There's no doubt that some of the voting members are purely driven to nominate users giving out Merit if you nominate them. It's obvious and somehow an act of "buying" nominations. The people giving out Merit are getting more nominations and the people nominating such members will obtain a cheap bunch of Merits.
That's not how it works and it's outright manipulating the contest.
In my opinion, nominations where a Merit was given by the nominated member, should be removed by half because it wasn't defined in the rules but awarding full points would be manipulation. [...]
And next time, we can add it to the rules that giving out Merit, if someone is voting for you, will remove this vote entirely.
As always, 1miau speaks the voice of ration. Only a blind one would not observe everything that 1miau emphasized so well here. Fortunately, most of us are not blind.
icopress, it's okay we are all understand your situation.
The entire crypto community is watching and experiencing with you what is happening now.
Hey guys, let's let's give moral support for icopress
[...]
icopress, you fraudster [...]
ICOPRESS - M0THERFUCKER IDIOTO
n0nce, you may be too new here to know the "
iconic figures" of the forum (I suggest you to read mostly the
unedited posts from ninjastic.space). Bitcoin SV and others may suffer from severe dementia or, at least, they share the same syndromes. Similar to the old troll
Timelord2067 (which, probably after evading from a mental institution started to believe that he lives on Galiffrey), Bitcoin SV probably took him as a mentor and started editing his posts with something which is somehow exactly the opposite of what he stated before. It is not unseen before and, after smoking certain types of shrooms it is possible to get such a severe brain damage that to think exactly the opposite of what you stated just 10 minutes earlier.
But not to worry, we all know them and, in time, you'll also get to know better these "remarkable figures".