Topic: ★★DigiByte|极特币★★[DGB]✔ Core v6.16.5.1 - DigiShield, DigiSpeed, Segwit - page 586. (Read 3058816 times)
January 15, 2016, 08:38:23 AM
Anyone else having trobules with connecting their DGB gaming wallet?
January 15, 2016, 08:26:35 AM
LittleTrader
I really dont think people are that interested in DGB anymore you just witnessed that in the Polo troll box
Just having 30BTC sat there doing nothing on polo isnt exactly the best option in the world, most Altcoins attack the markets but you lot just expect people to sell to you at a lose.........the only coins you are getting are mined dumps & game rewards, going to be years before DGB will even look remotely attractive to new investors
Dont get me wrong I too have BTC in those buy orders too but thats only because i have to water down the higher price i paid for DGB in the past
I really dont think people are that interested in DGB anymore you just witnessed that in the Polo troll box
Just having 30BTC sat there doing nothing on polo isnt exactly the best option in the world, most Altcoins attack the markets but you lot just expect people to sell to you at a lose.........the only coins you are getting are mined dumps & game rewards, going to be years before DGB will even look remotely attractive to new investors
Dont get me wrong I too have BTC in those buy orders too but thats only because i have to water down the higher price i paid for DGB in the past
January 15, 2016, 08:22:21 AM
I think DGB rocks
January 15, 2016, 07:59:52 AM
Jared have you read this article? https://medium.com/@octskyward/the-resolution-of-the-bitcoin-experiment-dabb30201f7#.49b7w1qw2
Maybe you should create a new video in which you underline the current problems surrounding bitcoin and explain why DigiByte is a much better alternative. If I were a bitcoin fan, I d much rather have DigiBytes!
Maybe you should create a new video in which you underline the current problems surrounding bitcoin and explain why DigiByte is a much better alternative. If I were a bitcoin fan, I d much rather have DigiBytes!
Its not Jared's place to highlight problems on Bitcoin, maybe we could ask an independent person/organisation to make a comparison video between Old School BTC and Modern "2.0" DGB
hopefully our developers can convince the public/"future investors" that "DGB" could handle the stresses that BTC is currently seeing if/when loads on the network increase dramatically.
Maybe we could calculate and predict the breaking point of DGB v4 and draw graphs showing how far off that point we currently are, for each variable (size, speed etc. etc. of the blocks/network).
January 15, 2016, 05:25:42 AM
talking of developers leaving.
I’ve said before, selling your DigiByte for fiat is crazy, now bitcoin isn’t looking that great either.
https://medium.com/@octskyward/the-resolution-of-the-bitcoin-experiment-dabb30201f7#.mknffukvx
At least you can flip that for DigiByte easily enough!
I’ve said before, selling your DigiByte for fiat is crazy, now bitcoin isn’t looking that great either.
https://medium.com/@octskyward/the-resolution-of-the-bitcoin-experiment-dabb30201f7#.mknffukvx
At least you can flip that for DigiByte easily enough!
DigiByte needs to make a serious and energetic effort to recruit Hearn, first by showing him how DGB strictly and faithfully adhears to the original crypto ethos and that it STILL IS a "decentralised form of money" with no “systemically important institutions” and “too big to fail” entities and will never become "a system completely controlled by just a handful of people" because the community's commitment is firmly set on doing just that and there's no better proof of that than the DGB track record. Our Dev team needs to make a concerted effort to communicating these facts to him. Then comes the second part of the challenge: convincing him that his participation will be another key element in making his dream a reality.
Let's get him on board! We're doing everything he says a successful crypto should be doing, so, unless he doesn't really believe in what he says (which I doubt), it should be as easy as counting 1, 2, 3.
January 15, 2016, 05:24:05 AM
talking of developers leaving.
I’ve said before, selling your DigiByte for fiat is crazy, now bitcoin isn’t looking that great either.
https://medium.com/@octskyward/the-resolution-of-the-bitcoin-experiment-dabb30201f7#.mknffukvx
At least you can flip that for DigiByte easily enough!
I’ve said before, selling your DigiByte for fiat is crazy, now bitcoin isn’t looking that great either.
https://medium.com/@octskyward/the-resolution-of-the-bitcoin-experiment-dabb30201f7#.mknffukvx
At least you can flip that for DigiByte easily enough!
DigiByte needs to make a serious and energetic effort to recruit Hearn, first by showing him how DGB strictly and faithfully adhears to the original crypto ethos and that it STILL IS a "decentralised form of money" with no “systemically important institutions” and “too big to fail” entities and will never become "a system completely controlled by just a handful of people" because the community's commitment is firmly set on doing just that and there's no better proof of that than the DGB track record. Our Dev team needs to make a concerted effort to communicating these facts to him. Then comes the second part of the challenge: convincing him that his participation will be another key element in making his dream a reality.
Let's get him on board! We're doing everything he says a successful crypto should be doing, so, unless he doesn't really believe in what he says (which I doubt), it should be as easy as counting 1, 2, 3.
I like this very, Very much!
January 15, 2016, 05:01:07 AM
talking of developers leaving.
I’ve said before, selling your DigiByte for fiat is crazy, now bitcoin isn’t looking that great either.
https://medium.com/@octskyward/the-resolution-of-the-bitcoin-experiment-dabb30201f7#.mknffukvx
At least you can flip that for DigiByte easily enough!
I’ve said before, selling your DigiByte for fiat is crazy, now bitcoin isn’t looking that great either.
https://medium.com/@octskyward/the-resolution-of-the-bitcoin-experiment-dabb30201f7#.mknffukvx
At least you can flip that for DigiByte easily enough!
DigiByte needs to make a serious and energetic effort to recruit Hearn, first by showing him how DGB strictly and faithfully adhears to the original crypto ethos and that it STILL IS a "decentralised form of money" with no “systemically important institutions” and “too big to fail” entities and will never become "a system completely controlled by just a handful of people" because the community's commitment is firmly set on doing just that and there's no better proof of that than the DGB track record. Our Dev team needs to make a concerted effort to communicating these facts to him. Then comes the second part of the challenge: convincing him that his participation will be another key element in making his dream a reality.
Let's get him on board! We're doing everything he says a successful crypto should be doing, so, unless he doesn't really believe in what he says (which I doubt), it should be as easy as counting 1, 2, 3.
January 15, 2016, 04:45:47 AM
Strange how the theif hadn't spent the coins. They must be waiting for $1000+
What's the address for the stolen funds?
January 15, 2016, 04:41:14 AM
Strange how the theif hadn't spent the coins. They must be waiting for $1000+
January 15, 2016, 12:08:22 AM
January 14, 2016, 10:30:00 PM
talking of developers leaving.
I’ve said before, selling your DigiByte for fiat is crazy, now bitcoin isn’t looking that great either.
https://medium.com/@octskyward/the-resolution-of-the-bitcoin-experiment-dabb30201f7#.mknffukvx
At least you can flip that for DigiByte easily enough!
I’ve said before, selling your DigiByte for fiat is crazy, now bitcoin isn’t looking that great either.
https://medium.com/@octskyward/the-resolution-of-the-bitcoin-experiment-dabb30201f7#.mknffukvx
At least you can flip that for DigiByte easily enough!
January 14, 2016, 07:32:31 PM
Can we use DigiByte in a system similar to ethereum so that DigiByte is used as a fuel (gas, payment) to do smart contract? Maybe it is not necessary as that market is occupied by Ethereum already.
Who would want to?
But seriously, have you really researched Ethereum? Their code base? Their network security? Their total lack of scaleability? Their distribution? Their pre-mine? Their now current cost cuttings with office closures? Well, I do admit they are good at marketing and packaging, but if that's all they've got, would you really want to imitate them? Ethereum?
They're light years behind us.
I think we should all agree that Ethereum is pretty amazing tech and it has a lot more 3rd party developers than DigiByte.
Based on hype, and unfounded hype at that. What 3rd party developers? Look into it closely. It's smoke and mirrors. There's really nothing under the hood. And it's not like they hide it either: it's all right there in their own documentation for the whole world to freely see. Technically, they're even worse off than BTC, and developmentally worse yet; you almost get the idea they're laughing in everyone's face.
My prediction is that they are going to give new meaning to the word bagholder. But don't take my word for it, look into it closely . . . don't forget to read all the different threads on them while you're at it, and please advise if you find a positive community thread somewhere other than their own sock puppet laiden forum or reddit, 'cause I've yet to find anything positive there either.
If I had Ethereum, I'd sell it now.
ADD: Please duly note that these are my thoughts being expressed to our community members both as strong opinion and a healthy challenge to really start comparing apples with apples and oranges with oranges, and that means in this case cryptographic digital currency basics with cryptographic digital currency basics. I am not on another coin's thread bashing it. I'm here saying they don't hold a candle to us. Big difference. On top of that, my last newsletter clearly laid out 4 of the most basic cryptographic digital currency fundamentals to compare with, so, if you want to really compare, you know right where to go for a head start. Prove me wrong.
And don't worry, I will be proving my point anyway. It's only a matter of time until I fully document my top 10 shams.
I don't want to dispute what your saying here (mainly because I have no time) but you should take into consideration that Ethereum is NOT a cryptoCURRENCY its a crypto smart contracts platform, its not meant to be a currency so if we're comparing DGB with ETH then we are indeed comparing apples with oranges. I also think a basic risk your taking with any cryptocurrency is that its a scam of some type or another (mainly due to the non-regulated nature of the market) and I'm quite comfortable taking that risk with certain cryptocurrencies.
In the spirit of keeping the thread mainly focused on DGB and other healthy discussions I will refrain from commenting.
That's the biggest joke of all: you buy and sell "ether", the "gas" that "makes it go", and somehow that makes it different? Call it by whatever name you like, but if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it's a duck, or, as in this case, a poorly made decoy.
Oh, and for the rest of what is claimed to be of value, being the "world computer" where anyone can install their private programs to be run from anywhere at anytime, please, don't make me laugh. But, I agree, enough of this for now and will leave it for the time being with a P.T. Barnum quote: "There's a sucker born every minute."
Good discussion, but you're right, we should let others join in too, more than anything with direct comparisons of fundamental aspects, since, as I said before, this is where the real conversation resides. I firmly maintain DGB beats them several times over. Prove me wrong by showing that DGB isn't the hands down winner IN ALL CATEGORIES (if you really compare the essential building blocks and principles . . . which differ not one iota, regardless of what they're called or the name they're given).
When you think about it, when seen from that point of view, that's about as DGB thread related as it gets.
January 14, 2016, 12:31:50 PM
Can we use DigiByte in a system similar to ethereum so that DigiByte is used as a fuel (gas, payment) to do smart contract? Maybe it is not necessary as that market is occupied by Ethereum already.
Who would want to?
But seriously, have you really researched Ethereum? Their code base? Their network security? Their total lack of scaleability? Their distribution? Their pre-mine? Their now current cost cuttings with office closures? Well, I do admit they are good at marketing and packaging, but if that's all they've got, would you really want to imitate them? Ethereum?
They're light years behind us.
I think we should all agree that Ethereum is pretty amazing tech and it has a lot more 3rd party developers than DigiByte.
Based on hype, and unfounded hype at that. What 3rd party developers? Look into it closely. It's smoke and mirrors. There's really nothing under the hood. And it's not like they hide it either: it's all right there in their own documentation for the whole world to freely see. Technically, they're even worse off than BTC, and developmentally worse yet; you almost get the idea they're laughing in everyone's face.
My prediction is that they are going to give new meaning to the word bagholder. But don't take my word for it, look into it closely . . . don't forget to read all the different threads on them while you're at it, and please advise if you find a positive community thread somewhere other than their own sock puppet laiden forum or reddit, 'cause I've yet to find anything positive there either.
If I had Ethereum, I'd sell it now.
ADD: Please duly note that these are my thoughts being expressed to our community members both as strong opinion and a healthy challenge to really start comparing apples with apples and oranges with oranges, and that means in this case cryptographic digital currency basics with cryptographic digital currency basics. I am not on another coin's thread bashing it. I'm here saying they don't hold a candle to us. Big difference. On top of that, my last newsletter clearly laid out 4 of the most basic cryptographic digital currency fundamentals to compare with, so, if you want to really compare, you know right where to go for a head start. Prove me wrong.
And don't worry, I will be proving my point anyway. It's only a matter of time until I fully document my top 10 shams.
I don't want to dispute what your saying here (mainly because I have no time) but you should take into consideration that Ethereum is NOT a cryptoCURRENCY its a crypto smart contracts platform, its not meant to be a currency so if we're comparing DGB with ETH then we are indeed comparing apples with oranges. I also think a basic risk your taking with any cryptocurrency is that its a scam of some type or another (mainly due to the non-regulated nature of the market) and I'm quite comfortable taking that risk with certain cryptocurrencies.
In the spirit of keeping the thread mainly focused on DGB and other healthy discussions I will refrain from commenting.
January 14, 2016, 06:23:16 AM
I would love to see these price updates once we're rising again
January 14, 2016, 06:16:38 AM
Hello gentleman,
you have not to fear any longer a price down pressure from myself since I am done with my selling.
you have not to fear any longer a price down pressure from myself since I am done with my selling.
January 14, 2016, 04:43:19 AM
DGB sale about to end on Polo. Goodbye low 30's
We will soon be back in the 40's or higher, buy support is strong and hoovering up all the sells and then more, just need a couple of braves to click buy at the spot price to raise us up.
So many alt choices and not enough traders, lets hope we can attract a few of them with a promise of a quick return.
January 14, 2016, 02:41:37 AM
DGB sale about to end on Polo. Goodbye low 30's
January 14, 2016, 02:06:24 AM
Look into it closely. It's smoke and mirrors. There's really nothing under the hood. And it's not like they hide it either: it's all right there in their own documentation for the whole world to freely see. Technically, they're even worse off than BTC, and developmentally worse yet; you almost get the idea they're laughing in everyone's face.
Altcoins in a nutshell.
January 14, 2016, 12:28:26 AM
Can we use DigiByte in a system similar to ethereum so that DigiByte is used as a fuel (gas, payment) to do smart contract? Maybe it is not necessary as that market is occupied by Ethereum already.
Who would want to?
But seriously, have you really researched Ethereum? Their code base? Their network security? Their total lack of scaleability? Their distribution? Their pre-mine? Their now current cost cuttings with office closures? Well, I do admit they are good at marketing and packaging, but if that's all they've got, would you really want to imitate them? Ethereum?
They're light years behind us.
Even so HR if you do read this then would you not swap that to be in there place just for a bit of publicity, DGB is now 17th on Polo for volume & at time of posting this the only Altcoin thats in the red
I will try my best to explain how DGB looks to new investors.
Football/soccer is one prime example, if your team isnt doing well usually the fans (investors in this case) either boo them of the pitch or vote with there feet & dont bother going to the game anymore because there fed up of seeing there team lose, this is pretty much the situation with DGB right now, you invest the market dumps...not only that how are we/you expected to get anyone to invest in DGB when the market clearly shows no support (apart from the old faithfuls here)
Go to any bank, investment group, building society..what ever.....go to them for investments in DGB & you will be laughed out the building...OK fair enough DGB managed to get $250k from Tofugear but since then what if anything has been put on the table....i tell you so you dont forget ZERO, NADA, ZILTCH..not a dime.
Hate on me as much as you want but sadly given i still have 5 mio & buying more to water it down I am here to stay
You have to admit it is rather embarrassing at times in the troll boxes one mention of DGB lately brings a tide of LOLs & ROFLs
If anyone is interested in listening to what Jared has to say when he speaks on the radio show it is going to be live at 3am Sunday morning UK time
Of course you will be laughed out of the bank if you ask them for money for investment in DigiByte.
Did you know that the Federal Reserve is actually paying banks not to make loans?It is true.
Section 128 of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 allows the Federal Reserve to pay interest on “excess reserves” that U.S. banks park at the Fed.
So the banks can just send their cash to the Fed and watch the money come rolling in risk-free. Why would they want to upset that by investing in DigiByte?
I use the term ‘their cash’ very loosely, in fact it’s our cash the Fed had printed up and gave to them when they lost all theirs, through being greedy and irresponsible. It’s great for them, a real win win, the responsible thing to do now is nothing!
The value of fiat is an illusion and selling your DigiByte for it is crazy but that’s the world we currently live in.
January 13, 2016, 10:26:26 PM
Can we use DigiByte in a system similar to ethereum so that DigiByte is used as a fuel (gas, payment) to do smart contract? Maybe it is not necessary as that market is occupied by Ethereum already.
Who would want to?
But seriously, have you really researched Ethereum? Their code base? Their network security? Their total lack of scaleability? Their distribution? Their pre-mine? Their now current cost cuttings with office closures? Well, I do admit they are good at marketing and packaging, but if that's all they've got, would you really want to imitate them? Ethereum?
They're light years behind us.
I think we should all agree that Ethereum is pretty amazing tech and it has a lot more 3rd party developers than DigiByte.
Based on hype, and unfounded hype at that. What 3rd party developers? Look into it closely. It's smoke and mirrors. There's really nothing under the hood. And it's not like they hide it either: it's all right there in their own documentation for the whole world to freely see. Technically, they're even worse off than BTC, and developmentally worse yet; you almost get the idea they're laughing in everyone's face.
My prediction is that they are going to give new meaning to the word bagholder. But don't take my word for it, look into it closely . . . don't forget to read all the different threads on them while you're at it, and please advise if you find a positive community thread somewhere other than their own sock puppet laiden forum or reddit, 'cause I've yet to find anything positive there either.
If I had Ethereum, I'd sell it now.
ADD: Please duly note that these are my thoughts being expressed to our community members both as strong opinion and a healthy challenge to really start comparing apples with apples and oranges with oranges, and that means in this case cryptographic digital currency basics with cryptographic digital currency basics. I am not on another coin's thread bashing it. I'm here saying they don't hold a candle to us. Big difference. On top of that, my last newsletter clearly laid out 4 of the most basic cryptographic digital currency fundamentals to compare with, so, if you want to really compare, you know right where to go for a head start. Prove me wrong.
And don't worry, I will be proving my point anyway. It's only a matter of time until I fully document my top 10 shams.
http://asistec-ti.com/tba/Q4report2015.htm
maybe that wasn't the one you were referring to and DiguSign implemented since then too. Perhaps you can point to it HR.
Jump to: