Wrong again Bob. The PCR tests, in they way they are mis-used for 'covid-19' against the complaints of the developer, simply means that there was a tiny trace of a genomic sequence in the initial sample, or that the cycles were so high that a false positive occurred. ...then of course there was the story about the swabs being contaminated with the SARS-cov-2 itself...
Are you saying that Fausti and the rest of the Gods of science are going to be able to design a vaccine which instigates the production of antibodies for 'covid-19', but they cannot even tell what such an antibody looks or act like enough to even have a test for it!?!
1. the PCR test has nothing to do with swabs.
it has nothing to do with the chemical used after for testing
call it a 3 step process
you can also do PCR with different input methods (pipettes/syringes)
the chemical analysis at the end is not unique to PCR either.
just to make things clear for you
PCR is basically the bit in the middle as you refer to as the 'cycling'
as for the false worry of swabs and chemical contamination.
there were not very good processes in place early on. because they didnt have good practices in place and were just rushing to get a system running
but this is more emphasis that your stuck in narratives of january/february. and your stuck not realising its july and alot has changed
yea you might find a few examples where a few mistakes are made. but those things have their own safeguards now and its not really a big problem you elude to
they have disposable pipettes and do certain parts in different area's to have good practices to avoid cross contamination now
and in a small under 0.1% chance of cross contamination. well they just ask for retests.
(previous contamination issues were due to re-using pipettes which came into contact with the virus. and then the chemical... now they dispose of the pipette tips after each use)
and use smaller bottles of chemicals so that in a small 0.1% chance of contamination. it doesnt affect a big batch.. plus other things
2. a vaccine is not an antibody.
they dont need to play around with recognising a certain antibody 'puzele piece' specific to covid
a vaccine uses the VIRUS(not antibody) that has been made impotent to replication while still having the unique identifiers. this then lets your bodies own antibodies see it and deal with it without harm
..
maybe try to research away from the similar sites badecker does and then you might learn more then the narrow minded thoughts of the small cultish antivax group
..
ignoring all the social drama queens just trying to get a name/famous/money
if true antivaxxers actually ignored those anti-vax social media cults. and instead actually done some real research. then they could actually find some real issues with vaccines worthy of discussing..
.. but instead you and your ilk will just repeat the stupid stuff that has already been debunked but you are too lazy to want/care to actually work out for yourself