Author

Topic: Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux) - page 628. (Read 3839163 times)

legendary
Activity: 3808
Merit: 1723
Up to 300% + 200 FS deposit bonuses
Its profitable for the older GPUs, like 280x and 290. Not the RX series.

the best is 7900 and r9 280x with hynix memory ? elpida is not good ? thx

Up to 90 sols with hynix 280x
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/hacked-modified-memory-strap-bios-database-for-zec-mining-1676474
hero member
Activity: 682
Merit: 500
yeah second that.  use 4.0 with -i 0

Actually, just that.... Even with my RX480s and a 4.4GHz 4790k i7 pumping them, -i 0 is faster than 1 and 2. Your results of course may vary, but with these things you have to trial and error.
legendary
Activity: 2294
Merit: 1182
Now the money is free, and so the people will be
yeah second that.  use 4.0 with -i 0
hero member
Activity: 682
Merit: 500
3.1 is faster on my 5 card MSI 390 rig with a G1840 than v4.0
by about 5Sol/s each card
The CPU runs around 97% on both versions so its not that.

Boysie

My seven 290x rig is faster using -i 0 than 1 or 2. Try that, getting around 10% CPU time with a Celeron G1840
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
Its profitable for the older GPUs, like 280x and 290. Not the RX series.

the best is 7900 and r9 280x with hynix memory ? elpida is not good ? thx
newbie
Activity: 43
Merit: 0
3.1 is faster on my 5 card MSI 390 rig with a G1840 than v4.0
by about 5Sol/s each card
The CPU runs around 97% on both versions so its not that.

Boysie

hero member
Activity: 682
Merit: 500
Its profitable for the older GPUs, like 280x and 290. Not the RX series.

For me, my RX480 are still more profitable mining ZEC. Pulling 500 sol/s across six RX480.
legendary
Activity: 3808
Merit: 1723
Up to 300% + 200 FS deposit bonuses
Its profitable for the older GPUs, like 280x and 290. Not the RX series.
hero member
Activity: 682
Merit: 500
Surprisingly, it appears that for the same rig, ZEC is still more profitable than ETH  Huh

That's because it is. I've been getting 140%+ all week on ZEC over ETH.
legendary
Activity: 1564
Merit: 1027
Surprisingly, it appears that for the same rig, ZEC is still more profitable than ETH  Huh
full member
Activity: 173
Merit: 100
SMOKING W33D
Can anyone tell me your speed with R9 380 4gb? I'am getting roughly 45 Sols/s.
Do anyone use a R7 370 4gb vaporX? Whats your seed like I'am getting 40-45 Sols/s.

I really want to compare so I can see if I'am getting the same speed as others.
Thank you.

mine 380 4G doing around 42-44

Kool thank you
hero member
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
It must be something on my computer or firewall or opening a port.
Profibility changes daily.  My observation of zclassic was a couple days ago.  Its currently not a stable coin to mine due to support and longevity. 
full member
Activity: 173
Merit: 100
SMOKING W33D
Yes.  Claymores miner does work for zclassic but currently not as profitable.  Tested on 3.1.

I need help resolving high latency shares currently getting avg. 500ms on US servers regardless of pool.

I am in the midwest USA and zcl.suprnova.cc:4042 is at 187ms and that is through a VPN!

my whattomine link shows ZCL as more profitable than ZEC.

I'am getting 140-200 ms. I'am in Jamaica not using any vpn.
hero member
Activity: 1246
Merit: 708
Quote
Plus, he dislikes linux, because many things are harder to do
Just to say about that line...Coin always has 2 sides...it may be harder for you...but not for others.



He meant harder for Claymore to develop on Linux.

That's unfortunate, a new Silentarmy fork released today, which work on Linux and is faster than Claymore 4.0...
what are you talking about?
I can't find anything...
legendary
Activity: 1281
Merit: 1003
Can anyone tell me your speed with R9 380 4gb? I'am getting roughly 45 Sols/s.
Do anyone use a R7 370 4gb vaporX? Whats your seed like I'am getting 40-45 Sols/s.

I really want to compare so I can see if I'am getting the same speed as others.
Thank you.

mine 380 2G doing around 42-44
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1094
Awesome Miner v2.1 includes support for management and monitoring of Claymore's ZCash Miner


hero member
Activity: 935
Merit: 1001
I don't always drink...
Yes.  Claymores miner does work for zclassic but currently not as profitable.  Tested on 3.1.

I need help resolving high latency shares currently getting avg. 500ms on US servers regardless of pool.

I am in the midwest USA and zcl.suprnova.cc:4042 is at 187ms and that is through a VPN!

my whattomine link shows ZCL as more profitable than ZEC.
hero member
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
Yes.  Claymores miner does work for zclassic but currently not as profitable.  Tested on 3.1.

I need help resolving high latency shares currently getting avg. 500ms on US servers regardless of pool.
full member
Activity: 173
Merit: 100
SMOKING W33D
In the http://www.coinwarz.com/cryptocurrency or what to mine, to calculate the profitability, shall we enter the H/s value  or the Sol/s value reported by the Calymore miner to do the calculation? For example, shall we enter 100 for the 390X?

You should use the Sols/s value from claymore miner.
newbie
Activity: 61
Merit: 0
In the http://www.coinwarz.com/cryptocurrency or what to mine, to calculate the profitability, shall we enter the H/s value  or the Sol/s value reported by the Calymore miner to do the calculation? For example, shall we enter 100 for the 390X?
Jump to: