tvbcof while you think the virus is just a paper/media/data thing. .. real people are dying getting sick due to the virus
...
I 'believe in the virus' and believe I had it after a year of trying to catch it. Actually, more like 10 or 11 months because only after a few months did it become clear that it was a joke which almost never causes a significant (currently known) problem for healthy people, and indeed, most people don't even know they had it.
For me it was a standard cold for a few days. But...the following month was weird. A week of immune system depression, then a month of very significant lack of energy. Back to normal now.
What is interesting is that other 'skeptics' like myself describe having probably had the virus and unusual physiological observations and noteworthy events, but often notably different ways. I, for instance, never had any pulmonary issues whatsoever. Not even one good hocker to spit out (sniffle.)
take your own observations. your 'long covid' of 'month of weird' 'week of immunesystem depression' 'month of lack of energy'
seems more then just 'few days of standard cold'.. even if you do evaluate yourself as 'healthy'
anyway.. your own observations of your lack of snot/mucus should be very revealing.
common colds have snot/mucus because thats your defense mechanism recognising and flushing out the nasties.
your lack of such shows your body didnt recognise the virus.. hense why it was not a 24hour thing. and instead 'long covid'
..
now then
covid is novel.. meaning new. meaning people dont have any early defense knowledge to fight it off easily.. as you have just learned... so the health risks even in healthy people are higher than say if covid has been around for 10 'flu' seasons already.
yep the emphasis that makes covid more deadly is no ones immune system has fought this particular covid19 strain lineage before
its like fighting your girlfriend vs fighting her boxer uncle.. yes say family. but completely different in many ways
.. so its not as simple as you thought.
(im downplaying heart risk people by 100x for your aimless benefit. 0.1% instead of 10%)
the thing is.. that without a vaccine .. even if 0.1%
* of people have heart issues. thats still 300k americans at risk
because the strain on fighting covid in the lungs will strain their heart.
...however a vaccine in the arm wont strain their lungs and thus wont strain their heart
simple logic...
so in a population of america that is still 300,000 needless deaths at the 100x downplayed number
so a vaccine is still helpful
yep america has 10% heart disease.
so if you think in the downplayed number 300,000 should die just so you can go without a vaccine..
how about you realise that other people may want their family members to live. maybe realise that you can just say 'no thanks' if offered a vaccine
you dont have to have the mindset that 300,000 who need the vaccine should not take it just because you personally fear needles.
i know i know you want to promote some fantasy about gene modifying crap to hide your insecurity about needles.
i know you want to promote fantasies about how its not even a vaccine but some crap drug used to program humans into consumers.
but how about drop your conspiracies. and actually look at the facts.
dont let yourself be narrated down conspiracy paths. as it makes you look like an idiot.
..
These observations match a situation where there are a variety of highly unusual strains (or maybe completely different pathogens) going around. This, in turn, lends support to the idea that a variety of products came out of the 'gain of function' research which is know to have been undertaken with coronavirus in various labs, and a number of the different products were released here and there. By accident, by design, or by some combination of both.
YOUR observations are not from clinical studies of the virus nor of understanding the lineage. nor of understanding they can actually recognise the difference between a crispr rna vs wild rna. nor understand the studies of the zoonotic process.
YOUR observations come from conspiracy site misinformation
A permutation on the above theme is that whatever it is about this 'new' coronavirus strain interacts differently with the immune systems of people who had different events years earlier. These could be different vaccines, or infections from different agents.
if you know the zoonotic differences you will know
mers2013_____ covid19_____
camels2012_/_____ pangolin 2019 __/_____
bats1960_______________/_____________________/
civits 2002\______________
sars2003\____________
sars2003 is the science proved same 'family'
but not immuni-identifable'(body recognition) like the bat1960 lineage
sars2003 is the same 'family' but not 'immuni-identifable' like covid
if your worried about the strains 15 generation changes within just the covid lineage. then you must atleast realise that covid is 150-300 generations different to sars 2003
Lots of these very interesting questions and observations could be studied and eventually understood if we were in 'old normal' times back when we had science. Now with scientism only certain questions can be academically explored and it is mandatory to arrive at a defined set of conclusions. Top most is that a conclusion has to support the bedrock principle that we ALL need to roll up our sleeves for the gene therapy trials NOW.
if you think medievel witch craft was science. and what is now done is witchcraft..
then so be it.. lay in your pool of ignorance and fantasy
