Pages:
Author

Topic: Cofound.it ICO evaluation and mentoring platform discussion - page 35. (Read 74107 times)

sr. member
Activity: 826
Merit: 254
On my watchlist.
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
I like the idea of CFI - VC Concept.

We are in the world of competition. ICO- Crypto-Blockchain Projects are launching almost every day.

To be realistic, mostly VC's are for wealthy and rich people.

Sooner or later we will be in the new economy of VC and CFI is the way for it.

Where-in rich meets poor. Intelligent meets average.

hero member
Activity: 966
Merit: 500
Not for them.. but what about certain countries and exchanges? Sad!

You're right, I forgot the exchange problem for dividend for a while  Lips sealed
Also ICONOMI chose to buyback instead of dividend because of exchanges I guess. Kraken USA based so they would unlist otherwise  Lips sealed
member
Activity: 67
Merit: 10
Not for them.. but what about certain countries and exchanges? Sad!
hero member
Activity: 966
Merit: 500

Yep  Cheesy

As an ameteur investor I'd prefer some token returns as cost of holding CFI. This is just my side though  Wink

Any reson for Sinagpore? Lately lots of projects seem based on there.

We actually decided against Singapore at the very last moment and went to BVI. Too late for that article though Smiley

Singapore is moving fast towards clear rules and regulations, which will be great. But they are not there yet, so we played it safe and will only have a subsidiary there until the situation becomes totally clear.

Thanks for answers and your patient  Grin

BTW as far as I know BVI is extremely flexible about the financial things. If you chose to give dividends to holders it wouldn't be problem legally I guess
member
Activity: 67
Merit: 10

Yep  Cheesy

As an ameteur investor I'd prefer some token returns as cost of holding CFI. This is just my side though  Wink

Any reson for Sinagpore? Lately lots of projects seem based on there.

We actually decided against Singapore at the very last moment and went to BVI. Too late for that article though Smiley

Singapore is moving fast towards clear rules and regulations, which will be great. But they are not there yet, so we played it safe and will only have a subsidiary there until the situation becomes totally clear.
hero member
Activity: 966
Merit: 500
But I don't get it why the holders would want keep costs down? If I had CFI I'd just hold it and then maybe use other projects tokens that I got from you and maybe keep them or use for another thing. The another thing could be buy more CFI. This is also buy pressure, right?

This is the basic logic:

profits=project income - operations cost

So an optimal short-term strategy for token holders is to make project income as high as possible and operation costs as low as possible. And low operation costs mean fewer developers and fewer marketing. The tokens would be expensive, but the company would face constant pressure to keep the costs low.

Does this make sense?

Yep  Cheesy

As an ameteur investor I'd prefer some token returns as cost of holding CFI. This is just my side though  Wink

Any reson for Sinagpore? Lately lots of projects seem based on there.
member
Activity: 67
Merit: 10
But I don't get it why the holders would want keep costs down? If I had CFI I'd just hold it and then maybe use other projects tokens that I got from you and maybe keep them or use for another thing. The another thing could be buy more CFI. This is also buy pressure, right?

This is the basic logic:

profits=project income - operations cost

So an optimal short-term strategy for token holders is to make project income as high as possible and operation costs as low as possible. And low operation costs mean fewer developers and fewer marketing. The tokens would be expensive, but the company would face constant pressure to keep the costs low.

Does this make sense?
hero member
Activity: 966
Merit: 500
In short: no. Granting the token equity rights is potentially problematic from a legal standpoint, so our token is defined as a pure utility token (more here: https://blog.cofound.it/cofound-it-token-role-and-value-returns-514a8aeface1). That said we are working on mechanisms for value return to make owning the token worthwhile - otherwise, what's the point? Smiley

Welcome back  Cheesy

I read that blog post. Wanna ask a question.
CFI holders get some proportion of the particaped(who use you service and pay with their own tokens) tokens. Is that right?
If so can we say that actual valu of holding CFI come from that?

Hey Smiley

No, and here is why: The solution where Cofound.it token holders get a share of the project tokens was the first one we started working on. It seems really straightforward and obvious at first glance. However, I spent weeks in Excel trying to make it work, and failed. If the amount of project tokens was large enough to be noticeable for CFI token holders, there was not enough funds left for operations.

There was also a more subtle problem: directly returning a share of the profits (in the form of tokens or other) mis-aligns the incentives of the Cofound.it token holders and the platform itself.  The token holders wish to keep costs down to increase returned value, which is counter-productive to rapid platform development. Using the profits to speed up platform development, geographical and market penetration has the potential to bring multiples of value spent.

Hey  Cheesy

Thanks for answer but I couldn't get this part: "If the amount of project tokens was large enough to be noticeable for CFI token holders, there was not enough funds left for operations."


Okay this is right. "Using the profits to speed up platform development, geographical and market penetration has the potential to bring multiples of value spent."

But I don't get it why the holders would want keep costs down? If I had CFI I'd just hold it and then maybe use other projects tokens that I got from you and maybe keep them or use for another thing. The another thing could be buy more CFI. This is also buy pressure, right?

I just want to understand  Embarrassed Grin
member
Activity: 67
Merit: 10
In short: no. Granting the token equity rights is potentially problematic from a legal standpoint, so our token is defined as a pure utility token (more here: https://blog.cofound.it/cofound-it-token-role-and-value-returns-514a8aeface1). That said we are working on mechanisms for value return to make owning the token worthwhile - otherwise, what's the point? Smiley

Welcome back  Cheesy

I read that blog post. Wanna ask a question.
CFI holders get some proportion of the particaped(who use you service and pay with their own tokens) tokens. Is that right?
If so can we say that actual valu of holding CFI come from that?

Hey Smiley

No, and here is why: The solution where Cofound.it token holders get a share of the project tokens was the first one we started working on. It seems really straightforward and obvious at first glance. However, I spent weeks in Excel trying to make it work, and failed. If the amount of project tokens was large enough to be noticeable for CFI token holders, there was not enough funds left for operations.

There was also a more subtle problem: directly returning a share of the profits (in the form of tokens or other) mis-aligns the incentives of the Cofound.it token holders and the platform itself.  The token holders wish to keep costs down to increase returned value, which is counter-productive to rapid platform development. Using the profits to speed up platform development, geographical and market penetration has the potential to bring multiples of value spent.
hero member
Activity: 966
Merit: 500
In short: no. Granting the token equity rights is potentially problematic from a legal standpoint, so our token is defined as a pure utility token (more here: https://blog.cofound.it/cofound-it-token-role-and-value-returns-514a8aeface1). That said we are working on mechanisms for value return to make owning the token worthwhile - otherwise, what's the point? Smiley

Welcome back  Cheesy

I read that blog post. Wanna ask a question.
CFI holders get some proportion of the particaped(who use you service and pay with their own tokens) tokens. Is that right?
If so can we say that actual valu of holding CFI come from that?
member
Activity: 67
Merit: 10
In short: no. Granting the token equity rights is potentially problematic from a legal standpoint, so our token is defined as a pure utility token (more here: https://blog.cofound.it/cofound-it-token-role-and-value-returns-514a8aeface1). That said we are working on mechanisms for value return to make owning the token worthwhile - otherwise, what's the point? Smiley
member
Activity: 74
Merit: 10
i like this project, this is a huge market...but there is still an open question from me. will we get a share in the platform?
member
Activity: 67
Merit: 10
Is it worth investing ? How will the platform generate profits ?

Here are the key assumptions of Cofound.it:
In essence, Cofound.it is a three-sided marketplace.

From the point of view of the experts, Cofound.it is a platform where they can use their expertise to get dream jobs. There are 12M freelancers on Upwork. We are aiming for 1M experts.

From the POV of startups, Cofound.it is a one-stop-shop not only to help with the process but to reach out to the existing supporter community. We're already getting multiple applications per day. We expect hundreds of thousands of startups to use this service in the future.

And finally for the supporters, not only do we provide verified projects but also actively work on rewarding them for their engagement, like Cofound.it Priority Pass that allows engaged supporters early access to the crowdsale. In time, this group will become larger and larger.

So this is what you are getting by supporting the Cofound.it crowdsale. An exclusive ticket to the platform that literally wants to make current VCs obsolete. A distributed VC ecosystem for the distributed age. With all the platform features designed to encourage using and holding the tokens. More about token role and value return here: https://blog.cofound.it/cofound-it-token-role-and-value-returns-514a8aeface1, but tl;dr - as the Cofound.it platform will be designed to encourage token use and holding, this will fuel the rise of token value in proportion to platform use. Short-term, Cofound.it team will be purchasing tokens on open market to fuel platform features like rewarding project evaluators

Will we make it? I don't know. But we have a top-notch team, some of the best advisors in the world and support from some of the best and most engaged supporters ever, and will work our hearts out to succeed. We already have a pipeline of projects that will last us through October with some really amazing names. We're forecasting a total deal flow of 50+M for the second half of the year, which immediately makes Cofound.it one of the largest VCs in the world. And we're building our service to use all the best features blockchain tech can give us, and partner with some amazing companies both in the blockchain space and in the old economy. I kinda like our odds Smiley

Now, is this worth investing - that is of course a question for you. I can tell you that more than 1200 supporters already think so and have applied for the Cofound.it Priority Pass, which allows them to send the funds a few days before the rest - a crowdsale mechanic we're testing out to try and reward engaged supporters. More info here: https://blog.cofound.it/introducing-cofound-it-priority-pass-7d3ab58fa6dd
full member
Activity: 186
Merit: 100
Next level greed here. You don't even need the money, let alone basically keeping 65-75% of the tokens to yourself. Hell, no one even needs your company. People are more than happy to throw millions at random ICOs without any form of due diligence.
sr. member
Activity: 588
Merit: 250
Crypto is Life!
Is it worth investing ? How will the platform generate profits ?
member
Activity: 67
Merit: 10
Hey oportunis,

thanks for the question.

Adel is trying to solve a similar problem than we are, but we are approaching it from the other end. We believe that the key challenge right now is a business one, not a technical one. So we have started to solve the business problems in trying to establish a VC ecosystem: how to evaluate projects, how to find what value to add, how to find the optimal experts, how to coordinate the coaching, how to calculate added value, how to do marketing & PR and how to do a crowdsale. Once we find the best way to solve them we'll work on translating the processes into code.

That's also why we are already able to work with the projects already (our pipeline is full till October at this point), which will mean that we are cash-flow positive from the start. The main goal of our crowdsale are to:
  • test the process - we are basically the guinnea pig testing it - we will find problems so the process for the projects will be smoother
  • raise awareness - we are getting several project signups per day
  • test cool new ideas like Cofound.it Priority Pass that allows engaged supporters access to the crowdsale before the general public
  • and finally raise funds so we can expand quicker

Jan
full member
Activity: 218
Merit: 100
I would say they want to copy https://adelphoi.io/ which is still an active ICO...
What is the difference between you and them? Adel ecosystem looks more interesting at the moment...
hero member
Activity: 3024
Merit: 614
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
I have not known an ico coin who has not open a thread in the altcoin section,it is a must because from that thread,you can access all the relevant information about the coin,and this is where everything started,this ico has zero value at all for not doing the first thing that needs to be done.
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 251
Pages:
Jump to: