Great, we have almost the whole clown car chiming in now.
"Site-directed mutagenesis" is NOT a natural process. Convenient how they left that tidbit out.
https://international.neb.com/applications/cloning-and-synthetic-biology/site-directed-mutagenesis
You really don't understand concepts of proof and evidence. The burden of proof is on you to prove that the virus was created in a lab. It's not anybody's job to prove that its not. Just flinging improbabilities out there and then saying they are likely is nothing but you propelling baseless conspiracy theories.
You like to play this little game a lot, where if I link an article, you expect me to defend every single facet of it as if I said it, and if I don't nothing I say has any logical basis. You keep talking about the article all you like, regardless of whatever is in it or the study it is based on, there is no denying...
IT IS A FACT viruses can have their mutations accelerated in a lab by infecting lots of animal subjects, and selecting for preferable mutation traits. This is NOT something that would be distinguishable from natural mutation. You call me incel, conspiritard, etc. all you like, none of this is an argument or changes this fact.