Pages:
Author

Topic: 📝[Discussion topic] Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns📝 - page 11. (Read 6467 times)

sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 343
Jolly? I think I've heard that name before. hmm

These are a really good rates and this is currently the highest paid campaign out there. You could probably make a living out of it in many developing countries.
They're clearly aiming for the top quality posters with minimum 50 merits in the last 120 days requirement. I wonder if they'll keep the payments high permanently, or is it just to lure quality posters in.
I'm staying where I am, as I like the stability of my campaign, but it's good to see new campaigns coming in and payments going up.

For now, perhaps the $7 payrate is the highest. However, if calculated per week, the tumbler campaign only pays $175 per week. The sinbad sig campaign promises bigger payouts with a maximum payout of $225 per week, and the highest weekly payout is held by mixero with a maximum weekly payout of $250
legendary
Activity: 2436
Merit: 1561
New campaign popped up yesterday for Tumbler: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/endcrypto-mixing-platformbanned-mixer-signature-campaign10post-reward-5475589

Legendary payroll: $7.00 per post
Hero payroll: $6.00 per post
Sr. Member payroll: $5.00 per post

No minimum posts, max 25 paid per week.

These are a really good rates and this is currently the highest paid campaign out there. You could probably make a living out of it in many developing countries.
They're clearly aiming for the top quality posters with minimum 50 merits in the last 120 days requirement. I wonder if they'll keep the payments high permanently, or is it just to lure quality posters in.
I'm staying where I am, as I like the stability of my campaign, but it's good to see new campaigns coming in and payments going up.
legendary
Activity: 2436
Merit: 1561
The new campaign is more like a promotional/seasonal campaign for a new product introduced by the service. Such campaigns usually don't last long. I think I have seen this happen before with FortuneJack signature campaigns.

The old campaign will stay on unless otherwise.

That's the only explanation that makes sense. On a side note, it would be nice if the advertisers/managers were honest about whether the intended length of a campaign was short. It's not great when you choose one campaign over another just to discover it will close in a few weeks.
For that reason, it's always best to look at the history of a campaign and assess its sustainability rather than to only focus on pay rates.
hero member
Activity: 1624
Merit: 791
Bitcoin To The Moon 📈📈📈
Another great signature campaign is up: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5475372.60

Lets discuss. I think this is the best signature campaign right now here in BitcoinTalk for senior ranks member. Imagine you only need to post 20 post to qualify for the payment for 65$ per week 3.25$ per constructive post. I'm planning to participate but it doubted it will last longer compared to my current campaign. Your thoughts please .
It's safe to say Rollbit has a successful campaign on their forums currently running two campaigns with a weekly allocation of funds which can be quite large, not to mention they sponsor the Champion League pool with an allocation of $11K which is handled by @buwaytress.

This is what I see in terms of rates, there is no change with Rollbit's previous campaigns [FM $40 - SR $65 - H/L $80] still said to be quite high paid just by posting 20 for the weekly quota.

I don't know if this campaign is just seasonal or could be long-term we never know, the manager didn't mention anything, so the old campaign is still continuing.
copper member
Activity: 2114
Merit: 1814
฿itcoin for all, All for ฿itcoin.
Yeah the duration of the campaign is still questionable, I curious why they didn't open for new slots in the old campaign where I participated. There must be a reason, I hope the old campaign will not be paused lol.

The problem is when the campaign become long term, the competition to join turns really high than present.
The new campaign is more like a promotional/seasonal campaign for a new product introduced by the service. Such campaigns usually don't last long. I think I have seen this happen before with FortuneJack signature campaigns.

The old campaign will stay on unless otherwise.
legendary
Activity: 2436
Merit: 1561
Another great signature campaign is up: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5475372.60

Lets discuss. I think this is the best signature campaign right now here in BitcoinTalk for senior ranks member. Imagine you only need to post 20 post to qualify for the payment for 65$ per week 3.25$ per constructive post. I'm planning to participate but it doubted it will last longer compared to my current campaign. Your thoughts please .

The minimum requirement of 20 is not low really. Many campaigns have it set much lower, e.g. at 5 posts (as my current campaign). From participants' perspective, it's definitely better to have a low minimum requirement and high maximum (if paid per post), so you could earn more if you're highly active, but still could get paid something when you don't have much time for posting.

$80 per 20 posts, for Hero/Legendary, converts to $4/post which is decent, but there are many campaigns with higher max earnings. The good thing with this one is that there doesn't seem to be any rule against "burst posting", so the quota could be met in 1 or 2 days, that's unless there's some unofficial rule against that. This could be convenient for many people.
legendary
Activity: 3234
Merit: 1375
Slava Ukraini!
Another great signature campaign is up: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5475372.60

Lets discuss. I think this is the best signature campaign right now here in BitcoinTalk for senior ranks member. Imagine you only need to post 20 post to qualify for the payment for 65$ per week 3.25$ per constructive post. I'm planning to participate but it doubted it will last longer compared to my current campaign. Your thoughts please .
Probably it's one of highest paying campaigns now, but I wouldn't call it best. From what I understand, Rollbit made this campaign to promote their new game. This kind of campaigns usually doesn't lasts long, especially when they have main campaign with lower rates. My campaign have significantly lower rates, but personally I wouldn't join to new campaign just because of rates. I prefer longetivity and stability of campaign.
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 343
Jolly? I think I've heard that name before. hmm
Yeah the duration of the campaign is still questionable, I curious why they didn't open for new slots in the old campaign where I participated. There must be a reason, I hope the old campaign will not be paused lol.


I was initially surprised when rollbit opened a new campaign because the old campaign was still running. I think it was a special campaign to popularize the "duel arena". So maybe it's only temporary, but I hope it can run for a long time like the rollbit campaign that has been running
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 633
Another great signature campaign is up: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5475372.60

Lets discuss. I think this is the best signature campaign right now here in BitcoinTalk for senior ranks member. Imagine you only need to post 20 post to qualify for the payment for 65$ per week 3.25$ per constructive post. I'm planning to participate but it doubted it will last longer compared to my current campaign. Your thoughts please .
Not really, [CFNP] [banned mixer] - CoinJoin Mixer | Sig Campaign | Up to 0.0048 BTC/W pay for 0.0001 BTC per post which is $3.78 right now and you can get paid up to 30 posts.

Yeah the duration of the campaign is still questionable, I curious why they didn't open for new slots in the old campaign where I participated. There must be a reason, I hope the old campaign will not be paused lol.

The problem is when the campaign become long term, the competition to join turns really high than present.
sr. member
Activity: 1638
Merit: 364
https://shuffle.com?r=nba
Another great signature campaign is up: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5475372.60

Lets discuss. I think this is the best signature campaign right now here in BitcoinTalk for senior ranks member. Imagine you only need to post 20 post to qualify for the payment for 65$ per week 3.25$ per constructive post. I'm planning to participate but it doubted it will last longer compared to my current campaign. Your thoughts please .
copper member
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1827
Top Crypto Casino
Is Roobet lost their active gamblers? so they don't make a lot money than it was and resulting reduction in signature campaign? or they just want to try other marketing strategy?

There's still a big traffic in their social medias and they still launch art contest for almost every month too.
Maybe a change of marketing strategy, but I think it has more to do with having already achieved the target, and now they have hit a plateau. Roobet has made a huge name for themselves in the crypto casino space and I don't think they reduced the participants due to financial constrains

Roobet has launched 3 different campaigns in this forum before. the first one was with Darkstar_ (https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/closed-roobet-signature-campaign-sr-member-legendary-5138374) which ended up getting closed after one week
Unfortunately the owner has had poor results from the campaign and has decided to end it early. All posts made up to this point will be paid.

But then they would come back in 2 different spells under Hhampuz. This and this

If the results weren't that good. I don't think they would have funded the campaign for all those years.


sr. member
Activity: 1638
Merit: 364
https://shuffle.com?r=nba
I don't think so, there are still quite a lot of active gamblers on Roobet, maybe there is another reason why they reduced the budget to 10x Hero/Legendary which means their budget for campaigns is $700 per week.

My assumption is that Roobet's management might evaluate forum marketing or try other marketing it is still very possible, but believe that Roobet will not leave completely from the forum despite its reputation and large casino.

It's simple, they achieved a certain goal that they planned through the signature campaign. Now they will maintain their presence with something smaller.
We have seen it before with some other casinos like Bitsler, Crypto-games etc... After the initial aggressive campaign and strengthening of the brand, a smaller number of users is enough to maintain their presence on the forum.

It can be, but the most common reason why most campaigns do this is that the campaign is no longer effective base on their evaluation. Campaign marketing may prove ineffective due to factors such as poor targeting or insufficient engagement with the target audience.

legendary
Activity: 3234
Merit: 1375
Slava Ukraini!
Is Roobet lost their active gamblers? so they don't make a lot money than it was and resulting reduction in signature campaign? or they just want to try other marketing strategy?

There's still a big traffic in their social medias and they still launch art contest for almost every month too.
I wouldn't draw such conclusion. I think that if they would be doing really bad, they would close campaign completely and end other their promotions, not just cut number of participants. IMO, it was just budget adjustment. Roobet is already established brand, so, they don't need such big campaign anymore. But as said above, they still keep campaign with less participants because they still need some presence on Bitcointalk.
legendary
Activity: 3178
Merit: 1140
#SWGT CERTIK Audited
I wish we had more diverse industries advertising via signatures, which is currently dominated by casinos/mixers and maybe some exchanges.
In the past, I believe the number of signature campaign advertising for other stuff where more prevalent than the latest years. Even the most popular ones weren't about gambling theme but things changed with the Bitcoin price rising much, maybe with the first ATH in 2017? I don't recall with precision.
For the signature campaign reducing a lot the number of its participants, I think they didn't notice a lot of difference when they did it in the past so they reduced it even further. This might backfire since the popularity of the forums is undeniable. When I first join the crypto world I was very sceptic about every service until I got reassured about it with good feedbacks in Bitcointalk. The more you are visible here, the more people trust you.
legendary
Activity: 3472
Merit: 3507
Crypto Swap Exchange
I don't think so, there are still quite a lot of active gamblers on Roobet, maybe there is another reason why they reduced the budget to 10x Hero/Legendary which means their budget for campaigns is $700 per week.

My assumption is that Roobet's management might evaluate forum marketing or try other marketing it is still very possible, but believe that Roobet will not leave completely from the forum despite its reputation and large casino.

It's simple, they achieved a certain goal that they planned through the signature campaign. Now they will maintain their presence with something smaller.
We have seen it before with some other casinos like Bitsler, Crypto-games etc... After the initial aggressive campaign and strengthening of the brand, a smaller number of users is enough to maintain their presence on the forum.
legendary
Activity: 2436
Merit: 1561
I don't think so, there are still quite a lot of active gamblers on Roobet, maybe there is another reason why they reduced the budget to 10x Hero/Legendary which means their budget for campaigns is $700 per week.

My assumption is that Roobet's management might evaluate forum marketing or try other marketing it is still very possible, but believe that Roobet will not leave completely from the forum despite its reputation and large casino.

Maybe they are simply testing whether there will be any significant impact of the massive cut in number of participants. If so, they might decide to increase the number again.
But honestly, it seems like the forum is already saturated with gambling-related signatures, especially the gambling section (due to the minimum posts requirements in that section), and it often looks like all the discussion there is just signature campaign posters trying to promote their sites to each other.

I wish we had more diverse industries advertising via signatures, which is currently dominated by casinos/mixers and maybe some exchanges.
hero member
Activity: 1624
Merit: 791
Bitcoin To The Moon 📈📈📈
Bump.

There's a sad news in Roobet campaign where they shrink their participants from 36 users to 10 users, previously they removed 23 participants, so it means they've remove 49 users.

Is Roobet lost their active gamblers? so they don't make a lot money than it was and resulting reduction in signature campaign? or they just want to try other marketing strategy?

There's still a big traffic in their social medias and they still launch art contest for almost every month too.
I don't think so, there are still quite a lot of active gamblers on Roobet, maybe there is another reason why they reduced the budget to 10x Hero/Legendary which means their budget for campaigns is $700 per week.

My assumption is that Roobet's management might evaluate forum marketing or try other marketing it is still very possible, but believe that Roobet will not leave completely from the forum despite its reputation and large casino.
hero member
Activity: 2786
Merit: 902
yesssir! 🫡
Bump.

There's a sad news in Roobet campaign where they shrink their participants from 36 users to 10 users, previously they removed 23 participants, so it means they've remove 49 users.

Is Roobet lost their active gamblers? so they don't make a lot money than it was and resulting reduction in signature campaign? or they just want to try other marketing strategy?

There's still a big traffic in their social medias and they still launch art contest for almost every month too.

I'm leaning towards there's no problem at all. and indeed, perhaps they'll be exploring other areas of marketing as well.

They have been running the campaign for a long time and have established a good standing hence it's not a long shot to think Roobet may have thought it's fine to ease up on signature campaign.
hero member
Activity: 854
Merit: 663
Bump.

There's a sad news in Roobet campaign where they shrink their participants from 36 users to 10 users, previously they removed 23 participants, so it means they've remove 49 users.

Is Roobet lost their active gamblers? so they don't make a lot money than it was and resulting reduction in signature campaign? or they just want to try other marketing strategy?

There's still a big traffic in their social medias and they still launch art contest for almost every month too.
hero member
Activity: 1624
Merit: 791
Bitcoin To The Moon 📈📈📈
Oh, I just realized that I haven't saw their signatures for a while and that their previous campaign was closed. I agree with others that they barely can attract good posters with such low payment rates. Especially if you're in their lower tier. But where did you get that you can earn up to $40 week? I see that in tier A they pay 3500 Satoshi per post, it's almot $1 and if you will make 60 posts, you can earn $60.
But the manager will keep an eye out for low-quality posters and the manager had said so after the announcement of the accepted participants.

Tier A started with a rates of 2200 sat and has now been increased to 3500 sat.
That's much better than before.
Pages:
Jump to: