Topic: Craig W. only claims to be Satoshi, because he knows the real Satoshi is dead? - page 2. (Read 15254 times)

@Nutilda what happened to Bruno?

The forum rule is no posting twice in a row under 24 hours. If a fresh thought crosses that genius brain of yours and you have to let us know about it, just edit your last post if its the last post in the thread. If somebody else posts after your post, no need - you can make a new post - and it won't be deleted.

I've explained that to hv_ at least 4 times but its more fun to pretend you are a victim of the Blockstream Conspiracy than actually acknowledge the rules of the forum.

And, you seem to be a person who wants to argue or to stir-up irrelevant stream of consciousness shit for the mere sake of it.  

Hard to know, exactly, what potentially insightful point, if even feasible, that you are trying to make.

You are likely the one that needs to get a grip, and maybe grow the fuck up.

You need to get so much of a grip that you cannot even make any semblance of staying on topic or trying to provide some kind insight without devolving into blurting out irrelevant and seemingly stream of consciousness nonsense.

Well, sometimes when you are so terse and flippant, then moderators can feel that you are not really adding much if any value.

I have had a few of my posts deleted too, especially when they are one liners that do not really add much substance and come off as merely serving as a kind of easy pun joke.  If you get a lot of posts deleted then you might find that you are tending to engage in that kind of a posting style. 

Overall, I don't get too many posts deleted, but I believe part of the reason is that even if I make a kind of smart ass statement, I will also provide some explanation, too, so that probably helps to lower my deletion rate.

Regarding whether Satoshi really is dead, I doubt that anyone really knows, including that fucktwat craig.  Sure, craig might be stabbing in the dark in terms of presuming that if satoshi disappeared (whether dead or not), that he (craig) had a lot of opportunities to present himself as satoshi.  Difficult understand why anyone would believe such a arrogant fuck, such as craig, but sometimes people can either be gullible or just feel that the narrative also fits their purposes, and another side of believing the craig story is that some people like to gamble on the possibility that some kind of outrageous claim may end up being true, and therefore they can benefit from getting on board early to such otherwise seemingly outrageous claim.

You are not saying anything that is exactly shocking or innovative, MicroGuy. 

The whole theme of this thread has the idea of satoshi being dead as its underlying premise.

Nope, more fragile and attackable, cause altered with less genius injections than was built by the real genius, and non-compliant BitCoin the more

Logic is not bendable

---

Why u think he might? Why he 'left' at all?

[moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]

I have nothing to do with Blockstream ...

 

No, I quite doubt that he would. But I can ask him if you really care.

Again,

Why would Satoshi threaten to dox himself?

Oh brother. 

Why would Satoshi threaten to dox himself? Can you answer that?

Clearly you weren't dealing with Satoshi, if anybody at all.

Smoking pot while reminiscing about what great pals you and Satoshi were, also inferring that he was killed and his body found covered in feces... all just to promote your altcoin? I would say it was bizarre if it wasn't also pretty low.

The fact is Satoshi had been long gone from the public by the time you added him as a "friend" on the P2P Foundation website. His P2P Foundation account was hacked sometime in 2014, so whoever "added" you was the hacker, who incidentally used the website to post as Satoshi and threaten to dox him if he wasn't paid some BTC.

This was the message he left using Satoshi's account on the P2P Foundation on September 9th, 2014:


That is who you were "friends" with.

Maybe you just weren't aware of it, but this occurred over 5 years ago you should have brought yourself up to speed on the matter in this time before attempting to pretend Satoshi was your "friend." LOL. He's your friend about as much as Tom from MySpace is my friend.

The hacking incident was even mentioned on the forum while you were a member.

This impersonator will never stop until He is putted beyond the bars because how many cases he has been facing yet not stopping to claim another BS stuffs.

Now His latest issue is this https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/satoshi-nakamoto-never-used-bitcointalk-new-claim-by-craig-wright-5244298 That satoshi never used Bitcoin ,Look how funny this stupid CSW is.

That's no longer news, I mean don't we all already know that Satoshi wants to remain anonymous,  unknown,  in this case, it is very convenient for an attention seeker like Craig W to want to take advantage of that, remember he can not verify that he is actually satoshi despite his claim,
I would say he doesn't know shit, he is just like everyone else with what already know, he can shout all he wants he is satoshi   but fact remains he is not, being one of the pioneer of btc is different from trying to be the creator of btc.

Newbies, this is Satoshi's real vision,



That's not possible if the Core developers made design-decisions that would centralize the network towards a few entities that are driven by profit.

I'm not saying those entities are "evil". They only act according to what's necessary for the network.

That's not a fact.  That's an opinion.  



Taking satoshi out of the equation altogether, whether they were here or not, the only thing that has any discernible impact is consensus.  It's fine to have an opinion on which network you believe is a closer reflection to a document written by satoshi, but at the end of the day, it's just an opinion.  

If some people allow their opinion to blind them to the reality that the Bitcoin network is the one that has the:

• most potent network effects
• longest chain without cheating with an emergency difficulty adjustment
• strongest security of any blockchain on earth
• majority of the community's dev talent working on it
• largest support from users running full nodes
• most recognisable "brand"
• greatest utility and actual usage in making real-world transactions

then there's nothing we can do for them (by the way, @hv, those are what "facts" look like).  

Faketoshi supporters are entitled to their fantasies that they're winning some sort of perceived "moral high ground" and pretending that only they are uniquely placed to know what satoshi really wanted, but the simple truth is, they've lost far more than just that.  They've lost their credibility by following a fraud.

What he "wanted", with the information he had that time, doesn't matter. He is not here anymore.

ALTHOUGH, if he was here, I believe he would agree to the conservative design-decisions taken by the Core developers that made Bitcoin more robust.

too much bla for what??

triggered ?

BSV is just Bitcoin

No shit

just fun

There's literally a thousand other altcoins out there that "does what Satoshi wanted" according to your very low standards. The only difference between those and BSV is that BSV is being led by a fraudulent conman who insists that he is Satoshi, despite being thoroughly ridiculed by the bitcoin community and never offering a single shred of proof that he is.

I call usership the ultimate measure of success. So far BSV has a very small actual userbase. It is accepted by almost no one, for anything, anywhere. Here's some quick stats for you:

Bitcoin SV
Median Transaction Value   0.00002 BSV ($0.0039 USD)
Active Addresses last 24h   21,220

vs

Bitcoin
Median Transaction Value   0.035 BTC ($266.13 USD)
Active Addresses last 24h   660,855

BSV has spent so much effort into filling its blocks with meaningless transactions in order to say, "behold muh big blocks!" that its totally lost sight of what was supposed to be its main goal: acting as a form of digital currency.

Really, when was the last time you wanted to send 4/10th of a penny to somebody?

BSV is like 99% of other altcoins: a lot of "look what we can do" with nobody actually doing it. If it weren't backed by Calvin Ayre, pumping millions of dollars into propping up its place in the CMC rankings, it would have fallen somewhere between Bitcoin Gold and Bitcoin Diamond, where it should be.

Your response will include the words "troll" and "triggered," because that's all you ever have to say. I don't think you're mentally capable of coming up with an actual rebuttal, but I'd be delighted to be proven wrong.

depends all on your own view - funny 'legal' proof there.

I see that facts - BSV does what Satoshi wanted - no matter of all the rest

All - really all other protocols (gambelling tickers!!) got derailed, hijacked - altered -

call that a success - the price is on a different plate (moaning trolls - what a fun)

Many people tried to claim themselves Satoshi Nakamoto including Craig Wright. Satoshi Nakamoto did not reveal himself to the public for whatever reason, therefore many people tried to take advantage of that by presenting themselves to be (fake) Satoshi. No body believed Craig Wright when he claimed to be the founder of bitcoin.
Also where is the original  Satoshi Nakamoto , dead or alive , no body knows ?