Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux) - page 358.

dlx

member

Activity: 61

Merit: 10

Quote from: miningpoolhub on December 11, 2016, 01:50:29 AM

Quote from: Subw on December 11, 2016, 01:07:30 AM

Quote from: yslyung on December 11, 2016, 12:21:55 AM

Quote from: Subw on December 10, 2016, 11:58:19 PM

Quote from: PeaMine on December 10, 2016, 07:53:28 PM

Just curious, what's the reason for ssl in stratum?
Or am I way behind on something.

you can't modify ssl network packets thus can't disable devfee

not entirely true hahaha ... ssl implemented to protect devfee is 1 of the main reason !

That is the ONLY reason as SSL adds nothing to mining.
Actually it is worse as it adds lag to connection

Actually MITM attack is possible not only to dev fee. Any connections can be modified by hacker if it's not secured.

I encourage all of you to mine with SSL/TLS connection.

And a big meteor is possible to fall from the sky.. I encourage you to buy a spacecraft.

beIbox

newbie

Activity: 21

Merit: 0

Quote from: TimLev on December 11, 2016, 05:35:18 AM

@Claymore

Rig 6xR9 390 1150/1500

v.1.0 - v.8.0 - 0 crashes for all the time.

v.9.0/9.1 – crashes each 10-15 min, various GPUs. (any -i value)

Something is wrong with this version.
Rollback on v.8 returns stability.

Again and again.
Problems can be:
1. PSU wattage load
2. PSU ripple suppression
3. PSU voltage regulation at different load variations
4. Bad risers and other cables. (Least likely if still working in other versions)
5. Incorrectly configuring windows

TimLev

newbie

Activity: 13

Merit: 0

@Claymore

Rig 6xR9 390 1150/1500

v.1.0 - v.8.0 - 0 crashes for all the time.

v.9.0/9.1 – crashes each 10-15 min, various GPUs. (any -i value)

Something is wrong with this version.
Rollback on v.8 returns stability.

ober

newbie

Activity: 29

Merit: 0

Quote from: miningpoolhub on December 11, 2016, 01:50:29 AM

Quote from: Subw on December 11, 2016, 01:07:30 AM

Quote from: yslyung on December 11, 2016, 12:21:55 AM

Quote from: Subw on December 10, 2016, 11:58:19 PM

Quote from: PeaMine on December 10, 2016, 07:53:28 PM

Just curious, what's the reason for ssl in stratum?
Or am I way behind on something.

you can't modify ssl network packets thus can't disable devfee

not entirely true hahaha ... ssl implemented to protect devfee is 1 of the main reason !

That is the ONLY reason as SSL adds nothing to mining.
Actually it is worse as it adds lag to connection

Actually MITM attack is possible not only to dev fee. Any connections can be modified by hacker if it's not secured.

I encourage all of you to mine with SSL/TLS connection.

MITM attack for miner's traffic? LOL, there are lot more interesting traffic for such capture if you have the skills and desire to do it Wink

The only complains of recent "hacker" attacks were due to total lack or security in Claymore's Remote manager. The bright people who exposed their rigs for external access deserve to be ashamed. RTFM, it was written there. The only purpose of the SSL is to protect dev fee, it gives nothing to us miners.

Just to be clear - i never cheated Claymore's dev fee no matter how easy it was. He deserves to be paid for releasing excellent and feature rich software.

ilia_vs

newbie

Activity: 24

Merit: 0

Quote from: forato on December 10, 2016, 05:26:16 PM

Quote from: Tmdz on December 10, 2016, 04:52:51 PM

for the people using r9 390, what is your hash and watts at the wall?

Stock is about 280

I have more than 80 r9 390 and never get 300 sol.

The max I get is 285

i have 5 R9 390
294 sol -cclock 1100 -mclock 1500 total 1580W win10

miningpoolhub

legendary

Activity: 1456

Merit: 1006

Mining Pool Hub

Quote from: Subw on December 11, 2016, 01:07:30 AM

Quote from: yslyung on December 11, 2016, 12:21:55 AM

Quote from: Subw on December 10, 2016, 11:58:19 PM

Quote from: PeaMine on December 10, 2016, 07:53:28 PM

Just curious, what's the reason for ssl in stratum?
Or am I way behind on something.

you can't modify ssl network packets thus can't disable devfee

not entirely true hahaha ... ssl implemented to protect devfee is 1 of the main reason !

That is the ONLY reason as SSL adds nothing to mining.
Actually it is worse as it adds lag to connection

Actually MITM attack is possible not only to dev fee. Any connections can be modified by hacker if it's not secured.

I encourage all of you to mine with SSL/TLS connection.

bisba

full member

Activity: 202

Merit: 100

Quote from: Xardas2014 on December 11, 2016, 01:09:10 AM

Quote from: bisba on December 10, 2016, 09:53:37 PM

little help here guys....

mining on nicehash and the Est. next payout time is today but unfortunatly this change to 18/12 and didnt receive my payment on my wallet!!!

is anybody knows for this something?

https://www.nicehash.com/index.jsp?p=news&id=122

damn...!

btw thank you my friend

Xardas2014

hero member

Activity: 635

Merit: 500

Quote from: bisba on December 10, 2016, 09:53:37 PM

little help here guys....

mining on nicehash and the Est. next payout time is today but unfortunatly this change to 18/12 and didnt receive my payment on my wallet!!!

is anybody knows for this something?

https://www.nicehash.com/index.jsp?p=news&id=122

Subw

hero member

Activity: 672

Merit: 500

Quote from: yslyung on December 11, 2016, 12:21:55 AM

Quote from: Subw on December 10, 2016, 11:58:19 PM

Quote from: PeaMine on December 10, 2016, 07:53:28 PM

Just curious, what's the reason for ssl in stratum?
Or am I way behind on something.

you can't modify ssl network packets thus can't disable devfee

not entirely true hahaha ... ssl implemented to protect devfee is 1 of the main reason !

That is the ONLY reason as SSL adds nothing to mining.
Actually it is worse as it adds lag to connection

Subw

hero member

Activity: 672

Merit: 500

Quote from: oslak on December 11, 2016, 12:05:48 AM

Quote from: Subw on December 10, 2016, 11:58:19 PM

Quote from: PeaMine on December 10, 2016, 07:53:28 PM

Just curious, what's the reason for ssl in stratum?
Or am I way behind on something.

you can't modify ssl network packets thus can't disable devfee

Next version will have ssl on default. The current version is just to make sure pools implement ssl. Claymore is bright.

As soon as couple more major pools add SSL he will disable plain HTTP entirely

yslyung

legendary

Activity: 1500

Merit: 1002

Mine Mine Mine

Quote from: Subw on December 10, 2016, 11:58:19 PM

Quote from: PeaMine on December 10, 2016, 07:53:28 PM

Just curious, what's the reason for ssl in stratum?
Or am I way behind on something.

you can't modify ssl network packets thus can't disable devfee

not entirely true hahaha ... ssl implemented to protect devfee is 1 of the main reason !

alesx.onfire

hero member

Activity: 966

Merit: 1000

It's Not Enough

more rejects with 9.1

oslak

sr. member

Activity: 273

Merit: 250

Quote from: Subw on December 10, 2016, 11:58:19 PM

Quote from: PeaMine on December 10, 2016, 07:53:28 PM

Just curious, what's the reason for ssl in stratum?
Or am I way behind on something.

you can't modify ssl network packets thus can't disable devfee

Next version will have ssl on default. The current version is just to make sure pools implement ssl. Claymore is bright.

Subw

hero member

Activity: 672

Merit: 500

Quote from: PeaMine on December 10, 2016, 07:53:28 PM

Just curious, what's the reason for ssl in stratum?
Or am I way behind on something.

you can't modify ssl network packets thus can't disable devfee

rwhiteman

newbie

Activity: 4

Merit: 0

Quote from: Za1n on December 10, 2016, 07:44:13 PM

Quote from: rwhiteman on December 10, 2016, 07:21:23 PM

Quote from: Za1n on December 10, 2016, 06:53:55 PM

Quote from: rwhiteman on December 10, 2016, 06:27:20 PM

Quote from: mikkowendell on December 10, 2016, 06:20:45 PM

Quote from: rwhiteman on December 10, 2016, 06:10:07 PM

Seeing 315+ H/s on each of my 390x clocked at 1180, though the temp hits 90C. One of the cards occasionally drops out now with 9.1 (was stable on 8 ).. even drops without overclocking. At least the miner resets itself.

Even doing -tt -80 or higher? Huh

Set -ttli 92

You probably should be spending your time looking into undervolting to lower temps, blowing the dust out of your cards, separating them from each other more for better airflow or relocating the rig for more efficient environmental heat removal, reapplying the thermal compound between the heat-sinks and GPU core, etc. There really isn't much difference between 90 and 100% fan speed when in comes to cooling, and you are quickly running out of headroom if you need to run that high to keep your cards at 90C. I have a few rigs with the 390x cards and I know they run hot, but I manage to keep them in the 70C range, I would be worried at 90C.

Will give undervolting a shot - they're brand new, so I'm not too worried about dust. Do they use decent thermal grease during production? Have them in a rackmount enclosure that moves an absurd amount of air across them.. with v8 I could run with the GPU fans at 0% and the temp stayed around 84C. 9 seems to have changed that a bit.

Yeah, version 9 pushes them harder so they will run hot. I have mine in open air rigs and they run ~74-77C now with earlier versions they would be under 70C. Your 84C is on the high side, but would still be a worthy goal versus 90C. Undervolting might take you there, but you might also need to be prepared to give up a bit of hashrate and decrease the core clocks a little.

There's been two times I've seen one of my cards spike to 90C now... otherwise it stays in the 80s, and the other cards are in the 60s. Haven't been able to get the cards to accept undervolting. Not seeing any error - the Gigabyte OC tool grays out power settings, and if I try through Claymore then the clockspeed just falls down to 600-800, though I have it set much higher.

sorry2xs

legendary

Activity: 924

Merit: 1000

Dark Passenger Bitcoin miner 2013,Bitcoin node

Quote from: naimc3243 on December 10, 2016, 10:22:25 PM

Mind sharing the port into for ssl on dwrafpool, nothing on the faq page.

my mistake will delete post

naimc3243

newbie

Activity: 27

Merit: 0

Mind sharing the port into for ssl on dwrafpool, nothing on the faq page.

bisba

full member

Activity: 202

Merit: 100

little help here guys....

mining on nicehash and the Est. next payout time is today but unfortunatly this change to 18/12 and didnt receive my payment on my wallet!!!

is anybody knows for this something?

Marvell1

legendary

Activity: 2408

Merit: 1102

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

If dwarfpool implements SSL I will switch for sure

Marvell1

legendary

Activity: 2408

Merit: 1102

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: rpg on December 10, 2016, 09:22:18 PM

Quote from: smaxz on December 10, 2016, 01:40:29 PM

Quote from: rpg on December 10, 2016, 10:31:01 AM

Quote from: yudhistira on December 10, 2016, 06:32:40 AM

Dual-X R9 280X 3G D5

win7 4 Gb RAM, 16 Gb virtual RAM
radeon software ver 16.9.2
zecminerx64.exe -zpool ssl suprnova -i 8
hashrate avg 200 h/s
hashrate do not match between pools and my rig
and always : share rejected 5

is this normal ?

Yes. Pools steal shares from you. The only zcash pool that reports and pays correctly what is expected is dwarfpool.

that's quite the rabbit hole you've started your way down.not that i don't agree.

we are executing closed source code written by an anonymous author that is coincidentally named after a device that sits idle until activation at which point it explodes and wreaking havoc all around it.

that author is being payed handsomely for this privilege.

funny how a few shills and largely clueless mining community can lead up to the current state of things.

We have a contract with claymore. We know how much we are paying. We have a contract with the pools that most don't give a crap about it and steal shares on top of the 1%. On top of that flypool generates a ton of rejects due to under performing server. It costs the miners around 10%.

FLypool was working well for me till 9.0 and 9.1 I barely got any rejects according to ethmon

Topic: Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux) - page 358. (Read 3839163 times)