No, now 430 hash for 1070...
See edits. Still isn't worth it...
Further Edit:
Efficiency Setup - at equal power use for comparison without power costs impacting the analysis.
Edit: Edit:
Card Price Hash/s Power (W) H/$
1070 $400 380 100 0.95
Fury $260 300 100 1.15
Full Bore Setup
Card Price Hash/s H/$
1070 $400 430 1.075
Fury $260 350 1.346
The 1070 has a long way to go before it's worth a look. The entry cost of $400/card is just too steep to overcome without some serious hash.
it's wrong, the 1070 do 380 at 100watt not 330
If you did a little math yourself you'd see at 380 it's still not wrong. AMD is still ahead of Nvidia in H/$ running efficiently AND running full bore. Even with the adjusted numbers the 1070 is still 20% less H/$. AMD dead?? It's still in the LEAD.
Edit: AMD guys are quibbling over 0.5% using ssl and 2%-4% in pool variance.
Nvidia guys are paying a 20% premium just to play the game and screaming victory. It would be funny if it wasn't so pathetic.
it is because 380 sol is always better than 300 sol at the same wattage, you need 25% more uselesses components with 300 sol to have the same total hash
you must remember than on large scale the less rig you haev that do the job the better
You are right, Amph. Also, real prices are not listed. AMD Fury is much more than a listed prices. Here is the actual price at the same shop in the EU:
http://www.ebay.com/sch/Graphics-Video-Cards/27386/i.html?_from=R40&_nkw=fury&rt=nc
http://www.ebay.com/itm/SAPPHIRE-NITRO-Radeon-R9-Fury-100379NTOC-SR-4GB-4096-Bit-HBM-TRI-X-OC-UEFI-Vi-/291648915692?hash=item43e7a148ec:g:A8QAAOSwu1VW7qbd
, also on newegg:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814202186
btw I never bought or tried fury as I know its consume 300W so I prefer to buy 290 or 290x @ 200USD (used). So i wonder if fury consumes 100W
Funny comparisons..
My nano's are close to 325sol while consuming just over 90watt..
Aint that something
