And my statements:
>1) Azarov's government was formed by democratically elected president (elections were observed and recognized by EU and US).
Have you read any history? Puppet governments are typically bought out not placed by force (especially in modern contexts where information travels so fast).
>2) Yanukovich is definitely wasn't a puppet. There are a lot of proofs (he sent Gazprom supporter into the jail, for example), you need a proof for opposite statements in order to deny that.
Smart puppets hide their strings.
>3) Now we have illegitimate
and puppet "government" instead, there are a lot of facts proving this statement.
Yes there are.
4) There were no protests in the Crimea. And actually, the "anti-maidan" movement was supported by huge part of Crimea citizens.
Ya
5) no additional militaries were sent yet.
>6) Now you have check & mate.
Is this really how you end your discourses? I wonder how anybody can stomach talking with more than once.
>And nothing personal, but I recognize myself as a self-sufficient and public person. That's why I'm able to live without advices from anonymous person. Especially if this person sees the global politics in black & white colors and tries to judge without any attempts to read something about the subject. But thanks, anyway.
You should try and learn something from everyone. Being self-sufficient doesn't mean ignore everyone that disagrees with you, after all if we did that we would never grow would we? When I look at my past, even people I had little respect for taught me something. Also, I think you're getting a little mixed up about who sees the world in black and white here mate
My advice is to remember, historically speaking, governments are almost always uncovered as the corrupt institutions that they are. If you look up to one as the epitome of good and righteousness you're bound to be disappointing.
