I don’t know if this is true or not, but you do have a point here. It might be that Craig Wright knows about this Satoshi Nakamoto and maybe the real person is dead and he then decides to claim that he’s the one so that he can take all the glory.
Or maybe he took the courage to do so, because he saw other people that has been claiming to be the real Satoshi that nothing was done to them. You just can’t tell. And moreover, I am not wishing that Satoshi be dead, because I am hoping that one day he would show up and reveal himself and take the spot he deserves. I seriously want to see who the real Satoshi Nakamoto is, and I don’t want him to die , not yet lol.
Topic: Craig W. only claims to be Satoshi, because he knows the real Satoshi is dead? - page 4. (Read 15254 times)
April 23, 2020, 07:10:14 AM
April 23, 2020, 06:42:16 AM
thats okay if the founder gave him a permision to do that but what if not ? and he claims that he is sato ? thats no good .
that is worst if sato is really dead because he dont respect a dead guy . now going back to my first sentence . if satoshi is a different guy ( and not craig ) i think its still awful to claim that he is sato even if given a legal permision . satoshi will only be satoshi for all of our hearts because that is the name we know when he released btc
that is worst if sato is really dead because he dont respect a dead guy . now going back to my first sentence . if satoshi is a different guy ( and not craig ) i think its still awful to claim that he is sato even if given a legal permision . satoshi will only be satoshi for all of our hearts because that is the name we know when he released btc
Satoshi released BitCoin a Peer to Peer Electronic Cash System - P2P - on IP to IP .... - not just a ticker
If you can only think ticker, first was no ticker, than BC
not btc
April 23, 2020, 04:17:16 AM
thats okay if the founder gave him a permision to do that but what if not ? and he claims that he is sato ? thats no good .
that is worst if sato is really dead because he dont respect a dead guy . now going back to my first sentence . if satoshi is a different guy ( and not craig ) i think its still awful to claim that he is sato even if given a legal permision . satoshi will only be satoshi for all of our hearts because that is the name we know when he released btc
that is worst if sato is really dead because he dont respect a dead guy . now going back to my first sentence . if satoshi is a different guy ( and not craig ) i think its still awful to claim that he is sato even if given a legal permision . satoshi will only be satoshi for all of our hearts because that is the name we know when he released btc
April 23, 2020, 03:52:14 AM
Someone in the forum once said that, the anti-Core trolls, have not brought their A-game yet. Their clout-chasing moves might be the start for another one of their disinformation rampage in the forum again.
They want to trick newbies to take their narratives for truth because, "look I know Satoshi, I have clout".
They want to trick newbies to take their narratives for truth because, "look I know Satoshi, I have clout".
Reading the Satoshi White-Paper and having no heavy hodl bags - get Bitcoin on a higher abstraction level than a ticker - is always best way to get into and understand the matter.
April 23, 2020, 02:24:33 AM
Someone in the forum once said that, the anti-Core trolls, have not brought their A-game yet. Their clout-chasing moves might be the start for another one of their disinformation rampage in the forum again.
They want to trick newbies to take their narratives for truth because, "look I know Satoshi, I have clout".
They want to trick newbies to take their narratives for truth because, "look I know Satoshi, I have clout".
April 22, 2020, 11:12:39 PM
"I knew Satoshi Nakamoto. Satoshi Nakamoto was a friend of mine. And you Sir are no Satoshi Nakamoto."
https://p2pfoundation.ning.com/friends/SatoshiNakamoto
https://p2pfoundation.ning.com/friends/SatoshiNakamoto
You added yourself years after Satoshi was no longer active: https://web.archive.org/web/20141022054522/https://p2pfoundation.ning.com/friends/SatoshiNakamoto
It looks like you created your account in March 2014 and the first thing you did was leave a comment promoting a shitty altcoin on a more than five year old post by Satoshi.
If you knew Satoshi in any way there certainly isn't any evidence at the link you provided-- quite the opposite: Most people don't tend to go around writing impersonal "Thank you for the clarification" messages to five year old posts by their friends. They especially don't go sticking tacky ads for their competing offerings on them.
Why do all these satoshi obsessed people need to be incompetently lying pieces of shit?
LOL. Busted. Guess this wasn't true either:
Satoshi who friended me years ago on P2P Foundation was actually a group.
He didn't "friended" you, you "friended" him.
Why let little details get in the way of a good story though?
April 22, 2020, 10:30:27 PM
this has been discussed o many times and we have made a conclusion that craig is not satoshi but faketoshi. By discussing him again and again we are doing what he exactly want i.e. giving him popularity. so I suggest all members not to discuss this faketoshi.
"I knew Satoshi Nakamoto. Satoshi Nakamoto was a friend of mine. And you Sir are no Satoshi Nakamoto."
https://p2pfoundation.ning.com/friends/SatoshiNakamoto
You added yourself years after Satoshi was no longer active: https://web.archive.org/web/20141022054522/https://p2pfoundation.ning.com/friends/SatoshiNakamoto
It looks like you created your account in March 2014 and the first thing you did was leave a comment promoting a shitty altcoin on a more than five year old post by Satoshi.
If you knew Satoshi in any way there certainly isn't any evidence at the link you provided-- quite the opposite: Most people don't tend to go around writing impersonal "Thank you for the clarification" messages to five year old posts by their friends. They especially don't go sticking tacky ads for their competing offerings on them.
Why do all these satoshi obsessed people need to be incompetently lying pieces of shit?
April 22, 2020, 02:39:27 PM
this has been discussed so many times and we have made a conclusion that craig is not satoshi but faketoshi. By discussing him again and again we are doing what he exactly want i.e. giving him popularity. so I suggest all members not to discuss this faketoshi.
April 22, 2020, 02:35:06 PM
~
I don't know man, I feel like Satoshi's identity is very important to them because Bitcoin is a threat to them so they want to stop any genius mind - like Satoshi's - that could provide us so-called "weapons" against them..Quote
But why? Why go to so much trouble to identify Satoshi? My source tells me that the Obama administration was concerned that Satoshi was an agent of Russia or China — that Bitcoin might be weaponized against us in the future.
I'm just wondering: what if Bitcoin's creator was either Chinese or a Russian? Yeah, so what? Where's the threat to us as human beings? I'm asking because it looks to me like it'd be a threat to them, the 1%, not to the peasants.
Haven't you guys had enough of CSW on here? I don't know, it kinda scratches my brain when I read his name now, just let his character die in peace, let him be, he doesn't deserve any of the attention we give him as we pop this topic to the top every day..
I'mma be straight on point: he's not Satoshi, he's just a lying pos that deserves nothing of what he's received except the court case. The court case is what he deserves, and I hope his final sentence will be larger than what he's got so far.
April 22, 2020, 01:51:17 PM
Bitcoin was created by the NSA so the government would have a way to track "cash" transactions.
So how do you explain the fact that it took so much data collected form mass surveillance for the NSA to make a fingerprint of Satoshi? From the link:
Quote
But why? Why go to so much trouble to identify Satoshi? My source tells me that the Obama administration was concerned that Satoshi was an agent of Russia or China — that Bitcoin might be weaponized against us in the future.
April 22, 2020, 08:35:24 AM
He just knows most about BitCoin.
Nobody else ever disputed him on this matter.
Why?
In fact Wright has shown extremely profound technical ignorance about Bitcoin, but he says that what he is saying is brilliant. Because you, yourself, are incapable of directly evaluating his claims you make the mistake of believing him and other similarly uninformed persons.Nobody else ever disputed him on this matter.
Why?
Of course, not absolutely everything he says is untrue or gibberish-- some things he just copies out of the bitcoin wiki or old posts and chatlogs.
Hey Greg, this guy says you should invest more in bitcoin. Did you see that? Should probably think about that.
LOL.
Seriously though. I mean wow, what a post!!
April 22, 2020, 08:20:34 AM
He just knows most about BitCoin.
Nobody else ever disputed him on this matter.
Why?
In fact Wright has shown extremely profound technical ignorance about Bitcoin, but he says that what he is saying is brilliant. Because you, yourself, are incapable of directly evaluating his claims you make the mistake of believing him and other similarly uninformed persons.Nobody else ever disputed him on this matter.
Why?
Of course, not absolutely everything he says is untrue or gibberish-- some things he just copies out of the bitcoin wiki or old posts and chatlogs.
April 22, 2020, 08:06:53 AM
*gibberish*
Just because you're not peddling your scamcoin anymore, doesn't mean your opinion is suddenly worth something around here. Leave the history lessons to be taught be people who aren't held back by the burden of their tinfoil hats, please.
April 21, 2020, 10:58:54 PM
Because you, yourself, are incapable of directly evaluating his claims you make the mistake of believing him and other similarly uninformed persons.
[/quote]
Agreed. I do not know enough about computer science and cryptology to challenge claims based in those topics. But I know enough about psychology and motivations. Craig's claims and existence do not align with Satoshi's original values.
They could not be more dissimilar.
[/quote]
Agreed. I do not know enough about computer science and cryptology to challenge claims based in those topics. But I know enough about psychology and motivations. Craig's claims and existence do not align with Satoshi's original values.
They could not be more dissimilar.
April 21, 2020, 10:25:39 PM
He just knows most about BitCoin.
Nobody else ever disputed him on this matter.
Why?
In fact Wright has shown extremely profound technical ignorance about Bitcoin, but he says that what he is saying is brilliant. Because you, yourself, are incapable of directly evaluating his claims you make the mistake of believing him and other similarly uninformed persons.Nobody else ever disputed him on this matter.
Why?
Of course, not absolutely everything he says is untrue or gibberish-- some things he just copies out of the bitcoin wiki or old posts and chatlogs.
April 19, 2020, 03:53:23 AM
Just an idea. If Craig Wright is NOT Satoshi Nakamoto, he would definitely risk the real Satoshi come up with a proof, that Craig is not SN. Is it possible, that CW explicitly knows about the death of the person behind SN, so he can make his claims without backing them up with a proof? 
That's possible because there's a possibility that the real Nakamoto could come out and that will embarrass Craig Wright, I guess he knows the real cannot come out anymore, unless he gives out a will to his inheritors and that includes the private key,he is exploiting something that he knows.
April 19, 2020, 02:34:53 AM
He just knows most about BitCoin.
Nobody else ever disputed him on this matter.
Why?
Nobody else ever disputed him on this matter.
Why?
April 18, 2020, 02:55:08 PM
Wright has no proof, his fame is dependent on been an imposter, this is how he gains more followers who know less about his original personality. I don't even think he knows about the real Satoshi.
Wright has no proof, his fame is dependent on been an imposter, this is how he gains more followers who know less about his original personality. I don't even think he knows about the real Satoshi.
Wright has no proof, his fame is dependent on been an imposter, this is how he gains more followers who know less about his original personality. I don't even think he knows about the real Satoshi.
April 18, 2020, 09:14:03 AM
Just an idea. If Craig Wright is NOT Satoshi Nakamoto, he would definitely risk the real Satoshi come up with a proof, that Craig is not SN. Is it possible, that CW explicitly knows about the death of the person behind SN, so he can make his claims without backing them up with a proof?
Craig Wright assumes that Satoshi Nakamoto has not shown himself for more than ten years. Satoshi either does not want to prove himself, or cannot do this for various reasons. Craig Wright takes advantage of this. Of course, he takes a little risk, calling himself Satoshi Nakamoto, however, in his opinion, the risk is worth it. April 18, 2020, 08:35:23 AM
Satoshi was a group, not a single person. Craig was part of this initial group. David Kleiman who mined the first million BTC is dead.
I don't understand how people still actually believe this. There's zero actual evidence that Kleiman knew fuckall about bitcoin. All that anybody has is a bunch of forgeries by Craig with computer generated signatures, some backdated documents and a shell corporation purchased in 2014.
MicroGuy, burden of proof is on you to demonstrate otherwise. Anybody can say anything they want about Satoshi. That part is easy. Backing their statements with evidence and facts is another story.
Craig has already been caught in so many lies. It's absurd to continue to believe anything he has to say, about anything. People need to deliver proof that they know what they are talking about instead of just regurgitating Calvin Ayre and John McAfee talking points from twitter.
Jump to: