Author

Topic: Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux) - page 289. (Read 3839163 times)

member
Activity: 75
Merit: 10

where did u check it?

Checked from every web site for last 1H. You can chek too if open one per one and see hashs and blocks for now.
sr. member
Activity: 504
Merit: 259
For Linux - Ubuntu - use this :

export GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR=0
export GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE=100
export GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS=1
export GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT=100
export GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT=100

make new file : run.sh
Code:
#!/bin/bash
export GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR=0
export GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE=100
export GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS=1
export GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT=100
export GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT=100

sleep 20
./zecminer64
Note: change the run.sh Permission
Code:
chmod +x run.sh

 use any setting ( read the ReadMe!! file )
 Smiley i think this will help!!

Thank you, but for what reason do you use the sleep command?
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500


I pref suprnova for mining, but today lucky pool its nanopool. Every pool have +/- 10% profit per day , and dont think this luck +20% on nanopool can be every day

where did u check it?
sr. member
Activity: 263
Merit: 250
semux
For Linux - Ubuntu - use this :

export GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR=0
export GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE=100
export GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS=1
export GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT=100
export GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT=100

make new file : run.sh
Code:
#!/bin/bash
export GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR=0
export GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE=100
export GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS=1
export GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT=100
export GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT=100

sleep 20
./zecminer64
Note: change the run.sh Permission
Code:
chmod +x run.sh

 use any setting ( read the ReadMe!! file )
 Smiley i think this will help!!
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
In case you want to save on fees (legally):

0% fee during Xmas on http://zec.suprnova.cc

Smiley

I love suprnova Cheesy
member
Activity: 75
Merit: 10


I pref suprnova for mining, but today lucky pool its nanopool. Every pool have +/- 10% profit per day , and dont think this luck +20% on nanopool can be every day
newbie
Activity: 7
Merit: 0

Stock GTX 1070 = 360 Sol/s @ 150 W
OC GTX 1070 (clock @ 2050, mem @ 4500) = 410 Sol/s @ 170 W
Efficient GTX 1070 (TDP 50%, mem @ 4500) = 330 Sol/s @ 95 W
dead AMD its near  Cool Cool Cool Cool Cool Cool
Nvidia rules

35% more expensive for 35% more hash.  We know.  You are not unleashing secrets here...

wrong, cost double of a 470 but it hash at double the speed or near that, the difference is the efficiency which is far greater

my 470 nitro 8g samsung mem are doing 260 each when properly tuned, so eff is lower but hashrate is more than half the 1070's


Could you share yours settings and BIOS ? I have the same card but only 240 sol/s.

I don't have the bios file at hand, but the only thing i did was use the 1750 straps for 2000 mhz.
For zec, with wattool i took the gpu to 1420 and left the memory at 2000, i had to give them like around 50mv overvolt, but even with the straps mod i could downvolt the mem to 0.95 so it's not much of a difference with the default tdp.
For Eth, i left the gpu at 1360 and instead took the mem to 2190, i had to do some serious overvolt there, 1.12, not all of them reached 2190, some did 2180, but they ended throwing 30.3mh/s on eth, stable, several days now. No dual mining.

Hope it helps! Smiley



Thank you, I will try this settings.
legendary
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1240
In case you want to save on fees (legally):

0% fee during Xmas on http://zec.suprnova.cc

Smiley
member
Activity: 108
Merit: 11
No, now 430 hash for 1070...

See edits. Still isn't worth it...

Further Edit:

Efficiency Setup - at equal power use for comparison without power costs impacting the analysis.
Card   Price   Hash/s   Power (W)   H/$
1070  $400    330        95             0.825
Fury   $260    285        95             1.096

Full Bore Setup
Card   Price   Hash/s   H/$
1070  $400    430      1.075
Fury   $260    350      1.346

The 1070 has a long way to go before it's worth a look.  The entry cost of $400/card is just too steep to overcome without some serious hash.
hero member
Activity: 677
Merit: 500
No, now 430 hash for 1070...
member
Activity: 108
Merit: 11

Stock GTX 1070 = 360 Sol/s @ 150 W
OC GTX 1070 (clock @ 2050, mem @ 4500) = 410 Sol/s @ 170 W
Efficient GTX 1070 (TDP 50%, mem @ 4500) = 330 Sol/s @ 95 W
dead AMD its near  Cool Cool Cool Cool Cool Cool
Nvidia rules

35% more expensive for 35% more hash.  We know.  You are not unleashing secrets here...

wrong, cost double of a 470 but it hash at double the speed or near that, the difference is the efficiency which is far greater

my 470 nitro 8g samsung mem are doing 260 each when properly tuned, so eff is lower but hashrate is more than half the 1070's


still not worth it because of density, better to have 4 rig than 9 rig doing the same, you waste money on uselesses components

on large scale the 1070 win without doubts


Fiji still beats the pants off 1070...

Efficient Setup
Fury $260 300H/s 100W
1070 $400 330H/s 95W
You're paying $840 more for 180H/s and 30W efficiency on a 6 card rig.

Full Bore (small scale with no electric cost)
Fury $260 350H/s
Edit: 1070 $400 430H/s
Edit: You're paying $840 more for 480H/s on a 6 card rig.
newbie
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
Hello It is possible to asus TROOPER H110 D3
 connect 3 graphics cards? for mining. when I connect only work 2. 3 graphics card does not show. Maybe in the BIOS you need to change something? Thanks to all
full member
Activity: 152
Merit: 100

Stock GTX 1070 = 360 Sol/s @ 150 W
OC GTX 1070 (clock @ 2050, mem @ 4500) = 410 Sol/s @ 170 W
Efficient GTX 1070 (TDP 50%, mem @ 4500) = 330 Sol/s @ 95 W
dead AMD its near  Cool Cool Cool Cool Cool Cool
Nvidia rules

35% more expensive for 35% more hash.  We know.  You are not unleashing secrets here...

wrong, cost double of a 470 but it hash at double the speed or near that, the difference is the efficiency which is far greater

my 470 nitro 8g samsung mem are doing 260 each when properly tuned, so eff is lower but hashrate is more than half the 1070's


still not worth it because of density, better to have 4 rig than 9 rig doing the same, you waste money on uselesses components

on large scale the 1070 win without doubts

Nice point, motherboard, memory, disk and risers also have costs, structure, physical space, heat dissipation
So if you have cheap electricity and physical space, it may be better to go with 470's cause the heat dissipation is much less of a problem so 1 motherboard with 6 1070 is no match vs 2 motherboards with 12 470's, but if you have both those problems then 1070's are better.
legendary
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070

Stock GTX 1070 = 360 Sol/s @ 150 W
OC GTX 1070 (clock @ 2050, mem @ 4500) = 410 Sol/s @ 170 W
Efficient GTX 1070 (TDP 50%, mem @ 4500) = 330 Sol/s @ 95 W
dead AMD its near  Cool Cool Cool Cool Cool Cool
Nvidia rules

35% more expensive for 35% more hash.  We know.  You are not unleashing secrets here...

wrong, cost double of a 470 but it hash at double the speed or near that, the difference is the efficiency which is far greater

my 470 nitro 8g samsung mem are doing 260 each when properly tuned, so eff is lower but hashrate is more than half the 1070's


still not worth it because of density, better to have 4 rig than 9 rig doing the same, you waste money on uselesses components

on large scale the 1070 win without doubts
full member
Activity: 211
Merit: 101
guys

does dwarf eu server still have problems?
sr. member
Activity: 245
Merit: 256
Good time of day, colleagues.

I have a problem with Ubuntu 16.04, RX480 and amdgpu pro driver by using the latest 9.2 version for Linux.
dmesg:
Code:
[  311.260341] VM fault (0x14, vmid 5) at page 1452397, write from 'TC2' (0x54433200) (200)
[  311.260347] amdgpu 0000:07:00.0: GPU fault detected: 146 0x0b6a4814
[  311.260348] amdgpu 0000:07:00.0:   VM_CONTEXT1_PROTECTION_FAULT_ADDR   0x0016296C
[  311.260349] amdgpu 0000:07:00.0:   VM_CONTEXT1_PROTECTION_FAULT_STATUS 0x0B088014
[  311.260351] VM fault (0x14, vmid 5) at page 1452396, write from 'TC6' (0x54433600) (136)

How can I stop this, because it is overload disk space at runtime.
Thanks for your replay.
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
are you working on a merged mining miner for ZEC and another coin Claymore?
newbie
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
Hello

I was wondering if anyone here can help me?
I am trying to run claymore 9.2 in ubuntu linux and I have 2 questions.

1.  How does one set the environmental variables like GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100?  do I put them in the config file?  and how do i put them in the config file?  putting setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100, or -GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 or GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT=100 all give an error..

2. when I run the miner I get "AMD ADL library not found"
but i have AMD APP SDK installed so how do i get claymore to use AMD ADL?

Thanks!

The variables go into a batch file.  There should be a start.bat in your Claymore folder.

You might update it to look something like this:

setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
ZecMiner64.exe

Thats windows, im asking about ubuntu, but thanks for the offered solution... i already know how to do it in windows...

also wondering about hte AMD ADL Library - using rx400 series cards and AMD APP SDK 3.0
hero member
Activity: 2576
Merit: 666
I don't request loans~
xmr/zec merged mining would be sooo nice Cheesy


That will not happen. They use simlar components.
full member
Activity: 152
Merit: 100

Stock GTX 1070 = 360 Sol/s @ 150 W
OC GTX 1070 (clock @ 2050, mem @ 4500) = 410 Sol/s @ 170 W
Efficient GTX 1070 (TDP 50%, mem @ 4500) = 330 Sol/s @ 95 W
dead AMD its near  Cool Cool Cool Cool Cool Cool
Nvidia rules

35% more expensive for 35% more hash.  We know.  You are not unleashing secrets here...

wrong, cost double of a 470 but it hash at double the speed or near that, the difference is the efficiency which is far greater

my 470 nitro 8g samsung mem are doing 260 each when properly tuned, so eff is lower but hashrate is more than half the 1070's


Could you share yours settings and BIOS ? I have the same card but only 240 sol/s.

I don't have the bios file at hand, but the only thing i did was use the 1750 straps for 2000 mhz.
For zec, with wattool i took the gpu to 1420 and left the memory at 2000, i had to give them like around 50mv overvolt, but even with the straps mod i could downvolt the mem to 0.95 so it's not much of a difference with the default tdp.
For Eth, i left the gpu at 1360 and instead took the mem to 2190, i had to do some serious overvolt there, 1.12, not all of them reached 2190, some did 2180, but they ended throwing 30.3mh/s on eth, stable, several days now. No dual mining.

Hope it helps! Smiley

Jump to: