post propaganda and ye shal get rebuttal
so dr 10: ................ and theres the funny.. only 9 doctors.. not 10
by the way. that website is not a website for unbiased both sides open opinion. that site is a quote aggregator that grabbed certain quotes from limited amounts of doctors that fit the website owners personal narative he wishes to push
anyway
so we know that 30% asymptomatic now. 50% very mild. 15% severe 5% critical(no support = death group)
again that 5% is not actual death. but to risk of death if they dont get hospitalised
soo. lets just say 1% critical. which UK has 65m.. so lets call it 650k critical
no we know r0 is 2.6 a week
so imagine january 1st 55 people came to the uk as patient zero.. yep im using numbers in your favour here
doing the maths means that by march 11th when isolations started to only 110k would have 'herd immunity' untested before isolation
so Dr1: thinks millions got herd immune before march 11th to outweigh/dilute the 650k critical risk
but that as i just shown is not the case
its due to self isolation that only scales of wanting 20k deaths of ~65k critical is desired because ~40k rolling occupacy per month is capable... definetly not 650k as it would be more like 500k death
so dr 2:
tries to play numbers games. but doesnt realise. that germwards dont need ventilaters and specialised respiratory staff. they just need a consultant offering antibiotics. there are not enough ventilators or ICU beds or ICU trained staff for something so specific. oh and i do love the callus tone of oh well people die let others die too.. true doctors dont want any preventable deaths. sems more interested in being allowed to parties..
..
reality check.. herd immunity will happen.. but WHEN hospitals can actually have capacity to cope with the critical. so keep your party dress locked away for another few months and think of peoples health not your social life
..
callus person 20 dead and she wont care unless 20k dead (facepalm).. think about it 20k need to die before she decides to not go to the pub
so dr 3: makes sense.. but forgets that partygirl number 2 will want to socialise and mingle with everyone she can. so although she asymptomatic/mild in 30-80% case. she can pass it around so she needs to be told to keep away from people
then when it comes to those who suppose to self isolate but instead go to the beach to like girls faces thinking they are doing the world a favour by spreading it.. then they need to be handed more harshly
the point is. before march11th in uk people were told to socially distance. no isolation.. guess what stupid people ignored it. so yea the government had to up the game due to ignorant people
so dr4: ignores all science of r0 and viral load and thinks no one dies and its just a cough and sniffle
(facepalm)
our planet is a victim of hospital facilities ill equiped. it aint a social drama thing
he says no evidence its any worse than the rhinovirus(runny nose)(double facepalm to this moron)
so dr5: doesnt know numbers or reporting methods.. (facepalm) seems to have been watching too many conspiracy websites about fake death certificates. not realising that doctors report death to one department and a death certificate department on different days. the ARDS (acute respiratory distress) being the big known corona death symptom when tested positive and also shown other known symptoms that rule out panic attack or asthma
so dr 6:yep he cant answer the question of whats different this time.. because he doesnt know the basics of r0. meaning he BLINDLY assumes its just the flu
so dr 7: says doesnt beleive isreal death numbers.. and italy is only 10% of its yearly number last year
well it would be more then 10% if no isolation.. plus.. its only been 2 months not a year. .. more deaths to come
says no deaths in isreal.. 3 weeks later there are deaths..
seems these people dont realise its the start of a lengthy event. its not the end of a previous years event
as for the countries with low numbers.. well low numbers at start all get a clean ICU be .. but as weeks pass new patients are not getting the same quality hospital service .. because.. hospitals cant cope after a certain level..
so dr 8: yes highly unlikely majority of asymptomatic cases are tested. and thats why those people should avoid being close enough to lick someone elses faces..
if governments on january 9th magically hadn hundreds of millions of tests like a pregnancy test style. then counties could monitor things better.. but they cant. so people have to take responsibility to not pass it on. so it slows the chance of getting to the vulnerable
.. yes as it spreads it gets difficult to monitor.. soo.. the solution.. delay the spread
so dr 9: his maths is flawed .. but lets run with it.... 2m assymptomatic which is still only 99% not even getting it in america
in short.. there is still alot of spread to come.. but only when hospitals can handle it
in short we are still in the calm before the storm
oh and he thinks its a 10k a day flatline case load... nope r0 means the number grows
as for his assumption of wuhan.. well he only compared it to flu.. but doesnt realise that it only compares to flu stats WITH ISOLATION and only at the first wave.. he wouldnt be comparing it like for like if there was no isolation and at the end of the year
