if you do the research you find that the lab compared DATABASE samples of genome sequences
and at first it was labled 'wildlife' which was not very helpful. so they contacted the head doctor of the research for clarification of the source and she said 'bats rats and civits' so they changed the database to be more descriptive.. not less
put it this way
if they changed bats and civits to become 'wildlife' instead(the other way round).. then it would look like a cover up. but this was not the case
also later on independant labs also done tests and studies and confirms that it was bat and civid comparisons to stuff they had in their 'genebanks' (database of genomes)
oh and many idiots take the 'lab close by' and then say that lab techs had their lunch break at the wetmarket..
um no.. its 20 miles away. google maps 'close by' is not the same as a car on a road 'close by'
anything can look close by on a map if you zoom out
how do they know it was from the wetmarket. beause the PATIENTS worked and attended there.
heck even the first case in france wife worked in a fishmonger where the fish is suggested to have originated from wuhan
...
as for the whole other article techshare linked about mikovitz and fauci
firstly she was not working on HIV she was working on chronic fatigue syndrome..
secondly it wasnt even her CFS study it was another doctors. frank ruscetti.
mikovitz was asking for lots of money while ruscetti was away. saying she had his research notes and it was compelling stuff and she deserved some large grant money to continue.
they refused. they also asked her to hand over the notes as she shouldnt have them as she was not the author. she refused.
thus they didnt know the progress of the study to even award any grant extensions..
she got angry and accusatory
she was sacked and then they filed a civil case against her to get the companies property back. which later she gave back
it was later found tht the studies didnt prove anything as no one could re create the process. and then when looking at the 2 slides of the CFS study they found the source test and comparison experiment test result to actually be the very same slide just editing the patient data to make them look different
later jealous from losing her job other doctors were getting new research done and she started to claim those as hers even without actually working there no more.
since then for many years she has been profiting off of the idiots in the conspiracy theory community. selling her stories(books) to them and lending her 'doctor title' to stroke their egos by charging them to endorse their theories.
basically she is only interested in the money not the science fact/actual research
