Pages:
Author

Topic: Digitalcoin Dev ROBBED! - page 10. (Read 26023 times)

legendary
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1022
April 11, 2014, 11:55:50 AM
An attacker that gained information through the heart bleed bug is 100% undetectable.


Bartius your a fucking liar.

But the whole community of crypto experts are wrong and Bartius is the savior. What a joke.

legendary
Activity: 2097
Merit: 1070
April 11, 2014, 09:44:15 AM
This thread, and resulting crash, moved me to unload my DigitalCoin completely.

If it ain't BTC or DOGE, then I ain't interested.

You must be subnormal if you think this thread caused anything to do anything.
hero member
Activity: 786
Merit: 1000
April 11, 2014, 08:28:53 AM
This thread, and resulting crash, moved me to unload my DigitalCoin completely.

If it ain't BTC or DOGE, then I ain't interested.

Panic sell much?

On a side note, I see first grade is still happening here.
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
Put your trust in MATH.
April 11, 2014, 08:18:04 AM
This thread, and resulting crash, moved me to unload my DigitalCoin completely.

If it ain't BTC or DOGE, then I ain't interested.
legendary
Activity: 2097
Merit: 1070
April 09, 2014, 05:04:54 PM
50 BTC worth.

EDIT:  Here's what I don't understand... How does he know it was his former employee?

Quote
I lost a bit more than 560,000 DGC due to an ex-employee copying the wallet file and later key logging the password from the work computer. Most if not all of it was already dumped (those are the massive sells you noticed yesterday).

This will not affect anything when it comes to DGC's development. I'm probably more motivated if anything.

How does he know said ex-employee made a copy of the wallet file, and keylogged the password?  How does he know it wasn't someone outside who managed to hack his network or something?


Reason #54 why the whole story is utter BS.


~BCX~

Dev says hack of exchange and massive losses due to heartbleed.  http://digitalcoin.co/forums/index.php/topic,1010.0.html

And he detected heartbleed before anyone else so really impressive skill, I feel better trusting dev now.

You're trying very hard to 'muddy the waters' here with an ambiguous and somewhat spiteful post.

There's no claim about detecting heartbleed before anyone else, he just knew that something wasn't right and according to the post he knew it wasn't his code. In fact you're the only person making a claim about detecting heartbleed...

Why is that ?
newbie
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
April 09, 2014, 04:19:08 PM
50 BTC worth.

EDIT:  Here's what I don't understand... How does he know it was his former employee?

Quote
I lost a bit more than 560,000 DGC due to an ex-employee copying the wallet file and later key logging the password from the work computer. Most if not all of it was already dumped (those are the massive sells you noticed yesterday).

This will not affect anything when it comes to DGC's development. I'm probably more motivated if anything.

How does he know said ex-employee made a copy of the wallet file, and keylogged the password?  How does he know it wasn't someone outside who managed to hack his network or something?


Reason #54 why the whole story is utter BS.


~BCX~

Dev says hack of exchange and massive losses due to heartbleed.  http://digitalcoin.co/forums/index.php/topic,1010.0.html

And he detected heartbleed before anyone else so really impressive skill, I feel better trusting dev now.
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
March 21, 2014, 10:01:43 AM
but creating facts places you on a lower footing.

Is that any different than what bcx here has been doing? Smiley

The best advice I have seen in this thread is, Don't feed the trolls. because they will win everytime.
newbie
Activity: 34
Merit: 0
March 21, 2014, 10:00:25 AM
Just spent 45 minutes reading 16 pages of this. I find threads where bcx is involved that are long to be quite entertaining at times. While there is some definite trolling in both directions bcx does bring some valid questions to the table. I'm not going to rehash them as a few others have already but his points are valid given the lack of communication from the party making the claim of stolen coins.

Then he needs to post something, since he's this great master hacker detective.   If not, then shut the fuck up.  Seems to be onesided troll speculation to me.

You apparently like bcx are biased in your beliefs. I am not as I have no Digitalcoin, ever mined it or have any dealings with the developer of the coin in any way. However after reading all of this nothing that bcx suggest is implausible and it does fit the circumstances. Has he submitted any proof, no but barutus the exchange owner has done nothing to refute any of it either. The strongest point made by quite a few in addition to bcx is that there is no good reason to not make the wallet adress known. I am not here to argue as I am just calling it like I see it. I will follow this post as this will be interesting to see how it all plays out.

This man speaks words of wisdom.
member
Activity: 102
Merit: 10
March 21, 2014, 05:06:35 AM
Your statement saying that Cryptsy gave him inside information can be debunked almost instantly.

I can't see how.  Huh


It's also becoming obvious that bcx lead you right into accusing Craptsy so you would discredit yourselves even further. He knows you guys know he is a Craptsy groupie and would instantly think that.

Figured that would be a possibility but also why would he then want to damage cryptsy's reputation even further. Someone could easily start a campaign "boycott cryptsy! they give your private info to criminals!"


Hey moron,

I don't know who is more wrong, you or the Hand Grenade guy. I never said where I got the third party info verified that's how I can instantly debunk you. Besides after Baritus finally reads his email I'm sure we'll be talking and working out a deal. He knows better than to come out and challenge me on this because I will stuff him and he knows it, which should tell you something in itself.


~BCX~

Translation "I know something you don't know, na-na na-na boo boo stick your head in doo doo"

Proof! Cold hard, non circumstantial Proof! You owe the community that, think of it as a service for being a massive fruitstick since you first came into this community.
hero member
Activity: 966
Merit: 1003
March 21, 2014, 04:39:04 AM
I never said where I got the third party info verified that's how I can instantly debunk you.

So just by saying you didn't say it makes it instantly debunked? ok  Cheesy

I'm not saying who is telling the truth you or baritus I couldn't basically care less. Cryptsy just happens to hit a nerve here as well.
hero member
Activity: 966
Merit: 1003
March 21, 2014, 04:17:48 AM
Your statement saying that Cryptsy gave him inside information can be debunked almost instantly.

I can't see how.  Huh


It's also becoming obvious that bcx lead you right into accusing Craptsy so you would discredit yourselves even further. He knows you guys know he is a Craptsy groupie and would instantly think that.

Figured that would be a possibility but also why would he then want to damage cryptsy's reputation even further. Someone could easily start a campaign "boycott cryptsy! they give your private info to criminals!"
hero member
Activity: 644
Merit: 500
March 21, 2014, 03:28:14 AM
only one thing for scum like this !!!!! and it comes out the end of a gun
member
Activity: 102
Merit: 10
March 21, 2014, 02:40:48 AM
You make no sense. Even if he had sold a bunch of his own coins that he supposedly stole from himself, he had any right to do so at any given time. It would be disappointing because he would really have to be a total idiot as he could have sold them AT ANY FUCKING TIME over the past year when they were worth much much more than over the past two weeks. Extremely weak motive, esp as he is working as hard as ever to improve DGC at the moment.


He needed money, plain and simple.

The third party verification is undeniable.

His only option in retaining any hope of continuing in this community is being straight with people.



~BCX~



Stop making accusations without proof.


No accusations made.

Stating what I know.

Let's just say I took your advice and chased down some addresses I found on my own.

I found more than I was looking for when my third party contact confirmed address to user names.

You should probably ask Baritus if he wants the undeniable truth posted.

His silence is more damning than anything I can post.




~BCX~



PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE for the thousandth fucking time PLEASE post the proof! If you did have proof and could post it for us, you would be the jesus christ of crypto's. Problem is you have nothing, so please, make me look like an idiot, or leave this thread and every other DGC thread (related to this topic) forever
hero member
Activity: 966
Merit: 1003
March 21, 2014, 02:29:11 AM
but creating facts places you on a lower footing.

Is that any different than what bcx here has been doing? Smiley
member
Activity: 102
Merit: 10
March 21, 2014, 02:28:31 AM
Just spent 45 minutes reading 16 pages of this. I find threads where bcx is involved that are long to be quite entertaining at times. While there is some definite trolling in both directions bcx does bring some valid questions to the table. I'm not going to rehash them as a few others have already but his points are valid given the lack of communication from the party making the claim of stolen coins.

Then he needs to post something, since he's this great master hacker detective.   If not, then shut the fuck up.  Seems to be onesided troll speculation to me.

You apparently like bcx are biased in your beliefs. I am not as I have no Digitalcoin, ever mined it or have any dealings with the developer of the coin in any way. However after reading all of this nothing that bcx suggest is implausible and it does fit the circumstances. Has he submitted any proof, no but barutus the exchange owner has done nothing to refute any of it either. The strongest point made by quite a few in addition to bcx is that there is no good reason to not make the wallet adress known. I am not here to argue as I am just calling it like I see it. I will follow this post as this will be interesting to see how it all plays out.

The main problem is that the block HAS been found and it has been shown by myself, and samson that the coins were moved on that day. So tell me, what is the difference between us finding the address and baritus posting the address? Thats what confuses me. Also I am guessing your fav part of the thread is my great jokes?
hero member
Activity: 966
Merit: 1003
March 21, 2014, 01:45:52 AM
I found more than I was looking for when my third party contact confirmed address to user names.

https://www.cryptsy.com/pages/privacy

Quote
Sharing your personal information

We do not sell, trade, or rent Users personal identification information to others. We may share generic aggregated demographic information not linked to any personal identification information regarding visitors and users with our business partners, trusted affiliates and advertisers for the purposes outlined above.

That's ok I guess, they didn't state they won't share the personal info for free to others.
hero member
Activity: 786
Merit: 1000
March 21, 2014, 01:36:58 AM
Just spent 45 minutes reading 16 pages of this. I find threads where bcx is involved that are long to be quite entertaining at times. While there is some definite trolling in both directions bcx does bring some valid questions to the table. I'm not going to rehash them as a few others have already but his points are valid given the lack of communication from the party making the claim of stolen coins.

Then he needs to post something, since he's this great master hacker detective.   If not, then shut the fuck up.  Seems to be onesided troll speculation to me.
hero member
Activity: 786
Merit: 1000
March 21, 2014, 01:07:34 AM
You make no sense. Even if he had sold a bunch of his own coins that he supposedly stole from himself, he had any right to do so at any given time. It would be disappointing because he would really have to be a total idiot as he could have sold them AT ANY FUCKING TIME over the past year when they were worth much much more than over the past two weeks. Extremely weak motive, esp as he is working as hard as ever to improve DGC at the moment.


He needed money, plain and simple.

The third party verification is undeniable.

His only option in retaining any hope of continuing in this community is being straight with people.



~BCX~



Stop making accusations without proof.


No accusations made.

Stating what I know.

Let's just say I took your advice and chased down some addresses I found on my own.

I found more than I was looking for when my third party contact confirmed address to user names.

You should probably ask Baritus if he wants the undeniable truth posted.

His silence is more damning than anything I can post.




~BCX~



If you have something why not just post it?

Because he's a troll.   Just ignore him, he trolls everyone.
hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
www.multipool.us
March 21, 2014, 01:05:08 AM
You make no sense. Even if he had sold a bunch of his own coins that he supposedly stole from himself, he had any right to do so at any given time. It would be disappointing because he would really have to be a total idiot as he could have sold them AT ANY FUCKING TIME over the past year when they were worth much much more than over the past two weeks. Extremely weak motive, esp as he is working as hard as ever to improve DGC at the moment.


He needed money, plain and simple.

The third party verification is undeniable.

His only option in retaining any hope of continuing in this community is being straight with people.



~BCX~



Stop making accusations without proof.


No accusations made.

Stating what I know.

Let's just say I took your advice and chased down some addresses I found on my own.

I found more than I was looking for when my third party contact confirmed address to user names.

You should probably ask Baritus if he wants the undeniable truth posted.

His silence is more damning than anything I can post.




~BCX~



If you have something why not just post it?
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1001
March 21, 2014, 12:06:17 AM
No accusations made, I see. Post proof or go to hell. Otherwise we're done here. And welcome back to my 2012-ignore-list. Was bout time.
Pages:
Jump to: