 149c target: 0x00000000dbe6fece (diff: 5000MH), epoch 135(2.05GB)
01:01:06:095 149c ETH - Total Speed: 43.860 Mh/s, Total Shares: 397, Rejected: 0, Time: 08:34
01:01:06:095 149c ETH: GPU0 21.866 Mh/s, GPU1 21.994 Mh/s, GPU2 0.000 Mh/s
01:01:06:330 149c send: {"id":6,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_submitHashrate","params":["0x29b61ef", "0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000035a0df71"]}
01:01:10:674 149c ETH: checking pool connection...
01:01:10:674 149c send: {"worker": "", "jsonrpc": "2.0", "params": [], "id": 3, "method": "eth_getWork"}
01:01:10:721 149c got 243 bytes
01:01:10:721 149c buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0x7dd9cb310bb7af68242c6d0ed706ef1fcc51daba1ce14f9438006d4330f84491","0xcb5d57db3888696bcf7c9b09b0c77c3ba41955b53950b8197064dc9df81cda49","0x00000000dbe6fecebdedd5beb573440e5a884d1b2fbf06fcce912adcb8d8422e"]}
01:01:10:721 149c parse packet: 242
01:01:10:721 149c ETH: job is the same
01:01:10:721 149c new buf size: 0
01:01:20:691 149c ETH: checking pool connection...
01:01:20:691 149c send: {"worker": "", "jsonrpc": "2.0", "params": [], "id": 3, "method": "eth_getWork"}
01:01:20:738 149c got 243 bytes
01:01:20:738 149c buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0x7dd9cb310bb7af68242c6d0ed706ef1fcc51daba1ce14f9438006d4330f84491","0xcb5d57db3888696bcf7c9b09b0c77c3ba41955b53950b8197064dc9df81cda49","0x00000000dbe6fecebdedd5beb573440e5a884d1b2fbf06fcce912adcb8d8422e"]}
01:01:20:738 149c parse packet: 242
01:01:20:738 149c ETH: job is the same
01:01:20:738 149c new buf size: 0
01:01:26:348 149c send: {"id":6,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_submitHashrate","params":["0x29d787d", "0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000035a0df71"]}
01:01:28:551 578 GPU0 t=68C fan=74%, GPU1 t=73C fan=88%, GPU2 t=50C fan=50%
01:01:28:566 578 em hbt: 16, fm hbt: 94,
01:01:28:566 578 watchdog - thread 0 (gpu0), hb time 219
01:01:28:566 578 watchdog - thread 1 (gpu0), hb time 0
01:01:28:566 578 watchdog - thread 2 (gpu1), hb time 203
01:01:28:566 578 watchdog - thread 3 (gpu1), hb time 407
01:01:28:566 578 watchdog - thread 4 (gpu2), hb time 77532
01:01:28:582 578 WATCHDOG: GPU 2 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
01:01:28:582 578 watchdog - thread 5 (gpu2), hb time 77328
01:01:28:582 578 WATCHDOG: GPU 2 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
01:01:29:817 578 Restarting OK, exit...
Thanks in advance!
July 23, 2017, 07:08:57 PM
Claymore, any interest in making a Signatum miner?
Probably not since there is no money there. He is making $1,000,000 daily now.
He's still that enterprising coder inside
July 23, 2017, 07:06:34 PM
Claymore, any interest in making a Signatum miner?
sp_ sells own mod July 23, 2017, 07:02:00 PM
when flashing RX 570, if we have to copy 1500 to 1625, 1750, 2000... do we have to do that on 1 and 2?
Meaning.. should we copy 1:1500 to 1:1625, 1:1750, 1:2000 AND 2:1500 to 2:1625, 2:1750, 2:2000
anyone?
Meaning.. should we copy 1:1500 to 1:1625, 1:1750, 1:2000 AND 2:1500 to 2:1625, 2:1750, 2:2000
anyone?
Copy both, no harm.
Thanks.. I have this card
https://anorak.tech/t/msi-rx-570-gaming-x-4gb-elpida/10336/2
I got 21 MHS on stock.. Overclocking took it to 24.5...
I tried to mod bios (tried both 1625 and 1750)... It made no improvement... Still 24.5 after overclock.. Wonder if I am doing something wrong?
What is your memory OC? Maybe this card requires 1500 straps.
1150/2000.. I just tried 1500 straps and it bumped the MHS to 27.5.. Can I do any better? Or is that the best to expect on a 570?
How do we know which strap to use? Just trial and error? Dont want to brick cards though..
Thank you !!
That is probably as good as its going to get with the current DAG decline. I would check to see if you have a lot of Memory Errors with HWinfo64 program though.
I am using simplemining OS.. So not sure where to check for that..
July 23, 2017, 06:52:40 PM
Claymore, any interest in making a Signatum miner?
Probably not since there is no money there. He is making $1,000,000 daily now.
July 23, 2017, 06:13:17 PM
Has anyone got 6 x 570/580 working in Windows 7? I can get 5 but 6 gives code 43, I've tried the 6gpu mod patcher to no avail..
July 23, 2017, 06:11:50 PM
Claymore, any interest in making a Signatum miner?
July 23, 2017, 05:41:26 PM
when flashing RX 570, if we have to copy 1500 to 1625, 1750, 2000... do we have to do that on 1 and 2?
Meaning.. should we copy 1:1500 to 1:1625, 1:1750, 1:2000 AND 2:1500 to 2:1625, 2:1750, 2:2000
anyone?
Meaning.. should we copy 1:1500 to 1:1625, 1:1750, 1:2000 AND 2:1500 to 2:1625, 2:1750, 2:2000
anyone?
Copy both, no harm.
Thanks.. I have this card
https://anorak.tech/t/msi-rx-570-gaming-x-4gb-elpida/10336/2
I got 21 MHS on stock.. Overclocking took it to 24.5...
I tried to mod bios (tried both 1625 and 1750)... It made no improvement... Still 24.5 after overclock.. Wonder if I am doing something wrong?
What is your memory OC? Maybe this card requires 1500 straps.
1150/2000.. I just tried 1500 straps and it bumped the MHS to 27.5.. Can I do any better? Or is that the best to expect on a 570?
How do we know which strap to use? Just trial and error? Dont want to brick cards though..
Thank you !!
That is probably as good as its going to get with the current DAG decline. I would check to see if you have a lot of Memory Errors with HWinfo64 program though.
July 23, 2017, 05:21:30 PM
when flashing RX 570, if we have to copy 1500 to 1625, 1750, 2000... do we have to do that on 1 and 2?
Meaning.. should we copy 1:1500 to 1:1625, 1:1750, 1:2000 AND 2:1500 to 2:1625, 2:1750, 2:2000
anyone?
Meaning.. should we copy 1:1500 to 1:1625, 1:1750, 1:2000 AND 2:1500 to 2:1625, 2:1750, 2:2000
anyone?
Copy both, no harm.
Thanks.. I have this card
https://anorak.tech/t/msi-rx-570-gaming-x-4gb-elpida/10336/2
I got 21 MHS on stock.. Overclocking took it to 24.5...
I tried to mod bios (tried both 1625 and 1750)... It made no improvement... Still 24.5 after overclock.. Wonder if I am doing something wrong?
What is your memory OC? Maybe this card requires 1500 straps.
1150/2000.. I just tried 1500 straps and it bumped the MHS to 27.5.. Can I do any better? Or is that the best to expect on a 570?
How do we know which strap to use? Just trial and error? Dont want to brick cards though..
Thank you !!
July 23, 2017, 05:04:25 PM
I have a 6GB HD 7970 GHz Edition, which claymore miner is only recognizing as a 3GB card. Is that slowing down my hashrate? Will it be a problem as the DAG increases? Finally, I’m on Windows, would the miner on Linux recognize the card correctly?
That 6GB HD 7970 is a rare gem. Sell it on eBay, they are fetching a huge penny.
But mine ZEC instead with your 7970, ETH no good for your GPU.
July 23, 2017, 04:06:14 PM
Hello, I'm currently trying dual mining ETH+Sia, but my Sia rate is very low
I'm using a 5x 1060-6bg rig and I get only 180to 220MH/s on sia per card, it should be around 1000MH/s for this card
Low rate is because of dual mining? or there is an issue here?
I'm using 382.X drivers, using the 368.X one as recommended could fix it?
I'm using a 5x 1060-6bg rig and I get only 180to 220MH/s on sia per card, it should be around 1000MH/s for this card
Low rate is because of dual mining? or there is an issue here?
I'm using 382.X drivers, using the 368.X one as recommended could fix it?
INCREASE YOUR "-dcri" VALUE TO AT LEAST 75--
That is where I start with all my nVidia cards. The nVidia cards can take high "-dcri" values without loss of primary coin hash rate.
You will have to adjust from there, of course. But the higher "-dcri" secondary coin intensity should at least double the secondary coin hashrate from its default hashrate. The default "-dcri" value is "-dcri 30" if none is specified in the launch line.
--scryptr
Thanks a lot it worked, I'm around 450-500 mh/s now, I will let it like that for now, I will try to tweak it tomorrow, thanks again.
July 23, 2017, 03:55:56 PM
Hello, I'm currently trying dual mining ETH+Sia, but my Sia rate is very low
I'm using a 5x 1060-6bg rig and I get only 180to 220MH/s on sia per card, it should be around 1000MH/s for this card
Low rate is because of dual mining? or there is an issue here?
I'm using 382.X drivers, using the 368.X one as recommended could fix it?
I'm using a 5x 1060-6bg rig and I get only 180to 220MH/s on sia per card, it should be around 1000MH/s for this card
Low rate is because of dual mining? or there is an issue here?
I'm using 382.X drivers, using the 368.X one as recommended could fix it?
INCREASE YOUR "-dcri" VALUE TO AT LEAST 75--
That is where I start with all my nVidia cards. The nVidia cards can take high "-dcri" values without loss of primary coin hash rate.
You will have to adjust from there, of course. But the higher "-dcri" secondary coin intensity should at least double the secondary coin hashrate from its default hashrate. The default "-dcri" value is "-dcri 30" if none is specified in the launch line.
--scryptr
July 23, 2017, 03:44:53 PM
I have a 6GB HD 7970 GHz Edition, which claymore miner is only recognizing as a 3GB card. Is that slowing down my hashrate? Will it be a problem as the DAG increases? Finally, I’m on Windows, would the miner on Linux recognize the card correctly?
July 23, 2017, 03:39:01 PM
Hello, I'm currently trying dual mining ETH+Sia, but my Sia rate is very low
I'm using a 5x 1060-6bg rig and I get only 180to 220MH/s on sia per card, it should be around 1000MH/s for this card
Low rate is because of dual mining? or there is an issue here?
I'm using 382.X drivers, using the 368.X one as recommended could fix it?
I'm using a 5x 1060-6bg rig and I get only 180to 220MH/s on sia per card, it should be around 1000MH/s for this card
Low rate is because of dual mining? or there is an issue here?
I'm using 382.X drivers, using the 368.X one as recommended could fix it?
July 23, 2017, 02:43:29 PM
when flashing RX 570, if we have to copy 1500 to 1625, 1750, 2000... do we have to do that on 1 and 2?
Meaning.. should we copy 1:1500 to 1:1625, 1:1750, 1:2000 AND 2:1500 to 2:1625, 2:1750, 2:2000
anyone?
Meaning.. should we copy 1:1500 to 1:1625, 1:1750, 1:2000 AND 2:1500 to 2:1625, 2:1750, 2:2000
anyone?
Copy both, no harm.
Thanks.. I have this card
https://anorak.tech/t/msi-rx-570-gaming-x-4gb-elpida/10336/2
I got 21 MHS on stock.. Overclocking took it to 24.5...
I tried to mod bios (tried both 1625 and 1750)... It made no improvement... Still 24.5 after overclock.. Wonder if I am doing something wrong?
What is your memory OC? Maybe this card requires 1500 straps.
July 23, 2017, 02:17:37 PM
when flashing RX 570, if we have to copy 1500 to 1625, 1750, 2000... do we have to do that on 1 and 2?
Meaning.. should we copy 1:1500 to 1:1625, 1:1750, 1:2000 AND 2:1500 to 2:1625, 2:1750, 2:2000
anyone?
Meaning.. should we copy 1:1500 to 1:1625, 1:1750, 1:2000 AND 2:1500 to 2:1625, 2:1750, 2:2000
anyone?
Copy both, no harm.
Thanks.. I have this card
https://anorak.tech/t/msi-rx-570-gaming-x-4gb-elpida/10336/2
I got 21 MHS on stock.. Overclocking took it to 24.5...
I tried to mod bios (tried both 1625 and 1750)... It made no improvement... Still 24.5 after overclock.. Wonder if I am doing something wrong?
July 23, 2017, 02:10:50 PM
when flashing RX 570, if we have to copy 1500 to 1625, 1750, 2000... do we have to do that on 1 and 2?
Meaning.. should we copy 1:1500 to 1:1625, 1:1750, 1:2000 AND 2:1500 to 2:1625, 2:1750, 2:2000
anyone?
Meaning.. should we copy 1:1500 to 1:1625, 1:1750, 1:2000 AND 2:1500 to 2:1625, 2:1750, 2:2000
anyone?
Copy both, no harm.
July 23, 2017, 02:09:59 PM
when flashing RX 570, if we have to copy 1500 to 1625, 1750, 2000... do we have to do that on 1 and 2?
Meaning.. should we copy 1:1500 to 1:1625, 1:1750, 1:2000 AND 2:1500 to 2:1625, 2:1750, 2:2000
anyone?
Meaning.. should we copy 1:1500 to 1:1625, 1:1750, 1:2000 AND 2:1500 to 2:1625, 2:1750, 2:2000
anyone?
Jump to: