Author

Topic: ★★DigiByte|极特币★★[DGB]✔ Core v6.16.5.1 - DigiShield, DigiSpeed, Segwit - page 1094. (Read 3058816 times)

legendary
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1000
The future is bright with DigiByte.
The future ahead, holds numerous surprises for us. Be open to changes.
Wishing you all a Happy New Year.
Let's break some goddamn barriers and build many bridges all the way!


Hello from, Xmas market, winter wonderland, hyde park, London Smiley
Tonight will be watching the fireworks live:)
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 500
Community Liaison,How can i help you?
The future ahead, holds numerous surprises for us. Be open to changes.
Wishing you all a Happy New Year.
Let's break some goddamn barriers and build many bridges all the way!

sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250
DigiByte? Yes!
I don't think I have ever seen comprehensive instructions on how to solomine a coin. I've found bits and pieces on several sites, but none that I could follow from start to finish and get the complete sequence.

Over the past few days, I decided to try it out just to see if I could get it working, and I did! If anyone else is curious about how to do it, here are the steps I followed:

(Assuming your wallet is running on a Windows computer.)

1. Shut down your wallet.

2. In the C:\Users\\AppData\Roaming\DigiByte folder, add a file called DigiByte.conf that contains this:

Code:
rpcallowip=*
rpcuser=abc
rpcpassword=zzz
server=1
daemon=1
txindex=1
debug=1
algo=scrypt
rpcport=14022
port=12024
addnode=74.208.230.160
addnode=69.164.198.161
addnode=66.228.56.115
addnode=106.187.37.124

3. Right-click the shortcut icon of your wallet
   a. choose Properties
   b. click the Shortcut tab
   c. in the Target, add -server to the end. (Example: "C:\Program Files\DigiByte\digibyte-qt.exe" -server)

4. Launch your wallet. It may reindex your blockchain, this can take awhile. Wait until this is done.

5. Go into the console of your wallet and type this and hit Enter: setgenerate true -1

6. Your computer is now CPU mining. It's going to use about 100% of the CPU on your computer, so it's best to run the wallet on a computer that is different from your mining rig.

7. Make note of the IP address of the computer your wallet is running on. From the Command Prompt: ipconfig

Wireless LAN adapter Wireless Network Connection 2:

   Connection-specific DNS Suffix  . : your.internet.provider
   IPv4 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.3
   Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
   Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.1


IP Address of the computer is 192.168.1.3

8. On your mining rig, point to 192.168.1.3:14022, username abc, password zzz

You are now solo mining! Depending on your mining program, you aren't going to see any activity until you find a block. But it is working. I have my wallet running on my Windows box, and my miner running on a Linux box. I pointed my linux miner to this and it worked.

There may be some other set of instructions out there that are better than this, but part of the fun for me was trying to figure out how to do it on my own from the bits and pieces I found on the internet.

Other Algos... In the digibyte.conf file, you should be able to change the algo= line to one of the other algorithms and mine, but I haven't tested that (yet).
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250
DigiByte? Yes!

I'm referring to mandatory identification of block finders only, not every miner. Each block found should be clearly associated with the miner who found it, exactly like we see with each block that the The Blocks Factory finds, for example. This would apply to pools and your one odd out solo miner still in existence (solo miners would only have to provide an IP address). This would go a long ways towards eliminating uncertainty regarding weird issues like the continual flow of phantom autosells on Cryptsy, as well as enhancing DGB's commitment to transparency. Again, this would only apply to entities actually finding blocks, of which there are only a few, who should identify themselves voluntarily to begin with one would think, and if not, then they should be required to do so.

Looking forward to seeing you white paper. Can't wait!

I'm not sure I agree with identification of block finders. You can already search the blockchain and see the DGB address who found the block (Example: A list of the last 500 DGB block finder addresses can be found here), and you can also search the blockchain to view the transactions of that address to follow the 'coins' to see where they go.

I prefer the voluntary listing like it is now. One of the basic attributes of cryptocurrency is the pseudo-anonymity it provides. That shouldn't change.
hero member
Activity: 831
Merit: 500
BitSong is a decentralized music streaming platfor
I'm referring to mandatory identification of block finders only, not every miner. Each block found should be clearly associated with the miner who found it, exactly like we see with each block that the The Blocks Factory finds, for example. This would apply to pools and your one odd out solo miner still in existence (solo miners would only have to provide an IP address). This would go a long ways towards eliminating uncertainty regarding weird issues like the continual flow of phantom autosells on Cryptsy, as well as enhancing DGB's commitment to transparency. Again, this would only apply to entities actually finding blocks, of which there are only a few, who should identify themselves voluntarily to begin with one would think, and if not, then they should be required to do so.

Isn't the point of these coins decentralized anonymity? I think the Devs have a commitment to transparency, but to ask miners to give out their details is tantamount to card-checking in US unions. Allows for potential harassment and threats because we know who is getting the blocks and if someone doesn't like what the miner is doing with them, they can pressure them to buy/sell/hold because its best for the "community". Sounds very close to "economic patriotism" touted by US liberals to get people scared to buy anything from outside the US.
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 500
Community Liaison,How can i help you?
Well I believe the problem is "coinmarketcap" giving coins like ripple the exposure they want by adding them while real coins get pushed down further and further.

When people go to coinmarketcap they look at the top coins and decide which they should invest in not knowing that most of those coins are premined or dont require any mining compared to the few real coins available.

I blame coinmarketcap. In fact they do have an option to remove those fake coins (in my opinion) and show some real coins.

http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/views/filter-non-mineable-and-premined/

Digibyte is ranked #57 as you can see but I believe this should be the main page not the other with all the fake coins because its pushing new investors to the top marketcap coins which most are premined or no mining at all. Obviously this also pushes digibyte out of the top 100 and lower when more and more fake coins pop up with massive marketcaps.

Maybe we should all post this to coinmarketcap?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=199685.new#new

Anyways thats just my opinion.

I think that's an excellent initiative! Not only would we be promoting DGB, and rightfully so, we would also be doing our small little parts to educate on the subject.

This is an excellent idea in my opinion. You can count on my help. Do you have any specific ideas on strategies and how to implement an effective campaign?


Funny to see that when you delist the premined / non-minable coins the page looks so much cleaner.
HR
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1011
Transparency & Integrity
Well I believe the problem is "coinmarketcap" giving coins like ripple the exposure they want by adding them while real coins get pushed down further and further.

When people go to coinmarketcap they look at the top coins and decide which they should invest in not knowing that most of those coins are premined or dont require any mining compared to the few real coins available.

I blame coinmarketcap. In fact they do have an option to remove those fake coins (in my opinion) and show some real coins.

http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/views/filter-non-mineable-and-premined/

Digibyte is ranked #57 as you can see but I believe this should be the main page not the other with all the fake coins because its pushing new investors to the top marketcap coins which most are premined or no mining at all. Obviously this also pushes digibyte out of the top 100 and lower when more and more fake coins pop up with massive marketcaps.

Maybe we should all post this to coinmarketcap?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=199685.new#new

Anyways thats just my opinion.

I think that's an excellent initiative! Not only would we be promoting DGB, and rightfully so, we would also be doing our small little parts to educate on the subject.

This is an excellent idea in my opinion. You can count on my help. Do you have any specific ideas on strategies and how to implement an effective campaign?

HR
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1011
Transparency & Integrity
that I've been clamoring for for some time now is mandatory identification as a block finder - either you identify yourself, or you don't mine.

Kinda of an absurd statement, not quite sure what the purpose would be, please elaborate.

I guess he means creating a transparent mining method for blockchain.
So you can query any IDs belonging to the miners and learn who they are etc.
But this is not quite possible to me... How can you make sure people are entering true information...
Maybe there are methods to query these things, but then it will be going through a centralized and government controlled mining scheme etc...

Cheers guys,...

Wait till you see my white paper. I have some of the issues, e.g., transparency, covered in my crypto-commodity venture.

This is one of the few threads I have on my Watchlist. Now that I'm caught up, back to work.

I'm referring to mandatory identification of block finders only, not every miner. Each block found should be clearly associated with the miner who found it, exactly like we see with each block that the The Blocks Factory finds, for example. This would apply to pools and your one odd out solo miner still in existence (solo miners would only have to provide an IP address). This would go a long ways towards eliminating uncertainty regarding weird issues like the continual flow of phantom autosells on Cryptsy, as well as enhancing DGB's commitment to transparency. Again, this would only apply to entities actually finding blocks, of which there are only a few, who should identify themselves voluntarily to begin with one would think, and if not, then they should be required to do so.

Looking forward to seeing you white paper. Can't wait!

legendary
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1001
Well I believe the problem is "coinmarketcap" giving coins like ripple the exposure they want by adding them while real coins get pushed down further and further.

When people go to coinmarketcap they look at the top coins and decide which they should invest in not knowing that most of those coins are premined or dont require any mining compared to the few real coins available.

I blame coinmarketcap. In fact they do have an option to remove those fake coins (in my opinion) and show some real coins.

http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/views/filter-non-mineable-and-premined/

Digibyte is ranked #57 as you can see but I believe this should be the main page not the other with all the fake coins because its pushing new investors to the top marketcap coins which most are premined or no mining at all. Obviously this also pushes digibyte out of the top 100 and lower when more and more fake coins pop up with massive marketcaps.

Maybe we should all post this to coinmarketcap?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=199685.new#new

Anyways thats just my opinion.
vip
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1145
that I've been clamoring for for some time now is mandatory identification as a block finder - either you identify yourself, or you don't mine.

Kinda of an absurd statement, not quite sure what the purpose would be, please elaborate.

I guess he means creating a transparent mining method for blockchain.
So you can query any IDs belonging to the miners and learn who they are etc.
But this is not quite possible to me... How can you make sure people are entering true information...
Maybe there are methods to query these things, but then it will be going through a centralized and government controlled mining scheme etc...

Cheers guys,...

Wait till you see my white paper. I have some of the issues, e.g., transparency, covered in my crypto-commodity venture.

This is one of the few threads I have on my Watchlist. Now that I'm caught up, back to work.
legendary
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1000
The future is bright with DigiByte.
that I've been clamoring for for some time now is mandatory identification as a block finder - either you identify yourself, or you don't mine.

Kinda of an absurd statement, not quite sure what the purpose would be, please elaborate.

I guess he means creating a transparent mining method for blockchain.
So you can query any IDs belonging to the miners and learn who they are etc.
But this is not quite possible to me... How can you make sure people are entering true information...
Maybe there are methods to query these things, but then it will be going through a centralized and government controlled mining scheme etc...

Cheers guys,...
legendary
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1000
The future is bright with DigiByte.
Why does the block explorer say the reward is 2410, but is paying out 2434 ?

Please check into this. Is the block reward reduction not working, or are the wrong values being reported to the block explorer, or... ?

If you are right, this is a problem... Lets wait updates from Jared for this. Thanks for pointing this out.
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250
DigiByte? Yes!
Why does the block explorer say the reward is 2410, but is paying out 2434 ?

Please check into this. Is the block reward reduction not working, or are the wrong values being reported to the block explorer, or... ?
legendary
Activity: 999
Merit: 1000
that I've been clamoring for for some time now is mandatory identification as a block finder - either you identify yourself, or you don't mine.

Kinda of an absurd statement, not quite sure what the purpose would be, please elaborate.
hero member
Activity: 831
Merit: 500
BitSong is a decentralized music streaming platfor
that I've been clamoring for for some time now is mandatory identification as a block finder - either you identify yourself, or you don't mine.

What would be the reasons for this?
full member
Activity: 391
Merit: 100
Funny how when you blow someones game up, the charts & books change dramatically. heh

Thanks for the info on this mate........still would have liked a cat picture to go with it would have understood it more Grin
HR
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1011
Transparency & Integrity

The idea is to hold on your coins now and wait until you really want to sell it.

Absolutely.

Regardless of the reason, motives, or possible explanations, because if this is not a volume 'enhancer', then it's someone who is very bored and needs to get a life - there is no way in either case to make money doing this, so, everyone, place your bets: I say it's still SCRxxx (I think that's what his nick was anyway).

BTW, that reminds me, something very tangible, and something that reflects on long term commitments as well, that I've been clamoring for for some time now is mandatory identification as a block finder - either you identify yourself, or you don't mine.

legendary
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1000
The future is bright with DigiByte.
Whoever is playing, playing hard Smiley... Selling small amounts to himself while expecting someone to dump, then places the smallest sell order to let someone buy, then place another buy wall... continue... If you realize, there was not a buy wall @14 until someone bought @16, meaning that he got BTC from @16 and placed another buy wall @14. I guess if someone places a buy wall @15, I wonder what might happen Smiley then I think he will just enjoy his small btc profit, that is all.

If you ask me, even though this guy is trying to create a chaos to lead people dump, he is playing very small. So I guess, we can just discard this person.
The idea is to hold on your coins now and wait until you really want to sell it.
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 500
I said this the other day and the day before that and the day before that



Who cares people are selling... Would you not like coins at cheaper value?    The price shouldn't move unless Jared releases some good info.... Besides that you are just helping these price watchers sell at 15satoshi buy and 13satoshi... It's not rocket science
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 500
Community Liaison,How can i help you?
2014-12-30 14:28:27   Buy   0.00000015   2435.00999862   0.00036525
2014-12-30 14:28:27   Buy   0.00000015   2434.40999877   0.00036516
2014-12-30 14:28:27   Buy   0.00000015   2434.40999854   0.00036516
2014-12-30 14:28:27   Buy   0.00000015   2434.40999872   0.00036516
2014-12-30 14:28:27   Buy   0.00000015   2434.40999884   0.00036516

Same amounts as the sells, Price is pressed down hard Smiley
Jump to: