Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux) - page 299.

golden0707

full member

Activity: 189

Merit: 100

Quote from: ivomm on December 22, 2016, 07:55:50 AM

Yesterday I moved my rigs to dwarfpool. For the last 24 hours I got at least 15% more ZEC than flypool. I don't trust in general the hashrate statistics, but in flypool it was always 10% less than the miner hashrate. Dwarf always shows 5% above the miner. Also the rejected shares in dwarf are 0.13%, whereas in flypool they were around 0.55%.

But what about bad luck finding blocks due to small pool hashrate ?

Gashans

newbie

Activity: 1

Merit: 0

Quote from: Bananana on December 22, 2016, 02:34:24 AM

Quote from: arielbit on December 21, 2016, 09:02:50 PM

v9.2

280x ~220H/s
390 ~325H/s
290x ~315H/s
Fury ~350H/s
480 ~260H/s

stock bios, overclocked, 16.10.3

What about 290 without x?

v 9.2

r9 290x ~340 H/s (water cooling) 1170/1250 with modded r9 390x bios
r9 290 ~280 H/s (air) 1170/1250 stock bios

Running on Crimson-ReLive-16.12.1-Dec7 Drivers

Hanfonan

newbie

Activity: 13

Merit: 0

Quote from: Gaglam on December 22, 2016, 08:55:23 AM

Same speed as 9.0 and 9.1 on 280x

Thanks for update anyway

That is right. For 280x do not use 9.2.

Gaglam

sr. member

Activity: 390

Merit: 250

Same speed as 9.0 and 9.1 on 280x

Thanks for update anyway

Hotmetal

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 250

Quote from: Demarsac on December 22, 2016, 07:59:48 AM

Quote from: a7med918 on December 22, 2016, 07:54:05 AM

Quote from: a7med918 on December 21, 2016, 06:41:11 PM

hi all
i face unstable current effective hashrate any comment or adding in command line?

Awaiting yr reply

I think you should change pool before anything else

Use Dwarfpool. For the past 10 days it is way more profitable than any other

Not just that .. There has been many rumors of flypool stealing shares on the server side (thereby looking like major hash rate fluctuations)

Bananana

sr. member

Activity: 481

Merit: 250

Quote from: Demarsac on December 22, 2016, 07:59:48 AM

Quote from: a7med918 on December 22, 2016, 07:54:05 AM

Quote from: a7med918 on December 21, 2016, 06:41:11 PM

hi all
i face unstable current effective hashrate any comment or adding in command line?

Awaiting yr reply

I think you should change pool before anything else

Use Dwarfpool. For the past 10 days it is way more profitable than any other

Anybody compared dwarfpool with nanopool?

Demarsac

sr. member

Activity: 504

Merit: 272

Quote from: a7med918 on December 22, 2016, 07:54:05 AM

Quote from: a7med918 on December 21, 2016, 06:41:11 PM

hi all
i face unstable current effective hashrate any comment or adding in command line?

Awaiting yr reply

I think you should change pool before anything else

Use Dwarfpool. For the past 10 days it is way more profitable than any other

_ZET_

full member

Activity: 299

Merit: 100

Crypto mining company | Mining pools

Some people have noticed hashrate drop after they were mining for some time (18-24h), especially with 280x cards. After restart hashrate is back up. Can someone confirm it?

ivomm

legendary

Activity: 1881

Merit: 3057

All good things to those who wait

Yesterday I moved my rigs to dwarfpool. For the last 24 hours I got at least 15% more ZEC than flypool. I don't trust in general the hashrate statistics, but in flypool it was always 10% less than the miner hashrate. Dwarf always shows 5% above the miner. Also the rejected shares in dwarf are 0.13%, whereas in flypool they were around 0.55%.

a7med918

newbie

Activity: 33

Merit: 0

Quote from: a7med918 on December 21, 2016, 06:41:11 PM

hi all
i face unstable current effective hashrate any comment or adding in command line?

http://www.3rbz.com/uploads/50d1f8f731ee1.jpg

Awaiting yr reply

bisba

full member

Activity: 202

Merit: 100

Quote from: Golku on December 22, 2016, 05:30:34 AM

Thinking about buying 2 more gpu's in my rig

I was thinking about 280x can get it for 80-90 euro's
and a 290 for 130 euro's

will it be wise to buy these cards or shall i look for a rx 470/480

where do you get with this prices??

mettalmag

legendary

Activity: 1084

Merit: 1003

≡v≡

it is getting ridiculous Grin

Golku

full member

Activity: 263

Merit: 100

Quote from: arielbit on December 22, 2016, 07:22:44 AM

Quote from: Bananana on December 22, 2016, 02:34:24 AM

Quote from: arielbit on December 21, 2016, 09:02:50 PM

v9.2

280x ~220H/s
390 ~325H/s
290x ~315H/s
Fury ~350H/s
480 ~260H/s

stock bios, overclocked, 16.10.3

What about 290 without x?

i don't have one

hey what 290x do you have?

arielbit

legendary

Activity: 3416

Merit: 1059

Quote from: Bananana on December 22, 2016, 02:34:24 AM

Quote from: arielbit on December 21, 2016, 09:02:50 PM

v9.2

280x ~220H/s
390 ~325H/s
290x ~315H/s
Fury ~350H/s
480 ~260H/s

stock bios, overclocked, 16.10.3

What about 290 without x?

i don't have one

vapourminer

legendary

Activity: 4354

Merit: 3614

what is this "brake pedal" you speak of?

Quote from: kiwo647 on December 21, 2016, 07:13:03 PM

Quote from: flekkelek on December 21, 2016, 07:02:30 PM

Quote from: kiwo647 on December 21, 2016, 06:58:06 PM

Whats the hashrate on a r9 380? Also is $110 usd or $140 cad good for one of these cards? I'm thinking about buying a bunch of them at this price.

i get 170 h/s on my 380x. 110 bucks for a 380 is god.

Is that stock and how many watts does that use? Also whats the difference between the x and none x?

i pull 175 on v9.2 on a 380 non x. 15.12 drivers on win7. -i 6. 1100/1500 (stock is 940/1400). stock bios, no undervolt. sapphire nitro 380itx 2gb

pulls about 200 watts at the wall

Densitymax

sr. member

Activity: 437

Merit: 250

Quote from: Demarsac on December 22, 2016, 07:04:06 AM

Quote from: Densitymax on December 22, 2016, 06:58:04 AM

Quote from: Demarsac on December 22, 2016, 06:41:57 AM

Quote from: rozsada on December 21, 2016, 07:30:59 PM

Quote from: Demarsac on December 21, 2016, 02:19:32 PM

Quote from: Hotmetal on December 21, 2016, 07:17:43 AM

Thanks.. 5 x RX480's working with v9.2 without issues.

ZEC: GPU0 252.655 H/s, GPU1 250.847 H/s, GPU2 254.769 H/s, GPU3 253.092 H/s, GPU4 253.355

Same here with x6 RX480's 8Gb , average about 253 H/s

How can you reach so high speed?
I have 6* rx480, but speed is max 245sol
Can you tell your command line and driver version?
Thanks.

For my Rx 480's Rig
I am using Claymore 9.2
i- 5 (although i can use bigger it gets unstable)
16.10.1 drivers

cclock 1350
mem 2000

undervolted -7

Try to use the latest drivers, should be no problem with intensity -i 6

What kind of an increase should i expect from i- 6?
I am currently averaging 253 H/s

I did not see that you have such a great performance. Slight increase can be 1-2 h/s.

Demarsac

sr. member

Activity: 504

Merit: 272

Quote from: Densitymax on December 22, 2016, 06:58:04 AM

Quote from: Demarsac on December 22, 2016, 06:41:57 AM

Quote from: rozsada on December 21, 2016, 07:30:59 PM

Quote from: Demarsac on December 21, 2016, 02:19:32 PM

Quote from: Hotmetal on December 21, 2016, 07:17:43 AM

Thanks.. 5 x RX480's working with v9.2 without issues.

ZEC: GPU0 252.655 H/s, GPU1 250.847 H/s, GPU2 254.769 H/s, GPU3 253.092 H/s, GPU4 253.355

Same here with x6 RX480's 8Gb , average about 253 H/s

How can you reach so high speed?
I have 6* rx480, but speed is max 245sol
Can you tell your command line and driver version?
Thanks.

For my Rx 480's Rig
I am using Claymore 9.2
i- 5 (although i can use bigger it gets unstable)
16.10.1 drivers

cclock 1350
mem 2000

undervolted -7

Try to use the latest drivers, should be no problem with intensity -i 6

What kind of an increase should i expect from i- 6?
I am currently averaging 253 H/s

Demarsac

sr. member

Activity: 504

Merit: 272

Quote from: KrokoTill on December 22, 2016, 06:55:21 AM

Quote from: Demarsac on December 22, 2016, 06:45:11 AM

Quote from: KrokoTill on December 22, 2016, 06:35:09 AM

Quote from: Demarsac on December 22, 2016, 06:30:50 AM

Quote from: KrokoTill on December 22, 2016, 05:26:42 AM

Quote from: QuintLeo on December 21, 2016, 06:52:16 PM

Quote from: KrokoTill on December 20, 2016, 04:01:44 PM

Quote from: KrokoTill on December 20, 2016, 03:57:55 PM

Quote from: Gambler8899 on December 20, 2016, 03:47:34 PM

Quote from: KrokoTill on December 20, 2016, 03:38:59 PM

GPU - 9.1 -> 9.2
R7 370 - 155 -> 156
R9 280 - 195 -> 193
r9 290 - 295 -> 313

What's your settings for 290?

1050/1250, -i 8, modded 390X ROM, modded timings

1175mV core (just 69% ASIC) and 16.12.1 driver

Try the 16.10.1 or 16.9.2 drivers, 16.12.1 COST me 5-10% hashrate on every card I tried it on when I was testing it.

Tested only with 9.1 @ R7 370:
16.9.2 - 153
16.10.1 - 154
16.12.2 - 155

Which R7 370 are u using?
I am getting 147 average from each
Are you using modded rom for them?

It is MSI Gaming 4G, running at 1175/1500
And yes I modded the ROM, without modding it is about 15 H/s slower.

Is it a custom mod? Any specific one? Eliovp or something?

I have the VaporX 4G running at 1200/1500
i-4 (if i increase it gets more unstable)
and still i get as i said around 147 H/s

Thanks

As I said I modded it myself. I tried Eliovp mod too, but it was not stable with my card.
I tried 1200/1500 too, it runs but is slower than 1175. Try to decrease GPU to 1175 or 1150 and see if it is more stable and if you can use higher intensity then.
I use -i 8 and it is fully stable. Tried ver 9.2 too and initially it looked slightly faster than 9.1 but later hasrate stabilized at a little bit lower, so now I am back using 9.1.

Thanks, i will try those and let you know

Densitymax

sr. member

Activity: 437

Merit: 250

Quote from: Demarsac on December 22, 2016, 06:41:57 AM

Quote from: rozsada on December 21, 2016, 07:30:59 PM

Quote from: Demarsac on December 21, 2016, 02:19:32 PM

Quote from: Hotmetal on December 21, 2016, 07:17:43 AM

Thanks.. 5 x RX480's working with v9.2 without issues.

ZEC: GPU0 252.655 H/s, GPU1 250.847 H/s, GPU2 254.769 H/s, GPU3 253.092 H/s, GPU4 253.355

Same here with x6 RX480's 8Gb , average about 253 H/s

How can you reach so high speed?
I have 6* rx480, but speed is max 245sol
Can you tell your command line and driver version?
Thanks.

For my Rx 480's Rig
I am using Claymore 9.2
i- 5 (although i can use bigger it gets unstable)
16.10.1 drivers

cclock 1350
mem 2000

undervolted -7

Try to use the latest drivers, should be no problem with intensity -i 6

KrokoTill

newbie

Activity: 51

Merit: 0

Quote from: Demarsac on December 22, 2016, 06:45:11 AM

Quote from: KrokoTill on December 22, 2016, 06:35:09 AM

Quote from: Demarsac on December 22, 2016, 06:30:50 AM

Quote from: KrokoTill on December 22, 2016, 05:26:42 AM

Quote from: QuintLeo on December 21, 2016, 06:52:16 PM

Quote from: KrokoTill on December 20, 2016, 04:01:44 PM

Quote from: KrokoTill on December 20, 2016, 03:57:55 PM

Quote from: Gambler8899 on December 20, 2016, 03:47:34 PM

Quote from: KrokoTill on December 20, 2016, 03:38:59 PM

GPU - 9.1 -> 9.2
R7 370 - 155 -> 156
R9 280 - 195 -> 193
r9 290 - 295 -> 313

What's your settings for 290?

1050/1250, -i 8, modded 390X ROM, modded timings

1175mV core (just 69% ASIC) and 16.12.1 driver

Try the 16.10.1 or 16.9.2 drivers, 16.12.1 COST me 5-10% hashrate on every card I tried it on when I was testing it.

Tested only with 9.1 @ R7 370:
16.9.2 - 153
16.10.1 - 154
16.12.2 - 155

Which R7 370 are u using?
I am getting 147 average from each
Are you using modded rom for them?

It is MSI Gaming 4G, running at 1175/1500
And yes I modded the ROM, without modding it is about 15 H/s slower.

Is it a custom mod? Any specific one? Eliovp or something?

I have the VaporX 4G running at 1200/1500
i-4 (if i increase it gets more unstable)
and still i get as i said around 147 H/s

Thanks

As I said I modded it myself. I tried Eliovp mod too, but it was not stable with my card.
I tried 1200/1500 too, it runs but is slower than 1175. Try to decrease GPU to 1175 or 1150 and see if it is more stable and if you can use higher intensity then.
I use -i 8 and it is fully stable. Tried ver 9.2 too and initially it looked slightly faster than 9.1 but later hasrate stabilized at a little bit lower, so now I am back using 9.1.

Topic: Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux) - page 299. (Read 3839163 times)