Sometimes, I really despair. The whole world gets f’cked over by the 1%, Satoshi comes along with an idea and shows how things could be managed very differently and actually implements his example, bitcoin, and it gathers pace but its own community then totally fail to modify and update the technology to make it scalable for the world to practically use. Jared and DigiByte then come along with some real solutions to the issues and implement them too but almost nobody is interested. It doesn’t surprise me in the least that some very powerful people want DigiByte to fall flat on its face and deliberately suppress it. The question is, can they keep us down?
Early indications are, they have become very good at doing exactly this but it really is still a game of numbers. They have the current resources and can paint the picture they want you to see but only because we have not yet managed to match their resources with feet on the ground. The real problem with the alt’ market is there is way too much chaff and people cannot easily distinguish the good from the bad, also probably quite deliberately and intended to disrupt.
Topic: ★★DigiByte|极特币★★[DGB]✔ Core v6.16.5.1 - DigiShield, DigiSpeed, Segwit - page 587. (Read 3058816 times)
January 13, 2016, 08:45:58 PM
January 13, 2016, 08:02:21 PM
Even so HR if you do read this then would you not swap that to be in there place just for a bit of publicity, DGB is now 17th on Polo for volume & at time of posting this the only Altcoin thats in the red
I will try my best to explain how DGB looks to new investors.
Football/soccer is one prime example, if your team isnt doing well usually the fans (investors in this case) either boo them of the pitch or vote with there feet & dont bother going to the game anymore because there fed up of seeing there team lose, this is pretty much the situation with DGB right now, you invest the market dumps...not only that how are we/you expected to get anyone to invest in DGB when the market clearly shows no support (apart from the old faithfuls here)
Go to any bank, investment group, building society..what ever.....go to them for investments in DGB & you will be laughed out the building...OK fair enough DGB managed to get $250k from Tofugear but since then what if anything has been put on the table....i tell you so you dont forget ZERO, NADA, ZILTCH..not a dime.
Hate on me as much as you want but sadly given i still have 5 mio & buying more to water it down I am here to stay
You have to admit it is rather embarrassing at times in the troll boxes one mention of DGB lately brings a tide of LOLs & ROFLs
If anyone is interested in listening to what Jared has to say when he speaks on the radio show it is going to be live at 3am Sunday morning UK time
I think support is clearly established at 30 after this quick P&D (I don't know how else I can call these last couple of days). We share some similar ideas and thoughts, I'm just resigned to the fact that we are here for the really long term. For me long term was 6 months, a year at most. Now I understand it could be 3, 5 or 10 years, which is a little too much to ask. The bottomline is that, the whole altcoin community for me doesn't seem to head anywhere, it will always be subject to manipulation and that's it, that's the hard truth. If Bitcoin fails, they will all fail, something new may take its place but no current one will replace BTC or be worth millions.
So, I didn't have much choice but I'm glad I'm "stuck" with DGB, I wouldn't choose any other coin or project right now, it's really the only one I can feel safe with.
January 13, 2016, 07:34:36 PM
Can we use DigiByte in a system similar to ethereum so that DigiByte is used as a fuel (gas, payment) to do smart contract? Maybe it is not necessary as that market is occupied by Ethereum already.
Who would want to?
But seriously, have you really researched Ethereum? Their code base? Their network security? Their total lack of scaleability? Their distribution? Their pre-mine? Their now current cost cuttings with office closures? Well, I do admit they are good at marketing and packaging, but if that's all they've got, would you really want to imitate them? Ethereum?
They're light years behind us.
I think we should all agree that Ethereum is pretty amazing tech and it has a lot more 3rd party developers than DigiByte.
Based on hype, and unfounded hype at that. What 3rd party developers? Look into it closely. It's smoke and mirrors. There's really nothing under the hood. And it's not like they hide it either: it's all right there in their own documentation for the whole world to freely see. Technically, they're even worse off than BTC, and developmentally worse yet; you almost get the idea they're laughing in everyone's face.
My prediction is that they are going to give new meaning to the word bagholder. But don't take my word for it, look into it closely . . . don't forget to read all the different threads on them while you're at it, and please advise if you find a positive community thread somewhere other than their own sock puppet laiden forum or reddit, 'cause I've yet to find anything positive there either.
If I had Ethereum, I'd sell it now.
ADD: Please duly note that these are my thoughts being expressed to our community members both as strong opinion and a healthy challenge to really start comparing apples with apples and oranges with oranges, and that means in this case cryptographic digital currency basics with cryptographic digital currency basics. I am not on another coin's thread bashing it. I'm here saying they don't hold a candle to us. Big difference. On top of that, my last newsletter clearly laid out 4 of the most basic cryptographic digital currency fundamentals to compare with, so, if you want to really compare, you know right where to go for a head start. Prove me wrong.
And don't worry, I will be proving my point anyway. It's only a matter of time until I fully document my top 10 shams.
January 13, 2016, 06:48:49 PM
Can we use DigiByte in a system similar to ethereum so that DigiByte is used as a fuel (gas, payment) to do smart contract? Maybe it is not necessary as that market is occupied by Ethereum already.
Who would want to?
But seriously, have you really researched Ethereum? Their code base? Their network security? Their total lack of scaleability? Their distribution? Their pre-mine? Their now current cost cuttings with office closures? Well, I do admit they are good at marketing and packaging, but if that's all they've got, would you really want to imitate them? Ethereum?
They're light years behind us.
Even so HR if you do read this then would you not swap that to be in there place just for a bit of publicity, DGB is now 17th on Polo for volume & at time of posting this the only Altcoin thats in the red
I will try my best to explain how DGB looks to new investors.
Football/soccer is one prime example, if your team isnt doing well usually the fans (investors in this case) either boo them of the pitch or vote with there feet & dont bother going to the game anymore because there fed up of seeing there team lose, this is pretty much the situation with DGB right now, you invest the market dumps...not only that how are we/you expected to get anyone to invest in DGB when the market clearly shows no support (apart from the old faithfuls here)
Go to any bank, investment group, building society..what ever.....go to them for investments in DGB & you will be laughed out the building...OK fair enough DGB managed to get $250k from Tofugear but since then what if anything has been put on the table....i tell you so you dont forget ZERO, NADA, ZILTCH..not a dime.
Hate on me as much as you want but sadly given i still have 5 mio & buying more to water it down I am here to stay
You have to admit it is rather embarrassing at times in the troll boxes one mention of DGB lately brings a tide of LOLs & ROFLs
If anyone is interested in listening to what Jared has to say when he speaks on the radio show it is going to be live at 3am Sunday morning UK time
January 13, 2016, 05:42:45 PM
Can we use DigiByte in a system similar to ethereum so that DigiByte is used as a fuel (gas, payment) to do smart contract? Maybe it is not necessary as that market is occupied by Ethereum already.
Who would want to?
But seriously, have you really researched Ethereum? Their code base? Their network security? Their total lack of scaleability? Their distribution? Their pre-mine? Their now current cost cuttings with office closures? Well, I do admit they are good at marketing and packaging, but if that's all they've got, would you really want to imitate them? Ethereum?
They're light years behind us.
I think we should all agree that Ethereum is pretty amazing tech and it has a lot more 3rd party developers than DigiByte.
January 13, 2016, 05:35:20 PM
Can we use DigiByte in a system similar to ethereum so that DigiByte is used as a fuel (gas, payment) to do smart contract? Maybe it is not necessary as that market is occupied by Ethereum already.
Who would want to?
But seriously, have you really researched Ethereum? Their code base? Their network security? Their total lack of scaleability? Their distribution? Their pre-mine? Their now current cost cuttings with office closures? Well, I do admit they are good at marketing and packaging, but if that's all they've got, would you really want to imitate them? Ethereum?
They're light years behind us.
January 13, 2016, 02:00:49 PM
You will soon be offering them a verification service then I’d guess. 
Hahah he sure will! Exciting times
If the process is automatic and easy(ish) to implement then Yes I will propose the idea to our Directors, could also be useful for Insurance Companies or any other company who deliver proof of result / service via a digital file.
January 13, 2016, 01:32:11 PM
I believe Jared is planning to build an API for DiguSign which would allow this kind of application to be easily implemented.
Thats great news, we have issues with clients editing PDF reports and presenting the forged/manipulated document to their customers.
Hahah he sure will! Exciting times
January 13, 2016, 11:40:50 AM
I believe Jared is planning to build an API for DiguSign which would allow this kind of application to be easily implemented.
Thats great news, we have issues with clients editing PDF reports and presenting the forged/manipulated document to their customers.
January 13, 2016, 11:19:06 AM
Can we use DigiByte in a system similar to ethereum so that DigiByte is used as a fuel (gas, payment) to do smart contract? Maybe it is not necessary as that market is occupied by Ethereum already.
This would be basically impossible to implement as far as I understand it.
In the fullness of time, if smart contracts become necessary to compete in the cryptosphere, I'd expect DigiByte to be able to compete in this market. The possibilities are endless but I'm sure DigiByte developers are working on implementations that aren't currently being explored by other block chains, for the time being anyway. Doesn't mean someone else won't knock up a version using DigiByte on their own just because they can though, after all this is all open source.
January 13, 2016, 10:01:08 AM
I believe Jared is planning to build an API for DiguSign which would allow this kind of application to be easily implemented.
Thats great news, we have issues with clients editing PDF reports and presenting the forged/manipulated document to their customers.
January 13, 2016, 09:55:27 AM
I was chatting with my boss this morning and showing the Digusign system working, we figured out that if the process was automatic then it would be a very useful service.
We use a program called A-PDF Server to automatically add a header and footer to any PDF saved onto a particular directory on the server, ideally after this process is complete another program would create a hash of the pdf and save a text file (of the same filename) which has the hash + transaction number + instructions how to verify that the pdf has not been modified, then process a payment taken from a pre-filled wallet.
www.a-pdf.com possibly a collaboration with this company could be easier than creating another piece of software.
I believe Jared is planning to build an API for DiguSign which would allow this kind of application to be easily implemented.
January 13, 2016, 09:15:28 AM
I was chatting with my boss this morning and showing the Digusign system working, we figured out that if the process was automatic then it would be a very useful service.
We use a program called A-PDF Server to automatically add a header and footer to any PDF saved onto a particular directory on the server, ideally after this process is complete another program would create a hash of the pdf and save a text file (of the same filename) which has the hash + transaction number + instructions how to verify that the pdf has not been modified, then process a payment taken from a pre-filled wallet.
www.a-pdf.com possibly a collaboration with this company could be easier than creating another piece of software.
January 13, 2016, 08:01:54 AM
Can we use DigiByte in a system similar to ethereum so that DigiByte is used as a fuel (gas, payment) to do smart contract? Maybe it is not necessary as that market is occupied by Ethereum already.
This would be basically impossible to implement as far as I understand it.
January 13, 2016, 05:50:29 AM
Can we use DigiByte in a system similar to ethereum so that DigiByte is used as a fuel (gas, payment) to do smart contract? Maybe it is not necessary as that market is occupied by Ethereum already.
January 13, 2016, 05:30:00 AM
January 13, 2016, 01:38:54 AM
We’ve got a great little community going here; let’s build on that and continue to grow stronger together, year on year!
January 12, 2016, 09:22:09 PM
Been looking at the markets a bit today and reading the troll boxes and you know what, I can see where Pringles is coming from.
Anyone new to DigiByte or crypto in general is very likely to get or at least feel badly burnt in the process and that can’t be good for our community and we need a community for survival.
The sensible things to do are, if you want to trade buy only when price hits a floor and sell as soon as a pump peaks ready to buy back at the next floor. Probably wise just to add, don’t trade with all of your stash in case someone with some serious cash decides they like dgb and puts it out of your reach.
If you are long term, you should only buy when the current floor is reached and then probably just go away for a year or two or concentrate on applications.
What Pringles is totally wrong about, the price action has nothing to do with the developers of DigiByte, who all work very hard.
Anyone new to DigiByte or crypto in general is very likely to get or at least feel badly burnt in the process and that can’t be good for our community and we need a community for survival.
The sensible things to do are, if you want to trade buy only when price hits a floor and sell as soon as a pump peaks ready to buy back at the next floor. Probably wise just to add, don’t trade with all of your stash in case someone with some serious cash decides they like dgb and puts it out of your reach.
If you are long term, you should only buy when the current floor is reached and then probably just go away for a year or two or concentrate on applications.
What Pringles is totally wrong about, the price action has nothing to do with the developers of DigiByte, who all work very hard.
This is true for all trading, buy low and sell high, I prefer "buy now and sell higher", its a shame that both types of investors are using the same forum and two different strategies, short term traders want to make a small amount quickly, turnover a 5-10% profit daily, this can only be done by jumping from coin to coin (today FCT and ETH are getting all the attention, in a few weeks time it will be back to DGB when it starts to rise quickly).
Long term investors buy new coins at very low prices and pray for a big return from at least one of their coins.
Not sure which camp I am in, I bought a large amount in mid 2014, been selling and buying (shorting) over the last 6 months to increase DGB numbers, plus adding to the pile over time by purchasing a million or two every few weeks. I have a selling strategy already figured out, its a staged sell over 5 years.
Nothing wrong with either strategy, but remember if your short term you will only make a small profit on each "pump" and timing is critical.
ETH is needless to say. its rocking the Altcoin World. literally occupying the #1 spot for the time being. going massive everywhere but i think China not yet based on coinmarketcap's data about ETH's list of exchanges where you can buy ETH.
FCT is purely (or mostly) because of one thing: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RDrfE9I8_hs. Most of FCT's volume is on a chinese exchange known as "Yuanbaohui". Traders on the TrollBox at Poloniex very very often make references to that exchange for FCT's price. When the exchange with the biggest volume goes up in price, every other exchange with lesser volume will follow. its only natural.
So as a reminder to everyone - China hasn't gotten involved with DigiByte yet!! And when China does, don't forget the Whale Pumpers&Dumpers are watching too. People who are reading this, buy some now to prepare yourselves. buy 1 bag for daily trading and another bag for selling on a targeted high price. Don't buy later when its on the rise. Do some history chart readings on DGB at Poloniex. You have been advised!
Hello Everyone,
If you have have any funds on dgbwallet.com please withdraw them now as we will be shutting the platform down in a few days. We are doing this becouse we want people to using the Gaming Wallet where people are in control of their own funds.
ReminderIf you have have any funds on dgbwallet.com please withdraw them now as we will be shutting the platform down in a few days. We are doing this becouse we want people to using the Gaming Wallet where people are in control of their own funds.
◈◈◈ Trading Tip ◈◈◈
Sometimes when you see a huge buy/sell order, it may not be real.
It's there to make other traders think there's support/resistance.
And when the market price nearly reaches it, it gets cancelled.
It's there to make other traders think there's support/resistance.
And when the market price nearly reaches it, it gets cancelled.
January 12, 2016, 06:44:32 PM
Remember this. 
Sounds like a good idea! I am in!
Many of us will be stuffing ourselves over the holidays, so I thought I’d offer some food for thought for consumption by the general DigiByte community and I came up with pie! The DigiByte pie in the sky club to be precise!
https://i.imgur.com/M26RKAG.png
We are approaching the New Year and DigiByte’s second birthday. There are over 5.5 billion Digibyte in circulation already and another 19 years of coin production to go before all 21 billion coins will have been minted.
Price or low price is often in discussion in this forum and as much as many of us believe it is not the most important aspect of DigiByte right now, it would be dishonest to say it is not of concern at all. So as a community what could we do to increase it?
Could we target price at one dollar per Digibyte and actively do something about achieving that?
I think this is possible, if we worked as a community, and this is my idea of how we might go about doing just that! A community acts together but it is extremely difficult to ensure that we do act together and not as individuals, people will always be tempted to move first because they know others will if they don’t.
Imagine we set up a club (the pie in the sky club) and we limited it to 1 million shares or members of this club. If we set the share value to 10,000 DGB, the total fund would have a potential target value of 10 billion DGB, nearly half of all the DigiByte that will ever be produced.
These funds would then be controlled by the trusted club trustees, contractually and legally bound to carry out their activities in accordance within the predetermined rules set out by the community members in a transparent manner so that everyone could see them and be reassured that this DigiByte at least, was off the market and was unable to be dumped onto it.
https://1broker.com/m/r.php?i=8768https://www.bitfinex.com/?refcode=JuvbcI1CzIhttps://www.bitmex.com/register/f1qY9qhttps://www.okcoin.com/?invid=2076079https://simplefx.com/?sfx-r=fb817c64-a4af-4d28-9d5e-8eb918121483https://bit4x.com/invite/2c724af5https://localbitcoins.com/?ch=4vi3https://www.quadrigacx.com/?ref=jsmu1vwd8mir1a35fa67ogwbhttps://primedice.com/?ref=CarlJeffhttps://purse.io/?_r=B2Z_KK
The mandate of the club could be as simple as this. All shares would be paid back to their respective owner, when DigiByte reached a fiat US dollar value of one dollar and remained above that value for 30 consecutive days or 30 days after all 1 million shares were allocated and total fund value was achieved, whichever came first! A $1 share at today’s prices could be worth $10,000 possibly when redeemed, hence ‘pie in the sky’ and if that wasn’t quite achieved, the club would have gone a long way to improving the value of DigiByte anyway.
Of course it would take time and cost money to set up a trust like this, so maybe the first hurdle would be to cost and fund that itself but this is the sort of thing that DigiByte Group was set up for, so that the community can do things like this. Maybe each share would come with a management fee, I don’t know because I have not taken this idea any further than it is presented here in front of you the DigiByte community for your consideration.
I’m not going to do anything more about it unless the support for it is overwhelming, so tell me what you think!
Please discuss and happy holidays everyone!
https://i.imgur.com/M26RKAG.png
We are approaching the New Year and DigiByte’s second birthday. There are over 5.5 billion Digibyte in circulation already and another 19 years of coin production to go before all 21 billion coins will have been minted.
Price or low price is often in discussion in this forum and as much as many of us believe it is not the most important aspect of DigiByte right now, it would be dishonest to say it is not of concern at all. So as a community what could we do to increase it?
Could we target price at one dollar per Digibyte and actively do something about achieving that?
I think this is possible, if we worked as a community, and this is my idea of how we might go about doing just that! A community acts together but it is extremely difficult to ensure that we do act together and not as individuals, people will always be tempted to move first because they know others will if they don’t.
Imagine we set up a club (the pie in the sky club) and we limited it to 1 million shares or members of this club. If we set the share value to 10,000 DGB, the total fund would have a potential target value of 10 billion DGB, nearly half of all the DigiByte that will ever be produced.
These funds would then be controlled by the trusted club trustees, contractually and legally bound to carry out their activities in accordance within the predetermined rules set out by the community members in a transparent manner so that everyone could see them and be reassured that this DigiByte at least, was off the market and was unable to be dumped onto it.
https://1broker.com/m/r.php?i=8768https://www.bitfinex.com/?refcode=JuvbcI1CzIhttps://www.bitmex.com/register/f1qY9qhttps://www.okcoin.com/?invid=2076079https://simplefx.com/?sfx-r=fb817c64-a4af-4d28-9d5e-8eb918121483https://bit4x.com/invite/2c724af5https://localbitcoins.com/?ch=4vi3https://www.quadrigacx.com/?ref=jsmu1vwd8mir1a35fa67ogwbhttps://primedice.com/?ref=CarlJeffhttps://purse.io/?_r=B2Z_KK
The mandate of the club could be as simple as this. All shares would be paid back to their respective owner, when DigiByte reached a fiat US dollar value of one dollar and remained above that value for 30 consecutive days or 30 days after all 1 million shares were allocated and total fund value was achieved, whichever came first! A $1 share at today’s prices could be worth $10,000 possibly when redeemed, hence ‘pie in the sky’ and if that wasn’t quite achieved, the club would have gone a long way to improving the value of DigiByte anyway.
Of course it would take time and cost money to set up a trust like this, so maybe the first hurdle would be to cost and fund that itself but this is the sort of thing that DigiByte Group was set up for, so that the community can do things like this. Maybe each share would come with a management fee, I don’t know because I have not taken this idea any further than it is presented here in front of you the DigiByte community for your consideration.
I’m not going to do anything more about it unless the support for it is overwhelming, so tell me what you think!
Please discuss and happy holidays everyone!
Sounds like a good idea! I am in!
Haha nice. After the small pump 30 to 45, i'm probably going to buy a bit here near 30 again. I'm not in a hurry to flip for profit.
January 12, 2016, 06:35:40 PM
I agree that both short term and long term trading/investing strategies are equally respectable; what I disagree with is the short termer who tries to psychologically manipulate to his or her favor, regardless if it's shouting pie in the sky when price is up, or that the sky is falling when at lows. That's what I consider to be despicable as its specific aim is to get the average person turned upside down losing money at each turn, and, thus, the main reason why I normally limit my recommendations to ignoring the short term "crap", and saving ourselves the time and effort by just focusing on the long term historical project we're working on. Nevertheless, indeed, honest short term traders are to be respected, I agree.
Jump to: