First off, I haven't really followed this thread only until recently. And I have to say that Denarium did deliver a product which is better than scammers like Coinographic. But...
What is disappointing is that the term "mint" is being thrown around when from what I gather the company "minting" the coins was not in fact an actual mint (not their main focus as a business). Please correct me if I am wrong.
Which is a bad move from a quality stand point.
Was the impression initially from customers that the "mint" was an actual mint or was it disclosed that they were a metal working company of some kind?
We've never promised anything in regards to the mint or mentioned "mint quality". Our main focus has in fact been value-for-money which has been clearly communicated. In this regard the 1/10 and 1/100 coins have been our most successful product.
The 1 BTC coin is a different beast though. It is supposed to be a more premium product. However I'm personally fairly happy with the quality that we've reached with the coin at the end. The auction coins were a bit of a disaster due to the serial issue and the coins being of lesser quality on average than the rest of the batch, but otherwise the batch is, to my novice eye, of good quality.
With the silver coin we had problems mainly because of the lack of experience. Like the whole polishing issue, which we had no idea about before now. But we're gaining experience with each problem and we are dedicated at not repeating the same issues at least.