The amount of scrutiny that went into adding users to the DT network years ago was something many of us didn't take lightly. The complaints were often that users felt they should be in DT, regardless of how much real world interaction they had with others or how deserving they were, etc. Others felt that they were wrongly rated as non-trustworthy because of their actions towards individuals in DT. It wasn't something any of us took lightly. Friendships were strained, people had hurt feelings, organizations were attacked, lies were spread, even to this day there are users who have trusted me with thousands of dollars of their money and would do so again, but won't leave me a positive rating out of spite that I took my job seriously and didn't add whoever they demanded to my network. It was foolish to think that doling out merit, largely to users with little to no real world interaction with users here, could possibly result in somehow establishing a more accurate trust network. It was a cop out to skirt responsibility and leave us original DT members who had been safeguarding the network to face the backlash by suddenly empowered nefarious users who were held out of the system because they didn't deserve to be in it in the first place. All I can say is it's still early and the trust system is going to get a lot worse. The only option at this point is to remove all negatives from the system and let people be judged by how many positives they have, not who kissed the most ass while playing politics. I won't hold my breath...