Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux) - page 411.

guys have some questions that bothers me...

just added in my rig today an HD 8990, to another 3x R9 390 gigabite 8 gb, with a Ewga supernova 1300w G2 PSU... The consuption is 1327w at wall...

Also have an Therma Take Though power 1200w PSU which is running at 1130w at wall....

where is the limit of the PSU consuption in long term? Any experience/advice?

Just dont wanna burn them in short time...

Many thanks for any advice and help....

Take the 1130w at wall, and figure out what it is outputting by multiplying by efficiency (can estimate based on 80+ level, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/80_Plus). Some say to not go over 80% load for 24/7, others say you can go higher if it is a quality PSU. Stability may be better not at high load, but depends on quality of PSU also. Look up Johny GURU review of your PSU. Or perhaps look here http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/id-2547993/psu-tier-list.html

Quote from: Puffy23 on December 04, 2016, 10:15:35 PM

Quote from: Assaro on December 04, 2016, 07:22:38 PM

guys have some questions that bothers me...

just added in my rig today an HD 8990, to another 3x R9 390 gigabite 8 gb, with a Ewga supernova 1300w G2 PSU... The consuption is 1327w at wall...

Also have an Therma Take Though power 1200w PSU which is running at 1130w at wall....

where is the limit of the PSU consuption in long term? Any experience/advice?

Just dont wanna burn them in short time...

Most PSUs achieve maximum efficiency around 50% load. The cost of doubling your power requirement usually washes any profits from extra efficiency though.

For longevity you should aim to load them around 80% (or less if you want the gains in efficiency).

Many thanks for you replyies... will think about it, and adjust the consuption....

ghostfaceuk

sr. member

Activity: 410

Merit: 250

for me Zec is still certainly the most profitable according to coinwarz.com.

Acguy

sr. member

Activity: 308

Merit: 250

Quote from: golden0707 on December 05, 2016, 01:51:40 AM

Quote from: Hotmetal on December 02, 2016, 09:35:31 AM

Quote from: needhelp2 on December 02, 2016, 08:32:22 AM

Network Hashrate increase = lower profit for miners???

Let's see if ZEC recovers but it's trending down.

Where did you get these graphs ?

Really thinking to switch to ETH

i think zec is better profit still

Golku

full member

Activity: 263

Merit: 100

Quote from: ghostfaceuk on December 05, 2016, 03:24:43 AM

nerdralph over in the silent army thread thinks it may be possible to get about 300 sols from the 470.

this is what they actually said: -

"The algorithm, i.e. 8 rounds of bin sorts to find collisions on 20 bits followed by a final 40-bit collision search, has not been optimized.
I've already explained the optimizations that could be done in OpenCL which would take ~5 million core clocks per round. That would push the performance up to ~200 on a Rx 470 clocked at 1250/1750. With GCN assembler I believe I can get that down to ~3 million core clocks per round, with performance of over 300 sols/s on a Rx 470."

They are looking at implementing this in a closed source miner with a 1-2% fee.

Can you imagine getting those speeds from a 470? wonder if a 480 would get even better h/s?

that would be like 2x the speed what we now get!

ghostfaceuk

sr. member

Activity: 410

Merit: 250

nerdralph over in the silent army thread thinks it may be possible to get about 300 sols from the 470.

this is what they actually said: -

"The algorithm, i.e. 8 rounds of bin sorts to find collisions on 20 bits followed by a final 40-bit collision search, has not been optimized.
I've already explained the optimizations that could be done in OpenCL which would take ~5 million core clocks per round. That would push the performance up to ~200 on a Rx 470 clocked at 1250/1750. With GCN assembler I believe I can get that down to ~3 million core clocks per round, with performance of over 300 sols/s on a Rx 470."

They are looking at implementing this in a closed source miner with a 1-2% fee.

Can you imagine getting those speeds from a 470? wonder if a 480 would get even better h/s?

delle54

sr. member

Activity: 307

Merit: 250

Quote from: peteycamey on December 05, 2016, 02:23:40 AM

Claymore when are you planning to release v9 ?

Search for his posts and you will know.

mamedesign

newbie

Activity: 78

Merit: 0

Quote from: melloyellow on December 05, 2016, 01:47:37 AM

Quote from: Jmme on December 05, 2016, 01:11:13 AM

Check the Thread Title on my post, can you also teach him to delete some of the previous quotes so it's not a waste of space

STOP WITH THE QUOTES FOOLS

nah, I'm good

yah i'm good to

peteycamey

legendary

Activity: 1184

Merit: 1017

Claymore when are you planning to release v9 ?

oldisoft

hero member

Activity: 854

Merit: 1000

https://iota.org/

Hi!

Still have not new ver of this great miner?

Cheers

golden0707

full member

Activity: 189

Merit: 100

Quote from: Hotmetal on December 02, 2016, 09:35:31 AM

Quote from: needhelp2 on December 02, 2016, 08:32:22 AM

Network Hashrate increase = lower profit for miners???

Let's see if ZEC recovers but it's trending down.

Where did you get these graphs ?

Really thinking to switch to ETH

melloyellow

full member

Activity: 176

Merit: 100

Quote from: Jmme on December 05, 2016, 01:11:13 AM

Check the Thread Title on my post, can you also teach him to delete some of the previous quotes so it's not a waste of space

STOP WITH THE QUOTES FOOLS

nah, I'm good

Jmme

newbie

Activity: 10

Merit: 0

Check the Thread Title on my post, can you also teach him to delete some of the previous quotes so it's not a waste of space

STOP WITH THE QUOTES FOOLS

melloyellow

full member

Activity: 176

Merit: 100

Quote from: rpg on December 04, 2016, 11:39:54 PM

Quote from: suggsy89 on December 04, 2016, 07:55:12 PM

Quote from: DStefanov on December 04, 2016, 07:50:00 PM

Quote from: suggsy89 on December 04, 2016, 07:45:08 PM

Quote from: DStefanov on December 04, 2016, 07:41:08 PM

Quote from: delle54 on December 04, 2016, 07:31:13 PM

Quote from: matmator on December 04, 2016, 06:51:56 PM

Here I come to try to undermine the zcash with claymore

But I crash after a few seconds

I get 180H / S per card, (rx 480)

This is what I put in the bat:

GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100

ZecMiner64.exe -zpool zec-eu1.nanopool.org:6666 -allpools 1 -zwal my address wallet.rig -zpsw x

Do you have an idea why this crash?

thank you in advance

On Windows you have to add set before GPU...

set GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
set GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
set GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
set GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
set GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100

ZecMiner64.exe -zpool zec-eu1.nanopool.org:6666 -allpools 1 -zwal my address wallet.rig -zpsw x

And don't forget: Virtual memory >16 MB.

?!? set or setx is true?

set modifies the current shell's (window) environment values, and the change is available immediately, but it is temporary. The change will not affect other shells that are running, and as soon as you close the shell, the new value is lost until such time as you run set again.

setx modifies the value permanently, which affects all future shells, but does not modify the environment of the shells already running. You have to exit the shell and reopen it before the change will be available, but the value will remain modified until you change it again.

Thanks for comprehensive answer, but I asked what is more properly used and not the differences between the set and setx?

Well i use setx as global, I don't think there is a "proper" way, you either set it temporary or permanently.
I guess if you have various different cards you would use set, and if they were all the same use setx.

When you use setx will stay there forever. You have to go to the registry and manually remove it under currentuser\environment

No you don't. Right click the start button, choose System. Click Advanced system settings. Then click Environment Variables. You can add, edit, and delete them there.

Jmme

newbie

Activity: 10

Merit: 0

It wasn't missed, it's just a bunch of shit that someone with to much time made into a conspiracy. I think President Electric Trump won the election on one of those days, maybe we can tie that to Claymore also.

AlcatelBravo

full member

Activity: 143

Merit: 100

Alfa, Bravo, Charlie, Delta, Echo, Foxtrot....

Quote from: SASAMMM on December 04, 2016, 08:00:25 PM

Claymore has a full mining speed from the start(v1) .no one sees but my?
He simultaneously works with pools and exchanges and zcash team.
Look at the Poloniex pump and dump and release of new miners (time)
His job is to prevent too large price decrease.Price now is unreal high.
There is no race.everything is pre-planned.
Slow start is over.There is still one final release,and that's it.
One more pump and price go down.(because he does not hurry with the latest version)
Game is over.

Hidden between all these pointless quotes I see this one post I shall quote that got missed, this seems the case from News/Market chart monitoring and the times these occurrences happen, some would say it is FUD but from all Equihash coins point of view prices are plummeting and could prove a link to why.

Jmme

newbie

Activity: 10

Merit: 0

I think you guys need to start your own thread so you can keep quoting each other until each post is a full fucking page. Huh

Topic: Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux) - page 411. (Read 3839163 times)