@Claymore
Just had a bunch of rejected shares when I was viewing my rig via Team Viewer..
I had pressed "S" to view info and literally every time after it was a rejected share.
Possibly a bug? I rebooted the machine just to be safe.
Thanks
Edit: Found one of my RX480's was hashing at over 450 sols/s, reverted to 9.1 and now seems to be fine.
Topic: Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux) - page 298. (Read 3839163 times)
Do I see the Claymore's Zcash AMD miner for Linux now available in the mega download link ? WOW ! You have finally delivered to the real miners who run with commands and not GUI's.
Keep up the good work Claymore, I know if any more new algorithms for mining get released you will be the first to go-to on my mind
Keep up the good work Claymore, I know if any more new algorithms for mining get released you will be the first to go-to on my mind
v9.2 Linux version is available.
Thank you. I was waiting for this.
RX 480 8G doing 265-270 sol , stock miner settings, 1165 core, 2000 mem
380 4G doing 170 sol, 1075/1500
290 310 sol, 1000/1250.
Ubuntu 14.04
nice job Claymore
Greetings
380 4G doing 170 sol, 1075/1500
290 310 sol, 1000/1250.
Ubuntu 14.04
nice job Claymore
Greetings
Thanks Eliovp
Is this 1 RX 480 or multiple on the same rig?
I will give linux a try tonight on my RX 480's 8G
I have 1342 core, 2000 mem, maybe it can give a bit more?
Here is what I'm getting:
6 x ASUS R9 380 4G Stryx. 770 sol. 560 watts total at the wall for the whole system.
About 1.4 sol/watt
Using x/1500 where x goes from 750 to 1075. Maybe a 0.5% change in the hash rate over this range.
6 x ASUS R9 380 4G Stryx. 770 sol. 560 watts total at the wall for the whole system.
About 1.4 sol/watt
Using x/1500 where x goes from 750 to 1075. Maybe a 0.5% change in the hash rate over this range.
Whats the hashrate on a r9 380? Also is $110 usd or $140 cad good for one of these cards? I'm thinking about buying a bunch of them at this price.
i get 170 h/s on my 380x. 110 bucks for a 380 is god.Is that stock and how many watts does that use? Also whats the difference between the x and none x?
i pull 175 on v9.2 on a 380 non x. 15.12 drivers on win7. -i 6. 1100/1500 (stock is 940/1400). stock bios, no undervolt. sapphire nitro 380itx 2gb
pulls about 200 watts at the wall
I would argue that the price is right, but 380 is definitely not the card you want for Zcash. The power/hash ratio is among the worst there is.
Very minor linux note. Reboot after running ETH miner.
RX 480 8G doing 265-270 sol , stock miner settings, 1165 core, 2000 mem
380 4G doing 170 sol, 1075/1500
290 310 sol, 1000/1250.
Ubuntu 14.04
nice job Claymore
Greetings
380 4G doing 170 sol, 1075/1500
290 310 sol, 1000/1250.
Ubuntu 14.04
nice job Claymore
Greetings
that looks like linux version is a bit faster then windows version or am i wrong?
RX 480 8G doing 265-270 sol , stock miner settings, 1165 core, 2000 mem
380 4G doing 170 sol, 1075/1500
290 310 sol, 1000/1250.
Ubuntu 14.04
nice job Claymore
Greetings
380 4G doing 170 sol, 1075/1500
290 310 sol, 1000/1250.
Ubuntu 14.04
nice job Claymore
Greetings
If anyone gets first readings in speeds for linux version do tell...
Thanks
Thanks
Yesterday I moved my rigs to dwarfpool. For the last 24 hours I got at least 15% more ZEC than flypool. I don't trust in general the hashrate statistics, but in flypool it was always 10% less than the miner hashrate. Dwarf always shows 5% above the miner. Also the rejected shares in dwarf are 0.13%, whereas in flypool they were around 0.55%.
no ssl on dwarf so the fee is higerDwarfpool is the best pool at this moment
v9.2 Linux version is available.
Excellent! Thanks!
Same hashrates as Windows?
Yesterday I moved my rigs to dwarfpool. For the last 24 hours I got at least 15% more ZEC than flypool. I don't trust in general the hashrate statistics, but in flypool it was always 10% less than the miner hashrate. Dwarf always shows 5% above the miner. Also the rejected shares in dwarf are 0.13%, whereas in flypool they were around 0.55%.
But what about bad luck finding blocks due to small pool hashrate ?
Im on zec.suprnova.cc and getting all I should , as http://www.coinwarz.com/calculators/zcash-mining-calculator says.
Yesterday I moved my rigs to dwarfpool. For the last 24 hours I got at least 15% more ZEC than flypool. I don't trust in general the hashrate statistics, but in flypool it was always 10% less than the miner hashrate. Dwarf always shows 5% above the miner. Also the rejected shares in dwarf are 0.13%, whereas in flypool they were around 0.55%.
no ssl on dwarf so the fee is higer v9.2
280x ~220H/s
390 ~325H/s
290x ~315H/s
Fury ~350H/s
480 ~260H/s
stock bios, overclocked, 16.10.3
280x ~220H/s
390 ~325H/s
290x ~315H/s
Fury ~350H/s
480 ~260H/s
stock bios, overclocked, 16.10.3
What about 290 without x?
i don't have one
hey what 290x do you have?
msi 290x twin frozr gaming.
core 1100 memory 1500
v9.2 Linux version is available.
Yesterday I moved my rigs to dwarfpool. For the last 24 hours I got at least 15% more ZEC than flypool. I don't trust in general the hashrate statistics, but in flypool it was always 10% less than the miner hashrate. Dwarf always shows 5% above the miner. Also the rejected shares in dwarf are 0.13%, whereas in flypool they were around 0.55%.
But what about bad luck finding blocks due to small pool hashrate ?
I was showing reduced hr and was getting some weird delays on shares being accepted. Up to 30 second in some case. Since moving to dwarf I never looked back. As of couple days ago tho I finally swapped to nicehash. With the dropping price the 30 coins I accumulated will have to suffice. I'm tired of watching my coins go up and the value of my wallet drop. It's almost faster than I can mine it
BR
Yesterday I moved my rigs to dwarfpool. For the last 24 hours I got at least 15% more ZEC than flypool. I don't trust in general the hashrate statistics, but in flypool it was always 10% less than the miner hashrate. Dwarf always shows 5% above the miner. Also the rejected shares in dwarf are 0.13%, whereas in flypool they were around 0.55%.
But what about bad luck finding blocks due to small pool hashrate ?
Yesterday I moved my rigs to dwarfpool. For the last 24 hours I got at least 15% more ZEC than flypool. I don't trust in general the hashrate statistics, but in flypool it was always 10% less than the miner hashrate. Dwarf always shows 5% above the miner. Also the rejected shares in dwarf are 0.13%, whereas in flypool they were around 0.55%.
But what about bad luck finding blocks due to small pool hashrate ?
That's no longer an issue since they went over 2 megahashes. Now we find blocks with regularity and variance is not bad anymore. All I can say is try them out for a week. That's long enough to make up your mind
BR
Jump to: